[00:00] <BUGabundo> pleanty
[00:01] <BUGabundo> :)
[00:01] <BUGabundo> oh it was to fta
[00:01] <BUGabundo> nvm me
[00:03] <fta> [reed], not much, abp, nightly testers, tab counter, jsview and rikaichan (a japanese dict). everything else is either disabled, or not compatible
[00:04] <fta> as in not forced
[00:13] <[reed]> fta: disable everything and try for a day, if you can?
[00:14] <fta> [reed], well, the web without abp is a horrible place
[00:14] <BUGabundo> LOLOLOL
[00:16] <[reed]> fta: ok, leave abp
[00:16] <[reed]> I use abp, and I don't see these problems
[00:17] <fta> [reed], how many tabs to you have?
[00:17] <[reed]> ~50 ?
[00:17] <[reed]> depends on which machine
[00:24] <asac> i really think adblock is broken
[00:24] <asac> i saw a few crashes that had it in the trace
[00:25] <asac> last one is the one that fta pasted earlier today
[00:29] <fta> asac, for me it doesn't crash, it's just a pig
[00:29] <BUGabundo> asac: depends on which version
[00:29] <fta> just restarted ~15min ago, 12% mem, 17% cpu
[00:29] <BUGabundo> that guys keep pumping new ones
[00:30] <BUGabundo> yeah CPU is common
[00:30] <BUGabundo> no idea why it eats so much CPU even with no page opened
[00:31] <fta> if i strace it, it's mostly zillions of gettimeofday
[00:31] <fta> we should buy firefox a watch
[00:31] <BUGabundo> LOLOLOLOLOL
[00:31] <BUGabundo> if I wasn't soooo sleepy
[00:31] <BUGabundo> I would redent that and qdb it
[01:00]  * BUGabundo make bed; make sleep; sleep(6h): wakeonlan( BUGabundo )
[01:05] <bdrung_> asac: i have all my changes pushed for m-d 0.16
[03:53] <micahg> is there a ppa for beta releases for mozilla/
[08:28] <eagles0513875> morning
[11:48] <bdrung_> av`: what do you think about this patch: http://pastebin.com/f11aa43c3
[11:50] <eagles0513875> morning bdrung_
[11:50] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: morning :)
[11:50] <av`> bdrung_, does it remove the timeout for?
[11:50] <eagles0513875> hows things up in germany
[11:52] <bdrung_> av`: this disables the showing of the config dialog on first startup
[11:53] <av`> bdrung_, do you think disabling it is the right choice?
[11:54] <av`> I mean if an user don't know how to set it up might get confused?
[11:54] <bdrung_> av`: yes. it annoys me.
[11:54] <av`> does it get launched at every ffox startup?
[11:54] <av`> don't remember
[11:55] <bdrung_> av`: no only the first one.
[11:55] <av`> so I don't see any harm in keep having it as it is
[11:55] <bdrung_> remove your .mozilla directory, run firefox and you will have 100 of windows open
[11:56] <av`> 100 config dialogs?
[11:56] <bdrung_> 1000
[11:56] <bdrung_> if you have some addons installed
[11:57] <av`> that's bad
[11:58] <av`> does it happen wwith mozgest only?
[11:58] <bdrung_> av`: it's a metaphor
[11:59] <bdrung_> av`: if you install many addons and then open ff, some addons open a window
[12:00] <av`> yeah, and why all this is related to mozgest?
[12:01] <av`> or better in which way
[12:01] <bdrung_> av`: on the first startup, i will see adblock and mozgest, but the mozgest config is not required
[12:02] <bdrung_> i think a addon should only pop up on the first startup, if it is really required
[12:03] <bdrung_> otherwise it annoys
[12:04] <bdrung_> av`: other example: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481424
[12:14] <av`> bdrung_, what are you able to change into the mozgest config at startup?
[12:14] <av`> e.g which kind of changes are you allowed / not allowed to do
[12:33] <gnomefreak> has anyone looked at f-spot, just to look at it? it looks like it is a mess it has alot of crap for an extension
[12:34] <bdrung_> av`: i don't understand your question.
[12:34] <bdrung_> gnomefreak: i have extended https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview
[12:35] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: do you have an example of the rules that has been cleaned so i can do it all at one time
[12:35] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: thanks looking at it
[12:36] <gnomefreak> ah cool
[12:36] <av`> bdrung_, usually in config dialogs you are able to change some settings
[12:36] <av`> bdrung_, in mozgest case, which kind of settings are you able to change?
[12:37]  * asac  lunch
[12:38] <gnomefreak> asac: have fun :)
[12:38]  * eagles0513875 lunch
[12:38] <eagles0513875> hgehe
[12:39] <bdrung_> av`: the geastures, and with wich button you activate them
[12:39] <bdrung_> av`: probably the most will live with the default
[12:40] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: if my blood sugur goes up i will do a few. may need to find out what you mean with the install and links files. i dont remember seeing any but that is after email
[12:41] <bdrung_> gnomefreak: example would be firebug
[12:41] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: ok thanks
[12:42] <bdrung_> gnomefreak: let me know, if the rules file contains more than the build variable and the includes
[12:43] <gnomefreak> most do IIRC
[13:05] <gnomefreak> he still hasnt pushed sunbird :(
[13:13] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: maybe we should add the misc recommends/depends since lintian gives warning about it?
[13:13] <gnomefreak> i dont recall the full name of it sorry i think its misc:depends
[13:14] <bdrung_> gnomefreak: it's in the list: "ensure that all binary packages depend on ${misc:Depends}"
[13:14] <gnomefreak> ah i didnt see it. thanks
[13:18] <asac> back
[13:26] <gnomefreak> asac: sunbird?
[13:30] <gnomefreak> what is the key combo to take a screenshot?
[13:31] <gnomefreak> i can get one of a drop down menu
[13:31] <asac> gnomefreak: alt+print
[13:31] <asac> sunbird sponsoring?
[13:32] <gnomefreak> asac: yes on sunbird. you forgot about it last time we talked abou tit (a few days ago)
[13:32] <gnomefreak> i will try alt+print
[13:33] <gnomefreak> alt+print gets rid of the drop down menu too. you know a way to get a screenshot of a dropdown menu that im not aware of?
[13:36] <asac> gnomefreak: run gnome-screenshot -d 5
[13:36] <asac> that gives you a delay of 4 second
[13:37] <gnomefreak> thanks trying it now
[13:38] <gnomefreak> that worked i think :)
[13:43] <eagles0513875> hey asac :) and gnomefreak
[13:43] <eagles0513875> will finish going through the checklist
[13:43] <asac> cool
[13:43] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: hi
[13:44]  * gnomefreak will get to one or 22 today i hope
[13:44] <gnomefreak> one or 2 even
[13:44] <eagles0513875> :)
[13:44] <eagles0513875> well im learning what each thing on the check list on the wiki meanas
[13:44] <eagles0513875> means
[13:44] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: and btw bdrung_ added somethings to that list
[13:44] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: i know i sope to him about it.
[13:44] <eagles0513875> ahh ok
[13:45] <bdrung_> gnomefreak: sope?
[13:46] <gnomefreak> spoke. sorry
[13:46] <bdrung_> aha
[13:47] <bdrung_> asac: i like to see m-d 0.16 released soon. with 0.16 we need a extension review, too. if the release is soon, we can merge both reviews.
[13:48] <eagles0513875> when you say test to make sure it works with ff 3.5 means compile and install from source correct
[13:48] <eagles0513875> bdrung_: wouldnt it be better to do it before this review is completed?
[13:48] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: yes
[13:49] <eagles0513875> what is this package u speak of the devscripts
[13:49] <bdrung_> m-d = mozilla-devscripts
[13:49] <eagles0513875> i thought so
[13:50] <eagles0513875> stupid question on my part how do i complie an extension for ff
[13:50] <gnomefreak> maybe we should add a menu to the review wiki, but that would need to be set into sections (sorry thinking aloud through fingers)
[13:51] <eagles0513875> dont feel bad i do that as well gnomefreak
[13:51] <eagles0513875> btw if anyone needs to runs todays updates i already have this morning and everythign is still functional even after a reboot
[13:53] <eagles0513875> !aptfix
[13:54] <eagles0513875> ok here is a nasty bug that just surfaced O_O
[13:55] <eagles0513875> strange as can be here O_o
[13:55] <bdrung_> asac, gnomefreak, eagles0513875 : i have updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview
[13:55] <eagles0513875> ok
[13:55] <eagles0513875> has dev scripts 0.16 been released yet?
[13:55] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: thanks ill refresh it when email is done
[13:56] <eagles0513875> thats messed up O_O command line stuff for apt-get and dpkg is broken
[13:56] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: no, waiting for asac
[13:56] <eagles0513875> ok
[13:56] <gnomefreak> what is wrong with apt and dpkg
[13:56] <eagles0513875> command like keeps telling me that something is using it when i have nothing that is
[13:56] <eagles0513875> then i go to kpackagekit and run the updates from there and it works
[13:57] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: maybe its update manager running at start up?
[13:57] <eagles0513875> now it works
[13:57] <eagles0513875> after running the updates
[13:57] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: gnome works fine :)
[13:57] <eagles0513875> that was peculiar
[13:58] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: how do i know if bindwood installed?
[13:58] <gnomefreak> be back in a few
[13:58] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: firefox->tools->addons  it will promt you when you restart firefox
[13:58] <gnomefreak> s/will/should
[13:59] <eagles0513875> http://pastebin.com/m33378bd8
[13:59] <eagles0513875> thats the output after running build.sh
[14:00] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: why do you run build?
[14:00] <eagles0513875> i ran configure.sh then build.sh
[14:00] <eagles0513875> am i missing something
[14:00] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: is it a debian package?
[14:01] <eagles0513875> no its the branch that i had updated and fixed
[14:01] <eagles0513875> do i need to package it before installing?
[14:01] <gnomefreak> system->pref>startup applications not working is a firefox bug :( i really really wish people would give at least a little thought into thier bug reports
[14:02] <gnomefreak> ok be back ina  few
[14:02] <eagles0513875> hehe agreed on that gnome
[14:03] <bdrung_> eagles0513875: so yes, it is a debian package. to build a package (from a bzr branch) run "bzr bd"
[14:04] <eagles0513875> there was a bzr update today :( not sure but i am getting an error saying unknown command "bd"
[14:04] <bdrung_> install bzr-buildpackage
[14:05] <eagles0513875> blarg it faild :(
[14:05] <eagles0513875> need to get gnupg setup and my pgp key
[14:06] <eagles0513875> humm i have a problem here
[14:06] <eagles0513875> im not seeing my .gnupg folder
[14:08] <gnomefreak> bdrung_: do we have an ETA on m-d 0.16?
[14:10] <eagles0513875> ya i dont think there is a point in me wasting time atm to package it if it gonna need to be redone with 0.16
[14:10] <eagles0513875> bdrung: gnomefreak asked bout eta on 0.16
[14:10] <bdrung> eta?
[14:11] <gnomefreak> when wi9ll it be releasd
[14:11] <gnomefreak> damn
[14:11] <gnomefreak> when will it be released
[14:11] <bdrung> i only found "ETA, an internet acronym for "edited to add"."
[14:11] <eagles0513875> estimated time of arrival as well
[14:11] <gnomefreak> estimated time of arrival
[14:12] <bdrung> gnomefreak: hopefully soon, ask asac (he wants to implement something before release)
[14:12] <gnomefreak> bdrung: asac is getting busy it seems :)
[14:12] <eagles0513875> what happened to the hidden .gnupg folder that one finds in the home folder O_o
[14:12] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: he could be working on it as we speak
[14:13] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: there is a command for gnupg that will re make it but dont reall the command
[14:13] <eagles0513875> humm ok
[14:14] <gnomefreak> sorry my low blood  sugur is causing me to shake. it should be but i dont recall the command
[14:14] <eagles0513875> its ok gnomefreak go get that sugar back up m8
[14:14] <eagles0513875> bdrung: do you have any idea
[14:15] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: if you package it and push it to a branch you can fix it when it is released by keeping target as UNRELEASED and using dch to add it and push to branch again
[14:15] <bdrung> eagles0513875: about what?
[14:16] <gnomefreak> on bindwood you still have 2 boxes un marked
[14:16] <eagles0513875> right now i tried to package bindwood gnomefreak but it fails due to it not finding gpg key
[14:16] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: i know im working on those as we speak
[14:16] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: ah that would be a good reason. im running updates atm but will see if i have same issue. do you not keep a backup of files ;)
[14:16] <eagles0513875> bdrung: for some reason in my home folder there is no .gnupg folder shoing up :(
[14:17] <eagles0513875> i have the key backed up in me email which i know isnt veery smart since its a private key
[14:18] <bdrung> eagles0513875: dunno, why it is gone.
[14:18] <gnomefreak> what the hell :9 what is xpi:provides and is it replacing anything and are we making a provides entry for it and keep * as they are?:depends
[14:19] <gnomefreak> damn. *:depends as they are
[14:19] <bdrung> eagles0513875: you have the private key send yourself via email?
[14:19] <eagles0513875> bdrung: ya the file that has it that was in the gnupg folder
[14:19] <eagles0513875> actually i think its the public key the private key is the one i have on lp
[14:20] <bdrung> eagles0513875: that's totally insecure
[14:20] <eagles0513875> is the private key what ends up on lp
[14:20] <eagles0513875> or the public key
[14:20] <bdrung> eagles0513875: you are not allowed to send the private part into the web
[14:20] <eagles0513875> time to make a new one then
[14:20] <eagles0513875> let me go to lp and disable it then
[14:20] <bdrung> eagles0513875: lp has the public part
[14:21] <eagles0513875> ahhh
[14:21] <gnomefreak> bdrung: we should really add notes to this wiki for some of these things (example: the *links/*install im sure im not the only one that doesnt know when to remove them and when not to. maybe we should add a rule for it so we can remove them all the time
[14:22] <bdrung> eagles0513875: create a new one, keep the private key private. if you need a backup burn a cd and put it into your safe
[14:22] <eagles0513875> stupidity on my part last time i was doing some bug fixing
[14:22] <bdrung> gnomefreak: feel free to improve it
[14:24]  * gnomefreak will see if i can find out when to keep/remove them im hoping there is a rule for it. other wise we need to find out what is sending it to right place
[14:24] <gnomefreak> ah thats why one failed for me it had xip in build deps :)i had put it aside until i had time to work on it :)
[14:25] <bdrung> gnomefreak: xpi:provides is new: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam
[14:25] <eagles0513875> !pgp
[14:26] <bdrung> gnomefreak: check if extra files are istalled (everything that is not in the xpi)
[14:26] <gnomefreak> k
[14:27] <eagles0513875> for instance in bindwood there are 2 extra files those stay as depends and where it has ${xpi:Depends} that gets moved to recommends :)
[14:28] <eagles0513875> yay i learned something
[14:29] <gnomefreak> if debian packages thier own extensions we nee dto let them know to remove ice* from the name
[14:30] <gnomefreak> ^^^ important if we sync extensions for debian
[14:31] <eagles0513875> random question does the downstream work sometimes find its way back upstream
[14:31] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: what do you mean? do we push to debian first?
[14:32] <eagles0513875> lets say for instance these changes to the firefox extensions would they ever get pushed upstream after the changes have been made for the ubuntu line
[14:32] <bdrung> eagles0513875: yes
[14:32] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: changes not unless we push them to debian but its not anything atm. bdrung how are we going to deal with that
[14:33] <eagles0513875> kool didnt know that :)
[14:33] <bdrung> eagles0513875: get in contact with the debian maintainer and ask if he want to adopt our changes
[14:34] <eagles0513875> you really want me to do that or are you joking around and explaining to me how its done
[14:34] <gnomefreak> maybe file a bug on it?
[14:34] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: hes not joking
[14:34] <bdrung> asac, gnomefreak, eagles0513875 : i have updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview again (now with plans for lucid)
[14:34] <gnomefreak> lucid?
[14:34] <eagles0513875> lucid aka 10.04
[14:35] <gnomefreak> oh its named
[14:35] <bdrung> gnomefreak: yes, bug reports
[14:35] <gnomefreak> i totally fell behind
[14:36] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: file a bug on extension upstream. would be nice if we had a link to it. maybe we should add a box for upstream bugs
[14:36] <gnomefreak> oh i dont like that idea :(
[14:37] <gnomefreak> renaming binaries
[14:37] <eagles0513875> :(
[14:37] <gnomefreak> we remove mozilla/ect* but add xul-ext
[14:38] <gnomefreak> why just for 10.04?
[14:39] <gnomefreak> also how do we find out the latest Standards Version?
[14:40] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: its in the control file
[14:40] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: no want to know the latest version. IIRC 3.8.4 was released but dont know how to check.
[14:41] <gnomefreak> saw it in a changes email as i recall
[14:41] <bdrung> gnomefreak: http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debian-policy.html
[14:41] <gnomefreak> thanks bdrung
[14:41] <bdrung> we are still at 3.8.3
[14:42] <gnomefreak> ya seeing that now im trying to remeber where i saw .4
[14:43] <gnomefreak> im thinking again :(
[14:44] <gnomefreak> maybe we should organize the wiki into rules changes and control changes
[14:44] <bdrung> asac, gnomefreak, eagles0513875 : updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview again (added explanation)
[14:44] <bdrung> gnomefreak: good idea
[14:45] <gnomefreak> you keep changing things ill never get this done :) keep changing as you wish
[14:45] <gnomefreak> i could use a smoke break
[14:45] <eagles0513875> hehe he was only making changes to lucid section lol
[14:45] <gnomefreak> yeah that is what i was asking about above
[14:46] <bdrung> gnomefreak: i am finished. it's now your turn
[14:46] <bdrung> :)
[14:46]  * gnomefreak thinks we should be maintainers not the devs. since m-e-d team does the work on them
[14:46] <gnomefreak> we == m-e-t
[14:47] <gnomefreak> if i can remember the code for a menu would be great too that way we can just go to each section since we are getting big
[14:47] <bdrung> gnomefreak: what is the difference?
[14:47] <asac> can i teach gdb to automatically run backtrace when it breaks?
[14:48] <asac> fta2: ? arent you doing this?
[14:48] <gnomefreak> we keep adding to it it will make moving to * easier
[14:48] <gnomefreak> but i have other things on mind atm
[14:48] <gnomefreak> smoke edit work on stumble
[14:48] <fta2> asac, have a look at chromium
[14:50] <asac> any quick hints?
[14:50] <eagles0513875> asac: doesnt gdb already do that
[14:50] <eagles0513875> !gdb
[14:50] <fta2> asac, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/chromium-browser.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/run-test.sh#L96
[14:50] <eagles0513875> i cant remember the command to do that
[14:50] <eagles0513875> !info gdb
[14:51] <eagles0513875> stupid bot lol
[14:51] <eagles0513875> asac: i remember it now you have to run it via the command line for instance gdb -r firefox
[14:51] <eagles0513875> that should run the code through the debugger and get ya a backtrace
[14:54]  * eagles0513875 starts swearing to myself cuz i cant upload my gnupg key to the keyserver
[14:54] <eagles0513875> is the keyserver down or something
[14:55] <eagles0513875> thats messeed up why on earth does it keep timing out when trying to send me key (talking out loud)
[14:56] <bdrung> av`: you do not advocate my patch for mozgest, but could you live with it?
[15:02] <eagles0513875> what is another way i can upload my key to keyserver.ubuntu.com
[15:02] <eagles0513875> cuz it keeps timimng out on me :(
[15:07] <gnomefreak> ok updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview  just need a place for Use the following: (./) for "DONE" OR {X} for "OUTSTANDING"
[15:10] <bdrung> gnomefreak: let me do this
[15:10] <gnomefreak> bdrung: hold on
[15:10] <gnomefreak> bdrung: dont edit it yet
[15:10] <bdrung> k
[15:11] <gnomefreak> bdrung: im waiting for it to post my changes when its done ill let you know. not sure why its taking this long
[15:11] <gnomefreak> bdrung: are we using #MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = sh build.sh
[15:12] <gnomefreak> bdrung: ok edit your heart out :)
[15:14] <eagles0513875> here i go again with building the bindwood package
[15:14] <eagles0513875> bdrung: which files do i back up in the .gnupg folder
[15:14] <eagles0513875> everythign that is in there?
[15:19] <eagles0513875> how do i give my secret key cuz when i run bzr bd it complains that my secret key isnt available
[15:19] <eagles0513875> then aborts
[15:19] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: do you have it set in .bashrc?
[15:19] <eagles0513875> O_O no
[15:20] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: where in bash rc do i add it
[15:20] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: hold on a sec
[15:20] <eagles0513875> ok
[15:20] <eagles0513875> brb gonna grab a bottle of h2O right quick
[15:21] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: here is mine http://paste.ubuntu.com/276430/
[15:22] <bdrung> gnomefreak: finished
[15:24] <gnomefreak> bdrung: should add something like push branch to .....
[15:24] <bdrung> eagles0513875: i backuped the complete directory
[15:24] <gnomefreak> bdrung: looking
[15:24] <bdrung> gnomefreak: yes
[15:25] <gnomefreak> you want it or shall i do it?
[15:26] <bdrung> you can do it
[15:26] <gnomefreak> ok
[15:27] <gnomefreak> pusing stumbleupon
[15:28] <gnomefreak> will build it in a few
[15:29] <bdrung> gnomefreak: you should add vcs tags to the list, too
[15:29] <gnomefreak> im having issues with wiki atm
[15:29] <gnomefreak> its not loading
[15:30] <bdrung> yes, it's very slow
[15:30] <gnomefreak> bdrung: can you get in the wiki? i cant even bring it up atm
[15:30] <gnomefreak> ah her eit is
[15:30] <gnomefreak> here it
[15:30]  * bdrung 's pizza is ready.
[15:31] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: which do i copy everythign that u exported?
[15:32] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: the gpg part. i cant look right now give me a few minutes. but you still need a .gnupg folder
[15:32] <eagles0513875> i have it now that i craeted a key
[15:32] <eagles0513875> ok when u get a chance
[15:33] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: it would be good to have lines 19->24 either way. just edit it for your info
[15:34] <gnomefreak> asac: btw i cant build a sid chroot. lenny chroot built fine
[15:34] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: what if i dont have a deb email like u eagles0513875@ubuntu.com
[15:35] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: use your email you use for LP
[15:36] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: become a member and you will get it. but i use that email to sign my changelogs
[15:36] <eagles0513875> ok
[15:36] <eagles0513875> member of what
[15:37] <asac> gnomefreak: what error are you getting?
[15:37] <gnomefreak> we need to file bugs for 10.04 for these extensions.
[15:37] <asac> eagles0513875: use a email that will you will have and check forever
[15:37] <gnomefreak> asac: configure failed
[15:37] <asac> dont need to be @ubuntu.com
[15:37] <eagles0513875> asac: ok :)
[15:38] <asac> after contributing a while you can become ubuntu member ... which will give you @ubuntu.com address and other goodies
[15:38] <eagles0513875> well that will be in another 2 yrs i think
[15:38] <gnomefreak> 2 years?
[15:38] <eagles0513875> lol once i graduate and get my bsc and hopefully start working
[15:38] <asac> gnomefreak: configure is unlikely to be different on sid/lenny ... need the error to say for sure
[15:38] <eagles0513875> got this yr then one more yr before i graduate and get my bsc gnomefreak
[15:39] <gnomefreak> asac: ok let try it again.
[15:39] <asac> eagles0513875: becoming member shouldnt take so long if you actively contribute
[15:39] <eagles0513875> ya asac the problem is finding time this yr for me is jam packed and not gonna be easy
[15:40] <asac> well. all of us usuall yhave a packed life
[15:40] <asac> but still find time to contribute and fulfill their commitments
[15:40] <asac> there might be weeks where you cannot contribute, but in general most come back
[15:40] <asac> ;)
[15:41] <eagles0513875> well i love linux
[15:41] <gnomefreak> ok its building should be done in ~5-10 minute
[15:41] <eagles0513875> source .bashrc to reload bashrc right
[15:43] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: it will update itself at least it does for me once i save it and restart term
[15:44] <eagles0513875> i sourced it
[15:44] <eagles0513875> and its still complaining about my secret key not available
[15:44] <gnomefreak> damnit wtf is wrong witht his now :(
[15:44] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: did you make the .gnupg dir?
[15:44] <eagles0513875> when i created the key it automatically did it
[15:45] <gnomefreak> you are usiong new key in the bd command and in .bashrc?
[15:45] <eagles0513875> ya
[15:45] <gnomefreak> I HATE ZIP/UNZIP
[15:46] <eagles0513875> cant u use tar -xvf to do that
[15:46] <eagles0513875> to unzip and tar -cvf to zip
[15:46] <gnomefreak> ok will fix build error after chroot build
[15:46] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: no this is for stumbleupon
[15:46] <gnomefreak> unzip:  cannot find or open ./, ./.zip or ./.ZIP.   :)
[15:47] <gnomefreak> will look at rules later
[15:47] <eagles0513875> O_o
[15:47] <gnomefreak> be back
[15:47] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: :( ok having issues with my secret key still
[15:47] <eagles0513875> this is getting frustrating
[15:50] <eagles0513875> bdrung: any idea why this thing isnt finding my secret key :(
[15:51] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: hes at lunch/dinner eating something i want :(
[15:51] <gnomefreak> maybe if i add unzip to control instead of zip
[15:51] <eagles0513875> aww :(
[15:51] <eagles0513875> im getting frustrated with this secret key bs
[15:52] <gnomefreak> nope its zip. but fails with or without zip in b-d
[15:53]  * eagles0513875 goes back to fuming in the corner about the secret key
[15:53] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: look at the wiki for gpg
[15:53] <gnomefreak> let me know when you are looking
[15:53] <eagles0513875> ok
[15:53] <eagles0513875> !gpg
[15:54] <gnomefreak> look at the part to show keys what does that give for your key (is it the one you are using)>
[15:54] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: did you upload new key to key servers?
[15:54] <eagles0513875> ya
[15:54] <eagles0513875> and already confirmed it and the email
[15:55] <gnomefreak> than im not sure sorry
[15:55] <eagles0513875> where would be best i ask then
[15:55] <gnomefreak> asac: im going to eat ill give you error when i get back
[15:56] <eagles0513875> asac: i know ur busy any idea as to my issue
[15:56] <asac> kk
[15:56] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: try either/both #bzr since it is the command that is messing up or you can try #gnupg if it is the key itsself. start with bzr
[15:56] <eagles0513875> ok thanks gnomefreak
[15:56] <gnomefreak> ok gone
[15:56] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: np
[16:01] <eagles0513875> ahhh asac how can i update the timestamp in the change log :(
[16:01] <eagles0513875> thats the reason that bzr bd is failing
[16:14] <asac> eagles0513875: i dont think thats the reason
[16:14] <asac> more likely a diffrerent version or something
[16:14] <asac> need to see the error
[16:15] <eagles0513875> would this help any bzr bd --uc -us
[16:15] <eagles0513875> nm that command doesnt work
[16:18] <gnomefreak> bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k764D5E13 -i.bzr' .  change to your key. that doesnt work?
[16:18] <eagles0513875> havent tried that hold on this is the error
[16:18] <gnomefreak> asac: now the chroot worked i gues it was a bug that day
[16:18] <eagles0513875> http://pastebin.com/m54914664
[16:19] <gnomefreak> nope still dizzy food didnt help
[16:19] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: put ur feet up
[16:20] <gnomefreak> hmmm
[16:20] <eagles0513875> that error takes me to a >
[16:20] <gnomefreak> yeah
[16:20] <eagles0513875> what do i type then
[16:20] <gnomefreak> ^C
[16:21] <eagles0513875> i killed it already
[16:21] <gnomefreak> exit may work too
[16:21] <eagles0513875> i ^C
[16:21] <gnomefreak> can you sign it by hand
[16:21] <eagles0513875> dunno how
[16:21] <eagles0513875> does this have something to possibly do with the CoC not being signed?
[16:22] <bdrung> eagles0513875: no
[16:22] <eagles0513875> ok
[16:23] <gnomefreak> i will worry about stmbleupon tomorrow im going to finish chroot build and rest.
[16:24] <gnomefreak> bdrung: forget the stumbleupon branch i have to fixing to do
[16:24] <asac> eagles0513875: thats ok
[16:24] <asac> its just that you are not the changelog owner
[16:24] <asac> err
[16:24] <asac> actually you are
[16:24] <asac> fix your name and email
[16:24] <asac> it should be fullname+email
[16:25] <asac> and if you want to sign it, you need a gpg key with the email as UID set
[16:25] <asac> but since we have to sponsor thats ok not to do for now
[16:25] <eagles0513875> is there a command to do that or i do it manually
[16:25] <gnomefreak> example -- John Vivirito <gnomefreak@ubuntu.com>  Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:13:09 -0400
[16:25] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: it should do it with dch *
[16:25] <eagles0513875> ok asac i have a gpg key ready
[16:26] <gnomefreak> you can use -r or just dch but remove the extra * from it
[16:26] <eagles0513875> i did remove the extra 8
[16:26] <eagles0513875> *
[16:26] <bdrung> gnomefreak: use dch -e
[16:26] <gnomefreak> or -e
[16:26] <eagles0513875> well thats fixed do i need to repush to my branch
[16:26] <gnomefreak> :) i havent used -e yet
[16:27] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: not yet just build than itf all goes well commit and push
[16:27] <eagles0513875> ok
[16:27] <gnomefreak> i hate debian now
[16:27] <eagles0513875> it did it :)
[16:27] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: dont i just push it to my branch and ask asac to merge it ?
[16:28] <asac> eagles0513875: you push to your branch
[16:28] <gnomefreak> The following packages have unmet dependencies: bzr-builddeb: Depends: bzrtools (>= 1.2) but it is not going to be installed
[16:28] <gnomefreak> E: Broken packages
[16:28] <asac> then you do a merge request
[16:28] <asac> you can do that In launchpad
[16:28] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: commit+push and request merge
[16:28] <asac> navigate to your branch (once you hare happy) and click: request a merge
[16:28] <asac> then select the branch you started from
[16:28] <gnomefreak> better to push to the team and he will get it there
[16:28] <eagles0513875> ok asac
[16:28] <asac> gnomefreak: i think eagles0513875 isnt ready for direct pushing (yet)
[16:28] <asac> needs a bit more experience with tools and procedures
[16:28] <eagles0513875> no im not lol
[16:28] <gnomefreak> asac: oh ok
[16:29] <eagles0513875> btw gnomefreak there was a bzr update today with a bunch of other stuff
[16:29] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: yeah i know this is debian not ubuntu though
[16:29] <eagles0513875> ahhhh
[16:30] <gnomefreak> version mismatches
[16:30] <gnomefreak> they didnt push all deps yet it looks like
[16:30] <bdrung> gnomefreak: why do you hate debian?
[16:31] <gnomefreak> bdrung: sid has been giving issues for chroot first it failed to configure packages now i cant install packages i would like to
[16:31] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: even if u run apt-get build-dep for those packages
[16:32] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: building chroot atm and they will still fail even onc eit is built. they need to fix the build-deps to use right version
[16:32]  * gnomefreak can fix it but too much work for today
[16:32] <eagles0513875> ahh
[16:33] <gnomefreak> ok while i have 30 minutes lets find out why its failing on zip/unzip
[16:34] <gnomefreak> ok not what i was hoping for
[16:35] <gnomefreak> bdrung: can i just blindly remove all zip entries from rules/ ;)
[16:35] <gnomefreak> if i had to guess upstream has a , wher eit shouldnt be
[16:37] <eagles0513875> :) well that works on ff3.5 :)
[16:37] <bdrung> gnomefreak: the problem is that two xpi files are generated
[16:37] <gnomefreak> we will update extensions for 10.04 with new upstream version + add support for 3.6 if they havent
[16:38]  * gnomefreak wonders how he knows that without looking at it ;)
[16:38] <gnomefreak> bdrung: easy fix?
[16:38] <bdrung> yes (will 3.6 make it into lucid?)
[16:38] <gnomefreak> im guessing removing one of them from build:* isnt going to help
[16:38] <gnomefreak> bdrung: should
[16:38] <bdrung> gnomefreak: remove line 3 till 19 :)
[16:38] <gnomefreak> tbird should as well
[16:39] <gnomefreak> line 3?
[16:39] <gnomefreak> all the # shit?
[16:39] <bdrung> yes and the targets, too
[16:40] <gnomefreak> thats not going to help me im sure
[16:40] <gnomefreak> is it?
[16:40] <bdrung> yes
[16:40] <gnomefreak> ok ill try
[16:44] <gnomefreak> bdrung: nope not it
[16:45] <gnomefreak> [ -d temp-xpi-unpacked ] || mkdir -p temp-xpi-unpacked
[16:45] <gnomefreak> unzip -d temp-xpi-unpacked ./ ./mozilla-stumbleupon.xpi
[16:45] <gnomefreak> unzip:  cannot find or open ./, ./.zip or ./.ZIP.
[16:45] <bdrung> gnomefreak: http://pastebin.com/f44a8d33a works here
[16:45] <gnomefreak> bdrung: full build error http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32166687/stumbleupon-fail%20to%20build.txt
[16:46] <gnomefreak> bdrung: do you have zip as a b-d
[16:46] <gnomefreak> ah you removed past line 19
[16:46] <bdrung> no
[16:47] <gnomefreak> you removed all zip build stuff
[16:47] <bdrung> yes
[16:47] <bdrung> that does med-xpi-pack
[16:47] <gnomefreak> ok and remove zip from b-d and build
[16:49] <bdrung> asac: your xpi.mk xpath code has problems with some install.rdfs
[16:49]  * gnomefreak thinks
[16:52] <gnomefreak> ok building
[16:54] <asac> bdrung: what cases
[16:54] <bdrung> gnomefreak: can you mark your branches in https://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions as merged, it they are merged?
[16:54] <bdrung> asac: e.g. https://code.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/mozilla-stumbleupon.ubuntu
[16:55] <gnomefreak> bdrung: would be great if i knew when they were merged
[16:55] <bdrung> asac: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/mozilla-stumbleupon.ubuntu/annotate/head%3A/install.rdf
[16:55] <gnomefreak> ok branched is pushed
[16:55] <bdrung> gnomefreak: look if they are in ~ubuntu-dev
[16:56] <bdrung> asac: there are RDF: in the tags and em:id is a attribute
[16:56] <gnomefreak> ok let me know when you merge this one if you are doing it now if not i will mark it tomorrow
[16:56] <asac> i think our xpath should be able to deal with all element/attribute combination
[16:56] <asac> maybe the fact that there is RDF: namespace
[16:58] <gnomefreak> cant mark flashgot as merged and i don teven see all-in-one* on the extension list, fairly sure i didnt work on it
[16:58] <asac> bdrung: ok thats a more difficult thing
[16:58] <asac> sigh
[16:59] <bdrung> asac: it's your job. i do not know how xpath works
[16:59] <gnomefreak> ok stumbleupon branch updated
[17:00] <asac> bdrung: well. thats not really solvable with xpath ... would need a full rdf parser
[17:00] <asac> but i will think about it. would assume that we need a bug for now
[17:01] <asac> i assume we have no way to disable auto depends generation?
[17:01] <bdrung> asac: no
[17:02] <asac> i will think about it. should be doable to address this corner case ...
[17:02] <asac> tomorrow i am back to normal
[17:02] <asac> need to finish death race for beta freeze still
[17:04] <gnomefreak> bdrung: dont touch the branch please something is very wrong here
[17:04] <bdrung> gnomefreak: i didn't pushed anything
[17:05] <gnomefreak> removeing those liones fixed FTBFS but now it doesnt show up in firefox
[17:05] <bdrung> gnomefreak: http://pastebin.com/f4be400c4
[17:05] <gnomefreak> i think i know the issue there.
[17:06] <bdrung> gnomefreak: the issue is the issue i talked with asac
[17:06] <asac> yes
[17:06] <asac> put it back till tomorrow evening please
[17:06] <bdrung> it's a problem with the install.rdf parser
[17:06] <asac> just go to the next extensions ;)
[17:07] <gnomefreak> the issue you just posted is what you guys were talkig about right?
[17:07] <bdrung> gnomefreak: this extension should wait for m-d 0.16
[17:07] <asac> yes
[17:07] <asac> you can set the >= 0.16 in build-depends already
[17:07] <asac> if you want to do something
[17:07] <gnomefreak> ok but fail to install isnt the wsame issue. we may need to wait until upgrade it to latest
[17:08] <asac> maybe even file a bug about "xpi.mk does not understand RDF:resource indirections for targetApplications"
[17:08] <gnomefreak> testing my thought atm
[17:08] <bdrung> asac: ctxextensions has the same problem (there i patched install.rdf as workaround)
[17:08] <gnomefreak> ctx* installed fine :)
[17:08] <bdrung>  >= 0.16~ please
[17:08] <asac> ok i think we need a bug with examples that currently fail
[17:08] <asac> otherwise i might forget a corner case thats currentyl needed
[17:09] <bdrung> asac: k, will do that
[17:09] <asac> thx
[17:09] <asac> either debian or launchpad
[17:09] <asac> i dont mind
[17:09] <gnomefreak> ok maybe it is the same thing
[17:10] <asac> bug 422898
[17:10] <fta2> asac, did you figure out the gdb thingy?
[17:10] <asac> maybe should be checked
[17:10] <asac> fta2: no :/ ... i fixed the bug i wanted to backtrace by reading code ;)
[17:10] <fta2> lol
[17:10] <asac> its really bad if you want to get a backtrace of something that has the menu open
[17:11] <asac> it locks your system completely
[17:11] <asac> and it was not a crash, but a GTK-Warning ... so i couldnt just let it fatal_warnings fail
[17:11] <asac> had to continue a few times first etc.
[17:11] <gnomefreak> it was filed already
[17:12] <fta2> asac, yep, it's not a news that menus are crap in that regard
[17:13] <asac> which is bad in nm case as everything is a menu ;)
[17:13] <eagles0513875> asac: whats happening with mozilla-devscripts 0.16
[17:13] <asac> anyway. this is what i hoped for: http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/wifi-connected-variant-B-1.png (connected) http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/wifi-disconnected-variant-B-1.png (disconnected) ....
[17:13] <asac> but this is the greatest common denominator with upstream ... http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/nm08-wifi-connected-final.png http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/nm08-wifi-disconnected-final.png
[17:13] <asac> so we will get that
[17:14] <asac> actually i wanted it without the icons for actions
[17:14] <asac> like http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/wifi-activating-variant-B-3.png
[17:15] <asac> eagles0513875: read bzr log
[17:15] <asac> of moz-devscripts
[17:15] <asac> thats usually the best place to get in-depth info ;)
[17:15] <fta2> nice
[17:15] <fta2> are those mockups?
[17:15] <asac> no
[17:15] <eagles0513875> asac: reason im asking is if we are already working on these extensions save us some extra work if you know what i mean
[17:15] <asac> all are real
[17:15] <gnomefreak> ok im really confused we have 2 firefox-sage packages on the wiki with 2 different bug #s
[17:15] <asac> but we will get the ones here:
[17:16] <asac> 18:13 < asac> but this is the greatest common denominator with upstream ... http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/nm08-wifi-connected-final.png  http://people.canonical.com/~asac/nm08-applet/nm08-wifi-disconnected-final.png
[17:16] <gnomefreak> fixing it
[17:16] <asac> http://people.canonical.com/~asac/tmp/newapplet4/
[17:16] <asac> thats the patches
[17:17] <asac> i think i will export the other patches too so they dont get lost in case i trash the local branch
[17:17] <eagles0513875> O_O
[17:17] <eagles0513875> whoops
[17:17] <eagles0513875> my fault on that one gnomefreak
[17:17] <eagles0513875> :(
[17:17] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: fixed
[17:17] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: np
[17:18] <eagles0513875> probably brain dead when i filed that one
[17:18] <eagles0513875> lol
[17:18] <gnomefreak> i also took sage ill get to it today/tomorrow
[17:22] <gnomefreak> bdrung: we are using >=0.16~ now right?
[17:23] <bdrung> gnomefreak: not yet, only for those who wont work with 0.15
[17:23] <gnomefreak> k
[17:24] <gnomefreak> are we keeping MOZ_XPI_BUILD_COMMAND = sh debian/med-xpi-pack . sage.xpi
[17:27] <bdrung> gnomefreak: no
[17:27] <gnomefreak> ok thanks
[17:27] <asac> eagles0513875: unless you bump into issues now you dont need to depend on 0.16 if thats what you are asking
[17:28] <eagles0513875> ahhh ok cuz if you look on the wiki bdrung added a few checks for devscripts 0.16 to it
[17:30] <bdrung> asac, gnomefreak, eagles0513875 : updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview again
[17:30] <eagles0513875> ahh im gonna go crazy here lol
[17:31] <bdrung> damn
[17:31] <eagles0513875> right now im with the ohhhhh ahh factor of the wiki
[17:31] <gnomefreak> thanks
[17:31] <bdrung> added it twice
[17:31] <gnomefreak> bdrung: i forgot to add the vcs info can you add it while your there
[17:31]  * gnomefreak thought i did add it
[17:38] <bdrung> gnomefreak: done
[17:38] <gnomefreak> bdrung: thanks
[17:38]  * gnomefreak is now officially lost
[17:38] <gnomefreak> ok nm fouudn where i left of
[17:39] <gnomefreak> f.
[17:43] <bdrung> asac, gnomefreak, eagles0513875 : updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview again
[17:43]  * gnomefreak just hits refresh this time
[17:43] <gnomefreak> your kidding
[17:44]  * gnomefreak goes to look at debhelper version
[17:45] <bdrung> gnomefreak: kidding?
[17:46] <bdrung> gnomefreak: debhelper is optional
[17:46] <gnomefreak> bdrung: i had just finished building when you added the debhelper version to wiki
[17:46] <gnomefreak> done now
[17:46] <bdrung> gnomefreak: do you have "remove all comments from the template and the unused variables " too?
[17:47] <gnomefreak> bdrung: not sure what you mean i closed the page but the template if you mean XPI:* we have a branch for that that should be updated for all this
[17:47] <gnomefreak> be back
[17:48] <bdrung> gnomefreak: ?
[17:51] <gnomefreak> bdrung: what did you mean
[17:51]  * asac out to cinema ... bb in 3.5+h
[17:52] <gnomefreak> asac: have fun
[17:52] <asac> thx
[17:52] <gnomefreak> bdrung: ok i see it but what do you mean? since they are all components and its the rules file not templates right?
[17:52] <gnomefreak> oh comments
[17:52] <gnomefreak> bdrung: got it
[17:53] <bdrung> gnomefreak: you can improve my description
[17:54] <gnomefreak> ok sage installed and shows up in ubufox but ubufox does not tell you it installed on start up
[17:55] <gnomefreak> bdrung: ok pushing sage branch
[17:56] <bdrung> gnomefreak: link
[17:56] <gnomefreak> bdrung: one sec
[17:56] <gnomefreak> ojhold that thought please
[17:56] <gnomefreak> ok hold even
[17:57] <bdrung> asac: updated bug #422898
[17:57] <gnomefreak> ok bdrung https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/firefox-sage.ubuntu
[17:59] <bdrung> gnomefreak: not lintian clean
[17:59] <gnomefreak> bdrung: thats due to the m-d problem
[17:59] <bdrung> debian-changelog-line-too-long
[17:59] <gnomefreak> they are what you showed earlier
[17:59] <gnomefreak> i didnt see that
[17:59] <gnomefreak> I: firefox-sage source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
[18:00] <gnomefreak> P: firefox-sage source: direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system install.rdf
[18:00] <gnomefreak> thats what i got with other comments with them
[18:00] <gnomefreak> bdrung: http://paste.ubuntu.com/276475/
[18:01] <gnomefreak> if you give me line # i will fix it but im assuming its the one from debian/control line in changelog
[18:01] <bdrung> line 2, 10
[18:02] <bdrung> and 15
[18:02] <gnomefreak> - see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview, for more information about this or - Updated maintainer field to use Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>  but niehter should be too long
[18:02] <bdrung> and direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system should be fixed
[18:02] <gnomefreak> bdrung: what causes it? it sounds like i should have patched it instead of changed it
[18:03] <gnomefreak> im guessing install.rdf
[18:03] <bdrung> gnomefreak: probably a maxVersion patch
[18:04] <bdrung> gnomefreak: use simple-patchsys
[18:04] <gnomefreak> bdrung: good idea just one question. what is it? :) never heard of it
[18:04] <bdrung> gnomefreak: its from cdbs
[18:05] <gnomefreak> ok no help page for cdbs
[18:05] <bdrung> gnomefreak: add "include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk" and drop the patch into debian/patches
[18:05] <gnomefreak> no man page either
[18:06] <bdrung> i have to leave now, cul8r
[18:06] <gnomefreak> k later
[18:06] <bdrung> gnomefreak: http://cdbs-doc.duckcorp.org/en/cdbs-doc.xhtml
[18:19] <gnomefreak> ok so that doesnt help me at all. still have to use dpatch, edit series an so on by hand
[18:25] <micahg> gnomefreak: you looking for a patch system?
[18:25] <gnomefreak> micahg: i used dpatch
[18:25] <gnomefreak> :)
[18:25] <micahg> ah, I was going to suggest quilt
[18:30] <gnomefreak> ok good i think that worked :)
[18:33] <gnomefreak> ok so only watch file warning
[18:36] <gnomefreak> bdrung: ok ive had all the fun i can handle today :) here is the new branch https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozilla-extensions-dev/firefox-extensions/mozilla-stumbleupon.ubuntu
[18:38] <gnomefreak> s/new/updated
[18:38] <eagles0513875> hehe gnomefreak leave some extensions for the rest of us :P
[18:38] <eagles0513875> j/k
[18:38] <gnomefreak> :) add some more if there are anymore
[18:39] <eagles0513875> those are all of em
[18:39] <eagles0513875> lol
[18:39] <gnomefreak> hell you have some that are not extensions yet on there
[18:40] <gnomefreak> chatzilla doesnt have a standalone extension its compiled with seamonkey and i need to update sm1 when i get time. im not too concered since 1.1.19 is due out soon
[18:41] <gnomefreak> firegpg hasnt been released yet im still working on it but i may enlist bdrun*g's help on that
[18:42] <gnomefreak> and flasgot we pushed to debian and on lucid it will be synced
[18:51] <gnomefreak> ok not here anymore :)
[19:02]  * eagles0513875 dinner
[20:34] <bdrung> i am back
[21:42] <BUGabundo> guud evening
[21:51] <eagles0513875> heyo guys im back to but fading fast
[22:44] <fta> asac, can we do something for bug 262723 in hardy onward?
[22:44] <fta> debian 448094
[22:44] <fta> debian 521181
[22:45] <fta> i hate debian/changelogs
[23:04] <bdrung> fta: all these bugs are closed
[23:18] <fta> bdmurray, i'm not talking about the debian bugs (i just wanted their title, d/changelog was not verbose enough)
[23:18] <fta> (i usually know what i'm doing)
[23:33] <BUGabundo> want to laugh?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file/+bug/248619/comments/2 Will Not Print On Tuesdayi still laught at this
[23:42] <bdrung> fta: bug bug 262723 is closed, too
[23:42] <fta> not in hardy++
[23:45] <bdrung> fta: it looks like this is fixed in karmic
[23:47] <fta> look at the last comment in the bug