[09:42] <jtv> allenap: I hope you're not still ocr'ing...  :)
[09:44] <noodles775> oh, it's thursday...
[09:44] <jtv> o/
[09:46] <noodles775> jtv: which of your two do you want me to start with?
[09:47] <jtv> noodles775: db-bug-435655, but turns out my last push (minor test fixup) failed.
[09:47] <jtv> Let me check that the diff is at least reasonably representative.
[09:48] <jtv> Oh well, the meat of the branch is there, just not a few removed lines.
[09:49] <jtv> noodles775: pretend the import at the very top of the diff isn't there (I ended up not needing it), and that one line of output has disappeared from the doctest.  :)
[09:49] <noodles775> :) I'll merge your branch locally anyway - so just let me know when you've pushed the latest change.
[09:51]  * jtv tries to break-lock...
[09:57] <jtv> noodles775: pushed.  Review at your convenience!
[09:57] <noodles775> ta
[09:59] <allenap> jtv: Ah, no. Thanks :)
[10:00] <jtv> allenap: did deryck get his template conversion through yesterday?
[10:29] <noodles775> jtv: r=me, sent.
[10:30] <jtv> noodles775: thanks!  Got another one coming up.
[10:30] <jtv> (Much more important than the one I had on the queue from last week)
[10:30] <noodles775> jtv: ok, does that mean there will be a re-roll?
[10:30] <jtv> noodles775: dunno, but if not, I'm going for 2 CPs.
[10:30] <noodles775> k.
[10:31] <jtv> Frankly, for this particular one, it'd be pretty impressive if we didn't need a re-roll...
[10:37] <jtv> noodles775: great suggestion to test for the Committed notice, thanks.  I'm using regex search to find it.
[10:40] <noodles775> jtv: why couldn't you just use assertIn() as you've done for the others?
[10:40] <jtv> noodles775: mostly because of the spacing between INFO and Committing.
[10:41] <jtv> If that changes, this test won't break—but it will no longer have any value as proof that the commit doesn't happen.
[10:41] <noodles775> k.
[10:42] <jtv> I could search for just Commit, but that's much too brittle for my taste.  I like tests that break when something important changes, not as superficialities change.
[10:42] <noodles775> Yup.
[10:43] <noodles775> jtv: Sorry, I still don't see why self.assertIn('Committed 0 file(s)', stderr) isn't what you want... what did I miss there?
[10:44] <jtv> Has no value as proof if the number isn't 0.
[10:45] <noodles775> jtv: but in that specific case, you want to ensure that the number is zero right?
[10:46] <jtv> I want to assure that the message isn't there.
[10:46] <noodles775> of course... I was thinking of checking that it was.
[10:46] <jtv> Or a message that would be in its place if things went wrong.
[10:46] <jtv> OIC... for that check I'm much less picky!
[10:46] <noodles775> Yep.
[10:52] <jtv> noodles775: my other critical MP is: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/bug-435699/+merge/12338
[10:52] <noodles775> jtv: yep, already started.
[10:52] <jtv> oh, sorry
[10:53] <noodles775> np!
[11:17] <noodles775> jtv: in _setUpDistro, you've replaced some lines with calls to _makeTemplateForDistroSeries... is it intended that this will not change the test at all (ie. just refactoring)?
[11:18] <noodles775> jtv: or, the other way around, is it relevant that now a POTemplateSubset is created for each template, where as before the same one was used twice?
[11:18] <jtv> noodles775: it's purely a refactoring, yes.  POTemplateSubset is stateless.
[11:21] <noodles775> jtv: great.
[11:35] <noodles775> jtv: r=me for the second one :)
[11:35] <jtv> noodles775: thanks!
[12:03] <bac> jtv: rc=bac on bug 435655.  please add to CRB.  has it gone through ec2 yet?
[12:03] <mup> Bug #435655: Export to branch fails: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'float' and 'datetime.timedelta' <Launchpad Translations:In Progress by jtv> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/435655>
[12:04] <jtv> bac: no, still in there, but has been for a while
[12:07] <bac> jtv:  thanks.  no decision has been made about a re-roll but this should be a candidate
[12:07] <bac> hi noodles775
[12:08] <jtv> bac: thanks for that.  Pretty urgent stuff.
[12:08] <bac> BjornT: ping
[12:08] <BjornT> hi bac 
[12:08] <bac> jtv: how long will you be around
[12:09] <jtv> bac: a while, I can check in at night.
[12:09] <bac> hi BjornT -- i have to leave in just a few minutes for a dental appt.  can i ask you to be RM until i return in a few hours?
[12:09] <BjornT> bac: sure
[12:10] <bac> BjornT: there are 4 MPs with r-c requests.  thanks!
[12:11] <BjornT> bac: ok. what's the status of bug 434519? it's fixed released, but is still on CRB
[12:11] <mup> Bug #434519: Text in overlay is now centered <Launchpad Foundations:Fix Released by michael.nelson> <LAZR Javascript Library:Fix Released by michael.nelson> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/434519>
[12:24] <leonardr> noodles775, care to review a javascript branch? (not release critical) https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~leonardr/launchpad/get-field-uri/+merge/12344
[12:34] <bac> BjornT: could you have noodles775 update CRB for that bug?
[12:36] <BjornT> noodles775: ^^^
[12:41] <BjornT> noodles775, bac: nm, i was looking at the wrong wiki
[13:34] <noodles775> leonardr: sure!
[13:52] <noodles775> leonardr: actually, I'll just do cprov's first if that's ok... looks urgent.
[13:52] <leonardr> noodles775, sure
[13:52] <cprov> thx, noodles775
[13:53] <noodles775> np
[14:56] <henninge> noodles775: Hi!
[14:56] <noodles775> Hi henninge :)
[14:56] <henninge> noodles775: Can you please do a code and ui review here? :
[14:56] <henninge> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~henninge/launchpad/bug-435712/+merge/12347
[14:57] <noodles775> henninge: sure - is it an rc? if so, I'll do it before leonardr's otherwise after?
[14:57]  * noodles775 checks
[14:57] <henninge> noodles775: yes, I plan to r-c it.
[14:58] <noodles775> henninge: usually I'd leave it unclaimed until I start, just in case others join reviewing soon.
[14:59] <henninge> noodles775: ah, sorry. I just requested the ui part from you personally. It's really easy, too.
[14:59] <noodles775> Great!
[15:14] <noodles775> jml: r=me - it might be worth adding an r-c request to your MP now.
[15:34] <noodles775> Hi henninge - there's no leaf breadcrumb on that question page - is that intentional or it just hasn't been done yet?
[15:34] <noodles775> (ie. outside of the scope of this branch)
[15:36] <henninge> noodles775: the latter, I filed a seperate bug about it. FAQ pages seem to suffer from that, too.
[15:36] <noodles775> aha
[15:39] <henninge> noodles775: bug 435743, just fyi ... ;)
[15:39] <mup> Bug #435743: Bread crumb missing for question and FAQ <Launchpad Answers:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/435743>
[15:39] <noodles775> Great.
[16:08] <jml> noodles775, which one?
[16:08] <noodles775> jml: Code->Branches?
[16:09] <jml> noodles775, ahh, thanks.
[16:09] <noodles775> jml: just see the note I added about other branches introducing print_location...
[16:09] <jml> noodles775, yeah, I just saw that.
[16:09] <jml> noodles775, really the best thing to do with that is land it asap
[16:10] <noodles775> jml: yes, but even then there are risks (like my branch which I updated).
[16:11] <jml> noodles775, well I guess I mean land via ec2test
[16:12] <noodles775> jml: but with a re-roll - even if we both sent off our branches again to ec2test - to land, they'd both pass (as they wouldn't have each others changes right).
[16:12] <noodles775> it would only be the integration that would fail.
[16:13] <noodles775> jml: I guess what I'm trying to say (but doing so poorly) is that the issue here is us all landing these branches for the re-roll at the same time.
[16:14]  * jml misses pqm
[16:14] <noodles775> henninge: code=me, but I'd like someone else to look at the ui as I had a few questions.
[16:14] <noodles775> jml: heh, yeah, that'd solve it :)
[16:14] <jml> noodles775, sure. I can take a reasonable amount of care to check for that.
[16:14] <noodles775> Great.
[16:14] <jml> noodles775, but in those cases, our present build system basically says "be ready to apply a [testfix]"
[16:14] <henninge> noodles775: so do I find somebody else for ui?
[16:15] <henninge> or do you?
[16:15] <jml> noodles775, which I'm happy to do, as long as it doesn't screw the release.
[16:15] <henninge> noodles775: thanks anyway ... ;-)
[16:15] <noodles775> jml: yep, I guess we could just try to avoid an extra 4hrs.
[16:16] <jml> yeah.
[16:17] <noodles775> henninge: np. And yes, I was about to ping someone... rockstar could you give a second opinion on the ui for henninge's branch:
[16:17] <noodles775> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~henninge/launchpad/bug-435712/+merge/12347
[16:17] <rockstar> noodles775, sure.
[16:17] <noodles775> Thanks!
[16:18] <rockstar> henninge, ah!  Thanks for doing this!  When I fixed this page, that slot didn't exist.
[16:18] <rockstar> henninge, a big +1 from me.
[16:18] <henninge> rockstar: pleasure
[16:19] <noodles775> henninge: did my question about the status make sense? I wasn't sure if it should be included there in the rego info, but maybe it's something you discussed with beuno et al?
[16:20] <rockstar> noodles775, it was discussed with beuno.  It allowed us to remove on entire superfluous portlet.
[16:20] <noodles775> OK, great!
[16:21] <henninge> noodles775: yes, makes sense.
[16:29] <rockstar> leonardr, I presume your branch is a lazr-restful branch, correct?
[16:29] <rockstar> Can you point me to it?
[16:29] <leonardr> rockstar: no, it's a launchpad branch
[16:30] <noodles775> ah great - I was just about to apologise to leonard for not getting to it!
[16:30] <noodles775> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~leonardr/launchpad/get-field-uri/+merge/12344
[16:30] <leonardr> though i do have a lazr.restful branch coming up in just a minute--writing the mp now
[16:32] <rockstar> noodles775, I got your back.  :)
[16:34] <noodles775> Thanks rockstar - about to EOD.
[16:40] <bac> rockstar: are the reviews you are working on RC re-roll candidates?
[16:41] <rockstar> bac, not sure.
[16:41] <bac> rockstar: please ask.  jump mrevell and any others to the top, please.
[16:41] <mrevell> thanks bac
[16:42] <rockstar> bac, I assumed since there was no one on duty when I started, no one needed theirs ASAP.
[16:42] <bac> rockstar: mrevell's will take 2 seconds
[16:42] <bac> rockstar: sure, that's reasonable.
[16:42] <rockstar> I don't see one in here from mrevell
[16:43] <mrevell> rockstar: it may be under bac
[16:43] <rockstar> Ah, I see it.  It's yours bac.  :)
[16:43] <mrevell> rockstar: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bac/launchpad/lp-blog/+merge/12351
[16:44] <rockstar> bac, r=me
[16:44] <mrevell> thanks rockstar
[16:44] <bac> tahnks rockstar.  sorry for the disruption.
[16:44] <rockstar> I'm a little confused on why we're copying the blog instead of aggregating it though.
[16:44] <rockstar> bac, I'm done now anyway.  :)
[16:44] <leonardr> rockstar, here's the lazr.restful branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~leonardr/lazr.restful/431986-field-resource-link/+merge/12357
[16:44] <bac> rockstar: that's coming soon
[16:44] <mrevell> rockstar: we'll be aggreagting soon
[16:44] <rockstar> bac, okay.
[16:44] <mrevell> or even aggregating
[16:45] <mrevell> bac I'll send it to pqm
[16:45] <mrevell> if I get rc from you bac
[16:45] <bac> mrevell: thanks
[16:45] <mrevell> heh
[16:45] <bac> mrevell: using your new dbsubmit alias
[16:45] <mrevell> thanks abc
[16:45] <mrevell> bac
[16:58] <henninge> noodles775: oops, I was so preocupied with the ui issue that I didn't see your suggestions in the code. Seeing that this is r-c, I will not do too much here, though.
[16:59] <noodles775> henninge: yep - np!
[17:09] <bac> henninge: re: your redirect patch.  can you add a comment better nailing down what "old stable release" means?  how long do we need to support it?  hardy + 5 years?
[17:12] <rockstar> leonardr, r=me
[17:12] <henninge> danilos: ^^
[17:12] <henninge> bac: AFAIUI it just changed in Karmic, so hardy +5 years would seem right.
[17:13] <danilos> bac: in general, we are not exactly sure what was the first release with these links, and how long do we want to support them
[17:13] <bac> danilos: normal releases only 2 years, as i understand.  LTS for 5.  that's why hardy+5 was my suggestion.
[17:14] <henninge> bac: but Karmic is mentioned in the test as the release where it changed, so anything before Karmic would be considered "old" then.
[17:14] <danilos> bac: yeah, I am not sure if we need to support dapper still, but hardy+5 is probably sane
[17:14] <danilos> of course, hardy+5 covers dapper+5
[17:14] <bac> well dapper+5 < hardy+5
[17:14] <bac> :)
[17:15] <danilos> also, 5 years is server only, but I'd definitely not try to determine when we can drop the support for these links now :)
[17:15] <bac> best would be to just leave the redirect in there for a good long while
[17:15] <danilos> bac: yep, but since it's an otherwise dead page, I wanted a comment in that would help us in the future determine if we can drop it
[17:15] <bac> ok
[17:18] <bac> henninge: so how about something to the effect of "This redirect must be supported for at least five years after the release of Hardy, which is 2013-04.  Please consult with the XYZ team before removing."
[17:19] <henninge> bac: sounds great!
[17:19] <stub> Open a bug to remove the link, create a milestone for LP 10.0 and target it.
[17:19] <stub> (not serious)
[17:20] <bac> henninge: rc=bac conditional on submission via ec2 to db-devel
[17:21] <henninge> bac: thanks, it is already running through ec2.
[17:21] <bac> henninge: super!
[17:28] <henninge> bac: I have another one as you may have noticed ... 
[17:28] <henninge> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~henninge/launchpad/bug-435712/+merge/12347
[17:28] <bac> henninge: ok
[17:28] <bac> will look soon
[17:29] <henninge> bac: thanks a lot
[18:09] <cprov> sinzui: can you please take a quick look at https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~cprov/launchpad/bug-408528-ensurePerson-again/+merge/12356 ?
[18:38] <cprov> bac: the death-row fix is a 'go', worked fine in production.
[18:40] <bac> cprov:  will look now
[18:40] <cprov> bac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~cprov/+activereviews
[18:40] <cprov> err
[18:41] <cprov> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~cprov/launchpad/bug-430552-unblock-death-row/+merge/12346
[18:41] <bac> yep
[18:51] <cprov> bac: it's on pqm, thanks.
[18:52] <bac> cprov: thanks.  please update CRB when it lands.  put it under the re-roll section
[19:06] <cprov> I wonder what PQM is doing during the 20 minutes it takes to process a request.
[19:38] <deryck> rockstar, ping
[19:38] <rockstar> deryck, hi
[19:39] <deryck> rockstar, I've got something to fix an oops that needs to go in.  Can you look at it?  One thing, though -- I have to leave in 5 minutes or so to pickup kids at school.
[19:39] <deryck> rockstar, so I'm asking for offline, while I'm away.
[19:40] <rockstar> deryck, cool.
[19:41] <deryck> rockstar, thanks!  https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~deryck/launchpad/filebug-redirect-package-oops-435628/+merge/12366
[19:42] <rockstar> deryck, that's actually really straightforward.
[19:42] <rockstar> deryck, r=me
[19:43] <deryck> yeah, I think so, too.  
[19:43] <deryck> excellent, thanks!
[19:43] <rockstar> deryck, wait, why is it going to the tour?
[19:43] <rockstar> Is this the change to the bug filing policy I saw recently for Ubuntu?
[19:44] <deryck> rockstar, that's the test.  earlier in the test, it sets the redirect url to the tour.  I assume to make the test not hit network for a live URL.
[19:44] <rockstar> deryck, alright, that's fine.
[19:45] <deryck> cool
[20:07] <henninge> bac: the +translations redirect patch is about to land!
[20:08] <bac> excellent henninge.  when it does will you move it to the re-roll section of CRB and note the revno?  thanks.
[20:08] <henninge> bac: I will
[20:14] <kiko> bac, I'm seeing an issue with the homepage, where it misrendered /and/ the beta testers redirect is being displayed as a box instead of the inline ajax thing?
[20:15]  * bac looks
[20:16] <bac> kiko: what kind of bad rendering?
[20:17] <bac> i don't see anything that looks off
[20:17] <kiko> the search box to the right hand side
[20:17] <kiko> blog posts to the left, search to the right
[20:17] <kiko> instead of search in the middle
[20:17] <kiko> bac, at any rate, there should be no beta testers redirect box up there -- it's in the footer everywhere
[20:19] <bac> kiko: i know it is in the footer for other pages.  i don't know what the design intent for the front page was.  barry can you explain?
[20:19] <bac> kiko: i'll agree its fugly
[20:19] <bac> beuno: you around?
[20:19]  * barry reads back
[20:19] <kiko> beuno, please help 
[20:20] <bac> beuno is probably on the floor at morpeth arms about now
[20:20] <barry> kiko, bac that's the design i was given by beuno
[20:21] <barry> kiko, bac as for the beta-box, i didn't touch that (wasn't part of the design change)
[20:21] <bac> barry: so the search box is placed as intended
[20:21] <barry> bac: as beuno intended, yes
[20:22] <kiko> hmm, okay then
[20:22] <bac> i know noodles moved the beta message and disable to the footer for internal pages but don't know about killing off the beta box
[20:22] <bac> (sounds like sushi)
[20:22] <kiko> needs to happen :-)
[20:23] <barry> bac: i reviewed noodles' branch.  iirc, it did not touch the beta-box on the home page, just added to the footer of internal pages
[20:23] <bac> barry: my recollection too
[20:23] <bac> shall i open a bug 'kiko hates the beta box'?
[20:23] <barry> :)
[20:23] <kiko> the bug is "MARK hates the beta box"
[20:23] <kiko> and asked a month ago to get it gone
[20:24] <barry> kiko: mark hates > beuno loves
[20:24] <bac> oh, that's even better
[20:24] <bac> ok, will do
[20:29] <bac> kiko: bug 436124
[20:29] <mup> Bug #436124: Beta user warning on Launchpad homepage needs to go away <Launchpad itself:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/436124>
[20:29] <kiko> thanks bac
[20:30] <bac> np
[20:48] <beuno> kiko-afk, bac, hi
[20:49] <beuno> it does need to go away
[21:02] <flacoste> cprov-afk: it's running make build
[21:08] <barry> rockstar: ping
[21:16] <rockstar> barry, hi
[21:16] <barry> rockstar: do you have time to review a critical fix?
[21:16] <barry> rockstar: it's slightly over the 800 line limit but mostly because there's a big delete in there
[21:17] <rockstar> barry, only for you.
[21:17] <barry> rockstar: you have once again earned your nick
[21:17] <rockstar> :)
[21:17] <barry> sending the mp now :)
[21:17] <rockstar> barry, my new band is playing our first show on Halloween.
[21:18] <barry> very cool!  and what are you going as? :)
[21:19] <rockstar> Well, the dressing up thing happens AFTER the set. :)
[21:20] <rockstar> Otherwise, I'd be going as "it's too hot from the lights to wear much of anything..."
[21:24] <barry> rockstar: oh, so you're going as the red hot chili peppers
[21:24] <rockstar> :)
[21:25]  * rockstar is glad his mental firewall silently dropped that last few proposed responses
[21:25] <barry> rockstar: mp is sent.  ping me if you have any questions about the test specifics.  running the MailmanLayer tests are um, "fun"
[21:25] <rockstar> Oh man.  You didn't tell me it was a Mailman fix.
[21:25] <barry> rockstar: gotta send me a link to the music when you have something.  i'd love to hear it
[21:25] <rockstar> Deal is off, I can't review it.
[21:25] <rockstar> :)
[21:25] <barry> rockstar: not much mailman in there :)
[21:26] <barry> rockstar: mostly integration issues, but i'm here to answer any questions
[21:34] <barry> rockstar: those lint warnings are bogus.  ignore 'em
[21:35] <rockstar> barry, so this was cowboyed into production already?
[21:36] <barry> rockstar: not that exact patch, but something very similar.  this is cleaner
[21:37] <rockstar> barry, okay.
[21:39] <rockstar> barry, why the change from "Configure a mailing list" to "Create a mailing list"
[21:39] <barry> rockstar: the link text on the team index page has changed
[21:40] <rockstar> barry, was that part of the issue, or a "while I'm in here" change.
[21:40] <barry> rockstar: it was a 'while i'm here' change ;)
[21:40] <rockstar> barry, okay.
[21:40] <barry> rockstar: these tests are not run automatically (there's an open bug on that) so whenever i mess around in them i first try to get them running again
[21:41] <rockstar> barry, I don't have a problem with that, but I would think usually RC patches are the minimal to fix the "holy shits"
[21:41] <barry> rockstar: you might be right; i'll fight that out with bac :)
[21:42] <rockstar> I guess I've never thought about how much of our test suito is Mailman integration tests.
[21:43] <rockstar> +    launchpad_top = os.path.dirname(
[21:43] <rockstar> +        os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(canonical.__file__)))
[21:43] <rockstar> barry, ^^ that's sub-optimal.
[21:43] <barry> rockstar: this is warsaw's extension to zawinksi's law
[21:43] <rockstar> Which is?
[21:43] <barry> rockstar: yeah.  we need to get to the top of the tree
[21:44] <barry> rockstar: http://catb.org/jargon/html/Z/Zawinskis-Law.html
[21:44] <barry> “Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can.” 
[21:45] <rockstar> And your extension is?
[21:45] <rockstar> barry, have you run this through ec2?
[21:45] <barry> rockstar, essentially s/mail/mailman/ :)
[21:45] <rockstar> :)
[21:45] <barry> rockstar: no. it wouldn't help anyway because none of the MailmanLayer tests are run automatically
[21:46] <rockstar> barry, oh snap.
[21:46] <barry> rockstar: yeah.  there's an open bug about adding them to a separate buildbot, but it hasn't been done yet
[21:46] <rockstar> barry, how confident are you that this patch isn't going to explode everything?
[21:47] <barry> rockstar: i'm pretty confident.  the essential change is to add an import of _pythonpath to make sure it can find the eggs.  everything else is inconsequential to production
[21:47] <rockstar> barry, okay, r=me
[21:47] <barry> rockstar: but don't worry, i will work closely with the losas to make sure its application goes smoothly
[21:48] <barry> rockstar: thanks!
[21:48] <rockstar> barry, you are welcome.
[21:49] <barry> bac: rc needed for https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~barry/launchpad/435604-mailman/+merge/12380
[21:49] <bac> hi barry -- good timing.  i just got back.
[21:49] <barry> bac: cool.  rockstar just reviewed and approved it
[21:54] <bac> barry: are all of those lint message fake?
[21:55] <barry> bac:  they are
[21:55] <barry> bac: they're doctest globals for convenience
[22:01] <bac> barry: i agree with rockstar that this fix should've been limited to a minimal change.  that said i know you can't see a test without convert it to ReST
[22:01] <bac> but it does make sussing out the good parts hard
[22:01] <barry> bac: yeah
[22:02] <bac> but let's land this thing
[22:02] <barry> bac: against devel, db-devel, or ...?
[22:03] <bac> db-devel
[22:03] <barry> bac: okay.  i'm submitting this straight to pqm since none of these tests are run by ec2 automatically
[22:04] <bac> barry: but you've run them locally, right?
[22:04] <barry> bac: lots :)
[22:04] <bac> great
[22:05] <bac> hey barry when you get a landing message would you update CRB and move it down to the 're-roll' section with the revno?
[22:05] <barry> bac: yepper!
[22:07] <rockstar> mwhudson, could you do a small review for me?
[22:15] <mwhudson> rockstar: sure!
[22:16] <rockstar> mwhudson, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rockstar/launchpad/fix-bmp-links/+merge/12384
[22:16] <mwhudson> rockstar: after the standup i guess
[22:31] <mwhudson> rockstar: reviewed, that was easy :)