| Laney | oh pants | 00:18 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | should have incremented the u-d-t version | 00:19 |
| Laney | too tired to do it now | 00:19 |
| sharms | Laney: I converted it and reassigned | 00:41 |
| === jono_ is now known as jono | ||
| lamalex | Hey guys, how can I pass added configure flags to a package if I want to repackage it? It's using autofoo? | 02:30 |
| lamalex | ah, figured it out but now it's failing :( guess I need to look at it more | 02:55 |
| ripps | Is there a guide to help cdbs users to use dh7? I learned to package using cdbs, but now it seems that dh7 is superior to it and I want to learn how. | 04:01 |
| zooko | Okay folks, there is a new package of Tahoe-LAFS at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/tahoe-lafs . It fixes all known licensing issues. | 04:03 |
| lifeless | \o/ | 04:06 |
| mzz | ripps: I thought debhelper was actually used by cdbs? What's telling you using it directly is superior? | 04:06 |
| lifeless | mzz: dh7 has much of the same 'magic' cdbs does | 04:06 |
| mzz | man | 04:06 |
| mzz | is there some document somewhere everyone but me is reading that explains what the best tools are right now | 04:07 |
| lifeless | no | 04:07 |
| mzz | bah | 04:07 |
| ripps | It just seems I should learn how to actually use debhelper, instead of just relying on cdbs to do it for me. | 04:07 |
| mzz | is that just because such a document would be too controversial, in an editor flamewar kind of way, or because nobody has gotten around to writing one, or what? | 04:08 |
| lifeless | ripps: by that argument one should learn assembler rather than depending on gcc :P | 04:08 |
| lifeless | I'll grant its good knowledge | 04:08 |
| lifeless | mzz: allof the above, I suspect | 04:08 |
| ripps | Actually, I have learned some assembly... | 04:08 |
| mzz | well, one thing about cdbs is that sometimes one of its steps did something bad to my package and it was hard to drop in some debugging before that step | 04:08 |
| mzz | if my Makefile just ran a whole lot of dh_* helpers I'd have more obvious spots to put extra checks | 04:09 |
| mzz | cdbs does have hooks, but figuring out what they all are is nontrivial, unless I missed yet another doc | 04:09 |
| lifeless | man debhelper | 04:09 |
| mzz | and yeah, debhelper's manpages are pretty good, at least the ones I've read so far | 04:10 |
| === danbhfive is now known as ChogyDan | ||
| lamalex | Hey guys, can anyone see what's failing here? http://paste2.org/p/436324 <-- output http://paste2.org/p/436325 <-- rules file | 04:19 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: Here is my advice: Get a security update into Jaunty that adds the patch to 0.6.35-0ubuntu1 (presumably 0.6.35-0ubuntu1.1) and then backport that to Hardy/Intrepid. You should also get a security update for the released versions in Hardy/Intrepid. | 04:26 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, ok thanks! will do then :) | 05:09 |
| fabrice_sp | Hi. What rights should I have to be able to unsubscribe u-u-s ? | 06:15 |
| fabrice_sp | Can some MOTU unsubscribe u-u-s from #417036 ? | 06:22 |
| fabrice_sp | bug #417036 | 06:22 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 417036 in psi "Psi 0.13 in Karmic?" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/417036 | 06:22 |
| wrapster | what are the necessary files to build any pkg? coz after i apt-get source <pkg> i see a lot of files are all those necessary? since i've also seen pkgs being build without any of those files.... | 07:15 |
| mzz | please be more specific | 07:16 |
| mzz | the files not in the debian/ directory are normally from the upstream source tarball, which may contain a few things that aren't actually necessary, depending on how tidy upstream is | 07:16 |
| fabrice_sp | wrapster, all the ones in debian directory | 07:17 |
| mzz | everything in debian/ should serve some purpose | 07:17 |
| wrapster | fabrice_sp: no.. but one moment i'll do a pastie and you can understand better | 07:17 |
| fabrice_sp | yes: build the package | 07:17 |
| fabrice_sp | ? | 07:17 |
| fabrice_sp | !pastebin | wrapster | 07:19 |
| ubottu | wrapster: pastebin is a service to post multiple-lined texts so you don't flood the channel. Ubuntu pastebin is at http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://tinyurl.com/imagebin | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic | 07:19 |
| fabrice_sp | (just in case) | 07:19 |
| mzz | "pastie" usually means they know that already, in my experience | 07:19 |
| fabrice_sp | anyway: have to go. bye | 07:21 |
| wrapster | http://pastie.org/630039 | 07:25 |
| wrapster | have a look at that.. i dwd the source into a dir called binutils under which i had another dir with the pkg name here can i delete all the files except changelog, debian/,copyright? | 07:26 |
| mzz | I don't understand how your pastebin relates to your question | 07:27 |
| mzz | your pastebin lists the stuff in the binutils source, not the debianization of that | 07:27 |
| wrapster | mzz may be iwas not clear..one moment. | 07:28 |
| wrapster | http://pastie.org/630039 | 07:29 |
| mzz | yes. | 07:30 |
| wrapster | now .... my question is ,is it enough to just have debian/ changelog and copyright files within the "binutils-2.18.1~cvs20080103" dir and then yet run dpkg-buildpackage to generate the pkg? | 07:30 |
| mzz | wait, where'd the debian.diff.gz go? | 07:30 |
| wrapster | oops | 07:31 |
| wrapster | that was not even downloaded | 07:31 |
| wrapster | :( | 07:31 |
| mzz | perhaps there isn't one | 07:31 |
| mzz | (this may be a "native" package) | 07:31 |
| mzz | anyway! | 07:31 |
| mzz | you seem to be root. Stop being that. You shouldn't be root for most, if not all, of the packaging process. | 07:31 |
| mzz | the stuff in the first "ls" is what I'd expect to get from apt-get source, although normally there's also a .diff.gz | 07:32 |
| mzz | the stuff in the second "ls" is what's present in the binutils (upstream) source tree, plus a debian/ directory. | 07:32 |
| wrapster | correct | 07:32 |
| mzz | what's present in the upstream source tree obviously varies wildly between upstream projects. | 07:33 |
| mzz | what's present here doesn't strike me as very unusual. | 07:33 |
| mzz | so I don't understand what you don't understand. | 07:33 |
| wrapster | hee hee | 07:33 |
| mzz | (since your original question was something like "coz after i apt-get source <pkg> i see a lot of files are all those necessary? since i've also seen pkgs being build without any of those files....") | 07:34 |
| wrapster | ok in that case.. what i wanted to point out was i see a lot of files in the upstream dir... | 07:35 |
| wrapster | are all those necessary? except for the debian? | 07:36 |
| mzz | depends on how tidy upstream is | 07:41 |
| mzz | most of them tend to be | 07:41 |
| mzz | there may be some things in there that aren't installed because they're only interesting to those working on the source package | 07:42 |
| mzz | there may also be some things that are only necessary to rebuild the build system, which may actually be useful here since it seems to be a snapshot | 07:43 |
| mzz | there may be stuff that's only used on other platforms | 07:43 |
| mzz | there may be stuff that isn't built for whatever reason (experimental, dependency not packaged, etc) | 07:43 |
| mzz | I think most of what you see here is indeed necessary | 07:43 |
| siretart | do new packages require a FFe, or are they simply not acceptable? Opencore finally ended up in debian, and there are quite some very vocal bug reporters requiring amr support in ffmpeg | 07:55 |
| siretart | siretart: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze%20for%20new%20packages | 07:56 |
| === santiago-pgsql is now known as foursixnine | ||
| AnAnt | Hello, does ubuntu care about armel architecture ? | 08:40 |
| AnAnt | LP 427562 | 08:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427562 in tablelist "tklib already contain tablelist package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427562 | 08:50 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| DaveMorris | I've previously generated some packages from a source package called opensg. I want to rename the generated packages from this source archive, so that they can be installed alongside version 2 of opensg. Do you simply create a new revision of the source package with the new package names and upload it? | 09:54 |
| directhex | DaveMorris, yes. | 11:02 |
| directhex | DaveMorris, but it'll land in the NEW queue due to the new binary packages. and you need to provide valid Replaces: etc lines in debian/control | 11:02 |
| DaveMorris | directhex: I assume they are of the format Replaces: <package name> then | 11:03 |
| directhex | with adequate versioning. read the debian nm guide | 11:04 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| slytherin | wgrant: ping, is it possible to add a category for java packages at http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ I believe section=java should be sufficient for now for filtering. | 11:55 |
| wgrant | slytherin: Have a http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/multidistrotools/java.html | 12:06 |
| slytherin | wgrant: Great, thanks. | 12:06 |
| wgrant | slytherin: np | 12:06 |
| sistpoty|work | hi folks | 12:22 |
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| === karimas_ is now known as karimas | ||
| === cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox | ||
| directhex | hyperair, thoughts on requesting a FFe for Banshee? since it's staying in universe for now, i see no benefit to sticking with the old stable version when the beta is more reliable | 14:54 |
| hyperair | directhex: i wouldn't mind. | 14:54 |
| directhex | hm. who's in motu-release & can give their informal opinion? | 14:55 |
| randomaction | for those working of FTBFS, here's a list of problematic universe packages sorted by popularity: http://paste.ubuntu.com/277970/ | 14:58 |
| directhex | 681 ftbfs bugs? lawks | 15:04 |
| sistpoty|work | directhex: https://launchpad.net/~motu-release/+members and at this point, I don't have an informal opinion about a banshee FFe yet, to be honest | 15:04 |
| LucidFox | Hmm | 15:04 |
| LucidFox | libtheora 1.1 is out | 15:04 |
| slytherin | LucidFox: Great, But we won't get it in karmic. :-( | 15:11 |
| slytherin | LucidFox: The 1.1 release is API/ABI compatible, so theoretically there should be no problem in pulling it in karmic. :-) | 15:16 |
| lamalex | Hey, does anyone know anything about intltool? It's failing with a strange error Ican't figure out | 15:52 |
| lamalex | Invalid [] range "F-8" in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/[encoding: UTF-8 <-- HERE ] | 15:52 |
| lamalex | at /usr/bin/intltool-update line 321, <FILE> line 1. | 15:52 |
| randomaction | apparently it thinks [encoding: UTF-8] is a regex, try escaping brackets with \ | 15:58 |
| lamalex | the weird part is it works on other files | 15:59 |
| lamalex | which when I compare the hexdumps, are identical up until the point where files start getting listed | 15:59 |
| lamalex | I can't figure out why it's trying to read that as a regexp | 15:59 |
| randomaction | it must be confused by "m/" part which looks like a start of regex match | 16:00 |
| lamalex | there's no m/ in the file | 16:00 |
| lamalex | http://paste2.org/p/437195 | 16:00 |
| lamalex | randomaction: ^ | 16:00 |
| randomaction | i see | 16:01 |
| lamalex | I thought maybe there was a hidden char or something, but hexdump says not the case | 16:02 |
| AnAnt | Hello, how can I check if a package is in build-dep of any other package in Ubuntu ? | 16:38 |
| zooko | Morning folks! (UTC-6) | 16:53 |
| zooko | Good day over there in, I'm guessing, UTC-5, mterry. | 16:57 |
| zooko | Would you please look at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/tahoe-lafs ? I believe it is ready to be uploaded into the Karmic Queue. | 16:57 |
| jmarsden | AnAnt: apt-cache depends PACKAGENAME | 16:58 |
| jmarsden | AnAnt: Ah, wait, that is for depends not build-depends... | 16:58 |
| geser | AnAnt: reverse-build-depends (from ubuntu-dev-tools) or using grep-dctrl | 17:05 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| Lichi | Hi, can someone help me with creating .deb files? | 17:15 |
| Lichi | Hello? | 17:16 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 17:17 |
| Lichi | I was told to ask here, help would be nice | 17:17 |
| AnAnt | geser: I need dpkg-src lines in sources.list for that ? | 17:18 |
| sistpoty|work | AnAnt: yes | 17:19 |
| sistpoty|work | !packagingguide | 17:20 |
| geser | yes, as only the Sources.gz files contain this information | 17:20 |
| ubottu | The packaging guide is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide - See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages for information on getting a package integrated into Ubuntu - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment - See also !backports | 17:20 |
| sistpoty|work | Lichi: ^^ | 17:20 |
| Lichi | thanks | 17:30 |
| AnAnt | LP 427562 | 17:31 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427562 in tablelist "tklib already contain tablelist package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427562 | 17:31 |
| AnAnt | LP 436733 | 17:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436733 in obextool "Depend on tklib instead of tablelist" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436733 | 17:40 |
| AnAnt | I attached a patch to LP 436733 | 17:41 |
| AnAnt | should I set it to confirmed ? | 17:42 |
| fabrice_sp | AnAnt, you should at least subscribe u-u-s :-) | 17:44 |
| AnAnt | I don't have a Source.gz (and I have a low bandwidth internet), can someone run: "reverse-build-depends tablelist" for me please ? | 17:45 |
| AnAnt | fabrice_sp: ok | 17:45 |
| fabrice_sp | AnAnt, I've run it and it doesn't give any package | 17:46 |
| fabrice_sp | should I download something first? | 17:47 |
| AnAnt | fabrice_sp: thanks ! I just wanted to make sure | 17:47 |
| AnAnt | fabrice_sp: can you mention this in LP 427562 please ? | 17:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427562 in tablelist "tklib already contain tablelist package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427562 | 17:47 |
| fabrice_sp | ok. I'll paste the result | 17:48 |
| fabrice_sp | output, I mean | 17:48 |
| AnAnt | ok | 17:49 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 17:49 |
| fabrice_sp | ;-) | 17:49 |
| AnAnt | so should I set LP 436733 to confirmed, since I attached a debdiff patch to it ? | 17:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436733 in obextool "Depend on tklib instead of tablelist" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436733 | 17:49 |
| AnAnt | bddebian: Hello | 17:52 |
| fabrice_sp | AnAnt, better to confirmed, yes, but it doesn't really matter | 17:56 |
| fabrice_sp | it matters for sync requests | 17:56 |
| bddebian | Hi AnAnt, what do you need this time? :) | 17:59 |
| fabrice_sp | Hey bddebian :-) | 17:59 |
| fabrice_sp | TheMuso, persia could you add me to the u-u-s team please? | 17:59 |
| AnAnt | bddebian: remember tablelist that was removed from Debian | 18:02 |
| AnAnt | bddebian: it was removed because it was already included in tklib, so, I am trying to remove it from Ubuntu too, so I filed those bugs: LP 436733 & LP 427562 | 18:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436733 in obextool "Depend on tklib instead of tablelist" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436733 | 18:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427562 in tablelist "tklib already contain tablelist package" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427562 | 18:04 |
| fabrice_sp | Can some MOTU unsubscribe u-u-s from Bug #406574 ? | 18:06 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 406574 in gjots2 "please update gjots2 to 2.3.8 (complete patch included)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/406574 | 18:06 |
| Laney | done and done | 18:08 |
| Laney | arent you in uus? | 18:08 |
| wrapster | Guys I have a curious question... When i apt-get <pkg> supposing it says dependency1 is missing install it first.. is there anyway that I can actually hardcode it into <pkg> so that when i apt-get <pkg> it will first check whether the dependency is satisfied if not it will automatically download it and then proceed with the <pkg> installation? | 18:09 |
| AnAnt | ?! | 18:10 |
| fabrice_sp | Laney, no: it seems new MOTU are not automatically added to u-u-s (that's why I pinged persian and TheMuso before) | 18:10 |
| Laney | yeah that's right | 18:10 |
| AnAnt | wrapster: that's what apt-get does ! | 18:10 |
| wrapster | AnAnt: one moment ... | 18:10 |
| wrapster | i'll give you a real world eg | 18:10 |
| AnAnt | brb | 18:12 |
| wrapster | AnAnt: what i wanted to say was... supposing i want to dpkg-buildpackage binutils.. it complains that tcl8.4 is necessary as some library that binutils checks for is a part of tcl8.4 ... so is there a way I can actually just say build bintuils and when the dpkg-buildpackage is running can it check and install tcl if not present? | 18:25 |
| fabrice_sp | wrapster: this is what Build-depends is for in debian/control) | 18:29 |
| wrapster | oh so supposing i put tcl in the control file that should do the trick? | 18:31 |
| nicklas_ | huj | 18:32 |
| sharms | If anyone gets a chance can anyone review LP 436082 -- I added patch that resolves FTBFS | 18:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436082 in minicom "Fix FTBFS" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436082 | 18:36 |
| joaopinto | wrapster, you don't apt-get <pkg>, you apt-get install <pkg>, and that should not tell you that a dependency is missing, if it does, then you are missing a dependency for that app on your repository | 18:36 |
| joaopinto | so, presumably that dependency is already listed on debian/control | 18:36 |
| wrapster | joaopinto: yeah your right.. i corrected my mistake.. the error was during the build-package | 18:36 |
| joaopinto | ah ok | 18:37 |
| wrapster | i meant when im building the pkg from source if i get an error saying a dependency is missing then if i add that into the control file... will that be sufficient? | 18:37 |
| fabrice_sp | can some other MOTU have a look at Bug #406574. I don't know how to answer :-/ | 18:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 406574 in gjots2 "please update gjots2 to 2.3.8 (complete patch included)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/406574 | 18:41 |
| fabrice_sp | (to a pissed off contributor, I mean) | 18:41 |
| ubuntu_giant | Grrr...I'm having a problem with updating a package given the following tutorial (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate), but the error output tripped pastebin's spam filter. | 19:09 |
| ubuntu_giant | Maybe I could paste the last few lines? | 19:10 |
| ubuntu_giant | Is it okay if I paste the last few lines? | 19:15 |
| * ubuntu_giant sometimes wonders if anyone is alive in these chat rooms. :( | 19:23 | |
| AnAnt | ubuntu_giant: so do I | 19:24 |
| geser | depends on the day and the time of the day | 19:24 |
| geser | don't forget that it's friday evening in europe so some people do other activities instead of IRC | 19:25 |
| ubuntu_giant | I've been following the tutorial at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate, and I'm having some trouble, but pastebin won't let me paste my error output because it's supposedly spam. Would it be alright if I paste the last few lines? Thanks. | 19:26 |
| geser | based on the actual activity here I guess nobody would object | 19:26 |
| ubuntu_giant | Cool, I got it...it's not all the output, but enough. http://pastebin.com/d7c9c47a2 | 19:27 |
| geser | did you use dch to edit the changelog? | 19:28 |
| ubuntu_giant | Yes. | 19:29 |
| geser | can you pastebin the changelog around line 13-15? | 19:29 |
| ubuntu_giant | I followed the steps exactly (except for my name and email, of course). | 19:29 |
| RoAkSoAx | fabrice_sp, congrats on your motuship :) | 19:29 |
| ubuntu_giant | Sorry, I'm sort of new to this packaging thing. What would the changelog be? | 19:30 |
| geser | debian/changelog, and please pastebin around the first 20 lines (as it complains about line 13 and 15) | 19:32 |
| ubuntu_giant | Sorry about that. :( http://pastebin.com/d50065e93 | 19:34 |
| geser | I assume it's about line 3: each line needs to be indented with at least 2 spaces (besides the header (like line 1 or 7) or the footer (like line 5 or 18) | 19:36 |
| fabrice_sp | RoAkSoAx, thanks ;-) | 19:37 |
| sebner | geser: evidently not us *cough* | 19:38 |
| geser | sebner: I'm gaming now a little and only watch IRC now at then :) | 19:39 |
| sebner | geser: heh nice, lucky you didn't write "go out or social activities" ^^ | 19:39 |
| === Cut-R changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: BANDES DE PEDOPHILES VIOLEURS MANIPULATEURS MENTEURS FILS DE PUTES ENCULÉS TROUS DU CUL MAGOUILLEURS ABUSEURS D'ENFANTS !!! | ||
| fabrice_sp | WTF? | 19:40 |
| === slangasek changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Karmic Feature Freeze is in effect now! | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://is.gd/2y76G | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck | latest rebuild failures: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20090909-karmic.html | ||
| Pici | I reported that guy earlier... | 19:41 |
| sebner | slangasek: thx for changing it back | 19:41 |
| fabrice_sp | thanks slangasek | 19:41 |
| slangasek | sure | 19:41 |
| ubuntu_giant | geser: Sorry, but indenting the lines seemed to make it worse. :( | 19:41 |
| slangasek | somebody reported him to the freenode ops? | 19:41 |
| geser | ubuntu_giant: worse? you only indented line 3, right? | 19:42 |
| slangasek | (preventative measure; someone please remind me to remove the topic lock later) | 19:42 |
| ubuntu_giant | Oh, no. Sorry, overread the line 3 thing. | 19:43 |
| ubuntu_giant | Read the rest of the post. :) | 19:43 |
| ubuntu_giant | It says it's a gpg error, so I wouldn't think the changelog would have anything to do with it. | 19:45 |
| geser | the gpg error you can ignore for now (unless you plan to upload the package somewhere) | 19:46 |
| geser | it happens when your name in line 5 doesn't match one of your gpg key uid so debuild can't figure out itself which key to use | 19:47 |
| geser | you can use the -k option to tell which key to use for signing | 19:47 |
| ubuntu_giant | I redid the changing line 3, but I still get the error. | 19:50 |
| geser | the same error? | 19:50 |
| ubuntu_giant | No, a different error, actually. I'll post it in a sec... | 19:50 |
| ubuntu_giant | http://pastebin.com/d1e38bd5 | 19:52 |
| geser | I see only the signing error, which you can ignore untill you want to upload it somewhere | 19:53 |
| tzafrir_laptop | hi, I'm trying to build -modules packages from zaptel-source in a pbuilder | 19:54 |
| tzafrir_laptop | I made a dummy package that builds them. It basically works on Debian: | 19:56 |
| ubuntu_giant | Cool...spam filter didn't trip: http://pastebin.com/d701ad710 | 19:56 |
| tzafrir_laptop | http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-voip/tools/builder/zaptel-modules/debian/ | 19:56 |
| tzafrir_laptop | This package is a helper package. It builds, but does not get into the repository | 19:58 |
| tzafrir_laptop | I'm trying to build it with hardy, and I see two errors when pbuilder tries to get dependencies: | 19:58 |
| tzafrir_laptop | zaptel-source: Depends: module-assistant (>= 0.8.1) which is a virtual package | 19:59 |
| tzafrir_laptop | pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all which is a virtual package. | 19:59 |
| tzafrir_laptop | Now I figure that I'll have to adjust the kernel version, and maybe not even use the -all | 20:00 |
| tzafrir_laptop | (right now I can live with that, as I build for i386 only) | 20:00 |
| tzafrir_laptop | But why do I get that message about module-assistant ? | 20:01 |
| CardinalFang | Hi all. I'm trying to sort out splitting a package. I have "foo" that I split into "foo" and "foo-bin". "foo" must depend on "foo-bin", and it shouldn't be possible to install old "foo" and new "foo-bin" at the same time. How is this done? I hear "Breaks" isn't supported yet, is it "foo-bin Conflicts (<< split_version)"? | 20:02 |
| CardinalFang | "foo-bin Conflicts: foo (<< split_version)"? | 20:03 |
| sistpoty | persia: mind adding me to ubuntu-universe-sponsors? (finally, I find some time to do sponsoring at least here and then again :)) | 20:08 |
| tzafrir_laptop | hmmm.. NM. | 20:13 |
| ubuntu_giant | Anybody on updating a debian package? http://pastebin.com/d701ad710 | 20:19 |
| sistpoty | ubuntu_giant: looks like you've got an error in debian/changelog (from a small glimpse only) | 20:31 |
| * sistpoty reboots for new kernel | 20:32 | |
| Laney | haha | 20:33 |
| Laney | I get a warning if XS-Python-Version is there | 20:33 |
| Laney | change for pyversions, get another warning | 20:33 |
| * Laney head in hands | 20:33 | |
| Laney | jbernard_: I just uploaded u-d-t | 20:43 |
| Laney | thanks for your fix | 20:43 |
| bdrung | do i need a ffe for theme packages? | 20:45 |
| sharms | Laney: Can you look at LP 436082 | 20:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436082 in minicom "Fix FTBFS" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/436082 | 20:49 |
| Laney | sharms: in a bit | 20:49 |
| sharms | thanks | 20:49 |
| lamalex | Hey guys, does anyone know about intltool? I'm still struggling with this regexp issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/intltool/+bug/436671 | 21:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 436671 in intltool "intltool fails on reportedly bad regexp" [Undecided,New] | 21:24 |
| ScottK | Laney: Use XS-Python-Version. It is at least common between both python-support an python-central. | 21:35 |
| Laney | ScottK: Alright I should revert that in u-d-t | 21:35 |
| Laney | cdbs shouldn't give that warning | 21:35 |
| ScottK | Laney: Not a big deal. Just put it in bzr for next time. | 21:36 |
| Laney | yeah | 21:36 |
| ScottK | Laney: Agreed. | 21:36 |
| Laney | pushed | 21:38 |
| jbernard_ | Laney: awesome, no problmem | 21:39 |
| Zhenech | hyperair, geany broken with new libvte? | 22:28 |
| ScottK | I'm pretty well convinced that the design theory behind the most recent LP release was, "Making useful information harder to find." | 22:54 |
| zooko | Any MOTUs who could look at Tahoe-LAFS? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/tahoe-lafs | 22:55 |
| hyperair | Zhenech: is it? wfm | 23:37 |
| Zhenech | hyperair, on sid it is | 23:38 |
| hyperair | hmm is that so | 23:38 |
| Zhenech | 0:03 evgeni@atae ~ % geany | 23:38 |
| Zhenech | zsh: segmentation fault geany | 23:38 |
| hyperair | ouch | 23:38 |
| Zhenech | gdb yells about libvte | 23:38 |
| hyperair | hmm | 23:38 |
| hyperair | i wonder if recompiling would work.. | 23:38 |
| Zhenech | I bet | 23:39 |
| hyperair | iirc geany uses some dlopen black magic with libvte | 23:39 |
| Zhenech | building :) | 23:43 |
| Zhenech | this problem exists with gedit too :) | 23:43 |
| bobbo | Hello everyone! | 23:47 |
| Zhenech | hyperair, nope, rebuild does not help | 23:49 |
| hyperair | Zhenech: figures. | 23:51 |
| hyperair | Zhenech: file a bug with a gdb trace please | 23:51 |
| Zhenech | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548350 | 23:52 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 548350 in gnome-terminal "segmentation fault" [Grave,Open] | 23:52 |
| hyperair | ah | 23:52 |
| Zhenech | there it is | 23:52 |
| hyperair | is it in geany? | 23:52 |
| Zhenech | nah, libvte9 | 23:52 |
| Zhenech | geany just using it and crashing | 23:52 |
| hyperair | no i meant is the bug set to affect geany? | 23:52 |
| hyperair | no wait, libvte is the one that broke eh | 23:53 |
| hyperair | not geany? | 23:53 |
| hyperair | well then that's fine | 23:53 |
| hyperair | wait for it to be fixed =p | 23:53 |
| Zhenech | funnily bug speaks about broken xfce-terminal | 23:54 |
| Zhenech | but mine still works XD | 23:54 |
| Zhenech | memo: dont close it the next couple o daus | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!