/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/25/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asacfta: upload is not there yet00:00
ftadid you get a reject?00:01
asacBUGabundo: what is working?00:02
BUGabundo3G00:02
BUGabundonm00:02
asacBUGabundo: can you see APs?00:02
asaci mean: did you disable wireless00:02
asacor move somewhere where you can see APs00:02
asacor is it just magically fixed?00:02
BUGabundoyes killswitch00:02
asacok00:02
asacBUGabundo: i marked your bug dupe of a master that had a bunch of bugs00:03
asaccan you confirm that killswitch worksaround? and maybe also confirm that being in proximity of APs also fixes it?00:03
asacmaybe confirm that it still crashes at all with killswitch off00:03
asactoo00:03
asacbug 43606100:03
asacis the master00:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 436061 in network-manager-applet "nm-applet assert failure: ERROR:applet.c:537:applet_menu_add_items_top_and_fold_sorted_helper: assertion failed: (items)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43606100:03
BUGabundo(trying )disabiling killswithc00:04
asacBUGabundo: yes. then wait a bit and and click the applet00:04
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
BUGabundoback.00:05
BUGabundoI guess that anwsers your question asac00:05
BUGabundoasac: sooo which bug do you need me to CONFIRM?00:06
asacBUGabundo: the one above00:07
asac01:03 < asac> bug 43606100:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 436061 in network-manager-applet "nm-applet assert failure: ERROR:applet.c:537:applet_menu_add_items_top_and_fold_sorted_helper: assertion failed: (items)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43606100:07
BUGabundook00:07
BUGabundoIF FF opens, I'll confirm it00:07
BUGabundo:)00:07
BUGabundo$ firefox-3.700:07
BUGabundoSegmentation fault (core dumped)00:07
ftaasac, i think you got some reject mails, right?00:07
asacnope00:08
asacnothing00:08
asacseems i am getting a bunch of mails00:12
asacnow00:12
asacnetwork-manager-applet_0.8~a~git.20090923t220421.1ac8ffd-0ubuntu1~nmt1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0.8~a~git.20090923t220421.1ac8ffd-0ubuntu1~nmt1 <=00:13
asac+0.8~a~git.20090923t220421.1ac8ffd-0ubuntu2~nmt100:13
asacfta: ^^00:13
ftadtchen, is there a way to teach openarena to not use p-a, or what broken sound system it's using? or the otherway around (blacklist o-a in p-a or something)00:14
ftaasac, hm00:14
asacthere is something wrong00:15
asacbzr is at ubuntu400:15
asacor something00:15
dtchenfta: pasuspender -- openareaexecutable00:16
ftaasac, strange. probably a bug in my bot, but i can't see clearly what happened00:17
BUGabundoasac: no one seems to like the heart shapes :D00:17
ftaasac, i know i have a bug when the tip of the packaging is a release00:17
ftadtchen, thanks, trying that..00:18
ftadtchen, nope, no sound at all00:20
ftadtchen, and it kills my music00:20
dtchenfta: right, it will suspend everything using PA00:25
dtchenfta: did you check your mixer volumes while in OA?00:25
ftanot sure how to do that..00:26
dtchenfta: e.g., alsamixer00:31
asacfta: its UNRELEASED00:34
ftadifferent bug then. i'll have a closer look00:36
ftaasac, i think it's the same bug, it's not about UNRELEASED but about the packaging branch being ahead of the last .daily00:44
asacis there anything one can do?00:45
asacor manual upload with a version that will not kill the bot later on?00:45
asacwhats the difference if the branch is ahead?00:47
asacthe merge fails different?00:47
ftano, i just have a bug to fix00:48
ftai'm not even considering that the packaging branch could be ahead :P just lower or equal00:50
ftai need unit tests here00:50
ftathe bug is in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~fta/%2Bjunk/ppa-scripts/annotate/head%3A/sync-ppa.pl#L50000:54
ftamost probably in the else block l52100:54
ftaor 54100:55
ftaor both :S00:56
asacat least that means that my latest commits will be in that upload ;)01:04
ftapff, i have to call dpkg --compare-versions01:18
asacthat makes sense ;)01:21
asacassuming you want to compare deb versions01:21
ftatentative fix http://paste.ubuntu.com/277510/01:21
ftaTARGET=0.8~a~git.20090923t220421.1ac8ffd-0ubuntu401:28
ftabetter but still incorrect01:28
ftait should be u5.. i think01:28
ftahm, no, it's UNRELEASED, so u4 is right01:29
ftaasac, does network-manager-applet_0.8~a~git.20090923t220421.1ac8ffd-0ubuntu4~nmt1_source.changes look correct?01:32
ftai'm tired01:32
asacyes01:38
asacfta:01:38
asacits UNRELEASED ubuntu401:38
asacfta: maybe make one more dry run01:39
asacand then i might have committed something else ;) in two minutes01:39
asacone final test build01:40
asacand quick check of build01:40
asacthen i have everything i want to get in for beta i hope01:40
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=10949#c1801:40
ftahttps://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+ppa-packages01:43
ftai hope i didn't introduce a regression for everything else01:44
asacok01:49
asaccommitted01:49
asacpush ;)01:49
asacits late enough01:49
ftatoo late, will be in the next run at 7am01:50
asacok01:51
asacgood enough01:51
ftagasp, i didn't do much upload this cycle: https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+uploaded-packages01:59
=== juanb_ is now known as juanb
eagles0513875morning07:39
=== asac_ is now known as asac
micahgping dpm re bug 43326209:53
ubottuLaunchpad bug 433262 in firefox-3.5 "Firefox can not display Chinese menu, and menu bar are in English!" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43326209:53
eagles0513875mornign michag j/w are you a kde user or gnome user09:56
micahgeagles0513875: xfce :D09:57
eagles0513875doh09:57
eagles0513875i have a nasty bug with kde that i need help debugging regarding unmet dependencies after yesterdays updates :(09:57
micahghave you tried #kubuntu?09:58
dpmthanks for the heads up micahg, I'll talk to ArneGoetje about this when he's back in a few hours09:59
micahgthanks dpm09:59
dpm#kubuntu-devel would be best ^10:00
micahgeagles0513875: ^^^10:00
eagles0513875dpm: banned from there :(10:00
dpmuh? why banned?10:01
eagles0513875for wanting to contribute but not knowing how to do certain things10:01
eagles0513875question then becomes how on earth am i supposed to learn10:01
eagles0513875this is the only channel so far where i am learning anything10:02
gnomezahi, fresh install of ubuntu-netbook-remix 9.04 with updates, firefox (3.0.14) bookmark manager seems very broken. Anyone suggestions?10:05
gnomezaer s/Anyone/Any/10:06
gnomezaand I notice a large number of places.sqlite-*.corrupt files in the profile directory10:11
gnomeza(this is a brand new clean profile, then attempted import of bookmarks from html)10:12
ftakenvandine, new gwibber crashed not long after a reboot. crash in webkit10:48
ftanot sure if i should file a bug10:53
eagles0513875hey fta11:43
eagles0513875asac: im going nuts here bud :(11:57
=== jtv1 is now known as jtv
eagles0513875im back in business today13:32
jonathan__hey asac its eagles051387514:03
jonathan__we redoing all extensions with devscripts 0.16? also do i need to create a new changelog or just update the entry that i added there?14:04
bdrungjonathan__: yes. if the package were already released, then you have to create a new one (dch -i) otherwise update it14:07
jonathan__well mine is still unreleased its bindwood which im working on14:08
bdrungjonathan__: k, then just update it14:09
jonathan__ok brb on my proper nick.14:10
|eagles0513875|bdrung: made one minor modification regarding the wiki the title of the table so we know when we start workign on stuff for lucid we can distinguish between the karmic table and lucid table14:15
bdrungeagles0513875: do you find the bug in: "9.04 Karmic Koala"?14:16
|eagles0513875|bdrung: will revert14:18
bdrungeagles0513875: revert?14:19
|eagles0513875|the title of the table to the way it was before14:19
|eagles0513875|bdrung: im trying to push the change i made to the control file in regards to mozilla-devscripts being version 0.15  but its showing that it hasnt been updated to 0.16 and im also getting an error which says error working tree  has uncommited chanes. use --no-strict to force the push14:21
|eagles0513875|should i force the push or not?14:21
bdrungeagles0513875: i only want to say that 9.04 != Karmic Koala14:21
|eagles0513875|bah sry meant 9.1014:21
|eagles0513875|got numbers coming outa my ears lol14:22
bdrungeagles0513875: which branch?14:22
|eagles0513875|my branch of bind wood14:22
|eagles0513875|https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~eagles051387/firefox-extensions/bindwood.ubuntu.lp42563114:23
|eagles0513875|brb need to get on the right nic14:23
bdrungeagles0513875: you can remove the branch and push it again14:24
eagles0513875thats better14:25
eagles0513875ok it wont matter though if i have the 0.15 version of devscripts installed cuz that is what is still in the repos14:25
bdrungeagles0513875: grab it from there: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mozilla-devscripts.html14:25
bdrung(or wait some days)14:26
eagles0513875bdrung: will purge what i have installed14:26
eagles0513875bdrung: do i just package the devscripts source then install it14:30
=== cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox
bdrungyes or simply install http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts_0.16_all.deb14:31
eagles0513875whats the command to package it again14:33
bdrungbzr bd14:34
eagles0513875its complaining about the dev scripts not being a branch14:35
bdrungthan use debuild14:39
eagles0513875got the deb package :)14:40
eagles0513875bdrung:  :( i deleted my old branch but i still cannot push the fix to bzr :(14:41
eagles0513875bdrung: last question do i have to run bzr commit first before pushing ?14:45
bdrungeagles0513875: yes15:05
ftakenvandine, i see you've committed some "remember position" fixes, does that include the position of the scrollbar? it's annoying to be sent to the 1st message by auto refreshes over and over again while reading15:06
kenvandinenot that15:06
kenvandinei have no idea how to handle that15:06
kenvandineright now we refresh the message list15:07
kenvandinefta, i agree that is annoying15:07
ftait started with gwibber 2, i don't remember it was doing that before15:07
kenvandinefta, also... your webkit crash15:07
kenvandineit did it in gwibber 115:07
kenvandineand before that15:07
kenvandineit has always erked me :)15:07
kenvandinei am not getting a webkit crash15:07
kenvandinefta, any ideas?15:08
ftajust got a crash this morning15:08
kenvandineonly one?15:09
ftayes15:11
ftaTitle: gwibber crashed with SIGSEGV in WTF::RefCountedBase::derefBase()15:16
ftahttp://paste.ubuntu.com/277987/15:17
ftakenvandine, ^^15:18
kenvandinefta, which theme are you using?15:20
ftaused to be darkroom, but it's now custom (darkroom + human, instead of humanity)15:21
kenvandinei mean gwibber theme15:22
kenvandinethemes work now15:22
kenvandineso i wonder if that is why the crash just surfaced15:22
ftadark-gwilouche15:23
ftadoesn't seem to work for me15:23
kenvandineyou can't change it?15:24
kenvandinelike to default15:25
kenvandineoh... maybe that is fixed since r44715:25
ftai have 44915:26
kenvandine45015:27
kenvandineis where that was fixed15:27
kenvandineso15:27
kenvandinethat isn't the problem15:27
jdstrandasac: hi! would you mind looking at my merge requests for firefox-3.5? two are profiling issues which would be nice to fix, but the one from yesterday is quite important I think (fixes bug #436221)15:27
ubottuLaunchpad bug 436221 in firefox-3.5 "apparmor profile is not disabled on upgrade from jaunty firefox-3.5" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43622115:27
kenvandineso i don't think anything changed in gwibber that should cause that crash15:27
kenvandinefta, are you using a snapshot of webkit or anything?15:27
ftanope15:27
ftalibwebkit-1.0-2 v 1.1.14-1ubuntu115:28
asacjdstrand: i am on vac today ;)15:30
kenvandinesame here15:30
kenvandineasac!15:30
asacjdstrand: beta material?15:30
asachi kenvandine15:30
kenvandinei am very sad you are on vacation!15:30
asacthats not fair ;)15:30
asacits just one day :)15:30
kenvandinewe desperately need to get a bindwood upload done... and nobody knows how15:30
kenvandinehehe15:30
asacyou cannot miss me soo much15:30
kenvandineasac, you know i love you man!15:30
asackenvandine: what is the problem?15:31
asackenvandine: 1st. reply the last upload on the ~ubuntu-dev branch ;)15:31
kenvandinewell the packaging branch doesn't have the latest upload15:31
asac/reply/apply15:31
kenvandineand... there isn't any tarballs, so how do we update the source?15:31
kenvandinemerging from trunk removes the packaging15:32
kenvandineso we could manually merge15:32
kenvandinebut that seems like we are doing something wrong15:32
asackenvandine: 2nd. bzr merge /path/to/upstream; dch -v0.NEWVERSION-0ubuntu1 -DUNRELEASED15:32
asackenvandine: removes the packaging?15:32
kenvandineyes15:33
asackenvandine: probably because you removed the packaging on trunk?15:33
kenvandinethe merge removes the debian dir15:33
* kenvandine didn't15:33
kenvandinebut i haven't touched it :)15:33
kenvandinewe can manually merge that part15:33
asaci assume the packaging was on trunk at some point. then it was removed, so the merge would do that15:33
asacso you do bzr merge ...15:33
asacthen you do bzr diff debian/15:33
asacbzr diff debian/  | patch -p1 -R15:33
asacdch -v0.NEWVERSION-0ubuntu1 -DUNRELEASED "New upstream snapshot ..."15:34
asacvi .bzr-builddeb/default.conf -> fix revision15:34
asacto find revision do: bzr log -l1 --show-ids /path/to/upstream | grep revision-id15:34
asacthen debcommit15:34
asacdch -r15:34
asacdebcommit -r15:34
asac;)15:34
kenvandinedo we want to call this 0.3?15:36
kenvandinewhoops15:36
kenvandineasac, nm that15:36
asackenvandine: you ewant to call it with a bzr revision from upstream15:37
asacdont use bzr but rather bzrX or something15:37
kenvandineany specific reason?15:37
kenvandineoh15:37
asacif you ever want to build it on < karmic ;)15:37
asacbzr-builddeb has a bug15:37
asacit doesnt honour default.conf revision if it finds bzrNUMBER15:37
asacin changelog version15:37
asacit would just assume that the number is the right upstream revision15:37
asacwhich is of course wrong on the ubuntu branch15:37
asaci think its fixed in karmic ;)15:38
asac_think_15:38
kenvandineok so we can't call it 0.3-0ubuntu1?15:38
asackenvandine: is it a release?15:38
kenvandineyes15:38
asacif its a release you should use the tag to merge15:38
kenvandinethat is the plan15:38
asacand also use that tag as upstream-revision in default.conf15:38
asacrather than the long revid15:38
kenvandineok15:38
asacotherwise just rever to the bzr revision in the version lke15:39
asac0.3+bzr111-0ubuntu115:39
asacrefer15:39
asaci would think the tag approach is better15:39
* asac hopes that merges remember tags15:40
* asac really hopes ... otherwise EWTF15:40
* kenvandine waits for them to tag the upstream branch...15:43
asackenvandine: for tags the revisionspec prefix is tag: rather than revid: (in default.conf)15:45
kenvandineok15:45
jdstrandasac: didn't know you were on vacation, sorry. the profiling bugs were submitted before beta, and I think they are worth it. bug #436221 really needs to be fixed otherwise as soon as a jaunty user gets 3.5.3 then upgrades to karmic, the profile is in enforce mode15:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 436221 in firefox-3.5 "apparmor profile is not disabled on upgrade from jaunty firefox-3.5" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43622115:45
asacjdstrand: isnt that a fortunate bug ;) ... getting more testing?15:46
asacjdstrand: one question. do you allow to read everything in /usr/share /usr/lib ... or how do you allow extensions?15:46
jdstrandheh, well, I'd rather the testing happen in devel rather than release15:47
asacbeta is not release ;)15:47
asacbut yeah15:47
asaci can upload a merge with just that fix on monday and then we can see if release team says ok ... makese sense?15:47
jdstrandregarding /usr/lib, yes that is available15:47
asacmost extensions live in /usr/share though15:48
jdstrand/usr/share is not in its entirety15:48
jdstrandbut I added better extensions support in one of those pending merges15:48
asaccan extension packages extend the firefox profile somehow?15:48
jdstrand  /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/** Uxr,15:48
jdstrand  /usr/lib/mozilla/extensions/** Uxr,15:48
jdstrand  /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/** Uxr,15:48
jdstrand  /usr/lib/xullrunner-addons/extensions/** Uxr,15:48
jdstrand  @{HOME}/.mozilla/**/extensions/** mixr,15:48
asacjdstrand: thats not really helping i would think15:48
asacjdstrand: most likely firefox resolves the links at some point15:48
asacand then accesses them directly15:49
asacand we only put links in the /usr locations15:49
asac(the profile one is good)15:49
* kenvandine shakes fist at bzr format 2a15:49
asacif your branch was updated to a non default format shake fist at whoever did that ;)15:50
asacthats not nice for those with older bzr installs;)15:50
kenvandineyeah15:50
kenvandineasac, it has been happening often now15:51
kenvandinelots of folks seem to want it, like pitti :)15:51
jdstrandasac: re extensions and /usr/share-- what I added may not fix everything, but it does fix langpacks15:52
jdstrandasac: I can add '/usr/share/** mixr,' though15:53
jdstrandasac: that would maintain the integrity of the profile, and should allow most stuff to work, assuming they don't call out to stuff in /usr/bin/* or something15:53
asacjdstrand: is it possible to do something like /usr/share/***/[install.rdf]/*15:54
asac;)15:54
asaci mean ... whitelist all subdir that have a install.rdf ;)?15:54
eagles0513875morning asac :)15:54
asachi15:54
jdstrandasac: otherwise, we need to add explicit rules for each extension like we do with plugins15:54
asacjdstrand: cant we ship kind of extensions for a profile in packages?15:54
asacjdstrand: imo that would be good feature ;)15:55
jdstrandasac: all exensions have 'install.rdf' in their path?15:55
asaclike: packages can whitelist themselve.15:55
asacjdstrand: yes15:55
jdstrandasac: we don't have a .d style of includes for the apparmor parser atm15:55
asacjdstrand: no ... not in their path15:55
asacjdstrand: they have a install.rdf file in their top level dir15:55
asacso find -name \*.install.rdf -> and then stripping off the install.rdf15:55
asacjdstrand: yeah. so unless you can do something like the install.rdf magic we shouldprobably allow /usr/share15:56
eagles0513875asac: im having issues pushing updated versions of bindwood to bzr :(15:56
asacand hope that /usr/share is properly confined15:56
jdstrandasac: I could do /usr/share/**/install.rdf/** ..., but I can detect if install.rdf is in the path as use that as the directory15:56
asaci mean for writing there15:56
asac/usr/share/**/install.rdf/../**15:56
jdstrandasac: hmm, I don't know if that would work...15:57
asaceagles0513875: you will figure .... first steps often take a bit longer15:57
jdstrandasac: do extensions need 'x' or just 'r'?15:57
asacusually just r15:57
asacthere might be extensions that have an executable15:58
asacbut those are rare i think15:58
eagles0513875asac: :( at least i got kde fixed15:58
* jdstrand just realized that adblock-plus is working just fine without having to adjust the profile any more than it already is15:58
jdstrandlet me see if I am pulling /usr/share from an abstraction...15:59
asacjdstrand: check strace ... there proably is a copy in the profile15:59
asacor something15:59
asacor we are in luck and it doesnt do realpath anywhere15:59
jdstrandasac: apparmor realpath's everything15:59
jdstrands/'//15:59
asachmm15:59
kenvandineasac, so when i get them to push the tag to trunk, what do i do with my branch?15:59
jdstrand(it has to to enforce security)15:59
eagles0513875asac:  i keep getting error working tree /home/jonathan/bindwood.ubuntu has uncommited changes use --no-strict-t to force the push O_O what am i forgetting15:59
asacjdstrand: dpkg -L adblock-plus ... check where the real files are15:59
asackenvandine: i gave all the instructions above16:00
kenvandineasac, just subscribe universe sponsors with a link to my branch?16:00
asac16:33 < asac> i assume the packaging was on trunk at some point. then it was removed, so the merge would do that16:00
asac16:33 < asac> so you do bzr merge ...16:00
asac16:33 < asac> then you do bzr diff debian/16:00
asac16:33 < asac> bzr diff debian/  | patch -p1 -R16:00
asac16:34 < asac> dch -v0.NEWVERSION-0ubuntu1 -DUNRELEASED "New upstream snapshot ..."16:00
asac16:34 < asac> vi .bzr-builddeb/default.conf -> fix revision16:00
asac16:34 < asac> to find revision do: bzr log -l1 --show-ids /path/to/upstream | grep revision-id16:00
asac16:34 < asac> then debcommit16:00
asac16:34 < asac> dch -r16:00
asackenvandine: ^16:00
kenvandineyeah i did all that :)16:00
asac16:34 < asac> debcommit -r16:00
asackenvandine: oh you are done16:00
asac16:34 < asac> ;)16:00
asacinstead of the revision-id you just use tag:YOURTAG in default.conf16:00
asackenvandine: so first, check that the proper orig.tar.gz gets produced16:00
asacand that diff.gz is clean16:01
asace.g. only debian/ files16:01
eagles0513875any idea as to my issue asac :(16:01
kenvandineoh the tag can be from my branch?16:02
kenvandinenot upstream?16:02
asaceagles0513875: bzr help status ... bzr help diff16:02
asacuse those tools to identify your local changes16:02
kenvandinegetting them to merge into trunk takes time :/16:02
asackenvandine: the tag is from upstream16:02
kenvandineok16:02
asackenvandine: otherwise you can just pick the right revision-id as i described16:02
eagles0513875asac all i changed is the changelog and control16:02
kenvandineyour back on monday right?16:02
asacbut tag makes more sense if its not a snapshot but release16:02
asaceagles0513875: you will figure. read the error message. it tells you that you have uncommitted changes. fix that16:02
kenvandineslangasek has given the ok to upload on monday, so i can have it ready for you then16:03
asackenvandine: great. so once you have pushed ask for a merge against the ubuntu-dev branch16:03
asacand ping me16:03
asacinclude the bug that tracks this upload16:03
kenvandineok16:03
kenvandinethx!16:03
asac(we need at least one for release team)16:03
asacno problem16:03
asacok out again on vac16:03
kenvandinehave fun!16:04
eagles0513875:) ok there we go16:04
eagles0513875nub mistake16:05
jdstrandasac: oh heh16:06
jdstrandasac: /usr/** r,16:06
jdstrandasac: that is why adblock works16:07
asacallrighty16:08
jdstrandasac: so, let me refine the merge for the extensions. I'll remove 'Ux'16:08
jdstrandfor stuff in /usr/share/.../exensions16:08
jdstrandasac: then we can add specific rules for those extensions that require 'x'16:08
jdstrandasac: how does that sound?16:08
jdstrandasac: I figure we add those rules as they come up16:09
jdstrand(the 'x' rules)16:09
asacover and out16:11
eagles0513875humm16:12
jdstrandasac: committed16:13
eagles0513875can some one tell me using my branch of bindwood if it works for them since i updated it using 0.16 of devscripts16:14
eagles0513875for me i have a hunch that its not working on my system16:14
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
av`bdrung, do you have an example of an extension that ships an .xpi file?17:23
av`.xpi + m-d17:24
bdrungav`: adblock-plus (debian's git repo)17:24
av`ty17:24
av`bdrung, new m-d rocks17:36
bdrungav`: thanks17:37
av`thanks for the hard work on it17:37
bdrungav`: it should now throw usefull errors17:37
bdrungyw17:38
av`now it handles .xpi files17:38
av`which is something great17:38
bdrungcul8r17:39
av`bdrung, are unzip / zip still needed?17:47
av`should I add enhances / provides fields as well?17:48
av`bdrung, ^^17:50
jdstrandasac: hey. so slangasek considers bug #436221 a beta blocker18:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 436221 in firefox-3.5 "apparmor profile is not disabled on upgrade from jaunty firefox-3.5" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43622118:14
jdstrandasac: I realize you are on vacation though. If you'd like I can prepare an upload with just that fix, or all in ubuntu318:15
jdstrandasac: or all in ubuntu3 and all my merge requests18:15
jdstrandasac: let me know how you want me to proceed, if at all18:16
av`bdrung, how can I have a patch applied if I have an .xpi?18:19
av`bdrung, I mean it first apply the patch and it fails cause the .xpi is not yet untarred18:19
av`so my question is how can I get the patch applied after the .xpi being extracted?18:20
bdrungav`: if there are no unzip / zip in debian/rules, you do not need to depend on it20:13
bdrungav`: please add enhances / provides20:13
bdrungav`: simplest way to patch is to use a unzipped version20:14
bdrungav`: or you can use the "install/$(MOZ_EXTENSION_PKG)::" target _after_ the includes20:16
bdrungav`: something like: "cd $(TEMPDIR) && patch [...]"20:16
TLFhello20:40
TLFmay I ask, I'm trying to add the PPA repo, and I'm having trouble with the key, can anyone help me? Thanks :)20:40
BUGabundohowdy20:56
TLFhi BUGabundo20:56
TLFBUGabundo: do you know if the keyserver is working?20:56
BUGabundohi TLF20:59
BUGabundoAFAIK it was having some trouble last week20:59
BUGabundonot sure if it is up or down21:00
TLFI see, thanks21:00
TLFI'm trying to add the PPA mozilla repo21:00
TLFand I'm unable to add the key21:00
BUGabundoahh21:05
BUGabundosorry, can't help21:05
BUGabundonot my _thing_ :P21:05
micahgTLF: what command are you using?21:07
TLFmicahg: apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 247510BE21:08
TLFas root21:08
micahgthat should do it21:09
BUGabundowhy root?21:09
micahgBUGabundo: apt keys are stored in teh root keychain21:10
TLFBUGabundo: because that's system-wide21:10
BUGabundook ok21:10
TLFmicahg: at first I though key was wrong, but It's not :=21:10
TLF:?21:10
TLFso I think it's not my fault21:10
micahgkeyserver appears to be having issues21:12
TLFI see21:15
TLF:)21:15
av`bdrung, are you there?22:03
av`bdrung, with that method I don't need simple-patchsys include then22:06
av`just the patch B-D22:06
av`bdrung, problem is the unpacked folder has a chrome dir with a .jar file in it22:12
av`and not directly the sources22:12
av`and the .jar files contains the sources I want to patch22:13
bdrungav`: oh, then you have to extract the .jar file in the same rule22:36
bdrungav`: and yes, i am back22:37
bdrungav`: and yes, you cannot use simple-patchsys22:37
av`bdrung, can you help me one second?22:37
bdrungav`: yes22:37
av`I am trying to make it working22:38
av`the layout is:22:38
bdrungav`: push it somewhere22:38
av`yes, i give you a dgettable url22:38
bdrungav`: or bzr, git or svn22:38
BUGabundoI'm tired of all this FF core dumps. making a new profile and adding just a few addons22:40
av`bdrung, http://www.abluepaper.com/stumbleupon_3.3.8-3.dsc22:42
av`bdrung, that would work if the .jar was unpacked22:42
BUGabundoasac: fta: if I just want to copy minimal stuff from one profile to the other, what should it be?22:43
BUGabundoplaces.sqlite formhistory.sqlite ?22:44
bdrungav`: why don't you use a extracted xpi file as source?22:45
av`bdrung, coz I didnt change the tarball at all22:45
av`bdrung, I used the one already in the archive22:45
bdrungk, that a valid reason22:46
av`and actually dak will refuse a new tarball22:46
av`if it's not a new upstream release22:46
av`I was thinking to change package layout but I can't...it's not a new upstream release22:48
bdrungav`: http://pastebin.com/f4831a19022:53
* av` tests it22:54
av`bdrung, what's /home/skipper/packages?22:54
bdrungav`: you can change it with the next upstream release (simple-patchsys is simpler and less hacky)22:55
av`yeah, that's what I wanted to do22:55
av`but then discovered that .jar into the .xpi file22:55
av`bdrung, you wrote me a wrong path22:55
bdrungav`: revert that (i don't have 0.16 installed) :)22:55
av`ok22:55
av`lol22:55
bdrungi link it directly for testing the xpi.mk22:56
av`worked22:57
av`bdrung, I had your name with your changes22:57
av`:)22:57
av`* gonna add22:57
av`unfortunately m-d is not really good with patching yet22:58
av`you should add something nice for 0.17~22:58
av`bdrung, a new package called nautilus-pastebin will be uploaded soon to unstable22:59
av`you simply right click on a file you wanna paste22:59
av`and you click on pastebin and it does everything for you23:00
av`it rocks really23:00
av`bdrung, I see a unzip command23:03
av`while building the package23:03
av`so I guess we need that23:03
bdrungav`: official yes (m-d depends on zip and unzip, so it would work in both cases)23:06
av`ok23:06
bdrungnautilus-pastebin sounds good (i use pastebinit since some days)23:07
bdrungav`: do we really need a way to patch it after extracting? shouldn't we deprecate the use of xpi files in the source tarball?23:08
av`bdrung, yes, but actually we will start doing that with the new upstream release23:09
av`as I said we can't change the layout23:09
av`atm23:09
bdrungav`: so i don't think we need patch improvements for m-d 0.1723:10
av`yeah, so simple-patchsys should do the work then23:11
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
ftakenvandine, any plan to add a "start in tray" option in gwibber, like in liferea. it's annoying esp on UNR where it's full screen23:14
av`bdrung, is the patch B-D needed?23:20
av`bdrung, or is that automatically installed?23:20
bdrungav`: it is pulled via debhelper -> dpkg-dev -> patch23:27
av`yep23:27
bdrungav`: but you may want to add it23:27
av`it's priority standards23:27
av`* standard23:27
av`so it gets installed by default23:27
bdrungreally?23:28
bdrungav`: i only 'found Build-dependencies on "build-essential" binary packages can be omitted'23:28
bdrungav`: i only found 'Build-dependencies on "build-essential" binary packages can be omitted'23:28
av`looks at apt-cache show patch23:29
av`it will show you its priority23:29
av`it is standard23:29
bdrungav`: yes, it's standard. don't you really need to list standard packages in b-d?23:30
av`nope, don't need to23:31
bdrungav`: i thought that this applies only for required and important. where is this documented?23:32
av`I guess on new maintainer's guide23:32
av`under priorities section23:32
ftakenvandine, you said themes are now working, i only see 1 now, is that correct?23:34
ftakenvandine, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/Gwibber-unreadable-theme.png23:36
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
bdrungav`: didn't find it in http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/maint-guide.en.txt23:40
av`bdrung, read the priorities section23:42
av`patch is into a base installation23:42
kenvandinefta, there are 3 now23:42
bdrungav`: there is no priorities section23:42
ftakenvandine, i have 45323:43
av`bdrung, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities23:43
kenvandine457 has some fixes that make sure the theme are compatable23:44
bdrungav`: yes, but there is nothing written about wich package you have to list in b-d.23:45
av`bdrung, yeah, but it says standard packages are installed by default so that's should be a good explanation for B-Ds23:46
bdrungok23:47
av`buildds machines got a standard system when the build something23:47
av`like a pbuilder23:47
bdrungexact this sentence should be written somewhere "buildds machines got a standard system when the build something"23:47
kenvandinefta, you are using darkroom.... gwibber doesn'tseem to like it23:48
av`yeah, propose a patch for that doc :)23:48
kenvandinefta, it does get some properties from the gtk theme23:48
kenvandinethe font color in gwibber when using darkroom is terrible23:49
* kenvandine posts your screenshot for ryan23:49
av`bdrung, did someone approve u earlier into the team?23:52
av`I saw the email from aliothg23:52
bdrungav`: yes, the maintainer of adblock-plus23:53
av`ok, great23:53
bdrungav`: now i can fix mozgest ;)23:53
av`whats wrong with it?23:53
av`the config thing at startup?23:54
bdrungsome details (vcs link e.g.)23:54
av`bdrung, you should make a script into m-d23:54
av`that recognize all team members of pkg-oz-ext23:54
bdrungav`: for what?23:54
bdrungav`: why?23:55
av`like Uploaders: moz@team23:55
av`into a control.in file23:55
av`and then it generates all names for the control23:55
av`so we don't have to add each other for uploads23:55
bdrungav`: like the gnome-devs do?23:56
av`e.g to avoid NMUs messages23:56
av`yes23:56
bdrungav`: lets discuss this with asac23:56
av`bdrung, if it's fine for you, just mail the ML23:56
bdrungav`: yes23:57
av`like an uploaders class23:57
av`uploaders.mk23:57
bdrungyou will mail it?23:57
av`yep23:57
av`brb 15 min23:57
av`then I write it23:57
bdrungav`: i would look how gnome-devs did it.23:57
bdrungi will go sleeping now23:57
av`ok, have a good night23:58
bdrungav`: you should rename mozilla-stumbleupon to xul-ext-stumbleupon23:58
av`done, already23:58
bdrunghf23:58
av`u too :)23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!