| fta | kenvandine, Title: gwibber-daemon assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy->last_request_read) - (long) (dpy->request)) <= 0)' failed. | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| === fenris__ is now known as ejat | ||
| === pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu | ||
| EruditeHermit | hey | 05:57 |
| EruditeHermit | has anyone packaged gnash 0.8.6 for karmic? | 05:57 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: managed to get passed them | 07:58 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| eagles0513875 | hey guys i know yall are probably outa the office as its sunday but what is the bzr link to firefox 3.5 as i woudl like to test bindwood with the latest version that is in bzr as the one in the repos on my duelboot bindwood doesnt seem to work with devscripts 0.16 | 10:09 |
| micahg | bzr link to 3.5? | 10:10 |
| eagles0513875 | ya | 10:11 |
| eagles0513875 | when i do sudo apt-get source it tells me this | 10:11 |
| micahg | isn't bindwood an extension? | 10:11 |
| eagles0513875 | it gives me notice of where that ff 3.5 is maintained in the bzr revision control system and gives me a link and how to get it but when i use bzr get and the link it throws an error | 10:12 |
| eagles0513875 | micahg: ya im in the process of testing it as i am helping asac and gnomefreak and andv with them | 10:12 |
| micahg | I still don't get why you need the source | 10:12 |
| eagles0513875 | micahg: would like to see if there were any fixes or enhancements to it that will allow bindwood to work with devscripts version 0.16 | 10:13 |
| eagles0513875 | with 0.15 it works fine but asac wants all extensions to use 0.16 now | 10:13 |
| micahg | but what does that have to do with ff35 source/ | 10:13 |
| eagles0513875 | micahg: im wondering if there were any changed that have been made to 3.5 since it was added to the karmic repos | 10:14 |
| eagles0513875 | that might allow for bindwood to work with version 0.16 of devscripts | 10:14 |
| micahg | hmm | 10:14 |
| micahg | do you just want the changelog? | 10:15 |
| micahg | source is lp:firefox/3.5 | 10:15 |
| micahg | but i don't see why you would need it | 10:15 |
| micahg | you can either try the dailies if you want to test the extension in the latest 3.5 | 10:15 |
| micahg | or use the karmic version which is the latest release version | 10:16 |
| eagles0513875 | ok strange then :( | 10:16 |
| micahg | I thought devscripts was just for building the package | 10:16 |
| eagles0513875 | cuz i am using latest ff version on a duel boot i have on my laptop and it doesnt work with 0.16 but with 0.15 | 10:16 |
| eagles0513875 | micahg: im new to this so i dunno | 10:16 |
| eagles0513875 | will talk to asac tomorrow about it | 10:17 |
| eagles0513875 | whois deathvalley | 10:17 |
| eagles0513875 | whoops | 10:17 |
| micahg | yeah, I think the packaging for the extension would need to be modified to work with the later devscripts library | 10:18 |
| micahg | but yeah, check with asac | 10:18 |
| eagles0513875 | will do im guessing hes outa the office since its sunday | 10:18 |
| asac | eagles0513875: why do you think it doesnt work with 0.16? | 11:16 |
| eagles0513875 | on my laptop it doesnt pop up asking me for a password like 0.15 devscripts being used did | 11:16 |
| asac | ffox has nothing to do with it | 11:17 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 11:17 |
| asac | eagles0513875: i dont understand that question. | 11:17 |
| asac | eagles0513875: i mozilla-devscripts doesnt ask for any password | 11:17 |
| eagles0513875 | im saying bindwood itself | 11:17 |
| asac | you probably get asked when building or when pushing | 11:17 |
| asac | but thats not m-devscripty | 11:17 |
| asac | its just a) signing the package with your gpg key | 11:17 |
| eagles0513875 | noooo | 11:17 |
| eagles0513875 | ur not understanding me | 11:17 |
| asac | thats obvious | 11:17 |
| eagles0513875 | i installed bindwood with 0.15 first time it worked when i loaded ff after installing it bindwood with ff running asked me for a password, for which im guessing is to access the couchdb | 11:18 |
| eagles0513875 | once i upgraded it to use 0.16 which i got from the upstream repo and installed and after packaging it and installing it it didnt seem to work | 11:18 |
| asac | eagles0513875: what did you do to upgrade to 0.16? | 11:19 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: upgraded it in the control file | 11:19 |
| asac | what changes did you do to the packaging | 11:19 |
| asac | eagles0513875: ok. so do you have mozilla-devscripts 0.16 installed at all? | 11:19 |
| eagles0513875 | yes i do | 11:19 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: nothing no changes to the packaging what was the command again to package | 11:20 |
| eagles0513875 | bzr md or something | 11:20 |
| asac | eagles0513875: ok. so you have mozilla-devscipts 0.16 installed | 11:20 |
| asac | and how did you build? | 11:20 |
| eagles0513875 | yes i do | 11:20 |
| eagles0513875 | i am drawing a blank on the command at the moment | 11:20 |
| asac | eagles0513875: have you pushed you bindwood branch somewhere? | 11:20 |
| asac | so i can take a look? | 11:20 |
| eagles0513875 | ya i have its to bzr to eagles051387 | 11:21 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~eagles051387/firefox-extensions/bindwood.ubuntu.lp425631 | 11:21 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: the only logical thing i can think of is something has changed in the devscripts from 0.15 to 0.16 | 11:22 |
| asac | eagles0513875: please run bzr bd --dont-purge | 11:22 |
| asac | that builds your extension | 11:22 |
| asac | then go to the ../build-area/bindwood*/ | 11:22 |
| asac | directory | 11:22 |
| eagles0513875 | when i built it i ran a simple bzr bd | 11:22 |
| asac | yes. use --dont-purge | 11:23 |
| asac | so the build tree is not removed | 11:23 |
| asac | after building and we can check whats going on there | 11:23 |
| eagles0513875 | ok let me grab me laptop | 11:23 |
| eagles0513875 | thought u were outa the office today asac | 11:26 |
| asac | i am out | 11:26 |
| asac | just checking | 11:26 |
| eagles0513875 | ahhh ok | 11:26 |
| asac | eagles0513875: mozilla-devscripts is not in ubuntu yet. so please double check with dpkg -l mozilla-devscripts | 11:26 |
| asac | that you have that version installed | 11:26 |
| asac | 0.16 that is | 11:26 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 11:26 |
| eagles0513875 | apt-cache policy showed i had 0.16 and the candidate was 0.16 | 11:26 |
| asac | are you on debian? | 11:27 |
| eagles0513875 | no | 11:27 |
| asac | -> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-devscripts | 11:27 |
| asac | there is no 0.16 in the official repos | 11:27 |
| eagles0513875 | was give the link ot the upstream page of 0.16 so i could download the deb from upstream | 11:27 |
| asac | so you must have gotten itsomewhere else | 11:27 |
| asac | ah | 11:27 |
| asac | ok | 11:27 |
| eagles0513875 | 0.16 is installed | 11:28 |
| asac | k | 11:28 |
| asac | so do what i said above | 11:28 |
| asac | with --dont-purge | 11:28 |
| eagles0513875 | running it now | 11:28 |
| asac | ok | 11:28 |
| asac | so after it finishes | 11:28 |
| asac | the build tree should be in ../build-area | 11:28 |
| asac | confirm that you have that dir | 11:28 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 11:28 |
| eagles0513875 | in the bindwood-0.2..... folder | 11:29 |
| asac | ok | 11:29 |
| asac | is there a .build file next to that bindwood-0.2 folder? | 11:29 |
| asac | and a .deb? | 11:29 |
| eagles0513875 | ya a deb is in my home folder | 11:30 |
| asac | no | 11:30 |
| asac | please go to the build-area | 11:30 |
| asac | and run ls | 11:30 |
| asac | what do you have there? | 11:30 |
| eagles0513875 | ahhh ya i do have a deb in there sry | 11:30 |
| asac | ls | 11:31 |
| asac | anything else? | 11:31 |
| asac | a .build file? | 11:31 |
| eagles0513875 | a ya there is a build file | 11:31 |
| asac | so install the .deb that is there | 11:32 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 11:32 |
| asac | sudo dpkg -i bindwood*.deb | 11:32 |
| eagles0513875 | reinstalling | 11:33 |
| asac | eagles0513875: ok | 11:33 |
| eagles0513875 | installed | 11:33 |
| asac | eagles0513875: so after that also install the pastebinit package through apt-get | 11:33 |
| eagles0513875 | will give it another try | 11:33 |
| asac | that helps | 11:33 |
| asac | ok | 11:33 |
| asac | but install pastebinit | 11:33 |
| asac | we will need it often if we want to check things out | 11:33 |
| eagles0513875 | got it already | 11:34 |
| asac | if you have it installed | 11:34 |
| asac | run | 11:34 |
| asac | dpkg -L bindwood | pastebinit | 11:34 |
| asac | and give me the past | 11:34 |
| eagles0513875 | http://pastebin.com/f537e091c | 11:35 |
| asac | looks good | 11:35 |
| asac | so should work imo | 11:36 |
| asac | i assume you didnt figure that the .deb is in build-area ;) | 11:36 |
| eagles0513875 | still didnt ask me for a password to access the couchdb | 11:36 |
| asac | eagles0513875: why would it? | 11:36 |
| asac | eagles0513875: you can easily test ... | 11:36 |
| asac | eagles0513875: start firefox with a fresh profile | 11:36 |
| eagles0513875 | ahhh ok | 11:36 |
| asac | if you have your old bookmarks | 11:36 |
| asac | then all is ok | 11:36 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 11:36 |
| eagles0513875 | which folder do i remove .mozilla | 11:37 |
| asac | eagles0513875: do you have anything important? like bookmarks/cookies/passwords you dont want to loose? | 11:37 |
| eagles0513875 | no | 11:37 |
| asac | if you dont then just remove it | 11:37 |
| eagles0513875 | nothing important | 11:37 |
| asac | yes | 11:37 |
| asac | eagles0513875: did you have chnaged the bookmarks at all? | 11:37 |
| eagles0513875 | bookmarks aare gone which were of launchpad and the edge | 11:37 |
| asac | eagles0513875: do you see bindwood in tools -> addons -> extensions? | 11:38 |
| eagles0513875 | yes and its enabled | 11:38 |
| asac | eagles0513875: is "unisntall" available? | 11:38 |
| asac | or just greyed out= | 11:38 |
| asac | ? | 11:38 |
| eagles0513875 | greyed out atm | 11:38 |
| asac | ok | 11:38 |
| asac | yes. all if fine then | 11:38 |
| asac | eagles0513875: a few comments what is missing in your 0.16 transition | 11:39 |
| asac | add "Provides: ${xpi:Provides}" and "Enhances: ${xpi:Enhances}" | 11:39 |
| asac | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Karmic/ExtensionReview | 11:39 |
| asac | check that | 11:39 |
| asac | bdrung_ updated the checklist | 11:39 |
| eagles0513875 | i know i havent gotten to that part of the check list | 11:39 |
| eagles0513875 | yet | 11:39 |
| asac | ah ok | 11:39 |
| asac | so far all looks fine imo | 11:39 |
| eagles0513875 | ok :) | 11:40 |
| eagles0513875 | thought it was related to something else | 11:40 |
| eagles0513875 | do provides and enhances go after recommends | 11:40 |
| asac | there is no rule, but in general they are after recommends/suggests | 11:40 |
| asac | but you can put them anywhere (except the first line needs to be Package: ...) | 11:40 |
| asac | besides that the order doesnt really matter ... besides from best practices. | 11:41 |
| eagles0513875 | ahhh ok asac also do i need a new change log | 11:41 |
| eagles0513875 | or just add to the one i have | 11:41 |
| asac | eagles0513875: i hope you are still at UNRELEASED | 11:42 |
| asac | that means just add to the current topmost | 11:42 |
| eagles0513875 | ya i am | 11:42 |
| bdrung_ | asac: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=mozilla-devscripts | 11:42 |
| eagles0513875 | so just add to that part of the changelog | 11:42 |
| bdrung_ | asac: Package is optional and has a Depends on lsb-release which is extra | 11:42 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: thats the link i was give for the 0.16 of devscripts | 11:42 |
| asac | bdrung_: yeah. is that RC? | 11:43 |
| eagles0513875 | bdrung_: are you here if i have any questions or u outa the office today | 11:43 |
| asac | eagles0513875: thx. i know | 11:43 |
| bdrung_ | asac: dunno, but i want to fix it. | 11:43 |
| * eagles0513875 lunchtime will be back | 11:43 | |
| asac | bdrung_: sure go ahead. but i think its enough to stage it until next regular release ;) | 11:44 |
| bdrung_ | eagles0513875: i am here, but i have to study | 11:44 |
| asac | eagles0513875: the checklist on the Review page is quite detailed | 11:44 |
| asac | eagles0513875: just try to do it and when done we can review everything | 11:44 |
| asac | thats better for the learning curve and makes it easier to help you | 11:44 |
| asac | eagles0513875: now that you know where to find the .deb you are ready for go i think | 11:44 |
| bdrung_ | asac: i want to put the data for XPI_RECOMMENDS/CHECK_VERSION magic (which is distro specific) into a separate package | 11:45 |
| bdrung_ | asac: what do you think? | 11:46 |
| bdrung_ | asac: do you have a good name for this package? | 11:47 |
| asac | bdrung_: i dont know. i would prefer to maintain everything in one source package and use build-time magic to figure | 11:47 |
| asac | is there anything that speaks against that? | 11:47 |
| asac | actually i had scheduled a call with mvo to talk about what we can/cannot do on the builderes | 11:47 |
| asac | builders | 11:47 |
| asac | but that got pushed back because of beta rush | 11:47 |
| bdrung_ | yes, if you want to backport | 11:48 |
| asac | backport? | 11:48 |
| asac | ah you say that you have to backport just data parts if that changes | 11:49 |
| bdrung_ | if the data is in a separate package we can simply backport m-d. the data package would differ for sid, karmic, and lucid | 11:49 |
| asac | right. | 11:49 |
| asac | so here is the idea: | 11:49 |
| asac | its basically something like what i do for extensions | 11:49 |
| asac | err plugins | 11:50 |
| asac | adding custom headers to the extension hosts | 11:50 |
| asac | like: Xb-Moz-AppId: .... | 11:50 |
| asac | Xb-Moz-... | 11:50 |
| asac | so for firefox | 11:50 |
| asac | in the firefox-3.5 package: Xb-Moz-AppId: .... | 11:50 |
| asac | and Xb-Moz-Version: ... | 11:51 |
| asac | or something | 11:51 |
| asac | the main question is whether we get that info while preparing the sources for -devscripts | 11:51 |
| bdrung_ | can we access this data on building? | 11:51 |
| asac | _or_ do it on the fly when the package is built | 11:51 |
| asac | i mean the extension package | 11:51 |
| asac | the latter is preferably if that works on builders | 11:51 |
| asac | oetherwise the former is a safe bet | 11:51 |
| asac | and would probably match what we have with a separate data package | 11:52 |
| bdrung_ | yes, that's the ideal solution | 11:52 |
| asac | just that it does not need to be maintained because the extension host apps just sign up for being listed there | 11:52 |
| asac | bdrung_: but during buildtime of extensions is really the best solution | 11:52 |
| asac | but for that i have to check whats possible on the builders with mvo ;) | 11:52 |
| asac | hence the call | 11:52 |
| asac | of course we have to agree on the headers needed ... but i thin that should more or less match what we currently maintain in the xpi.mk | 11:53 |
| asac | bdrung_: in ubufox there is some code in the pfs/ db directory that parses those special headers for plugins from arbitrary sources.lists | 11:59 |
| asac | e.g.in lp:ubufox | 12:00 |
| asac | its a bit different because i put stuff in a sqlite db | 12:00 |
| * bdrung_ clones it. | 12:00 | |
| asac | as the plugin finder service runs as a webservice | 12:00 |
| asac | but it has the hacks required to run arbitrary sources.lists | 12:02 |
| asac | ;) | 12:02 |
| asac | also check this: | 12:06 |
| asac | flashplugin-nonfree-10.0.32.18ubuntu1$ grep Xb- debian/control | 12:06 |
| asac | Xb-Npp-Description: Adobe Flash SWF Player (http://www.adobe.com) | 12:06 |
| asac | Xb-Npp-File: libflashplayer.so | 12:06 |
| asac | Xb-Npp-Applications: ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384, 92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a, aa5ca914-c309-495d-91cf-3141bbb04115 | 12:06 |
| asac | Xb-Npp-MimeType: application/x-shockwave-flash | 12:06 |
| asac | Xb-Npp-Name: Adobe Flash Player (installer) | 12:07 |
| asac | bdrung_: ^^ | 12:07 |
| asac | thats how its done in the plugins control files | 12:07 |
| bdrung_ | asac: should the extensions have such meta data, too? | 12:07 |
| asac | i dont think - so far | 12:08 |
| asac | but could be at some point ... especially if we want to improve ubufox | 12:08 |
| asac | to display packaged extensions in the "Get Extensions" ... | 12:08 |
| asac | but for the current stuff we seem to be able to figure everything we need during build from install.rdf etc. | 12:08 |
| bdrung_ | asac: or we use the package name as indicator (all starting with xul-ext-) | 12:09 |
| asac | bdrung_: you mean to get a db of extensions? | 12:09 |
| bdrung_ | yes | 12:09 |
| asac | would work. | 12:09 |
| asac | but we probably need more or different data | 12:09 |
| asac | like in the plugin finder case | 12:10 |
| asac | we cannot just use package description etc. because of the different UI constraints | 12:10 |
| bdrung_ | asac: we can generate the required data with m-d | 12:10 |
| asac | bdrung_: if you click in the addons Get Extension dialog on the "Get Ubuntu extensions" link | 12:10 |
| asac | there is a special app-install dialog | 12:10 |
| asac | we maintain that info manually atm. could be improved like the plugin db at some point | 12:11 |
| asac | but we also need images etc. which makes it a bit hard | 12:11 |
| asac | hmmm that "Get Ubuntu Extensions" link seems to not work in karmic anymore | 12:12 |
| asac | maybe because of the software store thign | 12:12 |
| asac | have to check with mvo | 12:12 |
| asac | hmm. i dont even have that software store insatlled as it seems | 12:13 |
| asac | not in the menu anywhere | 12:13 |
| asac | hmm gnome-app-install --xul-extensions=firefox still works | 12:14 |
| asac | thats basically what i mean | 12:14 |
| asac | not sure why its broken in ubufox atm | 12:14 |
| bdrung_ | asac: it is under anwendungen | 12:15 |
| asac | yes... but not for me ;) | 12:15 |
| bdrung_ | asac: and it is now called software center ;) | 12:15 |
| asac | i have it direcetly in applications top level menu on my laptop | 12:15 |
| asac | but its not here ;) | 12:15 |
| asac | but i can run software-store | 12:15 |
| asac | on command line | 12:15 |
| asac | something fishy | 12:15 |
| asac | let me killall gnome-panel | 12:15 |
| asac | nope ... not there :/ | 12:16 |
| asac | not even avail in edit menus | 12:17 |
| bdrung_ | asac: is the pbuilder environment identical to the official builders | 12:19 |
| bdrung_ | asac: it is gone im my kvm, too. some days ago it was there | 12:19 |
| asac | unlikely to be a reliable source for comparison | 12:20 |
| asac | oki so probably syntax issues in the .desktop file or something | 12:20 |
| bdrung_ | asac: it is now under system -> systemverwaltung | 12:20 |
| asac | bug 435828 | 12:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 435828 in software-store "Software Store not in System Menu after restart" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/435828 | 12:21 |
| asac | yeah | 12:21 |
| asac | i would think nobody will find it there | 12:22 |
| asac | any nromal users stops reading after the first two entries i am sure | 12:22 |
| asac | oh i think it was added to panel too ;) | 12:27 |
| asac | and i removed it | 12:27 |
| bdrung_ | asac: would this work? http://pastebin.com/f6f28a015 | 12:31 |
| asac | no | 12:32 |
| asac | well. | 12:32 |
| asac | might work | 12:32 |
| asac | i think parsing the stuff using the apt api would be more flexible | 12:32 |
| bdrung_ | in pbuilder environment it works | 12:32 |
| asac | ah | 12:33 |
| asac | problem is that you will not see stuff from universe in main packages etc. | 12:33 |
| asac | i would think | 12:33 |
| asac | i really have to talk to mvo ;) | 12:33 |
| asac | builders are black box for me | 12:33 |
| bdrung_ | asac: k, let me know, if you have news | 12:34 |
| asac | yep | 12:34 |
| asac | i currently lean towards doing that on source production like in the pfs/db case | 12:34 |
| asac | but lets hope that we can do something during build | 12:34 |
| bdrung_ | +1 | 12:37 |
| av` | bdrung_, the hack didnt work for the patches | 12:38 |
| av` | it applied them *after* install | 12:38 |
| av` | we've fixed it another way | 12:39 |
| av` | ;) | 12:39 |
| bdrung_ | av`: is there a difference before and after install? | 12:39 |
| av` | what's the point applying a patch after install? | 12:40 |
| av` | it gets applied then get removed automatically by the clean target | 12:40 |
| av` | without affecting the files effectively | 12:41 |
| bdrung_ | av`: k, you have to go into debian/$package/usr/share/$extname/ and run patch there | 12:42 |
| av` | we did another way | 12:42 |
| av` | but it worked in the end | 12:42 |
| bdrung_ | av`: and how? | 12:42 |
| av` | bdrung_, in the build rule we adapted the tree to be m-d compatible | 12:43 |
| av` | then in clean we repacked the orig | 12:43 |
| av` | to not differ from the one in the archive | 12:43 |
| bdrung_ | wow | 12:43 |
| av` | so that dak wouldnt refuse it | 12:43 |
| av` | and it seems to work | 12:44 |
| av` | anyway I saw your email about mozgest | 12:44 |
| av` | want needs to be done? | 12:44 |
| bdrung_ | me or you? | 12:45 |
| av` | both | 12:45 |
| bdrung_ | i should study, but yes | 12:46 |
| av` | did you push mozgest to git already? | 12:46 |
| bdrung_ | yes | 12:47 |
| av` | ok | 12:47 |
| av` | bdrung_, I guess removing config dialogue won't be done | 12:54 |
| bdrung_ | then at least in ubuntu :p | 12:55 |
| av` | lol | 12:55 |
| bdrung_ | av`: it will not removed, it will only not beeing pop uped. | 12:55 |
| av` | yeah, that's what I meant | 12:55 |
| bdrung_ | let's see if someone complains | 12:56 |
| av` | any news for the uploaders thing? | 12:59 |
| bdrung_ | not yet. asac do not like it very much (the control.in part) | 13:03 |
| bdrung_ | av`: i have looked how the gnome-devs did it | 13:03 |
| bdrung_ | av`: i could implement it | 13:03 |
| av` | why he don't like the control.in thing? | 13:03 |
| av` | control.in gets the control autogenerated at clean / debuild run | 13:04 |
| av` | so what's wrong with it | 13:04 |
| bdrung_ | because you have two control files? | 13:04 |
| av` | so? | 13:04 |
| bdrung_ | av`: ask him directly | 13:04 |
| bdrung_ | av`: gnome-devs only add the persons who are in debian/changelog _and_ are in the list to the uploaders | 13:05 |
| av` | bdrung_, yes | 13:06 |
| av` | bdrung_, can you fix the possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration thing and maybe write something more to debian.source? | 13:06 |
| av` | and then upload mozgest | 13:06 |
| bdrung_ | dunno how to fix possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration | 13:07 |
| bdrung_ | what should i write to debian.source? | 13:08 |
| av` | we should create two scripts, one for adding other for removing | 13:08 |
| av` | but I don't think it's necessary | 13:09 |
| av` | readme.debian sorry | 13:09 |
| av` | you said it needs a face lifting, don't know what you meant ther | 13:09 |
| av` | * there | 13:09 |
| bdrung_ | formatting | 13:11 |
| av` | want me to do it or ...? | 13:11 |
| bdrung_ | yes, you | 13:11 |
| av` | ok | 13:12 |
| av` | then should be ready | 13:12 |
| bdrung_ | av`: you should upload it (i would need a sponsor) | 13:12 |
| av` | ok | 13:13 |
| av` | bdrung_, what's wrong with readme.debian? | 13:17 |
| av` | looks formatted correctly | 13:17 |
| bdrung_ | av`: the header and the sharps and max. 80 chars/line | 13:30 |
| av` | I don't it's a problem since you parse them using a terminal | 13:31 |
| av` | is ok to rename the binary to xul-ext-mozgest? | 13:31 |
| av` | bdrung_, ^^ | 13:32 |
| bdrung_ | av`: yes, we agreed that we use xul-ext-, didn't we? | 13:33 |
| bdrung_ | av`: it think this looks better: http://paste.ubuntu.com/279553/ | 13:35 |
| bdrung_ | av`: or better http://paste.ubuntu.com/279556/ | 13:37 |
| av` | bdrung_, yes | 13:39 |
| av` | bdrung_, gonna commit now | 13:39 |
| fta | kenvandine, http://paste.ubuntu.com/279755/ | 17:29 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| micahg | hi BUGabundo | 19:31 |
| BUGabundo | hey micahg | 19:31 |
| micahg | just switched to Firefox 3.6 and apparently, it's more stable than 3.5 | 19:31 |
| micahg | especially with flash | 19:31 |
| BUGabundo | 3.7 seem betterish | 19:33 |
| BUGabundo | and finally I fixed my crashs | 19:33 |
| BUGabundo | stupid xmarks | 19:33 |
| micahg | well, I prefer fairly stable :) | 19:34 |
| micahg | 3.6 branch is only accepting tested patches :) | 19:34 |
| BUGabundo | I have no probs with 3.7 | 19:37 |
| BUGabundo | right now, I can't file ANY bug on it | 19:37 |
| BUGabundo | that's HOW stable it looks to me | 19:37 |
| BUGabundo | ok, maybe one, but its addon related | 19:38 |
| micahg | Do you get white menus? | 19:38 |
| BUGabundo | nope | 19:38 |
| * BUGabundo tests | 19:38 | |
| BUGabundo | nope | 19:39 |
| micahg | when you click on a menu, the menu title isn't white? | 19:39 |
| BUGabundo | they all refresh as expected | 19:39 |
| BUGabundo | enh??? | 19:39 |
| micahg | enh? | 19:39 |
| micahg | mozilla bug 316780? | 19:40 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 316780 in Menus "opening modal dialog from menu leaves menu name white" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316780 | 19:40 |
| BUGabundo | you better isntall 3.7 and test for you self | 19:43 |
| BUGabundo | I don't seem to be able to reproduce it | 19:43 |
| micahg | I have the same issue on firefox 3.7 | 19:44 |
| BUGabundo | maybe I have an addon too much :) | 19:45 |
| micahg | you're using the mozilla dailies? | 19:45 |
| micahg | it's in safe mode as well | 19:46 |
| BUGabundo | sorry | 19:46 |
| BUGabundo | either I'm not reading it right | 19:46 |
| BUGabundo | or I don't see it | 19:46 |
| micahg | I'm waiting for Mozilla to kick out the beta so we can get it into karmic | 19:50 |
| BUGabundo | lol | 19:51 |
| av` | fta, do you work on some ffox extensions as well? | 20:46 |
| bdrung_ | asac: go to #debian-mozext on oftc! | 23:32 |
| bdrung_ | av`: ^ :) | 23:32 |
| av` | :) | 23:32 |
| av` | bdrung_, when you have a minute please commit something | 23:32 |
| av` | wanna see if the hooks for git works | 23:33 |
| av` | and we get the logs | 23:33 |
| av` | on the channel | 23:33 |
| === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo | ||
| mac_v | !logs | 23:33 |
| ubottu | Official channel logs can be found at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ - For LoCo channels, http://logs.ubuntu-eu.org/freenode/ | 23:33 |
| av` | mac_v, ? | 23:33 |
| mac_v | av`: oh! you were talking about logs too...didnt notice :) i wanted the link for the log.. | 23:34 |
| av` | :D | 23:34 |
| === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!