/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/09/30/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

hggdhmicahg: you will be mentoring Dustin?01:29
* micahg will try01:30
DustinAmodeohey micahg, around?01:48
micahgyeah01:48
micahgbut I'm still trying to figure something out...01:48
micahgDustinAmodeo: PM?01:48
XDevHaldBTS is not working for reporting bugs, need to know how to gather ubuntu-bug from the apport.02:14
micahgXDevHald: are you trying to submit a bug to debian or ubuntu?02:15
XDevHaldHey micahg: I am fixing/reporting/triaging02:16
micahgXDevHald: you want to report to ubuntu?02:16
micahgDustinAmodeo: ok, which FF version are you using?02:17
XDevHaldMy apologies micahg as I wasn't able to understand the question.02:17
micahgXDevHald: that was going to be my line :)02:17
XDevHaldHehe02:17
XDevHaldI was using the Debian BTS software to report/fix the bugs from launchpad but BTS is no longer supported. Claims I need to use ubuntu-bug from the apport02:18
micahgok, to report to Ubuntu, it's ubuntu-bug PKGNAME02:18
XDevHaldah02:18
XDevHaldThank you micahg, I appreciate the clarification :-)02:19
micahgnp XDevHald02:19
XDevHaldmicahg: What about a tool to fix the bugs?02:21
micahgXDevHald: fix? how?02:21
XDevHaldSay if there is a bug from launchpad and I want to contribute on fixing it. How would I go about gathering the package that they want fixed on my desktop to triage and then fix02:22
XDevHaldbbiab, PM if you can micahg.02:22
micahgXDevHald: depends on the package02:22
micahgDustinAmodeo: I'm assuming you've read the triaging guides?02:24
DustinAmodeoi have02:24
micahgok02:24
micahgso, why don't you grab a bug from the firefox-3.0 package02:24
micahgand we can look at it02:24
DustinAmodeocan i sort bugs by package?02:27
micahgyou can go to a specific package02:28
micahghttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.002:28
DustinAmodeoi'm still here02:31
DustinAmodeojust sorting through this02:31
DustinAmodeoso i'm looking at Bug #32794302:33
ubot4`Launchpad bug 327943 in firefox-3.0 "firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in sqlite3_column_int64()" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/32794302:33
micahghmmm02:35
micahgDustinAmodeo: maybe try one that's not a crash...02:35
DustinAmodeolooking at Bug #34003202:39
ubot4`Launchpad bug 340032 in firefox-3.0 "Jaunty: Firefox crashes while using plugin finder service" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/34003202:39
micahgDustinAmodeo: ok, what do you think abotu this?02:40
DustinAmodeomicahg: from a straight triage perpective, it seems to have all of the initial relevant data02:42
micahgok, but how old is the bug?02:44
micahgand what version was it reported against?02:44
DustinAmodeoahh...over 6 months old and alpha 9.0402:45
micahgyep02:46
micahgso, now what do you think?02:46
DustinAmodeothat i would be unable to duplicate the bug, so a message should be sent to the bug reporter to confirm that it is no longer an issue?02:48
micahgyes, there should be a paragraph about obsolete versions on the responses page02:49
DustinAmodeo"02:50
DustinAmodeoThank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, according to this report, you are not using the most recent version of this package for your Ubuntu release. Please upgrade to the most recent version and let us know if you are still having this issue. Thanks in advance. "02:50
DustinAmodeoso i'll just add that to the comments?02:50
micahgDustinAmodeo: normally pastebin is better for such things...but yes, and you might want to tweak it to say not using the release version of Jaunty02:51
* micahg remembers pastebining lots of comments to be evaluated :)02:52
DustinAmodeonow i would also want to change the status of it?02:56
micahgyes DustinAmodeo03:00
micahgwhat do you think it should be?03:00
DustinAmodeoincomplete03:00
micahgyep[03:01
micahgand BTW, text looks great03:01
DustinAmodeoand this is where i go to the wait 4 weeks period? then a reminder, then 2 weeks later invalidate it?03:03
micahgyep03:03
micahgBTW, I suggest subscribing to the bug03:03
DustinAmodeoright. i was just about to ask if i had to note it and manually go back to it03:04
micahgif you click the down arrow next to the task, you can do it all at once (set status, respond, subscribe)03:05
test34Can someone look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/434121 and tell me if it should really be invalid? because I think it is very confusing that this checkbox ("Use message indicators") shows the icon in the notification area.  And also, it probably should be enabled by default03:05
ubot4`Launchpad bug 434121 in empathy "no notification area for new empathy update" [Undecided,Invalid]03:05
DustinAmodeooh cool03:05
micahgtest34: yes, it seems more like a support request than a bug03:07
test34ok then thanks micahg03:09
DustinAmodeoso for now i'm done with this bug?03:11
micahgyep03:11
DustinAmodeothanks03:12
micahgDustinAmodeo: you want to grab another?03:15
DustinAmodeoabsolutely03:16
DustinAmodeois it beneficial for me to go through these ones that were created with alpha jaunty?03:17
DustinAmodeoi'm looking at Bug #42576403:21
ubot4`Launchpad bug 425764 in firefox-3.0 "Tools-->Downloads-->"Open in containing folder" opens the file itself and not the folder!" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/42576403:21
micahgDustinAmodeo: if there are a lot of them03:21
micahgDustinAmodeo: can you duplicate it?03:22
DustinAmodeoand i've already attempted to duplicate the problem with 3.0.1403:22
DustinAmodeoand thje program is running as expected03:22
micahgDustinAmodeo: you mean it opens the file manager?03:22
DustinAmodeoit does03:23
micahgDustinAmodeo: what flavor of Ubuntu03:23
DustinAmodeo9.0403:23
micahgyes, but what desktop env?03:24
DustinAmodeognome03:24
DustinAmodeosorry03:24
micahgKDE, Gnome, Xfce?03:24
micahgah03:24
micahgok03:24
micahgwell03:24
micahgthe reported is most likely using KDE03:24
micahg*reported03:24
micahg*reporter03:24
DustinAmodeowhat leads you to make that inference? is KDE more commonly used?03:25
micahgno03:25
micahgthe user references Dolphin which is the KDE4 file manager03:26
DustinAmodeothe nautilus equivalent?03:26
DustinAmodeoi see.03:26
micahgyes03:26
DustinAmodeoso then i would leave this bug alone for someone running KDE?03:28
DustinAmodeoor make a note saying that i couldn't duplicate it in Gnome with FF 3.0.14?03:28
micahgor you can try to find someone running KDE on Jaunty to duplicate it?03:29
DustinAmodeothe few friends i have running ubuntu are all in gnome03:30
DustinAmodeoif that's what you mean03:31
micahgDustinAmodeo: I think this is an upstream issue :)03:31
micahgmozilla bug 26660003:35
ubot4`Mozilla bug 266600 in Download Manager "Open containing folder function does nothing (KDE)" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26660003:35
micahgDustinAmodeo: take a look at the responses page for upstreaming issues03:37
micahgDustinAmodeo: actually hold on03:38
micahgjust found the duplicate :)03:38
micahgbug 13313303:38
ubot4`Launchpad bug 133133 in firefox ""Open containing folder" is only working if nautilus is present" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/13313303:38
DustinAmodeonice :)03:39
micahgDustinAmodeo: you want to mark it?03:42
DustinAmodeoi just did03:43
DustinAmodeoconfirm i did it right?03:43
micahgDustinAmodeo: looks good03:44
DustinAmodeothanks for your help03:45
DustinAmodeo:)03:45
DustinAmodeoi have to get caught up on some work03:45
DustinAmodeobut clearly still need some more help03:45
micahgnp, feel free to come back03:45
DustinAmodeoso i'll catch you in here another time and go through a few more03:45
micahgyou did great!03:45
DustinAmodeoappreciate it03:45
DustinAmodeo:)03:45
DustinAmodeohave a good evening03:45
micahgbdmurray: hi, it seems like it's not processing the stats right...the list you posted shows I did many bugs yesterday (UTC based)04:08
micahgbdmurray: nevermind :( it wasn't UTC 00:00 when it was posted04:08
alkisgHello, I reported a bug in 8.10, then it was triaged, and now (9.04) it's fixed. Can I mark it as "Fix released" even though I don't know exactly when it was fixed?06:55
alkisghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/21280206:55
ubot4`Launchpad bug 212802 in ltsp "Server brightness popup window shown in clients" [Undecided,Incomplete]06:55
micahgalkisg: generally not06:56
alkisgmicahg: invalid, then?06:56
micahgWe generally mark the bug invalid if we do not know what fixed it06:56
alkisgIt was the newer gnome-power-manager version :)06:56
alkisgOK, I'll mark it as invalid06:56
alkisg(gnome-power-manager was completely redesigned, but it would take a lot of testing to see in which version exactly it was fixed...)06:57
alkisgmicahg: thsnk06:57
alkisg*thanks06:57
micahgnp alkisg06:57
dholbachgood morning07:08
thekornhello bugsquad ;)07:34
=== asac_ is now known as asac
slacker_nlhello to all09:21
slacker_nlhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guessnet/+bug/433677 << debian has just released a new version of guessnet, would that make karmic?09:21
ubot4`Launchpad bug 433677 in guessnet "Unknown pcap error" [Undecided,New]09:21
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
micahgslacker_nl: check in #ubuntu-motu09:21
slacker_nlmicahg: will do09:21
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
Luitnot sure where to file this bug: somehow my laptop shows a charge rate of +700W when connected to the charger...12:28
Luitis this a bug or just a misconfiguration?12:29
Luit(the discharge rate is 15W max, and charging is about twice as fast I guess, so it should be around 35W charge rate instead)12:34
Luitso the charge rate shows about 20x the real rate...12:35
Luitlooks like it can' t even be 35W, considering the charger only rates 30W12:37
Luitso it shouldn' t be 718,4 W, that' s for sure12:37
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
joaopintoI have this funny bug of only getting sound from firefox+flash and nothing else, it seems to have happened after installing the flash player package13:34
joaopintoany tipos how to debug/report it ?13:34
PersonneHi15:56
PersonneI encount a problem using Samba15:56
PersonneI don't understand why, when I create a file, this one is 644 mode15:57
PersonneI add this in my smb.conf : http://pastealacon.com/591915:59
Personne(on the server)15:59
PersonneOn my Ubuntu, I use Autofs, with this command : administration -fstype=cifs,credentials=/etc/auto.partage.auth,iocharset=utf8,uid=1000,gid=100,file_mode=760,dir_mode=775,workgroup=BUREAU ://192.168.0.200/administration16:00
PersonneAnd it always change the created file in 644 :(16:01
PersonneI test on a Windows client, and a NuTyx client (another linux), it works.16:01
PersonneSo I consider it's a bug of smbfs package16:01
hggdhPersonne: this channel is not a support channel, but a bug-work (triage, control) one. Please try #ubuntu, or (in your case) #ubuntu-fr16:05
PersonneThey don't have skills to respond on #ubuntu-fr  :'(16:07
PersonneI read the bug page but I don't find how to give the report of this bug16:07
PersonneHe is similar to http://fixunix.com/samba/244438-samba-ubuntu-7-10-64-bit-server-cant-write-shares.html16:07
hggdhOk16:07
hggdhPersonne: what version of Ubuntu are you running?16:08
PersonneI do not have a well spell english to explain my problem in english I think16:08
Personnejaunty16:08
Personne(i'm french, that's why I encount some problems speaking english)16:08
hggdhPersonne: no problem (and yes, this is why I suggested -fr ;-))16:09
PersonneWhat could I do ?16:09
hggdhPersonne: it does sound like a bug. Are you up-to-date on Jaunty?16:09
Personnehum, a moment, I try a apt-get update && apt-get upgrade to tell you this ;)16:10
hggdhmerci16:10
PersonneHum, it seems that i'm not utd (up to date), but that's the package which I have to load : apport apport-gtk linux-headers-2.6.28-15 linux-headers-2.6.28-15-generic linux-image-2.6.28-15-generic linux-libc-dev python-apport python-problem-report16:11
PersonneI think it's not "important"16:11
PersonneI search with rgrep in some files (which contains the word "samba"), and it reveals something like usershare_acl variable16:12
PersonneI think that the compilation change this variable to 64416:13
hggdhPersonne: open a bug on this: run, on a terminal, 'ubuntu-bug smbfs'16:13
=== marjomercado is now known as marjo
hggdhand point to your findings16:13
CarlFKI can't figure out how to report a bug...16:14
Personnehggdh: in a console I can explain my problem with annoting something ?16:14
Personnehggdh: I try this with the alt+f2 shortcut16:14
CarlFKhttps://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu  click 'Report a bug" takes me to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs16:14
hggdhPersonne: 'ubuntu-bug' will collect the necessary data for the smbfs package, and open a browser on LP.net for you to enter more details16:15
CarlFK"you can file one via Launchpad." which takes me back to https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu16:15
PersonneCarlFK: It's seems that I just have read it :D16:15
PersonneCarlFK: but I'm not so "good" in english ;)16:15
hggdhCarlFK: hum. This loop is not good :-(16:15
CarlFKPersonne:  I was not directing that to you. your english is pretty good16:17
hggdhCarlFK: I just tried it, and I cannot repeat: when I click on 'report a bug', I am taken to the +filebug page16:18
hggdhthis is on Edge16:18
PersonneOh really ? oÔ16:18
hggdhPersonne: this is only on edge.launchpad.net, which you may (or may not) have access16:18
CarlFKhggdh: are you hitting:  <h2>Get Involved</h2>    <ul>     <li>       <a href="https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug" class="menu-link-report_bug sprite bugs">Report a bug</a>16:20
greg-ghtml doesn't really work in IRC :)16:20
PersonneI always comme on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs16:20
Personnewhen I click on "report a bug" -__-16:20
hggdhPersonne: yes, this is why I asked you to run 'ubuntu-bug'16:21
Personne"If you need help in finding the right package or providing appropriate information ask someone on #ubuntu-bugs on the Freenode IRC server or on the bugsquad mailing list. "16:21
Personnehggdh: ok I try in a console16:21
hggdhCarlFK: I will have to look at the source, but yes, I clicked on 'report a bug' under the "Get Involved" header16:22
Personne"644 permissions on fresh file creating" <= is that a good summary ?16:23
greg-gPersonne: yes. It can be changed later if needed.16:24
Personneok.16:25
PersonneOh, some others bugs look like the mine :)16:26
Personne(I really have some problems understanding launchpad and the english language :s)16:26
CarlFK@#$@  something funky going on.  https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/439419  click "Report another bug about nautilus in ubuntu" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+filebug16:26
ubot4`Launchpad bug 439419 in nautilus "E: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.24-22-lpia_2.6.24-22.45netbook9_lpia.deb: files list file for package `libxcb-shape0' is missing final newline" [Undecided,New]16:26
CarlFKget redirected to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs16:27
CarlFKis there some setting to tell firefox to tell me about redirects?16:27
CarlFKwget tells me I need to log in.. I am logged into lp... maybe I should turn off edge16:28
hggdhmaybe a cache issue?16:28
Personneoh my bug seems to be here : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/26322816:34
ubot4`Launchpad bug 263228 in samba "problems with file-permissions using linux-cifs-client" [Undecided,Invalid]16:34
Personnebut the dev said they don't have the information for changing this16:35
PersonneBut what I see is that there was a bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/332431 , changed by a patch creation : http://www.nabble.com/ACLs-under-Samba-3.3.0-td21753941.html16:35
ubot4`Launchpad bug 332431 in samba "9.04 Jaunty Samba 2:3.3.0-3ubuntu2: files (permissions set to a=rwx) can only be renamed by owner although their content can be changed by all" [High,Fix released]16:35
PersonneAnd so, I think that the patch affect the permissions16:36
CarlFKhggdh:  (10:38:05 AM) Ursinha: CarlFK, yes, the ubuntu process to file a bug changed, so you have to append the no-redirect for it to go to lp16:37
hggdhCarlFK: I am sure I did not append no-redirect ;-)16:37
CarlFKmaybe a cache issue?  :)16:37
hggdhCarlFK: no, it is membership in the bug(squad|control) groups16:51
ebroderI'm helping run a local event for the global jam on Saturday, and I'm expecting to have a lot of people with, at best, a knowledge of how to use Ubuntu but not much development background. Are there any docs on how to find bugs that would be good for them to work on?18:22
ebroderOr things for them to test, or whatever18:22
trijntjewhat should i do when i want to retract a bug-report?18:40
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
yofel:q19:07
yofelargh... wrong window -.-19:08
sandbergAnyone experienced X-crashed while upgrading from Jaunty to Karmic?20:01
sandbergThink X crashed while the fglrx package was upgraded... :(20:01
joaopintohi21:18
joaopintohow do I link an LP bug to a bugzilla ?21:18
BUGabundohey joaopinto21:19
BUGabundojoaopinto: click on affect project21:19
BUGabundoLP edge or production?21:19
BUGabundoUIs are diff21:19
joaopintoLP prod21:20
BUGabundodid you manage to find the button joaopinto?21:24
joaopintoyes, it's linked21:24
joaopintonow I need to check that someone of the -desktop team will pick it up21:24
BUGabundoseb128: are you here?21:26
BUGabundocan you look at joaopinto bug?21:26
BUGabundojoaopinto: or try #u-dekstop :)21:26
joaopintodone :P21:26
BUGabundoYAY21:30
=== bwallum is now known as stumped
=== stumped is now known as bwallum

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!