[00:57] <spstarr> any reason usbcore is compiled into kernel?
[00:57] <spstarr> I cannot mount usbfs oddly
[00:58] <amason> Hi guys, having some problems with packaging a kernel. Despite passing the --initrd flag to make-kpkg it does not seem to create an initrd or run update-initramfs on installation
[00:58] <amason> any ideas where i am going wrong ?
[00:58] <spstarr> make-kpkg clean ? first
[00:58] <spstarr> then
[00:59] <spstarr> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=5 fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-custom kernel_image kernel_headers
[00:59] <spstarr> taking ubuntu's .config usbfs broke
[01:00] <amason> spstarr: asside from the CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=5 I have pretty much the same line.
[01:00] <amason> this is building a 2.6.31 kernel on 8.04. 
[01:01] <amason> does that make any difference ?
[01:01] <amason> i grabbed the 2.6.31 source from kernel.org
[02:24] <spstarr> erm where is usbfs in /proc/filesystems?
[02:24] <spstarr> its not there?
[02:24] <spstarr> given im building a custom kernel using ubuntu's .config i even rebuilt usbcore as a module, still no usbfs registered in /proc/filesystems ?
[02:25] <spstarr> and usbcore is loaded
[02:26]  * spstarr boots into a ubuntu kernel to confirm
[02:29] <spstarr> ubuntu's kernel is fine, so then building a custom kernel breaks usbfs?
[03:20] <spstarr>  if you do not enable CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS doesn't it defer to both /sys/bus/usb/drivers AND /proc/bus/usb?
[03:20] <spstarr> since the latter is the new mount point for usbfs
[07:09] <amason> Hi guys, having some problems with packaging a kernel. Despite passing the --initrd flag to make-kpkg it does not seem to create an initrd or run update-initramfs on installation
[12:20] <tuukkah> hey guys! what's the chance of getting the small module fixing this bug into karmic? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/435906
[12:20] <ubot3> Malone bug 435906 in linux "need to turn off extra "Switchable graphics" GPU" [Undecided,Confirmed] 
[15:47] <nxvl> hi!
[15:48] <nxvl> for some reason since one of the updates in karmic, my computer is not reading my swap anymore
[15:48] <nxvl> i've a bunch of encrypted LVM partitions for my swap
[15:48] <nxvl> but everytime i reboot my machine i need to add them by hand
[15:48] <nxvl> is that a known issue?
[15:49] <nxvl> i've no idea where to check for the error/logs/information
[15:49] <nxvl> ogasawara: ^^
[15:52] <tormod> nxvl: you'd better file a bug, and attach your fstab
[15:53] <rtg> nxvl, I wonder if its related to my bind mount problems, i.e., they are not mounted automagically. Keybuk, any thoughts?
[15:54] <nxvl> mm, for some reason some UUIDs are wrong
[15:54] <nxvl> i wonder if that's the issue
[15:54] <nxvl> not all of them though
[15:54] <nxvl> will reboot and check, brb
[15:58] <nxvl> wrong assumption, still doesn't work
[16:02] <nxvl> tormod: so you just need my fstab?
[16:02] <tormod> nxvl you have them referenced with UUID in fstab? do they appear in /dev/disk/by-uuid?
[16:02] <nxvl> yup
[16:03] <nxvl> and yes
[16:03] <nxvl> that's what you get with the installer
[19:53] <smoser> rtg, i'm guessing that there are tools that grab dependencies, but if not, for bug 439415, you need scsi_transport_spi.ko in -virtual also
[19:53] <ubot3> Malone bug 439415 in vm-builder "Bundling UEC image with uec-images-provided kernel/ramdisk results in an EMI that fails to boot" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/439415
[19:56] <rtg> smoser, I'll check. thanks for the heads up
[19:58] <rtg> smoser, drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.ko is already in the list
[19:59] <smoser> good deal
[21:31] <CarlFK> bug 439456  "missing nic firmware" should be easy to a) verify (the file is indeed missing) b) decide on if it should be included and c) include it
[21:31] <ubot3> Malone bug 439456 in linux "netboot e100/d101m_ucode.bin not found" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/439456
[21:31] <CarlFK> can someone make sure the right person looks at it?
[21:33] <rtg> CarlFK, looking...
[23:00] <zooko> Folks: what's the process that Ubuntu folks use to look out for security problems in supported kernels?  I'm thinking mostly of Hardy.
[23:01] <zooko> This is probably a FAQ.  I'll look for such information on the web.
[23:20] <zooko> Hm, I haven't yet found a statement of the process.
[23:30] <zooko> Aha. http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu/serveredition/features/security