| === stevel__ is now known as stevel | ||
| LLStarks | asac | 04:32 |
|---|---|---|
| LLStarks | you there? | 04:32 |
| micahg | LLStarks: can I help with something? | 04:38 |
| micahg | did that new build work? | 04:38 |
| LLStarks | is it merged? | 04:39 |
| LLStarks | i was wondering if the "set as background" is firefox or ubuntu-added code. | 04:39 |
| micahg | no, on the mozilla bug, one of the developers posted a new build to try for the 1.9.1 branch | 04:39 |
| micahg | asac wanted to get the patch in upstream if at all possible | 04:39 |
| micahg | there will be a 3.5.4 release before karmic is released | 04:40 |
| micahg | oh, he asked for it in 3.5.5 | 04:40 |
| LLStarks | which bug? | 04:40 |
| micahg | mozila bug 486065 | 04:40 |
| micahg | mozilla bug 486065 | 04:40 |
| * micahg kicks ubottu | 04:41 | |
| ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 486065 could not be found | 04:41 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 486065 in Layout: Block and Inline "hidden scrollbars get drawn anyway when Gtk theme gives scrollbars borders" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486065 | 04:41 |
| LLStarks | is either fix in the umd? | 04:42 |
| micahg | LLStarks: not yet | 04:44 |
| LLStarks | lemme try that other fix. | 04:44 |
| micahg | LLStarks: can you download the build from the link in the mozilla bug to see if the problem still exists? | 04:44 |
| LLStarks | it doesn't. | 04:46 |
| micahg | does it fix either of the issues? | 04:46 |
| LLStarks | does asac know about the second fix? | 04:46 |
| micahg | idk, he was pinged and he got a copy of fthe mozilla bug | 04:46 |
| LLStarks | it fixes the trough-border boxes, not click events. | 04:46 |
| micahg | LLStarks: I don't know if it was meant to fix click events | 04:47 |
| micahg | but can you reply in the mozilla bug with that? | 04:47 |
| micahg | at least maybe we can land the trough-border fix for 3.5.5 | 04:47 |
| LLStarks | maybe | 04:50 |
| LLStarks | is asac in touch with other people on the art team besides psyke? | 04:51 |
| micahg | idk | 04:51 |
| LLStarks | did you see the patches for 486065? | 04:53 |
| micahg | yeah, one was the one I used in my test build, the other was code a little later | 04:54 |
| LLStarks | the ones posted this evening? | 04:54 |
| micahg | no | 04:56 |
| micahg | I didn't see new posts this evening | 04:56 |
| LLStarks | there were a few | 05:00 |
| LLStarks | also, did you put in a merge request for the modified trough-border fix? | 05:01 |
| micahg | yes, but I think asac would rather do it this way | 05:01 |
| micahg1 | LLStarks: sorry, pulled my cable out by accident | 05:05 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| LLStarks | what way? | 05:05 |
| LLStarks | <micahg> yes, but I think asac would rather do it this way | 05:06 |
| micahg | LLStarks: try to get the patch in upstream | 05:06 |
| LLStarks | ah | 05:06 |
| micahg | LLStarks: more local patches means more maintenance for us | 05:07 |
| LLStarks | i see | 05:08 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: will need to talk to you this afternoon regarding bindwood and dev scripts 0.16 | 06:31 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| sevoir | morning | 07:47 |
| === dpm__ is now known as dpm | ||
| asac | https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/dholbert@mozilla.com-try-b28226f038b0/ | 10:16 |
| micahg1 | hi asac | 10:17 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
| micahg | asac: LLstarks tried it and said it worked correctly | 10:18 |
| asac | he should be more verbose | 10:19 |
| asac | in the upstream bug | 10:19 |
| micahg | I saw that but didn't know how much he needed to say | 10:19 |
| asac | Yes, it is fixed most likely means that he tried the buiöld | 10:19 |
| micahg | yeah, I was chatting with him earlier | 10:19 |
| asac | well. you need to be clear about a) what is fixed ... b) when is it fixed | 10:20 |
| micahg | ok | 10:20 |
| asac | did he try the tryserver build for instance | 10:20 |
| asac | could also be he just lurked on the bug and commented that its fixed in 3.7/3.6 | 10:20 |
| micahg | yes, he tried the special build that dholbert posted | 10:20 |
| asac | sure. but thats not clear from his comment | 10:21 |
| asac | anyway. in case they dont take it upstream we need to take the other patch too that dbaron referred to | 10:22 |
| micahg | ok, should I add that to the patch I made? | 10:22 |
| asac | not sure. so far it sounds like they are not against taking that on 1.9.1 ;) | 10:22 |
| asac | we should just not forget in case we have to do that on our own | 10:22 |
| micahg | yeah, they seem to be willing | 10:22 |
| micahg | ok | 10:22 |
| micahg | asac: if we didn't split out xulrunner, could we jump versions with an SRU? | 10:23 |
| asac | "jump version" means what? | 10:23 |
| asac | major version update? | 10:23 |
| micahg | yep | 10:23 |
| asac | we can also do that with xulrunner split out if its really needed | 10:24 |
| micahg | well, I'm thinking LTS | 10:24 |
| asac | but until 3.0 is not end of life its nothing we do | 10:24 |
| asac | yeah | 10:24 |
| asac | i am thinking about that every second day ;) | 10:24 |
| micahg | 3.7 should be close to ready for Lucid | 10:24 |
| asac | ah | 10:24 |
| micahg | but that will only last for about a year | 10:24 |
| asac | yeah. for lucid i am currently leaning towards getting xulrunner out of ffox | 10:25 |
| asac | howver, the next problem we will face is hardy | 10:25 |
| micahg | so by 11.10, we'll be in trouble with browser support | 10:25 |
| micahg | yes | 10:25 |
| micahg | 3.5 will only last until 10.04 | 10:25 |
| micahg | so even that's not a good solution | 10:26 |
| asac | we will have trouble with browsers upport in 10.01 ;) | 10:26 |
| asac | micahg: 3.5 will be EOL 6 month after 3.6 is out | 10:26 |
| micahg | well, I was saying even if we could push 3.5, it won't solve the problem | 10:26 |
| micahg | yes, which will be around 10.04/05 | 10:26 |
| asac | thats 10.06 _if_ they release in december ... which i dont think will happen | 10:26 |
| sevoir | hi asac :) | 10:26 |
| asac | hi# | 10:26 |
| micahg | oh, BTW, can we get 3.6 in karmic? | 10:27 |
| micahg | universe | 10:27 |
| asac | micahg: we need to go through the rdepends of xulrunner-1.9 and firefox-3.0 one more time. then remove those | 10:27 |
| asac | and then we can try to get freeze exception | 10:27 |
| micahg | ok, so only 2 versions per release? | 10:28 |
| asac | yeah. even that is too much work | 10:28 |
| micahg | ok | 10:28 |
| asac | and given how much folks rant about the naming of 3.5 in jaunty i am not sure its worth it ;) | 10:28 |
| asac | but well. | 10:28 |
| micahg | I'll try to look at that next week, they said 3.6b1 around oct 13 | 10:28 |
| asac | thats ok. | 10:29 |
| asac | i am just concerned to get the other stuff out | 10:29 |
| asac | i will do a hard transition for ffox 3.0 after beta | 10:29 |
| asac | but xulrunner 1.9 needs to be reviewed | 10:29 |
| micahg | ok | 10:29 |
| asac | e.g. is there still something not ported to 1.9.1 | 10:29 |
| asac | i dont think there is something missing | 10:29 |
| asac | bt could be that something sneaked in | 10:29 |
| asac | after i made the list of the stuff that needs to be ported | 10:30 |
| asac | https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-karmic-firefox-3.5 | 10:30 |
| asac | what you could do is check https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox | 10:31 |
| asac | there is a classpath build | 10:31 |
| asac | that somewhat failed on builders | 10:31 |
| asac | i am sure it built locally | 10:31 |
| asac | thats the last thing to get rid of xulrunner _1.8_ | 10:31 |
| asac | De-libxul-dev'ification (LP: #352968): | 10:32 |
| asac | * debian/control: build-depend on xulrunner-dev (and not libxul-dev) | 10:32 |
| asac | checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8 gthread-2.0 >= 2.2 gdk-pixbuf-2.0... Package @GDK_PRIVATE_PACKAGES@ was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `@GDK_PRIVATE_PACKAGES@.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package '@GDK_PRIVATE_PACKAGES@', required by 'GDK', not found | 10:32 |
| asac | configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.8 gthread-2.0 >= 2.2 gdk-pixbuf-2.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. | 10:32 |
| asac | make: *** [config.status] Error 1 | 10:32 |
| asac | not sure what that is | 10:32 |
| asac | either we really lack some builddepends | 10:33 |
| asac | or the control file is busted or something | 10:33 |
| asac | or some .pc file in my ppa | 10:33 |
| asac | let me retry the amd buid | 10:34 |
| asac | build | 10:34 |
| asac | i had some gtk hacking package in sandbox at that point | 10:34 |
| asac | not sure if that was bogus | 10:34 |
| sevoir | asac: I created branch and tested my package with 'debuild -b'. Created deb package and tested install. Working great. Next step? | 10:35 |
| asac | sevoir: push the branch somewhere | 10:36 |
| asac | (e.g. publish) | 10:36 |
| asac | so we can review | 10:36 |
| sevoir | it's here: https://code.launchpad.net/~sevoir/firefox-extensions/firefox-ubuntu-hu-menu.ubuntu | 10:37 |
| asac | yeah. usually you would post that in your NEED PACKAGING bug too | 10:37 |
| sevoir | ok. I post it. | 10:38 |
| * asac cannot look because launchpad gives internal error | 10:38 | |
| asac | i will check later | 10:38 |
| asac | ah now it works | 10:38 |
| asac | * Initial release. (Closes: #422206) -> thats the debian bug syntax | 10:38 |
| asac | for launchpad its: LP: #XXXX | 10:38 |
| asac | firefox-ubuntu-hu-menu (1.7.0.0 -> thats a native version ... use a upstream + ubuntu revision approach | 10:39 |
| asac | like 1.7.0-0ubuntu1 (if your upstream relesae is 1.7.0) | 10:39 |
| asac | Maintainer: Szenográdi Norbert Péter <sevoir@sevoir.hu> | 10:39 |
| asac | put yourself in XSBC-Original-Maintainer | 10:39 |
| asac | and use Mozilla Extensions Developmenet Team <....> as Maintainer: | 10:40 |
| asac | Vcs-Browser: https://code.launchpad.net/~sevoir/firefox-extensions/firefox-ubuntu-hu-menu.upstream | 10:40 |
| asac | -> dont use upstream branch | 10:40 |
| asac | also use the projected release branch | 10:40 |
| asac | which will be either ~ubuntu-dev or ~mozilla-extensions-dev | 10:40 |
| asac | same for Vcs-Bzr | 10:40 |
| asac | sevoir: ^^ | 10:40 |
| sevoir | ahhh | 10:41 |
| sevoir | :D | 10:41 |
| sevoir | learning, learning, learning | 10:41 |
| sevoir | ;) | 10:41 |
| asac | in debian/copyright -> dont put a full GPL copy | 10:41 |
| asac | if your license is in /usr/share/common-licenses | 10:41 |
| asac | just refer to that file | 10:41 |
| asac | and only put a short header in copyright file | 10:42 |
| asac | sevoir: you say that your import is 1.7.0.0 ... but your install.rdf says version=1.7 | 10:42 |
| asac | MOZ_XPI_EMID := {8c08a1b5-387b-4486-b4e3-77786ff7fd16} | 10:43 |
| asac | is that needed? | 10:43 |
| asac | in most cases it should just work without that | 10:43 |
| sevoir | okay, I check these errors now. | 10:43 |
| asac | sevoir: thats it ... oh. since you are upstream, please please pretty please put your LICENSE in the top level upstream .xpi | 10:43 |
| asac | (also would be in the import upstream) | 10:44 |
| asac | thx | 10:44 |
| asac | sevoir: thanks. btw, even i had a lot comments its not bad ;) ... so keep up the work!! | 10:49 |
| sevoir | just the first is hard, after more easier :-) | 10:51 |
| asac | yep | 10:52 |
| sevoir | I dont give up, I would like to see my extensions in repository :P | 10:52 |
| asac | sevoir: oh..we shouldnt use the firefox prefix i would think | 10:53 |
| sevoir | ubuntu-hu-menu is okay? | 10:53 |
| asac | we are currently working with debian on a standard | 10:53 |
| asac | that standard says that the binary package should be xul-ext- | 10:54 |
| asac | prefix | 10:54 |
| asac | some stuff for the new standard is http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam | 10:54 |
| asac | but dont take everythig for granted there yet ;) | 10:55 |
| sevoir | many info :D | 10:56 |
| asac | yeah | 10:57 |
| asac | just address the comments i had | 10:57 |
| asac | the XPI.TEMPLATE you used should have most stuff proper | 10:57 |
| asac | so you should be fine in general ;) | 10:57 |
| sevoir | bazaar not work ? | 11:24 |
| asac | bazaar works | 11:25 |
| asac | not sure what you mean | 11:25 |
| asac | ;) | 11:25 |
| sevoir | ERROR: Connection error: while sending POST /~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/XPI.TEMPLATE/.bzr/smart: [Errno 113] | 11:25 |
| sevoir | :o | 11:25 |
| asac | not sure | 11:25 |
| asac | what url are you triny got push to? | 11:25 |
| asac | e.g. you should not push to XPI.TEMPLATE | 11:26 |
| asac | thats for sure | 11:26 |
| sevoir | bzr branch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/XPI.TEMPLATE | 11:26 |
| sevoir | but this okay, I copied other dir. | 11:27 |
| sevoir | I cant put my branch | 11:27 |
| sevoir | bzr push bzr+ssh://sevoir@bazaar.launchpad.net/~sevoir/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-hu-menu.upstream | 11:27 |
| fta2 | asac, do you know of any waterfall like tool for bzr and/or pbuilder? | 12:10 |
| asac | fta2: i know the waterfall model ;) | 12:11 |
| fta2 | i'd like to setup something like that to do continuous builds and track perf & memory per commit | 12:11 |
| asac | you want to do those per-commit builds in ppa ;)? | 12:12 |
| === jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
| sevoir | asac: new debian/copyright file is okay? : http://paste.ubuntu.com/282916/ | 12:19 |
| asac | i think so | 12:20 |
| sevoir | and new debian/control file: http://paste.ubuntu.com/282917/ | 12:20 |
| asac | sevoir: have you checked our ubuntu-it-menu ? | 12:21 |
| sevoir | yes | 12:21 |
| sevoir | but only license file | 12:21 |
| sevoir | I check ubuntu-it-menu debian/copyright file | 12:22 |
| asac | ok | 12:22 |
| asac | sevoir: how did you produce the orig tarball? using med-xpi-unpack? | 12:22 |
| sevoir | the package from addons page > xpi unpack | 12:23 |
| asac | yeah | 12:24 |
| asac | good | 12:24 |
| asac | sevoir: so the top level license file should be included in your addons .xpi | 12:24 |
| asac | like license.txt ... or COPYING in the top level of the xpi | 12:24 |
| asac | makes it easier ;) | 12:25 |
| sevoir | I have license file in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sevoir/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-hu-menu.upstream/files | 12:26 |
| sevoir | this from ubuntu-it-menu ;-) | 12:26 |
| sevoir | it's wrong or wrong place? | 12:28 |
| asac | that lnk doesnt work | 12:51 |
| asac | if its in top level dir of the upstream tree then its fine | 12:51 |
| sevoir | asac: please check it now: https://code.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions | 12:57 |
| sevoir | it think, these same as ubuntu-it-menu | 12:58 |
| sevoir | -t | 12:58 |
| fta2 | asac, no, not in a ppa, this is not open source, at least not yet | 13:41 |
| fta2 | not that i don't want it to be... | 13:56 |
| sevoir | asac: I think its done, buildeb -b working fine. Deb is okay, installable | 14:35 |
| asac | sevoir: thx. i will check that in a few | 14:44 |
| sevoir | ok, Im waiting | 14:44 |
| sevoir | thx | 14:44 |
| asac | sevoir: ok i requested review from myself and bdrung on your branch | 14:47 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sevoir/firefox-extensions/ubuntu-hu-menu.ubuntu/+merge/12718 | 14:47 |
| asac | you should get mails with our comments etc. | 14:47 |
| sevoir | okay. and I subscribed to mailing list too ;-) | 14:48 |
| asac | sevoir: i made a quick comment up front ... but wait a bit till bdrung_ had a look at it too | 15:11 |
| asac | fta2: wlll you drop the python-tlslite depends in chromium? | 15:11 |
| asac | or shall i? doko said you said its not needed anymore | 15:11 |
| fta2 | asac, it's used as a 3rd party because i dropped the tiny patch needed to use the system one | 15:12 |
| fta2 | it's just a matter of /usr/bin/tls (policy compliant) vs /usr/bin/tls.py (expected by chromium) | 15:13 |
| fta2 | doko 1st wanted that package into the distro, until he realized the last version was from 2005 | 15:14 |
| sevoir | okay | 15:15 |
| sevoir | asac: but If my extension contain a jar file, what can I do? should I unpack and upload it? | 15:16 |
| bdrung_ | sevoir: yes, unpack it (already in the source file) | 15:22 |
| asac | sevoir: you produce the upstream tree by just running med-xpi-unpack | 15:23 |
| asac | with the .xpi | 15:23 |
| sevoir | ok, I check it now | 15:23 |
| asac | fta2: ok great. point is that we still build-depend on it. so we can just drop it? | 15:24 |
| asac | or is there anything needed (like tls.py link) | 15:24 |
| fta2 | by default, the install rule creates /usr/bin/tls.py, that's why google expects it, but it's not compliant with the debian policy to put *.py, *.sh, *.pl in /usr/bin, so i changed it, but it needs a patch in chrome, which i had for a long time, until i removed it for a reason i don't remember | 15:26 |
| fta2 | so either i re-add this patch and we can drop a 3rd party dir, or i drop the build-dep and keep that 3rd party | 15:27 |
| sevoir | bdrung_ , asac: unpacked and uploaded | 15:30 |
| sevoir | bye all | 15:52 |
| sevoir | I will come back tomorrow :) | 15:52 |
| asac | am i here? | 16:09 |
| asac | !test | 16:09 |
| ubottu | yes, I'm alive. | 16:09 |
| asac | good | 16:09 |
| fta2 | am I? | 16:16 |
| fta2 | i've disconnected for a while | 16:16 |
| asac | fta2: you are ;) | 16:19 |
| asac | !test | 16:19 |
| ubottu | yes, I'm alive. | 16:19 |
| asac | seems to be a good test ;) | 16:19 |
| fta2 | yep | 16:19 |
| asac | fta2: what would be the implication of dropping the build-dep ... would we still ship tls.py in usr/bin ? | 16:34 |
| asac | if not then we definitly want that | 16:34 |
| asac | dtchen: not sure if that is sound related, but i think so. | 16:34 |
| asac | dtchen: yesterday i upgraded my X61s lenovo thing | 16:35 |
| fta2 | no, it's just used during the tests, it's not shipped | 16:35 |
| asac | dtchen: (one week suspended) | 16:35 |
| asac | dtchen: now it makes some strange click sounds | 16:35 |
| asac | no really sure when it does that | 16:35 |
| asac | but it definitly happens from time to time | 16:35 |
| asac | something every other minute | 16:35 |
| asac | fta2: good. will you drop the build-dep? | 16:35 |
| asac | and repush (if the builders are not too busy) | 16:36 |
| fta2 | why repush? is there an emergency or something? | 16:36 |
| asac | fta2: no. | 16:41 |
| asac | fta2: just thought we would know if it fails earlier | 16:41 |
| fta2 | committed | 16:41 |
| asac | otherwise just keep it | 16:41 |
| asac | we will see tomorrow | 16:41 |
| fta2 | i made the test failures non fatal anyway, should not be a problem | 16:42 |
| eagles0513875 | hey asac you there | 17:30 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: is it normal for an extension to not work one min then work another. cuz today i got on linux at school and i tried out firefox and as soon as i got on bindwood which i built using devscripts 0.16 worked O_o without adding any extra lines as mentioned in the wiki | 17:42 |
| fta | asac, http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/chromium-verbose.png *sigh* | 19:15 |
| asac | fta: heh. make the font smaller ;) j.k. | 19:47 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: you still here | 20:00 |
| eagles0513875 | did you see my message that i left you earlier | 20:00 |
| asac | i dont understand the question | 20:06 |
| asac | works != is proper | 20:07 |
| asac | its usually less | 20:07 |
| BUGabundo | hey every one. guud evening | 20:58 |
| BUGabundo | fta: chromium is stupid | 20:58 |
| BUGabundo | a single download is hogging one of my cores | 20:58 |
| BUGabundo | luckly since it has PID separation | 20:58 |
| BUGabundo | I can run it with CPU limit -l 20 :) | 20:58 |
| micahg | BUGabundo: it is a nightly | 20:59 |
| BUGabundo | always daily :) | 20:59 |
| BUGabundo | also this morning version had some bug with cookies | 20:59 |
| bdrung | asac: now time to sync m-d | 21:02 |
| fta | BUGabundo, don't tell me, find existing bugs or file one | 21:17 |
| fta | (re) BUGabundo, don't tell me, find existing bugs or file one | 21:31 |
| bdrung | asac: can bug #440239 be ff fault? | 22:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 440239 in pwdhash "< key not dead" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/440239 | 22:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
