| lifeless | so, I'm upstream; I rolled release of what was already in Ubuntu as ~68 or so; tested that in a PPA, pushed it to Debian | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| lifeless | let it settle there | 00:00 |
| lifeless | and now want it it Ubuntu, because it includes the perl modules, .pc file etc | 00:00 |
| james_w | so it does have new features? | 00:01 |
| lifeless | from the upstream perspective, no. Some things that weren't installed by the package are now [the perl module] | 00:01 |
| james_w | ok, so motu-release will want to review | 00:02 |
| sistpoty | lifeless: are you subscribed as bug contact and promise to fix things if they are broken? | 00:02 |
| lifeless | sistpoty: is the moon in orbit? | 00:03 |
| sistpoty | lifeless: good, than declare it as bug fix only, and go straight to ubuntu-archive ;) | 00:03 |
| lifeless | sistpoty: I'm upstream; package it in Ubuntu, package it with Jelmer in Debian | 00:03 |
| lifeless | mm | 00:04 |
| lifeless | I'd rather err on caution here and use that card when I really have to :) | 00:05 |
| christoph_debian | sistpoty: hm I'm looking at the doc currently | 00:05 |
| sistpoty | haha | 00:05 |
| sistpoty | christoph_debian: for new packages it basically calms down to why we want it and where to get from | 00:05 |
| sistpoty | christoph_debian: bonus points for mentioning that you're packaging it in debian and will take care for ubuntu bugs as well ;) | 00:06 |
| lifeless | urgh, autotools, sometimes, I hates you | 00:07 |
| * JontheEchidna always hates autotools. cmake ftw | 00:07 | |
| lifeless | well, I just found that the .pc file generated contains | 00:08 |
| lifeless | exec_prefix=${prefix} | 00:08 |
| * sistpoty learnt to love autotools and hopes that now autotool will love him as well | 00:08 | |
| sistpoty | (which sadly isn't always the case) | 00:08 |
| lifeless | which I'm now going to have to check works | 00:08 |
| sistpoty | christoph_debian: of course mentioning some kind of testing would also be good (well, I've done that, so... ;)) | 00:09 |
| thiagocrepaldi | has anyone here able to ENABLE LdapAuthentication mediawiki-extension plugin ? | 00:12 |
| thiagocrepaldi | "mediawiki-extension" package looks like debian/ubuntu specific, so i can't find help to configure it | 00:12 |
| ari-tczew | is here? anyone | 00:21 |
| ari-tczew | please check this bug: 421684 have someone got this bug? | 00:23 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: Try it without the colon | 00:38 |
| ScottK | thiagocrepaldi: You might get help in #ubuntu-server. Not sure | 00:38 |
| thiagocrepaldi | ScottK, for ow, no success =/ | 00:39 |
| thiagocrepaldi | now* | 00:39 |
| thiagocrepaldi | and i checked that ubuntu-mot are the mediawiki-extensions's maintainer | 00:41 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: what is colon? | 00:46 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: Instead of bug: 421684, bug 421684 | 00:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 421684 in linux "bluetooth send malformed files " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421684 | 00:50 |
| ScottK | Then people have a better idea what you're asking about. | 00:50 |
| ari-tczew | bug 421684 | 00:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 421684 in linux "bluetooth send malformed files " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421684 | 00:53 |
| ari-tczew | OK | 00:53 |
| ari-tczew | sorry for mistaking, it's my first day on irc | 00:54 |
| ari-tczew | what is colon, ScottK ? | 00:54 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: colon is ";" | 00:55 |
| ScottK | oops | 00:55 |
| ScottK | That's semi-colon | 00:55 |
| ScottK | colon is ":" | 00:55 |
| ari-tczew | ah, OK | 00:55 |
| sistpoty | lifeless: haha, regarding ScottK's comment :P | 00:56 |
| lifeless | sistpoty: :P | 00:57 |
| ari-tczew | english isn't my language | 00:57 |
| ari-tczew | my fail :P | 00:57 |
| lifeless | ScottK: so, I still need -archive to flip the bit. Thats you isn't it? | 00:57 |
| ScottK | lifeless: Needs someone with shell access. | 00:57 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: You are doing great. | 00:59 |
| sistpoty | vorian: (| ScottK): bug #419465 looks kde-specific | 01:00 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 419465 in plasma-widget-fancytasks "New upstream release plasma-widget-fancytasks 0.9.6" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/419465 | 01:00 |
| sistpoty | (/me is just going through the list, trying to get long-standing ones updated) | 01:00 |
| === Guest77758 is now known as Pici | ||
| lamont | sistpoty: I'll be bootstrapping it this weekend | 02:06 |
| lamont | tonight is with family in a bit though | 02:06 |
| sistpoty | \o/ | 02:06 |
| sistpoty | lamont: excellent, thanks a lot! | 02:07 |
| * sistpoty goes to bed. gn8 everyone | 03:02 | |
| === runasand_ is now known as runasand | ||
| === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
| === captivus is now known as Guest47363 | ||
| Laibsch1 | can somebody please take the fix from 414537 from karmic and release it in jaunty? | 05:46 |
| === Laibsch1 is now known as Laibsch | ||
| Laibsch | The fix for that bug is the only difference between the karmic and jaunty package | 05:47 |
| Laibsch | bug 414537 | 05:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 414537 in isdnutils "{karmic] package ipppd 1:3.12.20071127-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414537 | 05:47 |
| Laibsch | bdrung_: ping. Kannst Du das vielleicht noch machen? | 05:49 |
| jdong | Laibsch: an excellent candidate for a StableReleaseUpdate | 06:02 |
| jdong | !sru | 06:02 |
| ubottu | Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 06:02 |
| jdong | if you can prep the writeup and debdiffs according to the instructions there, I'll take a look at it right away | 06:03 |
| Laibsch | I'm sorry | 06:03 |
| Laibsch | I'm taking an extended overseas trip on Monday | 06:03 |
| Laibsch | I'm very short on time | 06:03 |
| Laibsch | But the SRU should be more than straight-forward | 06:03 |
| jdong | absolutely | 06:04 |
| Laibsch | s/karmic/jaunty/ in the first line of the changelog is all that should be necessary | 06:04 |
| Laibsch | And maybe not even that | 06:05 |
| Laibsch | And regression potential is obviously 0 | 06:05 |
| jdong | indeed | 06:05 |
| === Quintasan1 is now known as Quintasan | ||
| fabrice_sp__ | jtimberman, about bug #420674. It's just a matter of waiting for an archive admin to perform the sync. Don't worry: it's on his way. | 07:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 420674 in libmixlib-config-ruby "Please sync libmixlib-config-ruby 1.0.12-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/420674 | 07:59 |
| === fabrice_sp__ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
| randomaction | fabrice_sp: I redid the debdiff for ufraw | 08:12 |
| fabrice_sp_ | randomaction, ok. I'll have a look now | 08:18 |
| fabrice_sp_ | (waiting for a build to end :-) ) | 08:18 |
| AnAnt | Hello, do I need to file FFe for a new branding package ? | 08:19 |
| AnAnt | it's an xsplash theme | 08:19 |
| fabrice_sp_ | randomaction, sounds good. I'll build, and if it installs, I'll upload. Thanks for your contrib! :-) | 08:21 |
| fabrice_sp_ | AnAnt, I think so (new package = new features) | 08:22 |
| === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung_home | ||
| AnAnt | ok | 08:24 |
| fabrice_sp_ | randomaction, uploaded. Thanks! | 08:37 |
| fabrice_sp_ | no more fix to FTBFS to sponsor? :-D | 08:37 |
| randomaction | good to have helpful upstreams :) | 08:37 |
| === Darren is now known as dmb | ||
| fabrice_sp_ | yep :-) | 08:38 |
| fabrice_sp_ | in general, it's good to have a look at upstream svn, to check if the bug is already fixed (others distros are using the latest c libs) | 08:40 |
| randomaction | oh, in this case it was even imported into LP | 08:51 |
| ripps | can someone help me use patches with a pacakge that doesn't use cdbs? | 09:01 |
| lifeless | have you read the wiki page on patch systems? | 09:02 |
| ripps | lifeless: I'm trying to implement a quilt patchsystem, and the wiki only explains how to do a simple patchsys. I know quilt includes a quilt.make, but I don't think it's working. | 09:04 |
| lifeless | there are plenty of packages using quilt already | 09:05 |
| lifeless | I'd cargo cult one of them | 09:05 |
| lifeless | but not fakeraid, cause it does two builds and it a bit heinous | 09:05 |
| RAOF | IIRC quilt.make basically gives you a patch: and unpatch: targets that DTRT. | 09:06 |
| ripps | lifeless: you know a cdbs-less package using quilt? | 09:06 |
| ripps | and then I keep reading something about usein --with-quilt with debhelper, but I don't know specifically where to put it or how | 09:08 |
| === Igorot is now known as Knightlust | ||
| ripps | ah, I think I know, I had to add something to build-stamp and clean | 09:14 |
| lifeless | if you have time, see if there is a FAQ on quilt as patchsys, and if not, perhaps write onee up? | 09:16 |
| lifeless | [e.g. on the patch systems page on the wiki] | 09:16 |
| ripps | Okay, I added dh_quilt_patch and dh_quilt_unpatch to the rules. I had assumed that quilt.make would take care of everything, but I was wrong | 09:18 |
| sebner | ripps: post your rules file somewhere | 09:20 |
| ripps | sebner: I'm not certain it will work yet, but you just add one dh_quilt_patch before configure and dh_quilt_unpatch before dh_clean, whereever those are in your rules | 09:22 |
| ripps | I put my dh_quilt_patch at the beginning of build-stamp: and dh_quilt_unpatch near the end of clean: | 09:23 |
| sebner | ripps: not really needed. dh --with quilt $@ | 09:25 |
| ripps | sebner: that's if your using the super simple dh7 layout, the package I'm trying to modify already has a pretty complicated setup and I don't want to alter it too much. | 09:29 |
| sebner | ripps: I personally also use --with quilt with big and not simple rules layouts ... paste you rules file somewhere ;) | 09:30 |
| === Zic is now known as Guest64736 | ||
| joaopinto | shouldn't all universe packages be maintained by MOTU ? | 11:06 |
| joaopinto | I am looking at apparmor-profiles, it's universe by maintained by UCD | 11:06 |
| === didrocks_ is now known as didrocks | ||
| === k0p_ is now known as k0p | ||
| directhex | bah, mysql won't start on my server after karmic upgrade | 13:12 |
| directhex | found it. skip-bdb line in my.cnf kills mysql-server-5.1 | 13:25 |
| jdstrand | joaopinto: the source package for apparmor-profiles is 'apparmor'. 'apparmor' is one of those cases where it has packages in both universe and main | 13:33 |
| jdstrand | joaopinto: if you want to make changes, file a bug against apparmor, attach a debdiff or link to a branch and we can get it merged | 13:33 |
| mok0 | Who has tried an update-manager upgrade jaunty -> karmc? | 14:05 |
| mok0 | Considering an upgrade of my production box but... you know | 14:07 |
| === Guest47363 is now known as captivus | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| bdrung | DktrKranz: your main email is dktrkranz@ubuntu.com ? | 14:56 |
| DktrKranz | bdrung: for ubuntu stuff yes | 14:58 |
| bdrung | k | 14:58 |
| bdrung | thx | 14:58 |
| DktrKranz | np :) | 14:58 |
| ScottK | mok0: I've upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic during the beta freeze. My only problem was I upgraded off of a stale mirror and got a dead box due to an old KDM. Once I coaxed it into life and got the updated one it was fine. | 15:01 |
| jbernard_ | mok0: I tried it 4 days ago and all went smooth | 15:11 |
| === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage | ||
| === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage | ||
| soc1 | hi | 16:13 |
| soc1 | can someone help me with a gnome app? | 16:13 |
| soc1 | i can't find that http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/26/re-adding-fonts-in-gnome/ app in the gnome source tree | 16:13 |
| soc1 | it _should_ be in gnome-control-center, but the changes there a at least 7 monts old ... | 16:14 |
| === azrael is now known as Guest21229 | ||
| soc1 | btw, *.ttf-fonts get a thumbnail, *.otf-fonts don't get one, that's a bug, right? | 16:21 |
| soc1 | additionaly | 16:21 |
| soc1 | s/additionaly/additionally | 16:21 |
| soc1 | ttf is opened by gnome-font-viewer, otf not | 16:21 |
| soc1 | any ideas? | 16:22 |
| wrapster | http://pastie.org/640490 thats the change log and line actually starts with a red highlight.. | 16:52 |
| wrapster | what does that mean? | 16:52 |
| Amaranth | wrapster: if you mean the first line it could be because "unstable" isn't an Ubuntu release | 16:53 |
| wrapster | no its not the first line its "* Added a return(0) to myk_mhz in myk_gem.c " | 16:54 |
| wrapster | that line.. btw is the format im specifying matching to the standard? | 16:54 |
| wrapster | or should i write in a different way? | 16:54 |
| ScottK | wrapster: Did you use spaces or a tab? | 16:55 |
| wrapster | tab | 16:55 |
| ScottK | If you used a tab, that's the problem | 16:55 |
| wrapster | which was set to 2 | 16:55 |
| wrapster | eiks!! | 16:55 |
| ScottK | Needs to be spaces | 16:55 |
| wrapster | ok | 16:55 |
| ScottK | Gotta run | 16:55 |
| wrapster | working now... | 16:56 |
| wrapster | thanks | 16:56 |
| wrapster | but i would like to know if the format i've followed is right? | 16:56 |
| wrapster | dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends};;;;; dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${misc:Depends} ---> while make this is a warning from the control file that im getting..is it a serious one? seconldy there are no dependency so should i yank that line out completely or can i specify something line NULL or null in Depends: | 17:03 |
| maxb | wrapster: They are not serious, you should probably leave in misc:Depends ... and I thought newer debhelper tried to avoid that warning. | 17:21 |
| maxb | It's reasonable to remove shlibs:Depends if your package contains no compiled code such that it's impossible for it to have a .so dependency | 17:22 |
| wrapster | well nope.. for now i'll leave both in peace. | 17:22 |
| wrapster | im building pkg out of tarballs for pkgs that are non exisitant so this is what i have in the chagnelog... " * Initial release (Closes: #nnnn) <nnnn is the bug number of your ITP>" what do i write here? or should it be left the way it is? | 17:23 |
| wrapster | i can take that line out right? | 17:25 |
| maxb | wrapster: Hm. I'm seeing code that claims to avoid the misc:Depends warning in the karmic version of debhelper | 17:26 |
| wrapster | im not using karmic i guess then!! | 17:27 |
| maxb | heh | 17:27 |
| maxb | On the subject of changelogs - write anything you like, just make it meaningful. | 17:27 |
| ari-tczew | hello all | 19:29 |
| hyperair | hello | 19:29 |
| fabrice_sp_ | hello ari-tczew | 19:55 |
| fabrice_sp_ | do you have 5 minutes to speak about maven2? | 19:55 |
| ari-tczew | yes | 19:56 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I tried earlier in the cycle to have the maven/plexus packages to work, and I had to stop, because it required some non maven2 package to be updated, and ttx didn't wanted to impact non maven packages because of maven | 19:57 |
| fabrice_sp_ | so, basically, if at some points you needs a non maven package, don't try to go further, and the sync won't be accepted | 19:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | just wanted to warn you :-) | 19:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | s/and/as/ | 20:00 |
| fabrice_sp_ | one of them was google-collections-java, I think | 20:02 |
| === bdrung_home is now known as bdrung | ||
| ari-tczew | sorry fabrice for non response | 20:17 |
| ari-tczew | so it's not eay work | 20:17 |
| ari-tczew | easy * | 20:17 |
| wrapster | ive developed pkgs out of a few tarballs and all of them after installaion require a reboot.. is it safe to install em all first then reboot at once? or should i do it one by one? | 20:19 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, no, but the Debian packages has changed, so it may be possible now | 20:20 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp_: what do you think, is it sense to work on maven? | 20:24 |
| ari-tczew | from some comments is info, that maven from karmic is broken | 20:25 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, you could do a quick check on the required packages, and see if you would need a non maven package, because of a FTBFS. If it's the case, it's not worth trying to go further | 20:25 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes: it's totally broken, but as I was saying before, it's known, and accepted by core-dev.... | 20:26 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I mean: the risk of getting something other broken because of a bad sync is not worth the risk | 20:26 |
| sistpoty | ? | 20:27 |
| ari-tczew | ehh, now I'm busy and for the moment someone else can works on maven2 | 20:27 |
| sistpoty | imho we should fix maven, but we need to get a plan of what we need to sync, what needs to get through new (at least the split off core package) etc. | 20:28 |
| ari-tczew | btw. Please MOTU review sync hugin request, now is complete informations: bug 439396 | 20:29 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 439396 in hugin "[FFe] Sync hugin 0.8.0.dfsg-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/439396 | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | ack needed | 20:29 |
| fabrice_sp_ | sistpoty, I've exchanged some emails with ttx, and this what I've been told 2 times (I tried it 2 times :-) ) | 20:31 |
| fabrice_sp_ | when I tried to fix them, I required at least 4 non maven packages | 20:32 |
| sistpoty | fabrice_sp_: so you do have some overview of what's needed for maven already? | 20:32 |
| sistpoty | fabrice_sp_: can you add that to the FFe bug please | 20:32 |
| fabrice_sp_ | sistpoty, I had all packages in my ppa, but deleted everything ... I only have the emails with ttx, that I will paste in the sync request, if it makes sense | 20:35 |
| sistpoty | fabrice_sp_: that would be great, thanks! | 20:36 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ok. Thanks to you ;-) | 20:36 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp_: hugin tested, works fine ;) | 20:38 |
| ari-tczew | libpano needed | 20:38 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, you still need to convince 2 motu-release team member :-) | 20:39 |
| ari-tczew | ACK right? | 20:39 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes | 20:39 |
| ari-tczew | status changed from Imcomplete to New, is this OK? | 20:40 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes | 20:40 |
| fabrice_sp_ | do you have the maven2 sync bug request at hand? | 20:40 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I'll update it with the answer of ttx | 20:40 |
| ari-tczew | yes, but it's made for all maven packages | 20:40 |
| ari-tczew | bug 427539 | 20:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 427539 in maven2 "[FFe] Sync libmaven packages from Debian unstable" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/427539 | 20:41 |
| fabrice_sp_ | perfect :-) Thanks | 20:41 |
| ari-tczew | np | 20:42 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, for Hugin, did you keep the patch I made to update default parameters? | 20:43 |
| fabrice_sp_ | it seems not, as I'm seen the bug as sync request | 20:43 |
| fabrice_sp_ | s/seen/seeing/ | 20:44 |
| ari-tczew | I did nothing on hugin! only send to ppa from unstable (debian/changelog changed) | 20:45 |
| ari-tczew | Darxus tested it | 20:45 |
| ScottK | sistpoty: hugin is probably something we want. | 20:46 |
| fabrice_sp_ | you need to perform the merge, then | 20:46 |
| sistpoty | ScottK: *nod*, though I haven't looked in detail yet. libpano1 seems a non-brainer *if* we want hugin (only hugin as rdepends) | 20:47 |
| ScottK | fabrice_sp_: Is it a merge or a sync? | 20:48 |
| fabrice_sp_ | it has to be a merge: the default pano software is not the same in Ubuntu than in Debian | 20:49 |
| fabrice_sp_ | libpano can be synced AFAIR | 20:49 |
| ari-tczew | btw. it's nice that we can talk directly about bugs instead on LP | 20:54 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, it's quicker :-) | 20:55 |
| fabrice_sp_ | do you take the merge? | 20:55 |
| ari-tczew | I can take this, but tell me what I need to do? | 20:57 |
| ari-tczew | include patch, remove patch... ? | 20:57 |
| fabrice_sp_ | It seems that 2 motu-release agree that hugin 0.8.0 is a must-have :-) | 20:59 |
| ari-tczew | yhym | 20:59 |
| fabrice_sp_ | !merge | 20:59 |
| ubottu | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging | 20:59 |
| Darxus | Hi. | 21:05 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Hi Darxus | 21:05 |
| Darxus | Wow, hugin 0.8.0 is actually going to make karmic? Excellent. | 21:08 |
| Darxus | Then it'll only be one major release behind :) | 21:08 |
| Darxus | Let me know if I can help further. | 21:10 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darxus, more testing after the merge :-) | 21:10 |
| Darxus | Sure. | 21:10 |
| Darxus | So Ari is doing the merge? | 21:11 |
| fabrice_sp_ | actually, the Debian version can't go as-is into Ubuntu | 21:11 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I think so: he is reading the merge guide now :-) | 21:11 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ari-tczew, do you confirm? | 21:11 |
| Darxus | fabrice_sp_: Yeah I was testing the ubuntu 2009.2.0 version and its lack of automatic stitching is a real pain. | 21:11 |
| fabrice_sp_ | this was one of my first fix for Ubuntu :-D | 21:12 |
| Darxus | fabrice_sp_: Making autopano work by default? | 21:12 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes | 21:12 |
| Darxus | fabrice_sp_: Nice, thanks :) | 21:12 |
| fabrice_sp_ | ;-) | 21:12 |
| Darxus | I couldn't even figure out how to get any of those to work with the debian experimental package :( | 21:13 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I don't know for the 2009.2.0 version, but the other one has to be patched, and the patch has to be adapted for version 0.8.0 | 21:14 |
| fabrice_sp_ | will have a look in the next dev. cycle | 21:14 |
| Darxus | Right. | 21:14 |
| * fabrice_sp_ is busy fixing FTBFS and sponsoring fixes | 21:14 | |
| Darxus | Cool. | 21:15 |
| Darxus | Makes me a little nervous that so many such things are still open at this stage. | 21:15 |
| Darxus | Hell, it makes me nervous that hugin 0.8.0 can be accepted after beta freeze without some kind of massive coordinated testing. | 21:16 |
| fabrice_sp_ | it has been some time in Testing, and no blocking bugs has been found | 21:18 |
| ScottK | Darxus: It's a judgement call. If we can get some reasonable testing, then we ought to have it. | 21:19 |
| ScottK | If not, we won't. | 21:19 |
| Darxus | Wow, Merge-O-Matic actually has hugin 0.8.0. | 21:20 |
| fabrice_sp_ | MoM has everything :-) | 21:22 |
| ari-tczew | I didn't read megre docs, now I'm working on something for my daily-work, not for Ubuntu | 21:23 |
| ari-tczew | give me time for this | 21:23 |
| ari-tczew | fabrice_sp_: So I must include patch from debian experimental to hugin 0.8.0, right? | 21:23 |
| ari-tczew | wait... what about libpano? It needed first, before getting hugin | 21:24 |
| fabrice_sp_ | no: include the changes done on hugin 0.7.0 to 0.8.0, or at leas review them | 21:25 |
| Darxus | # wc -l hugin_0.8.0.dfsg-2.patch | 21:25 |
| Darxus | 238872 hugin_0.8.0.dfsg-2.patch | 21:25 |
| Darxus | :( | 21:25 |
| fabrice_sp_ | include both in your ppa, and if testing is ok, the ack will go for both | 21:25 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darxus, my changes can't be applied as-is to 0.8.0: the source patched has changed | 21:25 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I don't remember it to be as big as that :-/ | 21:26 |
| ari-tczew | heh, I'll review this later. | 21:27 |
| ari-tczew | now I must go away, cya | 21:27 |
| fabrice_sp_ | bye | 21:27 |
| Darxus | Why isn't hugin on https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html ? | 21:31 |
| Darxus | Ohh, looks like the only merge conflict is in debian/control. | 21:36 |
| sistpoty | Darxus: it was uploaded to unstable after the last run of MoM | 21:37 |
| Darxus | sistpoty: Ah, thanks. | 21:37 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darxus, could, but the patch won't apply | 21:37 |
| fabrice_sp_ | otherwise, it's a quite easy merge | 21:39 |
| Darxus | And the only changes in debian/control are Build-Depends and Standards-Version. | 21:39 |
| ScottK | What's the build-depends change? | 21:40 |
| Darxus | "libpano13-dev" to "libpano13-dev (>= 2.9.14~0)", wx-common was removed, and libglew1.5-dev was added. | 21:41 |
| Darxus | http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/libglew1.5-dev exists. | 21:41 |
| Darxus | So it looks like the only conflict can be resolved by just accepting the new stuff from debian? | 21:42 |
| Darxus | Standards-Version: 3.8.0 | 21:42 |
| Darxus | Standards-Version: 3.8.3 | 21:42 |
| ScottK | Standards version we don't care about | 21:43 |
| Darxus | I don't know what that means, but I'm going to guess, since these are the only changes, that it'll work :) | 21:43 |
| ScottK | What that means is we need the newer libpano | 21:43 |
| Darxus | Didn't we know that? | 21:44 |
| ScottK | So if those are the only changes, we should be able to update libpano and then sync hugin. | 21:44 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes: it won't build with the actual one | 21:44 |
| ScottK | Yes, but that's what that means. | 21:44 |
| Darxus | Right. Cool. | 21:44 |
| fabrice_sp_ | no: there is still a patch to apply to hugin for Ubuntu | 21:45 |
| fabrice_sp_ | so sync for libpano and merge for Hugin | 21:45 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darkus was jsut speaking about the conflict in the merge | 21:45 |
| fabrice_sp_ | 51_ubuntu-autopano-sift is the patch to keep. IIRC, 52_ubuntu_gcc44_ftbfs can be dropped | 21:48 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darxus, ^ | 21:49 |
| Darxus | fabrice_sp_: Looking. | 21:49 |
| Darxus | How sure are you? :) | 21:49 |
| fabrice_sp_ | about keeping 51_ubuntu-autopano-sift ? | 21:50 |
| fabrice_sp_ | 100% :-) | 21:50 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I began to work on the merge some time ago, and got then distracted .-) | 21:50 |
| Darxus | Man that's a small patch :) | 21:50 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yep: but the lines don't fit now | 21:50 |
| Darxus | fabrice_sp_: How sure are you about dropping 52_ubuntu_gcc44_ftbfs? | 21:50 |
| fabrice_sp_ | hmm, 50% :-) | 21:51 |
| Darxus | Oh. I expected that to show up in MoM's report. | 21:51 |
| Darxus | Hah. | 21:51 |
| fabrice_sp_ | I think all lines where fixed.... | 21:51 |
| fabrice_sp_ | you can try, if you want, without the gcc 4.4 patch, and see if it compile | 21:51 |
| Darxus | Ah, that makes sense. | 21:51 |
| ScottK | Generally you can look at the source that the patch was touching and see. | 21:52 |
| ScottK | Particularly in the case of GCC 4.4 compatibilty changes, it's usually pretty obvious. | 21:53 |
| Darxus | #define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano-sift-c.exe" | 21:55 |
| Darxus | There's the problem. In the upstream. | 21:55 |
| fabrice_sp_ | this one if for Windows | 21:55 |
| Darxus | Ohh.. | 21:55 |
| fabrice_sp_ | there is 3 blocks of parameters, and I patched only the unix one | 21:55 |
| Darxus | Right. | 21:56 |
| fabrice_sp_ | :-) | 21:56 |
| Darxus | Okay. New debian patch: | 21:58 |
| Darxus | -#define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano-sift-c" | 21:58 |
| Darxus | +#define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano" | 21:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | in my work in progress merge directory, I don't have the gcc patch, and I remember looking at the source one by one, so it should be safe to remove it. Anyway, new errors could come | 21:58 |
| Darxus | Which makes your ubuntu patch not match: | 21:58 |
| Darxus | -#define HUGIN_APSIFT_EXE "autopano-sift-c" | 21:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | it should be autopano-complete | 21:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | yes: | 21:58 |
| fabrice_sp_ | new parameters has been inserted | 22:00 |
| Darxus | $ mv hugin-0.8.0.dfsg-2ubuntu1 .. | 22:04 |
| Darxus | mv: cannot move `hugin-0.8.0.dfsg-2ubuntu1' to `../hugin-0.8.0.dfsg-2ubuntu1': Directory not empty | 22:04 |
| Darxus | Since when? | 22:05 |
| Darxus | Oh, nevermind. | 22:05 |
| * fabrice_sp_ never moves directories :-) | 22:05 | |
| fabrice_sp_ | have to go now | 22:06 |
| Darxus | Okay, thanks. | 22:07 |
| fabrice_sp_ | Darxus, if you comes to some debdiff, post it in the bug report. Anyway, still miss one motu-release ack to be able to upload it. You should perhaps upload it to a ppa | 22:07 |
| fabrice_sp_ | so that more people can perform tests | 22:08 |
| fabrice_sp_ | bye :-) | 22:08 |
| Darxus | "Generate a new merged source package using the merge-buildpackage script." doesn't appear to exist. | 22:19 |
| Darxus | "It looks like this package is maintained in revision control:...You almost certainly don't want to continue without investigating." | 22:21 |
| Darxus | Found merge-buildpackage :P | 22:21 |
| Darxus | Wow, it built. | 22:55 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Darxus | dput said it successfully uploaded to my ppa, but launchpad says there's nothing there. | 23:30 |
| Darxus | $ dput ppa:darxus/hugin-0.8.0 hugin_0.8.0.dfsg-2ubuntu1_i386.changes | 23:30 |
| Darxus | Successfully uploaded packages. | 23:30 |
| ScottK | Darxus: Patience. | 23:30 |
| Darxus | ScottK: Oh, it's doing something with them and they'll show up at some point in the future? | 23:31 |
| Darxus | And there's no way I can check evidence of that? | 23:31 |
| ScottK | Generally. | 23:31 |
| ScottK | Every now and then, it loses packages, but not often | 23:31 |
| Darxus | Hah. | 23:32 |
| Darxus | Hah, upload rejected because it contains binary packages. | 23:32 |
| Darxus | Rejected: | 23:50 |
| Darxus | PPA uploads must be signed by an Ubuntu Code of Conduct signer. | 23:50 |
| Darxus | So I signed the code of conduct. | 23:50 |
| Darxus | And now dput won't let me upload it again. | 23:50 |
| Darxus | "Already uploaded to ppa on ppa.launchpad.net" | 23:51 |
| Darxus | Oh, I love force flags. | 23:51 |
| sistpoty | Darxus: there should be a .upload file, remove that (or use dput -f) | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!