[10:57] Hi [10:58] I'm trying to build deb packages with xorg-edgers's xorg-pkg-tools [10:59] I run "auto-xorg-git -t "~" -g -H hooks -d origin/ubuntu -p mesa", it creates the .orig.tar.gz, the diff.gz, the .dsc, the .build and the .changes [10:59] but I have no .deb file at the end. Is it expected? [11:00] do I have to make the .deb manually? [11:00] what's next? [11:21] Duke`, yes these files are the source package. to build binary packages you can run debuild -b -us -uc [11:22] usually we upload the source package to a PPA [11:23] ok, thanks, I'll look at this command [11:24] don't forget apt-get build-dep mesa before building binaries [11:57] hi all [11:57] I just wanted to ask if the patch from this report could make it into Karmic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/435241 [11:57] Launchpad bug 435241 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "Intel KMS ignores some monitor resolutions (SHP 31)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [11:57] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;f=drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c;h=bbcb2e22675b127ce64454e69ba7a9abe55b6cc9;hp=80cc6d06d61b6ba53ae316a8de5112c8cf434a09;hb=5c61259e6c7290082108e93815f7f72f27da14f4;hpb=26bbdadad356ec02d33657858d91675f3e9aca94 [11:58] * http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5c61259e6c7290082108e93815f7f72f27da14f4 [12:02] hum, is there a way to make the building use more than one CPU core? [12:03] Duke`: sure -j CORENUMBER [12:03] can I pass it to debuild? [12:03] some say you should use 1,5xCores [12:04] I don't know, but it works with dpkg-buildpackage [12:04] afaik [12:04] I know the option for make, but I'm generating deb package [12:04] ok [12:04] I'll try next time I build one :) [12:04] Imho the Debian-Script should recognize the core number on its own and pass it [12:05] currently it's using one core of two, and it's slow :( [12:05] It has a huge impact if you have a quad core and compile the kernel or wine or similar big things [12:05] +especially [12:07] yeah, I already experienced these benefits with only a dual core :) [12:09] that's why the build script should recognize its on their own, I mean the difference is even more severe with an i7 [12:35] ok, I have all my deb packages \o/ It was a bit long. [12:35] thank you for your help tormod [12:35] Duke`, np. you know you can just d/l debs from xorg-edgers also right? [12:36] yes, I've done that for months, but I need to track some performance regression [12:36] so I'll try to do some bisecting myself... [12:36] I see, recompiling the whole mesa is quite long [12:38] yes, you know the tricks with mesa env vars so you can just test the libs without reinstalling? [12:38] aahhhh, I've heard about them once but I forgot their existence... [12:39] I should look at it, yeah [12:39] to save you the whole debuild > install debs, rerun cycle [12:40] maybe you can even git-bisect a built tree and only rerun make (or debian/rules build) [12:40] without cleaning up? possible [12:42] for env vars, see http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/TestingAndDebugging [12:47] http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building also mentions LD_PRELOAD [13:08] hi folks - i'm having a hard time getting my extended desktop to work with ubuntu jaunty jackolope using an intel 945GM --- if I am to go through the process of enabling UXA - should i solve this problem [13:08] ? [13:09] as of now an output of lshw is showing my graphics controller to be 'unconfirmed' [18:13] Urgh. No compositing today all of a sudden on my mini 10v. Bug report soon. [18:50] Meh, of course as soon as I want to replicate the problem, it goes away [19:04] hehe === Duke`__ is now known as Duke` === estan_ is now known as estan [21:06] hmm...I've updates karmic, and now Xorg uses 100% of the CPU all the time. [21:06] s/updates/updated/ [21:08] the only thing that looks related in dpkg.log is mesa [21:11] hmm [21:11] is compiz running? [21:13] pwnguin: no, I turn off desktop effects. [21:14] although I tried turning compiz back on, same thing [21:14] my guess was compiz was somehow running in software mode [21:15] not even touching the keyboard and Xorg is using 100% cpu [21:16] have you browsed /var/log/Xorg.0.log? [21:16] yeah, but the only thing that looks odd is: (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) [21:17] hold on, I'll try logging out and loggin back in [21:20] hmm...logging out and logging back in, the problem is solved and I have "(II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket)" [21:20] looks like X is starting before the acpid socket is there for some reason [21:20] when I fresh boot [21:20] shouldn't make a hugh difference though [21:20] huge, even [21:22] hmm...I was on vt 9 after a fresh boot, and now I'm on vt 7 [21:22] sorry, opposite [21:22] 7 after a fresh boot, 9 now [21:24] you might see if there are other xorg logs of recent origin [21:25] I found one from a week ago, no difference except for the acpi failure [21:32] bug 441706 [21:32] Launchpad bug 441706 in xorg "100% cpu usage with latest updates, acpid socket missing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/441706 [21:37] mdeslaur: how attached are you to 3d? [21:40] oh, nvidia. fun.