| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| av` | asac, going to sleep, the build went successful for all archs, feel free to upload it, so I can finally use epiphany :) | 00:10 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | fta: I'm fixing the dailies now | 01:41 |
| micahg | fta: dailies are fixed, just waiting on i386 build before proposing merges | 03:39 |
| LLStarks | asac. i have a bug for you but i'm not sure how to best describe. | 04:27 |
| LLStarks | let's say i want to use imageshack. when prompted to upload an image, when choosing between two images with a similar name (file1.png and file1.jpg), the thumbnail doesn't change. | 04:28 |
| micahg1 | asac: fta: just wanted to let you know I finished and proposed the merges | 08:27 |
| asac | fta: i think the theming is a gtk theme issue (icons gone) | 09:02 |
| eagles0513875 | morning asac | 09:14 |
| asac | hi | 09:15 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: question for you how would i know what extension should be on what version of dev scripts | 09:15 |
| asac | eagles0513875: 0.16 is our policy | 09:16 |
| eagles0513875 | ok cuz i got all confused yesterday with bdrung mentioning .17 | 09:16 |
| asac | 0.17 is a bug fix release. doesnt matter much for extension packages | 09:24 |
| eagles0513875 | gotcha it is more for the big programs like firefox seamonkey etc | 09:25 |
| asac | its a cleanup thing | 09:28 |
| asac | no need to bother on extension side | 09:28 |
| eagles0513875 | ok | 09:29 |
| bdrung | eagles0513875: it does not add new features and do not changes the interface | 09:33 |
| eagles0513875 | gotcha | 09:34 |
| asac | kenvandine: gwibber on track? | 10:06 |
| asac | ;) | 10:06 |
| asac | fta: did you sponsor his latest fixes yet? | 10:06 |
| * asac checks micahg fixes for ffox 3.7 | 10:07 | |
| fta | FIREFOX_3_5_4_RELEASE | 11:13 |
| asac | fta: thx. my bet is that it will take a few weeks ;) | 11:14 |
| fta | FIREFOX_3_0_15_BUILD1 | 11:14 |
| bdrung | asac: did you review m-d? | 11:49 |
| asac | bdrung: no. pulling it now | 12:00 |
| gnomefreak | i have a fucking babysitter for my daughter and now me :( | 12:51 |
| eagles0513875 | ouchie how u feeling btw gnomefreak | 12:59 |
| gnomefreak | eagles0513875: fine but dr thinks im a threat to myself or to others, so now i have a babysitter for a while | 12:59 |
| eagles0513875 | O_O | 13:00 |
| gnomefreak | eagles0513875: you using tbird3 by chance? | 13:00 |
| eagles0513875 | no im not | 13:00 |
| eagles0513875 | im fighting with alpha 6 on a vm that im trying to update | 13:00 |
| bdrung | asac: and? | 13:00 |
| asac | got side tracked obviously. now getting some food then i will really do it :) | 13:16 |
| asac | bdrung: one question up front: why is there sol/eol business in -all.mk at all? i would think all that would be in -Ubuntu/-Debian/-common | 13:23 |
| bdrung | asac: that is for packages, that are only in PPAs | 13:25 |
| asac | yeah. i dont think we should put that into -all though | 13:25 |
| bdrung | asac: ok, i can remove it | 13:26 |
| asac | bdrung: put that in Ubuntu imo | 13:26 |
| asac | or we make a third-party thing ... but as that repo is in theory not really debian it probably belongs to ubuntu | 13:26 |
| bdrung | asac: we should only recommend packages, that are in the repos | 13:26 |
| asac | bdrung: where is Debian/Ubuntu excluded? | 13:27 |
| bdrung | asac: it's only recommends, so we do need to fit all use cases | 13:27 |
| asac | based on lsb-release? | 13:27 |
| kenvandine | asac: gwibber could really use an upload, there are a ton of bugs fixed since the version in universe | 13:27 |
| asac | cant find it ... though ti would have been a ifneq or something in -all | 13:27 |
| asac | based on the DISTRO | 13:27 |
| asac | oh | 13:27 |
| asac | wait | 13:27 |
| asac | let me check for that variable ;) | 13:28 |
| asac | bdrung: please dont make xpi.mk.in | 13:28 |
| asac | i wanted a tiny config file ;) | 13:28 |
| asac | to avoid having main code in an .in | 13:28 |
| bdrung | asac: didn't you said that yesterday? | 13:28 |
| asac | no. i said make a config.mk.in | 13:28 |
| eagles0513875 | will finish bind wood honestly and truly today | 13:29 |
| asac | and include that ;) ... at least that what i tried to say :) | 13:29 |
| eagles0513875 | been hell trying to get back into a blasted routine of studying | 13:29 |
| asac | bdrung: so yeah. the include in xpi.mk makes sense | 13:30 |
| bdrung | asac: so having one additional file for only _one_ line? | 13:30 |
| asac | bdrung: for the ppa packages we could do a xpi-data-Ubuntu-suggests.mk or something ... but lets push that back for a a while | 13:30 |
| asac | bdrung: yes | 13:30 |
| bdrung | asac: isn't that a overkill? | 13:31 |
| asac | bdrung: the config is on system so if we use a hard coded global path you can work on xpi.mk in upstream tree | 13:31 |
| asac | no | 13:31 |
| asac | its overkill to make a great source file a .in just because there is one variable | 13:31 |
| bdrung | asac: where is the config file located? | 13:32 |
| asac | you can decide. either its a distro config file: /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/config... or a real config file /etc/mozilla-devscripts/... | 13:32 |
| asac | i think share is probably right location as its a build-time decision we make | 13:33 |
| asac | and users are supposed to override that with passing a parameter | 13:34 |
| asac | or setting variable | 13:34 |
| bdrung | so /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/config.mk ? | 13:34 |
| asac | bdrung: xpi-config.mk ... since we dont have a real dir hierarchy in there | 13:34 |
| LaPingvino | hello again | 13:34 |
| asac | LaPingvino: hi. | 13:35 |
| LaPingvino | I have downloaded and tested Karmic | 13:35 |
| asac | you left yesterday ... please just write your real problem . i will check after lunch ;) | 13:35 |
| LaPingvino | the version of the eo-packages is still on firefox 3.0 there... | 13:35 |
| asac | LaPingvino: go ahead ... i will read when back | 13:35 |
| LaPingvino | thus it doesn't work | 13:35 |
| LaPingvino | I hope the language-pack will be up-to-date with the translations for the current version of firefox when it goes out of beta | 13:36 |
| LaPingvino | otherwise we still won't have an esperanto firefox in ubuntu | 13:36 |
| asac | bdrung: so maybe make that config.mk -include optional and set a default with =all | 13:38 |
| gnomefreak | asac: when you get around to testing sunbird from my PPA forget the version please that was a screw up here and it wont let me push ubuntu3 since it is lower | 13:38 |
| asac | in the xpi.mk | 13:38 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i was about to upload it yesterday ... not sure why i forgot ;) | 13:38 |
| asac | i mean ... based on the branch | 13:38 |
| asac | not on your ppa | 13:39 |
| asac | just took the orig i think | 13:39 |
| gnomefreak | asac: branch is good to go. thanks :) | 13:39 |
| asac | good | 13:39 |
| bdrung | asac: why do you want a =all default? | 13:40 |
| asac | because you can then just work even without having the template done | 13:40 |
| asac | just a safe fallback | 13:40 |
| asac | thats possible if we put the config in a template | 13:40 |
| asac | no real practical use besides someone working on the tree directly with a lower version installed etc. | 13:41 |
| bdrung | asac: do you really insists on having a fallback? | 13:55 |
| asac | bdrung: whats the reason not to add it? | 13:56 |
| asac | codewise its just a -include /usr/share.../xpi-config.mk and a default before that, right? | 13:56 |
| bdrung | asac: it makes the makefile longer | 13:57 |
| asac | one line ;) | 13:57 |
| bdrung | asac: no, it is more (because MOZ_XPI_DISTRO uses ?=) | 13:57 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/287786/ | 13:58 |
| asac | hmm if its complicated then its not needed. | 13:58 |
| asac | sorry that patch was wrong ;) even in theory | 13:58 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/287790/ | 13:58 |
| bdrung | asac: defining MOZ_XPI_DISTRO ?= all makes the config file superfluid | 13:58 |
| asac | so two ?= dont work? | 13:59 |
| bdrung | k, the second one will work | 13:59 |
| bdrung | asac: the first ?= will define it and the second will be ignored | 13:59 |
| asac | yes | 14:00 |
| asac | thats the idea | 14:00 |
| bdrung | asac: but if we allow a missing config file, we have to define everything twice | 14:01 |
| gnomefreak | when im done there are a bunch of debian mails im letting loose from mailing list | 14:01 |
| asac | yes. but so far we only have one config variable ;) | 14:02 |
| asac | (that does not have a distro agnostic default) | 14:02 |
| asac | the rest of the config stuff already has its default set in the xpi.mk | 14:02 |
| asac | (if there is a default) | 14:02 |
| bdrung | asac: this would be shorter: http://pastebin.com/f7c89e2a8 | 14:02 |
| asac | pastebin.com is really slow for me | 14:03 |
| bdrung | it's pastebinit's default | 14:03 |
| asac | bdrung: that wont protect the use case i mentioned | 14:03 |
| asac | e.g. lower mozilla-devscripts installed | 14:04 |
| bdrung | ok, ok, you win | 14:04 |
| asac | err. where is the default set there? | 14:04 |
| bdrung | only in the config :p | 14:05 |
| asac | yes. but we dont have that config | 14:05 |
| asac | because its a template | 14:05 |
| asac | hence the ultimate fallback | 14:05 |
| asac | anyway i really need food | 14:06 |
| asac | ttyl | 14:06 |
| LaPingvino | asac: done with lunch? ;) | 14:24 |
| * LaPingvino is reachable on ikojba@gmail.com (E-mail/XMPP/MSN) when not here... | 14:25 | |
| gnomefreak | ill be back later i have some shit to do around here | 14:49 |
| asac | LaPingvino: back in 5 minutes .... | 14:54 |
| LaPingvino | OK | 14:55 |
| LaPingvino | tnx for informing me :) | 14:55 |
| asac_ | LaPingvino: so whats your problem? | 15:15 |
| asac_ | eo language is not avail on 3.5? | 15:16 |
| asac_ | is a language that got translated in launchpad? or is that from upstream .xpis? | 15:16 |
| LaPingvino | hi | 15:19 |
| LaPingvino | it's from upstream | 15:20 |
| LaPingvino | not in launchpad | 15:20 |
| LaPingvino | I guess the upstream translations for 3.5 will be merged in yet before launch end this month... | 15:21 |
| LaPingvino | but in the Beta it's a translation for 3.0 and that doesn't work... | 15:21 |
| bdrung | asac: pushed m-d, now satisfied? | 15:30 |
| bdrung | did i miss something? | 15:30 |
| asac | bdrung: call now | 15:34 |
| asac | bdrung: will check right after call | 15:35 |
| bdrung | k | 15:35 |
| fta2 | installing an ubuntu server.. | 15:49 |
| fta2 | :wq | 16:19 |
| fta2 | oops | 16:19 |
| asac | bdrung: looks good. just wonder if we should make the DISTRO all lower or upper case and adjust how the other data- things are named | 16:30 |
| asac | bdrung: besides from that, please run it against a coupld of extensino packages to see that all is fine and upload | 16:30 |
| asac | we should put some kind of info in README ... or put test install.rdf files somewhere | 16:31 |
| asac | or teset install.rdf and test rules so we can are better sure we dont have regressions | 16:31 |
| asac | not now obviously ;) | 16:31 |
| asac | let me know when its up so i can get it synched here | 16:32 |
| asac | bdrung: for the sync it would be cool to link more bugs from changelog | 16:32 |
| asac | so i can more easily sell it as a "bug fix" release | 16:33 |
| asac | not sure if it makes sense to open bugs for a few things | 16:33 |
| asac | just to document it | 16:33 |
| bdrung | asac: some where only discussed on irc | 16:42 |
| bdrung | asac: for 0.18 we should use this policy: lower case for internal variables and upper case for external | 16:43 |
| asac | bdrung: yes. preferably we will have a bit longer cycle for 0.18 :) | 16:45 |
| asac | with new features and refactoring and stuff | 16:45 |
| asac | well thought out etc. | 16:45 |
| bdrung | yes | 16:45 |
| bdrung | hey i thought about 0.17, too ;) | 16:46 |
| asac | also fixing a few mozclient issues that i have no time to deal with | 16:46 |
| asac | i also want to add something simliar to for xulapp.mk | 16:46 |
| asac | (i think that name is currently taken by something different for mozclient) | 16:46 |
| asac | I didnt say that wasnt the case ;) | 16:46 |
| asac | if there are important bugs coming in that needs to be fixed its ok | 16:46 |
| asac | we can also say that next major target is 0.20 | 16:46 |
| asac | :) | 16:47 |
| asac | and before that its bug fixing | 16:47 |
| asac | ;) | 16:47 |
| asac | anyway. i think we made a huge difference to extension world this cycle | 16:47 |
| asac | so we should get some rest and enjoy it ;) | 16:47 |
| asac | and till RC freeze we should finally fix all extensions ;) | 16:47 |
| asac | i reserved a half day slot tomorrow | 16:48 |
| asac | to just do that | 16:48 |
| asac | though reservations can be pretty short lived for me :( | 16:48 |
| gnomefreak | asac: as maintainer of a Debian package do you get subscribed to all bugs against that package? | 16:49 |
| bdrung | asac: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List needs a refresh then | 16:50 |
| bdrung | gnomefreak: yes | 16:50 |
| asac | bdrung: yes. that should be done while doing the review. hopefully getting a complete list of extensions out of it | 16:50 |
| gnomefreak | bdrung: thanks | 16:50 |
| asac | bdrung: last thing we usually do for extensions is updating the .desktop files shipped in appt-install-data | 16:51 |
| asac | app-install-data | 16:51 |
| bdrung | asac: and we should add a column for maintaince (debian or ubuntu) | 16:51 |
| gnomefreak | we need to update XPI.TEMPLATE | 16:51 |
| asac | in that way you get that in the update-manager-dialog | 16:51 |
| asac | bdrung: i think we should make a column "ubuntu only" ... because all other extensions should go to debian sooner or later | 16:51 |
| bdrung | gnomefreak: iirc, the template is up-to-date | 16:51 |
| asac | we could make a checklist entry in the review page: "already in debian" | 16:51 |
| gnomefreak | we dont have desktop files for extensions since they dont end up anywhere in menus/lang... | 16:52 |
| gnomefreak | bdrung: it was updated for the rules file? | 16:52 |
| bdrung | asac: i like to have a link to the pts for packages in debian | 16:52 |
| asac | gnomefreak: yes. you get subscribed. thats why we get all the icedove bug mails in the queu | 16:53 |
| * asac remembers to send out a call for help on list moderator | 16:53 | |
| gnomefreak | i just did list :) | 16:53 |
| bdrung | gnomefreak: debian/rules is up-to-date | 16:53 |
| gnomefreak | bdrung: ok didnt know it was worked on thanks | 16:53 |
| bdrung | gnomefreak: we may remove MOZ_XPI_EMID, MOZ_EXTENSION_PKG and point to the xpi.mk for documentation | 16:54 |
| gnomefreak | k | 16:55 |
| gnomefreak | asac: is bug 438868 ubufox? | 16:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 438868 in firefox-3.5 "Address bar autocomplete doesn't always work" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/438868 | 16:58 |
| gnomefreak | lol tbird 3.0~hg20091006r4049+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 edit>selectall is broken | 17:01 |
| asac | unlikely ubufox | 17:02 |
| gnomefreak | k | 17:03 |
| gnomefreak | why not add bdrung to list mod if he wants asac ? | 17:05 |
| bdrung | what? | 17:06 |
| gnomefreak | bdrung: he said he was looking for list mods | 17:06 |
| gnomefreak | sudo mount -a | 17:06 |
| gnomefreak | damn | 17:06 |
| gnomefreak | ok cooking | 17:07 |
| bdrung | asac: found one typo. then it passed my regression tests. it's now uploaded | 17:36 |
| asac | rock. | 17:38 |
| asac | gnomefreak: not sure bdrung also wants to help on list moderation ;) | 17:38 |
| asac | i think our team can have more admininstrative postitions ;) | 17:38 |
| asac | and list moderation is a good entry ; | 17:38 |
| asac | ) | 17:38 |
| gnomefreak | asac: a couple pf ,more would be great :) | 17:43 |
| gnomefreak | s/pf/of | 17:43 |
| asac | yep thats what i am thinking | 17:44 |
| gnomefreak | i can name 2 but im sure one doesnt want to do it and not sure of the other | 17:44 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i think a public call is better. might even get more fresh blood in here ;) | 17:49 |
| gnomefreak | asac: agreed only problem is we need to trust the person/people | 17:50 |
| asac | sure | 17:50 |
| asac | not sure how to best find out ;) | 17:50 |
| asac | maybe give them a few minor administrative tasks | 17:50 |
| gnomefreak | asac: lets see who answers and we can do it from there | 17:51 |
| asac | or probationary period | 17:51 |
| asac | yep | 17:51 |
| gnomefreak | i like it | 17:51 |
| gnomefreak | updaing last 2 chroots than i am going to finish cooking and eat | 17:52 |
| bdrung | gnomefreak: what does a list moderator have to do? | 17:59 |
| gnomefreak | bdrung: go through the emails to the mailing list and decline/accept emails. most are spam but it is high volume | 18:04 |
| gnomefreak | out of ~50 i accepted 5 or 6 from debian | 18:05 |
| bdrung | sounds doable | 18:05 |
| gnomefreak | im ok with it if you and asac are | 18:07 |
| gnomefreak | ok im gone. i should be here tomorrow depending if babysitter allows me to :( | 18:08 |
| micahg | asac, I was going to fix a packaging problem in 3.0 on karmic, but then I was remembering you were talking about pulling it | 19:10 |
| asac | micahg: i pulled it to .5 | 19:19 |
| asac | 3.5 | 19:19 |
| asac | err 3.7 | 19:19 |
| asac | micahg: did you fix 3.0?` | 19:19 |
| micahg | no, this is for bug 445060 | 19:21 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 445060 in firefox-3.0 "firefox-3.0 warns about upgrades when only 3.5 is running" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/445060 | 19:21 |
| micahg | asac, were you waiting for me to rebase the 3.6 patch against your changes for badwindow? | 19:23 |
| asac | micahg: if you want to, feel free to go for it :) | 19:23 |
| asac | i only pulled it into the main distro branch | 19:23 |
| asac | wanted to wait for feedback | 19:24 |
| micahg | asac, you might want to request landing o mozilla bug 499498 on 3.6 as well | 19:24 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 499498 in X-remote "BadWindow error upon first run of FF3.5 RC" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499498 | 19:24 |
| micahg | since I saw that you patched that in the .head revision | 19:24 |
| asac | micahg: its already asked for | 19:24 |
| asac | mozbugz: approval1.9.2? | 19:24 |
| asac | asac: approval1.9.1.5? | 19:24 |
| micahg | oops | 19:25 |
| micahg | right | 19:25 |
| asac | :P | 19:25 |
| micahg | :-! | 19:25 |
| micahg | asac, about the update notifier issue in 3.0, is it worth fixing for karmic? | 19:25 |
| asac | not sure what you mean ... i still wanted to get rid of 3.0 :/ | 19:26 |
| asac | ETOOMUCHTHINGSTOREMEMBER | 19:26 |
| micahg | ok,that's my answer then :) | 19:26 |
| asac | is there a bug? | 19:26 |
| micahg | I'll fix it for 3.5 though | 19:26 |
| micahg | bug 445060 | 19:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 445060 in firefox-3.0 "firefox-3.0 warns about upgrades when only 3.5 is running" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/445060 | 19:26 |
| asac | i dont know what the problem is ;) | 19:26 |
| asac | ah | 19:26 |
| asac | i thought that was fixed | 19:27 |
| micahg | update notifier does a pgrep on firefox instead of firefox-3.0 | 19:27 |
| asac | oh ... ok | 19:27 |
| asac | thats the other thing | 19:27 |
| asac | i wanted to actually drop that | 19:27 |
| asac | preferably if ubufox is installed | 19:27 |
| micahg | yeah, I do get 2 notitifcations on updates | 19:27 |
| micahg | asac, I was wondering if we can do complex diplay ifs? | 19:28 |
| micahg | *DisplayIfs | 19:28 |
| asac | or better yet "enabled" | 19:28 |
| asac | not sure how to best do it ;) | 19:28 |
| micahg | do we have a way to check if an extension is enabled yet? | 19:28 |
| asac | not in a sane way | 19:28 |
| asac | the approach would be to search all profile dirs for a lock | 19:28 |
| asac | file | 19:29 |
| micahg | well, we can easily check to see if it's installed as a package | 19:29 |
| asac | and then check if the ubufox extension is enabled for that profile | 19:29 |
| asac | yes | 19:29 |
| asac | i think its worth considering | 19:29 |
| asac | but fta for instance wouldnt get any notification because he has it just disabled | 19:29 |
| asac | probably a minority though ;) | 19:29 |
| micahg | then why would he have it installed? | 19:30 |
| micahg | asac: is it possible to do multiple DisplayIfs thoug? | 19:33 |
| asac | micahg: we can make a script most likely | 19:34 |
| asac | instead of putting raw stuff in there | 19:34 |
| micahg | and then DisplayIf the script returns true? | 19:34 |
| asac | most likely | 19:36 |
| asac | give it a try ;) | 19:36 |
| asac | exit 0 | 19:36 |
| asac | exit 1 | 19:36 |
| fta | i wanted to do that a while ago | 19:36 |
| asac | yes | 19:37 |
| asac | ;) | 19:37 |
| fta | i wish someone writes a real adblock for chromium | 19:37 |
| asac | do extensions live in a separate process too? | 19:39 |
| micahg | asac, do I have to uncommit to rebase? | 19:39 |
| asac | micahg: not sure what you mean | 19:39 |
| micahg | oh, neverming | 19:40 |
| micahg | I knwo what I did | 19:40 |
| asac | micahg: k | 19:40 |
| fta | http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/index.html | 19:40 |
| micahg | asac, can you look at bug 441872 | 19:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 441872 in network-manager "network-manager disconnects from wirless network" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/441872 | 19:42 |
| asac | fta: do i need to read all this to get the answer ;)? | 19:42 |
| asac | ok | 19:44 |
| asac | so i would think yes from what i read | 19:44 |
| fta | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33243756/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-amd64.firefox-3.7_3.7~a1~hg20091007r33630%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~jaunty_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 20:01 |
| fta | still the same patch !??? | 20:01 |
| micahg | fta: it was working for me yesterday | 20:02 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/288044/ | 20:03 |
| fta | there's jsut the changelog, the patch is missing | 20:03 |
| fta | nm, stupid bzr & merge | 20:04 |
| micahg | yeah | 20:04 |
| micahg | fta: it will fail again though...http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c2e54fc14cd7 | 20:05 |
| fta | fta@cube:/data/bot/firefox-3.7.head $ bzr st | 20:07 |
| fta | working tree is out of date, run 'bzr update' | 20:07 |
| fta | fta@cube:/data/bot/firefox-3.7.head $ bzr pull bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/ | 20:07 |
| fta | bzr: ERROR: Tags not supported by BzrBranch5('file:///data/bot/firefox-3.7.head/'); you may be able to use bzr upgrade. | 20:07 |
| asac | oops | 20:07 |
| asac | my fault. i upgraded to 0.92 | 20:08 |
| asac | didnt know it would complain | 20:08 |
| asac | usually pulling works | 20:08 |
| asac | 0.92 is really conservative still ;) | 20:08 |
| asac | current default format is 2.0a | 20:08 |
| fta | after upgrade & update: | 20:08 |
| fta | fta@cube:/data/bot/firefox-3.7.head $ bzr update | 20:08 |
| fta | M debian/changelog | 20:08 |
| fta | M debian/patches/bz460917_att350845_reload_new_plugins.patch | 20:08 |
| fta | All changes applied successfully. | 20:08 |
| asac | hmm. are you now on 2.0a? | 20:09 |
| asac | we dont want to go that far i think | 20:09 |
| asac | i did upgrade --pack-0.92 | 20:09 |
| micahg | asac, can you check my comments here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.6-20091006 | 20:10 |
| micahg | I have to fix the patch anyways | 20:10 |
| micahg | but I wanted to know if the comment was ok | 20:10 |
| fta | asac, so when you do that, the bot is stuck | 20:10 |
| asac | yes. now i know that | 20:11 |
| asac | before i didnt ... i often have different branch formats locally vs. remote and usually dont have problems | 20:11 |
| asac | fta: seems that only tag support is kind of the bridge that we needed to pass at some point ... so ... anyway, before i check other branches i will ping you :) | 20:12 |
| fta | ok | 20:13 |
| asac | ok on first glance it doesnt look like they changed the functions of plugin finder wizard | 20:15 |
| asac | just refactored the code | 20:15 |
| asac | micahg: my comment would read "adjust patches after landing of "bug title" (bmo:xxxx)" | 20:15 |
| asac | so ... probably ok | 20:16 |
| asac | though i like mine better ;) | 20:16 |
| micahg | ok, do I have to redo it after you landed your revisions? | 20:16 |
| micahg | asacL is it more important to gut ff3.0 out of karmic or fix all the FTBFSs before release? | 20:18 |
| micahg | asac ^^^ | 20:18 |
| asac | micahg: what ftbfs? | 20:19 |
| asac | in archive? | 20:19 |
| micahg | in yeah | 20:19 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/288051/ ?? | 20:19 |
| asac | i think priority for mozillateam should be: a) fix blocker bugs in archive, b) fix ftbfs in archive, c) remove ffox 3.0, d) do the rest ;) | 20:19 |
| asac | fta: yes. the unnamed ones are really old | 20:20 |
| asac | fta: please run upgrade --pack-0.92 | 20:20 |
| asac | locally and remote | 20:20 |
| asac | let me know when done so i can sync my branches | 20:20 |
| micahg | asac, I'm referring to all the packages, not just mozilla ones for FTBFS | 20:20 |
| asac | fta: i think i upgraded the 3.1 tree at some point | 20:20 |
| asac | because i tag archive releases | 20:20 |
| fta | all xul are 0.92 | 20:21 |
| asac | micahg: for mozillateam the other ftbfs are not so important ;) ... if you want to look from the distro point of view i would think that blocker bugs or ftbfs of mozilla stuff on supported hardware is more important | 20:21 |
| asac | and even getting ffox 3.0 out is more or same important | 20:21 |
| micahg | yes, I was wondering from a distro point of view | 20:21 |
| asac | fta: yes, xul branches are younger | 20:22 |
| micahg | ok, so I guess I'll focus on the mozilla stuff then | 20:22 |
| asac | the ffox branch still comes from earliest day | 20:22 |
| asac | or am i wrong? | 20:22 |
| asac | micahg: sparc build failures etc are not important | 20:22 |
| asac | if its a main package its important, but most likely someone should already be working on that | 20:22 |
| asac | if you spot one that would be good to verify | 20:23 |
| asac | micahg: what we want to know for firefox-3.0 is how many packages still rdepend on that | 20:24 |
| asac | i mean: rdepend on it in such a way that they coulndt be installed anymore | 20:24 |
| asac | i hope thats close to zero | 20:24 |
| asac | then we file a removal request ;) | 20:24 |
| micahg | ok, I so have to look at each of the rdepends to see if it also depends on firefox | firefox-3.5 | 20:25 |
| micahg | and same for xul1.9? | 20:25 |
| fta | asac, done for 3.2, but i can't for 3.7 | 20:25 |
| asac | fta: whats the prob for 3.7? | 20:26 |
| asac | its already pack-0.92 | 20:26 |
| asac | at least the upgrade succeeded here | 20:26 |
| fta | fta@cube:/data/bot/firefox-3.7.head $ bzr upgrade --pack-0.92 | 20:26 |
| fta | bzr: ERROR: Cannot convert from format <RepositoryFormat2a> to format <RepositoryFormatKnitPack1>. Does not support rich root data. | 20:26 |
| fta | it's 2a | 20:26 |
| fta | is the icon bug fixed in 3.7? | 20:30 |
| asac | fta: well. you upgraded your local branch | 20:33 |
| asac | maybe you upgraded the remote automatically too :/ | 20:33 |
| asac | if thats the case tell me ... i still have it here, so i can repush | 20:33 |
| micahg | fta: was the FTBFS for 3.7 after you fixed it or before? | 21:03 |
| fta | i'd say before | 21:07 |
| micahg | I just submitted bug 445761 for soyuz | 21:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 445761 in soyuz "ability to stop or cancel builds" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/445761 | 21:08 |
| fta | stevel, still no fix for the build issue? | 21:08 |
| fta | asac, seems i can't upgrade the 3.7 branch. it never completes.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/288090/ or it's really slow | 21:32 |
| asac | fta: why upgrade. the 3.7 branch is already upgraded in launchpad. maybe unbind it first | 21:41 |
| asac | let me check if its trashed or something now ;) | 21:41 |
| * asac branches fresh | 21:41 | |
| fta | read my paste, i dropped mine, branched from lp, it's unnamed | 21:46 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| === aakashd_ is now known as aakashd | ||
| asac | anyone has a jaunty system here? | 22:00 |
| LaPingvino | asac: I have | 22:11 |
| BUGabundo | boas | 22:11 |
| LaPingvino | BUGabundo: como vai ;)? | 22:11 |
| BUGabundo | bai se bem LaPingvino. e tu? | 22:12 |
| LaPingvino | eu tb :) | 22:12 |
| LaPingvino | obrigado | 22:12 |
| LaPingvino | asac: where do you need it for? | 22:12 |
| LaPingvino | BUGabundo: acho que d verdade nem falo português sabia? :P mas felizmente normalmente me entende :) | 22:13 |
| BUGabundo | claro | 22:13 |
| LaPingvino | é similar demais :) | 22:14 |
| LaPingvino | até muitÃssimas palavras e partes de gramática ;) | 22:14 |
| asac | LaPingvino: so you have a auth eth0 connection? | 22:14 |
| asac | LaPingvino: and made that a system connection? | 22:14 |
| BUGabundo | hey asac | 22:14 |
| BUGabundo | any thing on that bug of mine ? | 22:14 |
| LaPingvino | asac: I'm on wireless... | 22:15 |
| BUGabundo | LaPingvino: well you do a very strange thing: you write brasilian portuguese as you know how to speak. | 22:15 |
| LaPingvino | that's how I chat | 22:15 |
| BUGabundo | and brasilian ppl write it a bit differently from the way the speak oraly | 22:15 |
| asac | LaPingvino: hmm. do you have a auth eth0 in the connection editor under wired? | 22:15 |
| LaPingvino | yes I have | 22:16 |
| LaPingvino | BUGabundo: when I write bigger pieces, I don't even use the spoken language... but it is difficult... | 22:16 |
| LaPingvino | I like it more the brazilian way :) | 22:17 |
| BUGabundo | :) | 22:17 |
| LaPingvino | asac: what do you want to check/...? | 22:18 |
| asac | LaPingvino: edit that connection | 22:18 |
| asac | LaPingvino: check if its "available to all userse" | 22:18 |
| asac | if not ... flag it so | 22:19 |
| asac | exit the edito | 22:19 |
| asac | and see that its now in /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/ | 22:19 |
| LaPingvino | it is available to all users | 22:19 |
| asac | then just check the dir | 22:19 |
| LaPingvino | one moment | 22:19 |
| asac | there should be Auto eth0 | 22:19 |
| asac | please post that somewhere | 22:19 |
| asac | verify that there are no secrets | 22:19 |
| asac | but there shouldnt | 22:19 |
| LaPingvino | I don't se anything in /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections | 22:20 |
| LaPingvino | :S | 22:21 |
| LaPingvino | ah wait | 22:21 |
| LaPingvino | got it | 22:21 |
| micahg | fta: are you planning on respinning the ff3.7 builds? | 22:21 |
| fta | micahg, i need to fix my local branch first | 22:22 |
| micahg | ok | 22:22 |
| === stevel_ is now known as stevel | ||
| LaPingvino | here it comes | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | [connection] | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | id=Auto eth0 | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | uuid=4d2572c3-bc46-4188-9553-794af0f22ab0 | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | type=802-3-ethernet | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | autoconnect=true | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | timestamp=0 | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | [ipv4] | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | method=auto | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | ignore-auto-routes=false | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | ignore-auto-dns=false | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | never-default=false | 22:23 |
| LaPingvino | [802-3-ethernet] | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | speed=0 | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | duplex=full | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | auto-negotiate=true | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | mac-address=0:13:77:ab:9f:0 | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | mtu=0 | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | I can get it in a pastebin as well if you prefer ;) | 22:24 |
| BUGabundo | !paste > LaPingvino | 22:24 |
| ubottu | LaPingvino, please see my private message | 22:24 |
| BUGabundo | as you didn't know !!!! | 22:24 |
| BUGabundo | :) | 22:24 |
| LaPingvino | http://paste.ubuntu.com/288125/ | 22:25 |
| LaPingvino | sorry for the load :( | 22:26 |
| LaPingvino | don't get mad please | 22:26 |
| LaPingvino | asac: there it is :) | 22:26 |
| LaPingvino | asac: is it useful someway? | 22:28 |
| asac | LaPingvino: can you paste it to paste.ubuntu.com ? | 22:28 |
| asac | thx | 22:28 |
| BUGabundo | asac already is | 22:29 |
| LaPingvino | done already | 22:29 |
| BUGabundo | (10:25:52 PM) LaPingvino: http://paste.ubuntu.com/288125/ | 22:29 |
| BUGabundo | LOLOL | 22:29 |
| asac | kk | 22:29 |
| asac | sry | 22:29 |
| BUGabundo | some one is sleeping | 22:29 |
| BUGabundo | ahahahah | 22:29 |
| LaPingvino | was my fault as well, I just dumped the lot there... :S | 22:29 |
| LaPingvino | BUGabundo: gosta muito de rir, não é? | 22:32 |
| BUGabundo | so e' bom | 22:32 |
| BUGabundo | faz bem à saude | 22:32 |
| LaPingvino | BUGabundo: tem um jeito de ser bem cheio de emoçãos boas... :P | 22:33 |
| LaPingvino | é | 22:33 |
| LaPingvino | ainda uma vez eu vá tb para portugal, tá? | 22:34 |
| LaPingvino | que posso aprender o verdadeiro português aà ;) | 22:34 |
| LaPingvino | até então eu fico falando brasileiro ;) | 22:34 |
| BUGabundo | try to say that again. didn't make *any* sense :D | 22:34 |
| BUGabundo | LaPingvino: join #ubuntu-pt | 22:35 |
| LaPingvino | eita | 22:35 |
| fta | mozilla 460917 | 22:35 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460917 in Plugin Finder Service "New plugins only recognized after restarting Firefox" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460917 | 22:35 |
| fta | asac, do you plan to update this bug? this patch had to be rebased 10 times already | 22:37 |
| micahg | fta: failed again based on my patch from yesterday | 22:54 |
| fta | damn | 22:54 |
| micahg | should I fix and propose another merge? | 22:54 |
| asac | fta: yes. thats a good reason | 22:54 |
| micahg | and the fact that m-c has branched twice since the patch was submitted? | 22:56 |
| asac | well. the patch needs to be rebased anyway before submission | 22:56 |
| asac | i am not sure i actually addressed the problems | 22:56 |
| asac | ;) | 22:56 |
| fta | grrr | 22:56 |
| micahg | asac, should I rebase based on todays changes? | 22:57 |
| fta | Committing to: /data/bot/firefox-3.7.head/ | 22:57 |
| fta | is not compatible with | 22:57 |
| fta | CHKInventoryRepository('file:///data/bot/firefox-3.7.head/.bzr/repository/') | 22:57 |
| fta | different rich-root support | 22:57 |
| micahg | asac: at least rebase our version in bzr? | 22:57 |
| fta | asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/288145/ | 22:58 |
| fta | i'm stuck | 22:58 |
| asac | fta: you need to upgrade your merge target branches to --pack-0.92 | 22:58 |
| asac | fta: what pack version are you running? | 22:58 |
| fta | i can't upgrade from unnamed to pack-0.92, i can't downgrade from 2.0a to pack-0.92 either | 22:58 |
| asac | fta: did you try to unbind? | 22:59 |
| asac | you can only upgrade | 22:59 |
| fta | hmm, sounds like a deja vu | 22:59 |
| asac | from unnamaned it should work, but you probably need to unbind | 22:59 |
| asac | because i alreawdy upgraded the remote location | 22:59 |
| asac | which probably confuses bzr | 22:59 |
| fta | unbind? | 22:59 |
| asac | if you upgrade with bound branch it automatically does that upgrade locally and remote | 22:59 |
| asac | fta: bzr info | 22:59 |
| asac | paste please | 22:59 |
| asac | ;) | 22:59 |
| asac | if you use bzr update | 22:59 |
| asac | you usually have a bound branch | 23:00 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/288147/ | 23:00 |
| asac | fta: yes. thats already too late | 23:00 |
| asac | why cant you trash that dir and do a fresh branch? | 23:00 |
| asac | its just the remote branch, right? | 23:00 |
| fta | i did that 5 times, it's unnamed, and i can't upgrade to 0.92 | 23:01 |
| asac | ok damn i forgot where i branched my test branch:( | 23:01 |
| asac | redoing | 23:01 |
| asac | ok found it ;) | 23:02 |
| asac | just in /tmp ... how easy ;) | 23:03 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/288148/ the last step never ends | 23:03 |
| asac | sigh | 23:04 |
| asac | thats so shitty ;) | 23:04 |
| asac | micahg: still have the branch i merged in today? | 23:05 |
| micahg | yes | 23:05 |
| asac | lp:~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7-20091006 ? | 23:05 |
| micahg | yes, my local copy | 23:05 |
| * asac branches that | 23:05 | |
| micahg | I haven't touched it | 23:06 |
| asac | good ... dont touch it ;) | 23:06 |
| asac | what a mess ;) | 23:06 |
| micahg | that what you told me, create permanent branches for each fix | 23:06 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 23:07 |
| asac | its really broken though | 23:07 |
| asac | its the same problem | 23:07 |
| asac | upgrading to --pack-0.92 does not work | 23:07 |
| fta | it did for all my other ff branches, incl 3.7.head.daily* | 23:08 |
| fta | except this one | 23:08 |
| asac | so when was -2a introduced | 23:08 |
| asac | seems we re not able to upgrade the 3.7 branch for whatever reason to 92 | 23:09 |
| asac | or we can file a bug | 23:09 |
| asac | and keep it the way it is? | 23:09 |
| asac | did hardy have 2.0a? | 23:09 |
| asac | unlikely | 23:09 |
| asac | do we care? | 23:09 |
| fta | i don't think so | 23:09 |
| micahg | bzr 2.0 was just introcued I thought in 1.17 or something | 23:09 |
| asac | why the hell do make it the default | 23:10 |
| asac | imo it needs to sink for a year at least | 23:10 |
| asac | even 2 | 23:10 |
| asac | then make it default so everyone has that | 23:10 |
| micahg | well, they backport bzr packages for people | 23:10 |
| micahg | idk | 23:10 |
| micahg | I asked about that myseld | 23:10 |
| micahg | *myself | 23:10 |
| asac | yes. but you dont get wide spread adoption | 23:10 |
| asac | if you get pointed against branches that you cannot use | 23:11 |
| asac | you will think its not mature | 23:11 |
| asac | ok i think we dont care for 3.7. but lets try to keep the other branches at 0.92 | 23:11 |
| asac | fta: xulrunner are all 0.92? | 23:12 |
| fta | yes | 23:12 |
| asac | ok. then upgrade 3.7. is that ok for you? | 23:12 |
| asac | to 2.0a :( | 23:12 |
| asac | 2a | 23:12 |
| fta | well, ok | 23:12 |
| asac | or want to file a bug and hope for a quick fix? | 23:12 |
| asac | :) | 23:12 |
| BUGabundo | asac since I catch you tonigh | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | can you do me a favour? | 23:13 |
| asac | BUGabundo: looogg | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | I need a FF 3.7 build | 23:13 |
| asac | BUGabundo: i have not much time atm for favours ;) | 23:13 |
| asac | but go ahead | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | :(( | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | a verbose build | 23:13 |
| asac | a debug build? | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | but not as much as strace | 23:13 |
| asac | i can give you instructions how to build | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | for some strange reason | 23:13 |
| BUGabundo | both 3.5 and 3.7 | 23:13 |
| asac | whats with those? | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | won't restart to finish addons install | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | even on a clean profile | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | as soon as I had a few of them | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | it won't be able to upgrade or install more | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | I tracked down my past crashs to xmarks | 23:14 |
| BUGabundo | and no longer have that one | 23:14 |
| fta | asac, created lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head-broken, so feel free to use that in a bug ;) | 23:15 |
| asac | thats unnamaned that cannot be upgraded? | 23:15 |
| asac | ok | 23:16 |
| asac | fta: i will subscribe you too ;) | 23:16 |
| fta | yep, ok | 23:16 |
| fta | oh my! | 23:19 |
| asac | micahg: also subscribed you ;) | 23:19 |
| fta | fta@cube:/data/bot/firefox-3.7.head $ bzr upgrade lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/ | 23:19 |
| fta | starting upgrade of bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/ | 23:19 |
| fta | making backup of bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/.bzr | 23:19 |
| fta | to bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/backup.bzr | 23:19 |
| fta | bzr: ERROR: File exists: '/srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/push-branches/00/02/da/9e/backup.bzr' | 23:19 |
| asac | bug 445857 | 23:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 445857 in bzr "bzr upgrade --pack-0.92 never finishes" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/445857 | 23:19 |
| asac | fta: yes. lets rename the branch | 23:19 |
| asac | and push fresh | 23:19 |
| asac | at best push the one micagh had | 23:19 |
| asac | its the one before i ran anything | 23:19 |
| micahg | thanks asac | 23:19 |
| asac | lp:~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7-20091006 | 23:19 |
| asac | that should be equal | 23:19 |
| asac | you can diff it against the sources you have still locally to ensure that we are really up to date | 23:20 |
| asac | probably misses last rebase fix | 23:20 |
| fta | eh??? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head says it's "lp:firefox"?? | 23:21 |
| micahg | fta: yeah, it's the main devel branch for firefox | 23:21 |
| asac | its annyoing i cannot edit bug description anymore in lp | 23:21 |
| asac | micahg: did you notice that? | 23:22 |
| micahg | no | 23:22 |
| asac | or arent you on "edge"? | 23:22 |
| * micahg is on edge | 23:22 | |
| BUGabundo | asac Need to get 299MB of archives. After unpacking 537MB will be freed. | 23:22 |
| BUGabundo | this a joke, right? | 23:22 |
| asac | whatever i try to edit in description it always gives me "red" | 23:22 |
| asac | BUGabundo: thats probably the langpack removal ;) | 23:22 |
| micahg | BUGabundo: it's from the grub update | 23:22 |
| BUGabundo | nope | 23:22 |
| BUGabundo | not a single lang pack tonight | 23:23 |
| asac | i would double check whats going on before pursuing | 23:23 |
| micahg | asac: middle click on the edit button | 23:23 |
| micahg | same thing happens on descriptions for me | 23:23 |
| fta | micahg, i don't see your 3.7 branch in https://code.edge.launchpad.net/firefox | 23:23 |
| asac | fta: yes. i thought you started the habit to link the branches ;) | 23:23 |
| asac | so i did the same for 3.7 when we created it | 23:23 |
| micahg | fta: probably because it's been merged | 23:23 |
| fta | oh | 23:24 |
| micahg | fta: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/firefox/firefox-3.7-20091006 | 23:24 |
| fta | asac, yeah, maybe, i'm just tired | 23:24 |
| asac | fta: that happens if you link a branch to a series and mark it as default series | 23:24 |
| asac | then you get lp:PROJECTNAME | 23:24 |
| asac | for that branch | 23:24 |
| asac | "main development focus" series actually | 23:24 |
| micahg | asac: bug 331990 | 23:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 331990 in lazr.restful "The inline editor widget reports a JSON error when saving non-ASCII characters" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/331990 | 23:24 |
| asac | lazr.restful ? | 23:25 |
| BUGabundo | asac micahg http://paste.ubuntu.com/288160/ | 23:25 |
| asac | HMM | 23:25 |
| micahg | BUGabundo: I told you, it's grub | 23:25 |
| micahg | I had this yesterday | 23:26 |
| micahg | let me see if I can find the bug | 23:26 |
| asac | micahg: grub? | 23:26 |
| micahg | bug 44470 | 23:26 |
| asac | how can grub release twice as much of space as the total size of downloaded archives? | 23:26 |
| micahg | oops | 23:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 44470 in python-apt "ParseSection(control).get(field, default) raises when default is None" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44470 | 23:27 |
| micahg | bug 444703 | 23:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 444703 in grub "package grub 0.97-29ubuntu57 failed to install" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/444703 | 23:27 |
| BUGabundo | if it is fixed | 23:27 |
| asac | Need to get 299MB of archives. After unpacking 537MB will be freed. | 23:27 |
| asac | micahg: ^^ | 23:27 |
| asac | thats the problem | 23:27 |
| BUGabundo | what wrong with my update? | 23:27 |
| asac | micahg: did you really have that too? | 23:27 |
| micahg | idk, that's the bug that james_w pointed me to | 23:27 |
| micahg | yes | 23:27 |
| micahg | asac: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/10/07/%23ubuntu-motu.txt | 23:28 |
| micahg | i don't claim to understand it | 23:28 |
| asac | micahg: ah ;) | 23:28 |
| asac | so version 0.97-29ubuntu57 had a full filesystem in some image | 23:29 |
| BUGabundo | $ df | 23:29 |
| BUGabundo | Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on | 23:29 |
| BUGabundo | /dev/sda2 289G 161G 114G 59% / | 23:29 |
| asac | BUGabundo: so go ahead | 23:29 |
| asac | thats good | 23:29 |
| BUGabundo | 41% [25 libc6 2758214/4,206kB 65%] 44.0kB/s 1h 5min 44s | 23:30 |
| BUGabundo | its gonna take a while | 23:30 |
| BUGabundo | :( | 23:30 |
| * BUGabundo wish NM had an hardcoded speed of gigabit for 3G :) | 23:30 | |
| asac | hehe i can give you that ;) | 23:31 |
| asac | in the applet :) | 23:31 |
| asac | notifications that say: "you are on speed ... fasten your seatbelt" | 23:31 |
| BUGabundo | heeheh | 23:31 |
| BUGabundo | I would be fine | 23:31 |
| BUGabundo | if we would get back that speed bar for 3G | 23:31 |
| BUGabundo | instead of this stupid antena :( | 23:31 |
| asac | BUGabundo: yeah. that fell through ... sorry | 23:33 |
| BUGabundo | :( | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | it was dumped? | 23:34 |
| asac | is not hard work but the cycle is too short | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | best NM feature in two years? | 23:34 |
| asac | BUGabundo: no pushed back | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | why? | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | it was working | 23:34 |
| asac | because not enough folks working on 0.8 upstream | 23:34 |
| asac | and now its too late | 23:34 |
| asac | BUGabundo: yes, but the code was not clean for a upstream tree | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | shame | 23:34 |
| asac | and maintaining that as a patch causes more pain | 23:34 |
| BUGabundo | ok | 23:35 |
| BUGabundo | hope it gets back | 23:35 |
| BUGabundo | that and SMS support | 23:35 |
| micahg | asac: any reports of problems with ath9k and nm0.8? | 23:35 |
| asac | it will be back quite soon | 23:35 |
| BUGabundo | I read some change log that mentioned that | 23:35 |
| asac | micahg: yes | 23:35 |
| asac | micahg: well. not ath9k + nm0.8 | 23:35 |
| asac | but ath9k + linux .31 | 23:35 |
| micahg | ah | 23:35 |
| micahg | anyhints | 23:36 |
| asac | seems to be in not-so-good state | 23:36 |
| * micahg is going crazy | 23:36 | |
| asac | (again) | 23:36 |
| asac | for older ath9k chipsets | 23:36 |
| micahg | that's why I can't stay connected at night | 23:36 |
| micahg | I have an AR928X | 23:36 |
| asac | micahg: so what are your symptoms. if you get disconnected, can you connecte again? or have to reboot? | 23:36 |
| micahg | connect again, but it drops every minute or 2 | 23:36 |
| asac | hm | 23:37 |
| asac | so that could be the general background scanning problem | 23:37 |
| asac | can you try to use wpasupplicant manually? | 23:37 |
| asac | and stop NM? | 23:37 |
| micahg | ah seems to be background scanning | 23:38 |
| asac | micahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/288172/ | 23:38 |
| asac | put that in your interfaces ... stop NM | 23:38 |
| asac | and run sudo ifup wlan0 | 23:39 |
| micahg | I'm using WEP | 23:39 |
| asac | (if its wlan0 ... adjust accordingly) | 23:39 |
| asac | micahg: you shouldnt use web | 23:39 |
| asac | ;) | 23:39 |
| micahg | I know | 23:39 |
| BUGabundo | asac any idea why my 3G modem *always* falls around mid night - 1am , and won't reconnect??? | 23:39 |
| BUGabundo | very strange | 23:39 |
| micahg | that's back from when I couldn't get WPA working with my wireless chipset in linux | 23:39 |
| asac | micahg: wpa-wep-key1 | 23:40 |
| micahg | asac: I'll have to trywhen I get home | 23:40 |
| asac | err 0 | 23:40 |
| asac | use that instead of psk | 23:40 |
| asac | and key mgmnt = NONE | 23:40 |
| fta | asac, i think i'm done fixing this mess. | 23:40 |
| micahg | so, I should't have nm-applet running then? | 23:40 |
| asac | fta: 2.0a for 3.7 now? | 23:41 |
| fta | no, 0.92 | 23:41 |
| asac | how? | 23:41 |
| fta | i 1st took micahg's branch but when i pushed it on lp, it created a stacked branch on top of his | 23:42 |
| fta | so i restarted from a branch of an old rev of 3.2, before i created the 3.7 branch, then pulled from micahg, and pushed to lp | 23:42 |
| fta | so 3.7 is properly stacked now | 23:43 |
| asac | wow | 23:43 |
| asac | so now we cannot rename the 3.2 to 3.5 without breaking the stacking? | 23:43 |
| asac | or doesnt that matter | 23:43 |
| micahg | what's the code platform called? | 23:44 |
| fta | i think we can, lp seems to track the branch renames | 23:44 |
| micahg | in LP? | 23:44 |
| micahg | the codename | 23:44 |
| fta | code platform? what do you mean? | 23:45 |
| micahg | I needed to file a bug against it | 23:45 |
| fta | use launchpad itself, i'm not sure it's soyouz or something else, they will re-assign if needed | 23:46 |
| micahg | no, it's launchpad-code :) | 23:46 |
| micahg | and the bug already was filed | 23:46 |
| micahg | bug 413026 | 23:46 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 413026 in launchpad-code "Branch subscription doesn't show results inline (ajax)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/413026 | 23:46 |
| asac | micahg: you can file against launchpad ... i was told everythign gets properly triaged there | 23:47 |
| asac | ah ok | 23:47 |
| micahg | yes, but someone still has to move it | 23:47 |
| micahg | plus if I would have done that, someone would have had to move and dupe it | 23:47 |
| micahg | asac BTW the ath9k bug is bug 414560 | 23:48 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 414560 in linux "ath9k disassociates/reassociates a lot" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414560 | 23:48 |
| micahg | I should dupe the nm bug against it | 23:48 |
| micahg | or maybe not | 23:49 |
| asac__ | reconnect | 23:54 |
| === asac__ is now known as asac | ||
| fta | asac*, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head.old is the old branch, it should be dropped.. at some point | 23:55 |
| fta | gasp, bugs linked to the old branch are still pointing there | 23:56 |
| fta | seems there are just 2 though | 23:56 |
| === ripps_ is now known as ripps | ||
| micahg | fta: are you fixing the FTBFS? | 23:57 |
| fta | micahg, when you fix a problem, please use dch for the changelog commit. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/revision/466 | 23:57 |
| micahg | fta: I do | 23:57 |
| fta | micahg, no, look at the diff of this link, you take owner ship of all the changes | 23:58 |
| fta | -" " | 23:58 |
| micahg | that's what dch does :) | 23:58 |
| micahg | unless there's a flag | 23:58 |
| micahg | I use dch -e | 23:58 |
| fta | no, it should add my name in brackets | 23:58 |
| fta | dch alone should work and it's UNRELEASED | 23:59 |
| micahg | ah | 23:59 |
| micahg | sorry, didn't know that | 23:59 |
| micahg | I'll so that in the future | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!