=== Mujahideen is now known as Vantrax
=== Vantrax is now known as Hashishin
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
=== Hashishin is now known as Nizari
=== Nizari is now known as vantrax
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[01:52] <lfaraone> Bug 405904 shouldn't be filed against Ubuntu, should it? I don't think there's a package for p.u.c, but it's not really an issue affecting the Ubuntu distribution.
[01:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 405904 in ubuntu "packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405904
[01:54] <kamusin> how do you pronounce rhythmbox?
[01:57] <charles> kamusin: ...?  "rhythm" + "box"
[01:59] <micahg> lfaraone: p.u.c wouldn't be a package, but a project, and no, I don't think there is one
[02:00] <lfaraone> micahg: so the bug should be invalid in Ubuntu, right?
[02:00] <micahg> site seems to be fine now, so I think it can be closed anyways
[02:01] <lfaraone> micahg: The bug reporter keeps on reopening the bug when it's marked as  invalid in Ubuntu, claiming "this was already discussed". (he was the only one talking, afaict)
[02:02] <micahg> yes, well this is an ongoing problem, is it on the hugday list?
[02:03] <kamusin> charles,  hehe
[02:04] <micahg> bdmurray: you around?
[02:06] <lfaraone> micahg: yes, it is on the list, that's how I found it :)
[02:07] <micahg> ah
[02:07] <micahg> well, lfaraone, I'd say come back in the morning when bdmurray is around and ask him
[02:12] <lfaraone> micahg: mk. the user then proceeded to insult me via PM,  (which seemed just a bit unjustified) so I'm not inclined to be permissive.
[02:12] <micahg> lfaraone: now you see why I'm not saying just to close it ;)
[02:13]  * micahg is not in the mood for a sparring match
[02:15] <lfaraone> micahg: in other news, I "cleaned up" about 20 or so bugs today from the hugday list. Do I totally get anti-hugged for not marking them as done on the Wiki? :P
[02:15] <micahg> lfaraone: use the hugday-tools
[02:16] <micahg> lfaraone: check out ubuntu-dev-tools and ubuntu-qa-tools
[02:16] <micahg> you can close from a console
[02:16] <lfaraone> micahg: cool.
[02:16] <micahg> lfaraone: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Tools
[02:19] <lfaraone> micahg: I'm getting "TypeError: Error while trying to read cookie in sql format, cannot handle format of '.mozilla/firefox/nt0jde1l.default/cookies.sqlite'"
[02:19] <lfaraone> micahg: when I do:  "lfaraone@Opus:~$ hugday init --user lfaraone --cookie .mozilla/firefox/nt0jde1l.default/cookies.sqlite"
[02:20] <lfaraone> micahg: nevermind, just had to kill ff
[02:26] <micahg> lfaraone: I e-mailed the maintainer of p.u.c about setting up a project, if he gets back to me, I'll take care of the bug
[02:27] <lfaraone> micahg: okay. now, how can I get a list of bugs that I've touched today? I've since changed computers, so I don't have a history. (which makes hugday close difficult)
[02:28] <micahg> ummm
[02:28] <micahg> wait for 5-a-day stats to update?
[02:29] <micahg> oh, you don't seem to be on there
[02:31] <micahg> lfaraone: you can grep your way through an mbox file: http://people.canonical.com/~listarchive/ubuntu-bugs/
[02:31] <lfaraone> micahg: hehe, mk.
[02:31] <micahg> there's gmane, but I don't know how updated it is
[02:32] <micahg> yeah, that starts 2009-10-04
[02:49] <lfaraone> micahg: I've initted, but, "RuntimeError: You are not allowed to change the content of 'https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091008'. Plase run 'hugday init' and try again."
[02:49] <micahg> have you logged in before to the wiki?
[03:09] <AdamDV> I may have found a bug in Nautilus.
[03:10] <AdamDV> If your familiar with sshfs, I noticed today that when viewing an sshfs mounted folder it reports 1000GB of free space in the folder.
[03:32] <lfaraone> micahg: yes, I have.
[03:33] <micahg> lfaraone: did you run hugday init?
[03:33] <lfaraone> micahg: yes, that exited without output
[03:35] <micahg> isn't the cookie a path to the cookie file?
[03:47] <lfaraone> micahg: it is. I've also tried inputing my moin session directly.
[03:48] <micahg> are you logged into the wiki now?
[03:50] <lfaraone> micahg: yeah. nevermind, got it working
[03:52] <micahg> ok
[04:06] <lfaraone> against what project should archive bugs like bug 405097 be submitted?
[04:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 405097 in ubuntu "APT errors when using jm Ubuntu mirrror" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405097
[04:22] <hggdh> lfaraone: so far sounds like the packages are hosed somewhere, either mirror, or <whatever>. Frankly, I do not know what to set it against
[04:26] <lfaraone> hggdh: I see.
=== mac__v is now known as mac_v
=== sandberg_ is now known as sandberg
[10:12] <balthus> Hi, i am considering contributing to this bug report
[10:12] <balthus> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zope3/+bug/444579
[10:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 444579 in zope3 "python-zopeinterface removed from Karmic repos still has lots of dependants" [Undecided,New]
[10:14] <balthus> it looks to me that this is a transition issue
[10:17] <balthus> in aptitude, the package is in the Obsolete list
[10:18] <balthus> the package description in aptitude reads:
[10:18] <balthus>   --\ Versions of python-zopeinterface (2)
[10:18] <balthus> i    3.4.0-0ubuntu3
[10:18] <balthus> p    python-zope.interface 3.5.2-1
[10:20] <balthus> so the new version is listed
[10:22] <balthus> but its name is quite different from the old one
[10:24] <balthus> could this be the reason why the upgrade is not automatic?
[10:29] <balthus> when manually selecting the new version and going for the upgrade, here is what I get:
[10:29] <balthus> --\ Packages being deleted due to unsatisfied dependencies (1)
[10:29] <balthus> id   python-zopeinterface
[10:29] <balthus> --\ Packages to be installed (1)
[10:29] <balthus> pi   python-zope.interface                                   +745kB  <none>     3.5.2-1
[10:31] <balthus> you can notice the subtil difference between the two package names
[10:31] <balthus> python-zopeinterface vs python-zope.interface
[10:33] <balthus> has anyone a clue?
=== stochastic_ is now known as stochastic
=== balthus is now known as xba
=== xba is now known as xab
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
=== ogra is now known as Guest77653
=== Guest77653 is now known as ogra
[11:49] <jurjen> Hi All, new on IRC. I get unexpected behaviour in a preseeded unattended install: an empty extended partition is not recognized as free space in Jaunty, while it was in Hardy. What pacakge to file a bug against?
=== porthose is now known as porthose|afk
[12:10] <sbc> jurjen: My first guess would be: ubiquity (the installer)
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler
=== Igorot is now known as Knightlust
[12:36] <lfaraone> bdmurray: ping. what should bug 405904 be filed against?
[12:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 405904 in ubuntu "packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405904
[12:55] <kblin> hi folks
[12:58] <jurjen> sbc: I would guess that Ubiquity is just a front end to d-i. But I'm unsure whether PartMan is already in the picture when the decision is made where to install.
=== marjomercado is now known as marjo
[14:47] <bddebian> Boo
[16:39] <bdmurray> lfaraone: it doesn't belong where it is that's for sure
[16:54] <hggdh> yes. I also had a look at it yesterday, and I am not sure where to put it. Rolf does have a point, though
[16:58]  * thekorn personally does not like this SOMESTATUS<->Invalid battles on bugreports like this, it has a kind of aggressive character
[17:00] <jcastro> pedro_: bdmurray: OpenWeek!
[17:00] <jcastro> you guys are killing me!
[17:01] <hggdh> thekorn: +1. But the reporter has been courteous, and the issue could be seen as a infrastructure issue
[17:02] <hggdh> in fact, similar to the eeeBotu I have been running: it *is* a service to the community, but outside the, er, official channels
[17:03] <bdmurray> but you wouldn't shoe horn eeeBotu bugs into Launchpad about the Ubuntu _distribution_
[17:03] <hggdh> I agree
[17:03] <bdmurray> That should really be addressed in an rt
[17:03] <hggdh> this is why I stated 'similar'
[17:13] <thekorn> can anyone remind me on login/password for rt.ubuntu.com, let's report this packages.ubuntu.com problem there
[17:13]  * hggdh is starting to get annoyed by Quassel's behaviour
[17:14] <hggdh> bdmurray: is rt a restricted resource, internal to <whatever>?
[17:15] <Pici> thekorn: ubuntu/ubuntu iirc
[17:15] <bdmurray> No, it's available to ubuntu members
[17:15] <thekorn> Pici: oh, that's simple ;)
[17:15] <hggdh> Interesting. Never heard of it. Where do I get an user/pswd for it?
[17:15] <Pici> hggdh: topic of #canonical-sysadmin
[17:15] <Pici> or what I said a few lines ago
[17:16] <jpds> thekorn: It has been reported there.
[17:16] <thekorn> jpds: cool, do you have an url handy?
[17:17] <jpds> No, but I know mdke sent an email.
[17:18] <jpds> thekorn: what's the problem?
[17:19] <Okachobi> Hey all- just did a apt-get upgrade/dist-upgrade from karmic koala alpha 6 and seem to be unable to launch anything after KDE login.  Can't even get into the bug reporting tool- it comes up then kicks me back to the login screen.  Is there something I can do to get back to a working desktop?
[17:20] <thekorn> jpds: we have a bugreport (bug 405904) and we would like to close it, but give the people an alternative contact point,
[17:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 405904 in ubuntu "packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/405904
[17:20] <jpds> thekorn: Yeah, that's the one mdke reported.
[17:20] <thekorn> jpds: so they see that at least some cares about it
[17:26] <jpds> thekorn: There is a ticket for it, it is a known issue, and people are working it.
[17:27] <thekorn> jpds: good, but unfortunatly I've no luck finding this ticket
[17:28] <jpds> Because someone still has to move it out of the hidden 'incoming' queue.
[17:29] <thekorn> aha, that's how it works ;)
[17:29] <jpds> No, someone just has to make it public on their rota.
[17:29] <hggdh> jpds -- is there any docs on what rc is for?
[17:30] <jpds> No.
[17:30] <jpds> It's a Request Tracker
[17:30] <jpds> ...for the Ubuntu community.
[17:31] <hggdh> thank you. And what should i request there?
[17:31] <jpds> New mailing lists, LoCo websites, DNS, mirrors, etc.
[17:33] <hggdh> heh. *NOW* we can tackle some of these bugs... Of course, we would still need to close them with a link to the rc bug opened...
[17:34] <Okachobi> Where can I got to find a list of reported bugs in the latest updates to Karmic Koala Alpha 6?  The latest update completely hosed my system.
[17:34] <jpds> hggdh: I'll keep any eye out for the ticket.
[17:34] <jpds> Leave it to me.
[17:34] <hggdh> jpds: thank you
[17:34] <thekorn> jpds: thank you
=== jsalisbury_ is now known as jsalisbury
=== porthose|afk is now known as porthose
[18:49] <Okachobi> from: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad : "Ubuntu BugSquad members can always be contacted via IRC on the channel #ubuntu-bugs on irc.freenode.org for help or collaboration. "  and by "help" I guess that means inability to even direct someone to the right place to get their questions answered.  Thanks anyway... I removed the ~/.kde/ directory and my desktop now works again.  I would have been happy to help provide bug data on this, b
[18:49] <Okachobi> one here could even answer the simple question of 'where do I find the bug database'.  Forgive my intrusion...
[18:51]  * Pici blinks
[18:53] <jcastro> bdmurray: openweek!
[18:55] <bdmurray> jcastro: I'm being attacked by bugs
[18:55] <jcastro> bdmurray: this is after release
[18:55] <bdmurray> oh right there will be less reports then ;-)
[18:55] <jcastro> yes, allowing plenty of time for you to have a session!
[18:58] <bdmurray> jcastro: okay I'll do 2100 on monday - reporting bugs alright?
[18:58] <jcastro> yessir!
[20:37] <darthanubis> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/379371
[20:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379371 in liferea "Liferea segfaults with "Signal 11" whenever a feed-entry is clicked" [Low,Incomplete]
[20:37] <darthanubis> Who is responsible for assigning these bugs?
[20:41] <micahg> darthanubis: please install the dbg packages for libglib-2.0, and libgio-2.0
[20:42] <darthanubis> micahg, will do
[20:42] <micahg> darthanubis: although you seem to have a different issue than the reporter
[20:42] <darthanubis> I thiought I had done that..
[20:42] <micahg> the reporter can start liferea
[20:43] <micahg> darthanubis: if those don't work, then you'll need to add the ddeb repos and get the dbgsym packages
[20:43] <hggdh> darthanubis: what version of Ubuntu are you running?
[20:43] <darthanubis> Karmic
[20:43] <micahg> ah, good catch hggdh
[20:43] <hggdh> a sig 11 should trigger apport automagically on Karmic
[20:44] <micahg> darthanubis: definitely file a new bug, preferably with an apport crash
[20:44] <darthanubis> hggdh, it did , has not
[20:44] <hggdh> darthanubis: check if you already have a crash report under /var/crash for linferea
[20:44] <darthanubis> micahg, will do
[20:44] <lfaraone> bdmurray: thoguth so.
[20:45] <micahg> thanks darthanubis
[20:45] <darthanubis> thank you
[20:46] <darthanubis> hggdh, everything but liferea is in /var/crash
[20:46] <hggdh> heh
[20:46] <hggdh> so it may not be a sig 11
[20:47] <hggdh> hum. Try running 'gdb liferea'; on the gdb prompt, type in 'r' (for 'run'). Wait for the crash, then tell us what signal was it
[20:47] <micahg> hggdh: it is based on his backtrace
[20:47] <micahg> hggdh: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32897025/gdb-liferea.txt
[20:47] <hggdh> oh already there... sorry
[20:48] <micahg> well, it was on another bug
[20:48] <micahg> and it was incomplete
[20:49]  * gnomefreak betting he runs it again and it comes up as a different crash
[20:49] <darthanubis> hggdh, standby
[20:49]  * hggdh will not bet ;-)
[20:49] <gnomefreak> i would say use "ubungu-bugs liferea"
[20:50] <gnomefreak> and file new report since this report is old and a much older version
[20:50] <darthanubis> did you guys see the gdb crash report I posted to the bug report?
[20:50] <gnomefreak> darthanubis: need a new one
[20:51] <hggdh> darthanubis: yes, I saw it. But this is a different issue from the bug 379371
[20:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379371 in liferea "Liferea segfaults with "Signal 11" whenever a feed-entry is clicked" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/379371
[20:51] <darthanubis> working on it
[20:51] <gnomefreak> new bug report would be great using the command i gave above
[20:51] <darthanubis> have to reinstall the debugging packages since I gave up on this
[20:51] <gnomefreak> darthanubis: use the command i gave above and you dont need to do anything
[20:51] <darthanubis> I got it, hang on;)
[20:51] <bdmurray> gnomefreak: I think you meant 'ubuntu-bug liferea'
[20:52] <gnomefreak> it should post debug info if it sees it as a crash
[20:52] <gnomefreak> bdmurray: yes sorry typo with s
[20:53]  * gnomefreak trying to remember who works on it
[20:53] <hggdh> pochu did, of old
[20:53] <gnomefreak> hggdh: thats him thanks. he dropped it?
[20:54] <hggdh> IDNK. Last comment on the bug was on June, but have not seen him for a while
[20:54] <hggdh> !last pochu
[20:54] <ubot4> Factoid 'last pochu' not found
[20:54] <gnomefreak> the liferea daily PPA has been forgotten it looks like
[20:55] <gnomefreak> thinking daily since its in my daily section of *.list
[20:55] <hggdh> heh
[20:56] <gnomefreak> either way new bug is needed, i will close the one open
[20:56] <hggdh> k
[20:56] <micahg> what open one?
[20:56] <gnomefreak> micahg: bug 379371 is closed now
[20:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379371 in liferea "Liferea segfaults with "Signal 11" whenever a feed-entry is clicked" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/379371
[20:56] <darthanubis> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/446649
[20:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 446649 in liferea "Liferea did receive signal 11 (Segmentation fault)." [Undecided,New]
[20:57] <micahg> gnomefreak: he wasn't the reporter on that bug
[20:57] <gnomefreak> it does us no good. would been nice if someone connfirmed it
[20:57] <micahg> and it was for something else
[20:57] <darthanubis> there you g
[20:57] <darthanubis> go
[20:57] <darthanubis> I thought it might have been the flashplugin, removed that, and still the segfault, I'm stumped
[20:57] <micahg> gnomefreak: please comment when closing bugs
[20:57] <gnomefreak> micahg: he was last commenter and other guy never answered the question from june
[20:57] <hggdh> darthanubis: good. Now please install the dbg/dbgsym libraries and GDB the beast again
[20:58] <micahg> ok
[20:58] <gnomefreak> micahg: i was going to but close no longer allows you too and you got me side tracked
[20:58] <darthanubis> hggdh, will do
[20:58] <hggdh> darthanubis: also please install the libc6 dbg
[20:58] <micahg> gnomefreak: do you have the launchpad improvements addon isntalled?
[20:59] <gnomefreak> micahg: yes
[20:59] <gnomefreak> and on edge
[20:59] <micahg> Ok, I use that for a quick close
[20:59] <micahg> you can't use the AJAX though if you intend to comment
[21:00] <micahg> or rather, shouldn't
[21:00] <gnomefreak> i use the little ! sign :)
[21:00] <darthanubis> please install the dbg/dbgsym libraries?
[21:00] <darthanubis> I don't understand that..sorry
[21:00] <micahg> right, bdmurray, should we get the AJAX disabled for Ubuntu bugs since we would like comments for status changes?
[21:00] <hggdh> darthanubis: yes, *either* .dbg *or* .dbgsym
[21:01] <micahg> darthanubis: s/./-/g
[21:01] <hggdh> thanks
[21:02] <gnomefreak> liferea-dbg
[21:02] <hggdh> and libc6 dbg and libglib and libgio
[21:02] <gnomefreak> also handy to know if its webkit or xulrunner version :)
[21:03] <gnomefreak> although not sure how that works if it provides both since only one is installed
[21:04] <darthanubis> libc6,libglib, but no libgio on my system, all dbg packages
[21:04] <hggdh> k, let's try the gdb
[21:05] <darthanubis> k
[21:06] <darthanubis> http://pastebin.com/d52cd7e5d
[21:06] <darthanubis> The GUI is up, but no text and it's dark/grey
[21:07] <hggdh> darthanubis: you forgot to 'bt full' ;-)
[21:07] <darthanubis> hope I did everything right?
[21:07] <darthanubis> bt full?....
[21:07] <micahg> darthanubis: libgio is in libglib2.0
[21:08] <darthanubis> oh, well I installed that package then
[21:08] <hggdh> darthanubis: gdb stopped at the crash, now we need to 'bt full' at the gdb prompt
[21:08] <hggdh> so that we will have a backtrace
[21:09] <darthanubis> http://pastebin.com/d3915cd75
[21:09] <darthanubis> REALLY appreciate all this help on this matter.
[21:10] <darthanubis> I love this feed reader
[21:10] <darthanubis> It did work when I installed Alpha5 but since the udates, something broke
[21:10] <darthanubis> updates
[21:10] <hggdh> weird. Only one frame
[21:11] <hggdh> darthanubis: please install samba-dbg -- the frame points to a library in it.
[21:11] <gnomefreak> mines working fine here atm
[21:12] <darthanubis> gnomefreak, well thats good I guess
[21:12] <darthanubis> I envy you
[21:12] <gnomefreak> my gwibber doesnt but liferea does :)
[21:12] <darthanubis> hggdh, roger that
[21:12] <hggdh> darthanubis: then please run again the gdb, and this time select, at the crash, 't a a bt f' (thread apply all bt full)
[21:12] <darthanubis> got it
[21:12] <hggdh> why is WINS resolution being called, alone in the thread?
[21:12]  * gnomefreak goes to bother our beloved gwibber expert
[21:13] <darthanubis> hggdh, I don't know. This was the only version of Ubuntu where I had to install wins and edit a file to get my samaba shares to show up
[21:13] <darthanubis> why liferea has any business with it beats me
[21:15]  * darthanubis waiting for smaba-dbg to install
[21:16]  * darthanubis huge download
[21:19] <darthanubis> http://pastebin.com/dbcff8fc
[21:19] <darthanubis> I think I sent the wrong cmd or wrong syntax?
[21:19] <darthanubis> because t a a bt f did nothing
[21:20] <hggdh> no, nothing wrng
[21:20] <hggdh> I was wrong
[21:20] <hggdh> darthanubis: you first have to 'r' it
[21:20] <darthanubis> got it
[21:21] <darthanubis> done
[21:21] <darthanubis> I have massive output now
[21:22] <darthanubis> http://pastebin.com/d329d59a
[21:22] <caravena> Hello
[21:27] <hggdh> darthanubis: interesting the segv was on samba code
[21:27] <hggdh> caravena: hello
[21:27] <hggdh> darthanubis: please upload this bt to the bug
[21:28] <caravena> Hello hggdh
[21:28] <hggdh> I am out of my depth on samba
[21:28] <caravena> See bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444155
[21:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 444155 in telepathy-butterfly "New release for telepathy-butterfly, update to 0.5.1" [Undecided,New]
[21:28] <darthanubis> hggdh, I already uploaded the output.
[21:28] <darthanubis> hggdh, removing wins from /etc/nsswitch.conf allows liferea to work again
[21:29] <darthanubis> Now I hope I did not break my shares again
[21:29] <hggdh> darthanubis: GOOD! You have a bypass (I hope). Please add this comment to the bug
[21:29] <hggdh> caravena: what is the issue with this?
[21:30] <caravena> finding mantainer for create new package of package de Debian
[21:31] <hggdh> OK. what you want is a sync request
[21:31] <caravena> hggdh, yes
[21:32] <hggdh> caravena: please have a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage#Special%20types%20of%20bugs
[21:33] <hggdh> this is how it is done. Please also follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[21:33] <joaopinto> darthanubis, could you please re-add the wins lookup to nsswitch and try: nslookup planet.ubuntu.com
[21:34] <darthanubis> joaopinto, wow, you've been following the bug , nice. Readd wins with liferea running or close it?
[21:34] <hggdh> close it
[21:34] <joaopinto> the bug is not with liferea, it's on the wins lookup
[21:35] <hggdh> joaopinto's request is trying to check the samba setup
[21:35] <joaopinto> doing an nslookup could produce something similar
[21:36] <darthanubis> well with it closed or open here are the results with wins add again....
[21:37] <darthanubis> http://pastebin.com/d5988364f
[21:37] <darthanubis> how strange all this is to me
[21:37] <darthanubis> I thought readding wins wouls surely make liferea segfault again
[21:38] <joaopinto> it didn't ?
[21:38] <hggdh> nope...
[21:38] <darthanubis> nope
[21:38] <darthanubis> I can't seem to get it to segfault
[21:38] <joaopinto> so the conditions to trigger the bgu is not a trivial lookup
[21:38] <joaopinto> bug
[21:38] <darthanubis> let me readd the flashplugin to liferea again
[21:40] <joaopinto> darthanubis, you need to put nis on the same order on nsswitch you had before
[21:40] <joaopinto> ops, wins
[21:41] <darthanubis> joaopinto, I did, it was at the begining of that line
[21:42] <caravena> hggdh,  I install package of Debian
[21:43] <hggdh> caravena: you installed a Debian package?
[21:43] <hggdh> caravena: this is usually not a very good idea -- Debian and Ubuntu have some differences on where files go
[21:43] <caravena> hggdh, Yes. Testing
[21:44] <hggdh> caravena: but this does not impact your sync request. For it to be acted on, you have to follow the instructions I gave above
[21:44]  * caravena translate in google
[21:45] <hggdh> :-)
[21:45] <hggdh> sorry
[21:45] <hggdh> caravena: you still have to fill in the sync request as I pointed above
[21:48] <caravena> hggdh, ok
[21:51] <caravena> Now fine hggdh? https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telepathy-butterfly/+bug/444155
[21:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 444155 in telepathy-butterfly "New release for telepathy-butterfly, update to 0.5.1" [Undecided,New]
[21:51] <hggdh> caravena: looking at it
[21:55] <hggdh> caravena: please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess#Content%20of%20a%20sync%20request
[21:55] <hggdh> (although I think it might be too late for Karmic)
[22:00] <darthanubis> hggdh, http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7075850&postcount=4
[22:00] <darthanubis> thats why I edited that file to begin with
[22:05] <atrus> if i've installed a karmic package from archive.ubuntu.com because my local mirror doesn't have the update yet, how do I file a bug on it with ubuntu-bug?
[22:06] <micahg> atrus: you can still use ubuntu-bug even if you don't have it installed
[22:06] <hggdh> darthanubis: so you are always trying WINS before dns
[22:06] <atrus> micahg: it just says "this is not a genuine ubuntu package"
[22:07] <micahg> atrus: does it prevent you from filing the bug?
[22:07] <hggdh> it will
[22:07] <atrus> yes.
[22:08] <micahg> weird..it'll let you file a bug for a package you don't have installed, but if you have it installed it'll stop you?
[22:08] <atrus> apparently.
[22:09] <micahg> which package?
[22:09] <darthanubis> hggdh, never used it any other way
[22:10] <micahg> atrus: well, you can switch your sources to archive.ubuntu.com to submit the report
[22:11] <micahg> atrus: the problem with ubuntu-bug has already been filed as bug 443961
[22:11] <atrus> micahg: empathy.
[22:11] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 443961 in apport "Given that ubuntu-bug is now needed for all bug reports, non-genuine packages should be allowed." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/443961
[22:11] <atrus> micahg: ooh, that's cool. thanks.
[22:14]  * gnomefreak likes that idea :)
[22:16] <darthanubis> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/432620
[22:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 432620 in mountall "needs to load (or wait for) filesystem modules e.g. xfs" [Medium,Fix committed]
[22:16] <darthanubis> Now this bug right here, we need help on
[22:17] <darthanubis> And thank all who helped with my Liferea issue!
[22:18] <hggdh> darthanubis: Scott is working on it
[22:19] <darthanubis> ugh, clicking add new feed via firefox using liferea-addfeed crashes liferea
[22:19] <darthanubis> hggdh, thanks
[22:19] <darthanubis> just thought Scott could use a hand. But you know better than I
[22:20] <darthanubis> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liferea/+bug/379371
[22:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 379371 in liferea "Liferea segfaults with "Signal 11" whenever a feed-entry is clicked" [Low,Invalid]
[22:20] <darthanubis> I think gnomefreak might have dismissed this bug a little too early?
[22:20] <darthanubis> Liferea did receive signal 11 (Segmentation fault). after adding a feed
[22:21] <darthanubis> let me try to remove WINS again
[22:22] <hggdh> brb
[22:23] <gnomefreak> signal 11 does not mean its the same bug it just means it died the same
[22:24] <darthanubis> gnomefreak, what does it mean if like the bug title says, as soon as I add a feed it segfaults?
[22:24] <darthanubis> Exactly as described?
[22:24] <gnomefreak> darthanubis: nothing much to the crash. the crash report is what needs to be the same
[22:25] <gnomefreak> darthanubis: a feed can cause a crash and user would only know that clicking on it crashed it
[22:25] <darthanubis> well the guys @#liferea asked me to make it a duplicate of my new bug you told me to file
[22:26] <darthanubis> removing WINS from /etc/nsswitch.conf solves the crash
[22:26] <gnomefreak> darthanubis: if the dbug output is same than that is what should happen but age+reporter no answer == cant tell if the same
[22:27] <darthanubis> gnomefreak, I'm following you...
[22:39] <xteejx> Hi guys bug 383511. Anything else needed?
[22:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 383511 in update-notifier "apt_check.py crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/383511
[22:43] <xteejx> I'm going through my reported bugs and there's a couple that are resolved, so will comment on and change these as appropriate, but unsure what to do with the above. I thought apport reported bugs were already triaged?
[23:02] <xteejx> Hi again guys, is anyone around?
=== scream is now known as scream|Away
=== scream|Away is now known as scream
=== asac_ is now known as asac