| === ramana__ is now known as ramana | ||
| === ramana__ is now known as ramana | ||
| === lamont` is now known as lamont | ||
| ramana_ | doko_: glad to hear the oo.o problem got fixed. | 16:36 |
|---|---|---|
| doko_ | ramana_: yes, thanks for the help! I'll follow-up with email. | 16:37 |
| ramana_ | doko_: anytime - Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance. | 16:39 |
| ramana | doko_: ping | 19:46 |
| === ramana_ is now known as ramana | ||
| doko_ | ramana: pong | 22:59 |
| ramana | doko: I tried the binutils 2.19.92-rc2 snapshot on an arm-linux board that I've got access to running Debian Lenny and don't see the test failures that you see. However the number of tests I run are significantly lower than yours. | 23:00 |
| ramana | Ofcourse the 2.19.92-rc2 snapshot includes Jakub's gas patch . | 23:02 |
| doko_ | yes, the snapshot includes the patch as well. | 23:02 |
| doko_ | for historical reasons the binutils in ubuntu includes some of the hj lu patches; checked that disabling these doesn't help | 23:03 |
| ramana | ok | 23:03 |
| ramana | as well as trying gcc-4.3 doesn't help . | 23:05 |
| ramana | ? | 23:06 |
| doko_ | right, and building with -fno-stack-protector -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE neither | 23:06 |
| doko_ | currently looking at our buildlogs at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+publishinghistory when the failures do appear | 23:06 |
| doko_ | they are in 2.19.51.20090620, not in 2.19.51.20090423 | 23:08 |
| doko_ | in 2.19.51.20090515 | 23:10 |
| ramana | I'm still new to launchpad. | 23:12 |
| ramana | so I clicked a link and got here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.19.51.20090515-0ubuntu1/+build/1030198 - not sure where you are seeing the test logs | 23:12 |
| doko_ | there is link called buildlog, search for the second occurrance of test-summary | 23:13 |
| doko_ | they are in 20090508 | 23:14 |
| doko_ | ramana: between 20090423 and 20090508 | 23:17 |
| ramana | ok . atleast we know the range now to look at. | 23:19 |
| ramana | Is this failure only armel specific or do you see it on other arch's as well ? | 23:28 |
| ramana | I thought your report on binutils@ suggested that you were seeing similar failures on mips ? | 23:30 |
| doko_ | yes, I see these on mips as well | 23:32 |
| doko_ | and mipsel | 23:32 |
| doko_ | but mips fails in 2.19.1 as well | 23:34 |
| doko_ | and 2.18.1 | 23:35 |
| ramana | hmmm | 23:35 |
| doko_ | now running a 20090430 build | 23:37 |
| ramana | ok | 23:37 |
| ramana | well do any more hj lu patches need to be backported in . I see there is a http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/binutils-2.20.51.0.1.tar.bz2 | 23:40 |
| ramana | unless you've seen this already . | 23:40 |
| doko_ | no, didn't look yet, but as we don't see this in the debian build, I doubt we find the solution there. | 23:48 |
| doko_ | debian has one more difference: built with -march=armv4 by default | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!