/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/10/12/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

=== asac_ is now known as asac
LLStarksasac, why is it so easy to accidentally "New Window" when trying to click the "Back" button?00:21
|eagles0513875|happy monday yall09:39
asacfta: hey. you think you can kick off another modemmanager round? i committed the build fix upstream for that now and i need to get someone verify that their issues are fixed in trunk etc.11:30
asacrock on11:30
asacfta: yeah. i talked to cody russell about the new client side windows once ... was that just a fyi or do we have issues because of that now?11:31
asac!test11:31
ubottuyes, I'm alive.11:31
eagles0513875morning or afternoon asac12:16
=== statik` is now known as statik
fta2http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/restart-no-very-helpful.png13:19
asacfta: what restart?13:25
asacflash is also known to keep the UI thread running13:26
mac_vasac: hi... i can see this Bug #439172 with gnome 3 also , only the nm-applet icon blurs , while the gpm is crisp13:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 439172 in network-manager-applet "nm-applet icon blurry on 25+ pixel panel" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43917213:42
mac_vis that a known issue?13:42
asaclet me look13:46
asacmac_v: not sure how that could be a applet bug, why do you think it is?13:48
asaci mean ... yes, we dont ship icons for larger sizes, but themers can do that, right?13:48
asachmm. thats tray only, right?13:48
asachow do other apps do that?13:48
asacmaybe they use a different tray lib?13:48
mac_vasac: the nm icon just scales , while the rest of the applets skip icon sizes to the next size... hmm i think it is because there is no 48 px for the nm applet alone... let me test it13:50
fta2asac, the restart thing was a reboot14:03
asacfta2: but what does it show?14:04
asacjust a general gdm bug?14:04
asacmac_v: yes. though i wonder how that would work without code14:05
fta2asac, it says that some unknown process is still running, but it should at least give a pid, or something14:05
asacoh. thought you said it was a firefox process14:05
asacand a firefox bug14:05
asachow can a process be unknown?14:06
asacshouldnt there be at least a process name?14:06
mac_vasac: ah ha..! nm applet does things differently... as soon as the size goes beyond 24px it searches for the next bigger [32px] icon and scales it down and uses it... similarly for 32px  , as soon as panel size changes to 33px, 48px icon is used after being scaled down... whereas other applets only change when the panel size hits 32px [the next icon size normally available] :/14:11
mac_vnote the messaging indicator... it never changes icon size ;)  always 22px icon whatever the size of the panel is14:12
mac_vother applets just use the 24px icon until the panel size reaches 32px , and the 32px icon until the 48px14:14
fta2asac, yeah, that was my point, it's clueless as it is14:15
asacmac_v: feels odd ... will check that14:17
mac_vthanks :)14:18
asacmac_v: i dont see anything that would scale it14:30
asacit just uses the pixbuf from what i see14:31
asacso maybe it just looks good if you are at even multiples of the original size icon14:31
asacmac_v: hmm. ok i see it14:32
mac_vasac: but thats what happens for me... it scales...  maybe comparing how other applets do it might give a clue.. i wonder  how gpm does it14:32
asacapplet just loads the icon using gtk14:32
asacusing the size it gets for the status icon14:33
asacfeels more like a gtk bug14:33
asacnm doesnt really know about the size it will get14:33
asacalso ... dont you now get greyscaled icons if you shrink the panel below 22?14:33
mac_vasac: below 22 it seems to use only the 22px icon.. i use a 19px panel and it uses the 22px icon14:34
asacyes. whatever. so it uses 2214:34
asacand if you make it bigger it will use 24 ;)14:34
mac_vyup14:34
mac_v;p14:34
* mac_v wishes nm uses same method as gpm ;) and would have no need to worry about gtk 14:35
asacwell. this means your hack is broken ;)14:38
asacbut thats not a nm-applet bug14:38
mac_vasac: hmm? i didnt understand14:38
asacif you make the icon bigger you will get the colorful icons14:38
asacnot the greyscale ones14:38
asacor the other way around (if you make it smaller)14:39
asaccant rememmber if you put greyscale in 22 or 2414:39
asaci dont know what gpm uses. if you have other apps that work right let me know14:39
asacgpm is a mess afaict ;)14:39
mac_vasac: but nm-signal-* are specific icons so they cont change to color ;) the nm-device-wired doesnt use 16px icon on panel.. so i'm safe for now :)14:39
mac_vdont* change to color14:40
asacsorry. thought you put that in2214:40
asacnot 1614:40
asacdidnt know that signal are not greyscale in panel14:40
asachmm. seems its greyscale everywhere14:40
mac_vthe nm-signal are greyscale... so there is no problem regarding that... since they are separate labels14:41
mac_vonly the 16px nm-device-wired is color , the 22px and 24px are greyscale ;)14:41
asacok it uses gtk_status_icon_from_name14:42
asacso might have different logic then the pixbuf logic14:42
asacfeels buggy in gtk14:42
mac_vasac: actually its not a bug , that the way gtk works , it scales icons to fit the area available...14:43
mac_vasac: but the rest of the applet seem to use something other than gtk or maybe use fixed icon sizes14:43
mac_vasac: i think gpm and the volume applet do something like for 24-31 use always size 24px and dont scale14:44
asacits all gtk14:48
asaci moved the bug there14:48
mac_veitherway.. if its solved ... it would be awesome ;)14:49
asacnot for karmic i think14:49
asacbut should be low hanging fruit for next cycle14:49
mac_vyeah , atleast for gnome3 ;)14:49
mac_vasac: the bluetooth icon name? when that is updated in Ubuntu , could you ping me... :) the icon names will need to be updated in Humanity too15:28
asacmac_v: is there a bug in launchpad to track this?15:28
asacsorry if thats obvious ;)15:29
mac_vyup , just a sec15:29
mac_vasac: Bug #43716215:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 437162 in gnome-bluetooth "Gnome Bluetooth needs to use different icons for notification area and system menu" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43716215:30
mac_vthats from where the upstream bug started ;)15:30
* asac nm debugging bbl16:22
=== aakashd_ is now known as aakashd
micahgasac: did you see ff3.5.4 build1?20:06
ftamicahg, Oct 07 12:09:14 <fta>     FIREFOX_3_5_4_RELEASE20:30
dtchenfta: we'll need to tackle your openarea bug in Lucid. I plan to add osspd to handle it.20:31
dtchenfta: so, sorry for not getting to it this cycle [honestly, had higher priority bugs]20:31
dtchenopenarena*20:31
ftadtchen, that would be nice, i was ready to uninstall it as it's unplayable right now20:32
micahgfta: I'm usually sleeping then :)20:32
dtchenfta: it doesn't really help that SDL devs can't pinpoint the regression ):20:34
dtchenoh well, more work later.20:34
dtchenjust have to knock out 500 bugs in the next two weeks! (:20:35
ftadtchen, until recently, the sound was just disappearing but the game itself was playable. but now, the video is all jerky when there's too many sounds happening at once20:35
dtchenfta: yeah, we're missing the linux patches for RtKit20:35
micahgfta: asac: are we dropping seamonkey for karmic?20:35
ftamicahg, i don't know but we probably should20:35
dtchenfta: I work around it by adding @audio with RT privileges in /etc/security/limits.conf20:35
ftadtchen, how do i do that?20:36
dtchen22:56 <dtchen> @audio           -       rtprio          9920:36
dtchen22:56 <dtchen> @audio           -       nice            -1920:36
dtchen22:56 <dtchen> @audio           -       memlock         unlimited20:36
ftai already have those 3 lines20:37
dtchenwith PA 0.9.19?20:37
fta1:0.9.19-0ubuntu1~ubuntuaudiodev4~20:38
dtchenright, that's pretty much 0.9.19 that's in the repo now20:38
dtchenwell, we'll go through the stuff after 9.10 releases20:38
ftadtchen, since the last few days, each time i start or unpause a stream, there's a glitch20:40
dtchenusing totem? mplayer? rhythmbox?20:49
ftadtchen, mplayer21:06
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
asacmicahg: why are we dropping seamonkey?21:28
av`asac, is makedev really needed on bluez?21:28
av`asac, e.g as depends21:28
asacav`: not sure. check the code or the changelog to see why its there21:29
asaccould have been forgotten, but mostlikely its there for some debian ports ;)21:29
av`asac, is set as an alternative for udev21:29
av`makedev | udev21:29
asaci would think for ports then21:30
asacfile a bug against debian21:30
av`there is a debian bug asking to remove it21:30
asac(if you think its wrong=21:30
asacdepends on the rational21:30
av`policy violation21:30
asacdoes it hurt?21:30
asacwhat is in policy?21:31
av`asac, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=54686021:31
ubottuDebian bug 546860 in bluez "bluez: depends on extra package (makedev)" [Serious,Open]21:31
asacfta: did you repush modemmanager ?21:33
asacwould be really great ;)21:33
asacand then its also after 10 ;)21:33
ftawas i supposed to?21:33
asacfta: i asked for it ;)21:33
ftasorry, i missed it21:33
asacfta: but if you missed it consider this the request ;)21:33
asacno problem21:34
av`asac, what do you think?21:34
ftadone21:34
asacav`: i am one of those that doesnt care about these kind of things ;)21:34
asacits probably a bug yes.21:34
asacfta: thx21:34
av`asac, so you would say to remove it and leave udev alone21:34
asacdan did some modem refactorings ... wanted to check if he dropped a bomb or med-kit ;)21:34
micahgasac: fta wanted to since there was low usage21:34
micahgbut if we're not, then maybe we should push SM2 since RC1 was just released21:35
asacav`: yes.21:35
av`asac, k, thanks21:35
asacmicahg: i am not sure about the quality ;)21:35
asacbut maybe you are right21:35
asactoo bad we are still stuck at tbird 221:36
av`asac, you should try claws-mail21:36
av`asac, it's way better than TB21:37
av`for performances, filters, faster IMAP handling21:37
asaci am just the messenger ... i use it for obvious reasons for some21:37
asacbut we hav a huge load of users ;)21:37
asacso pumping in tbird 3 would have been great ... if it only were stable21:37
asac;)21:37
av`is it not stable yet?21:38
micahgasac: release is supposed to be before karmic release21:39
av`asac, what did they add / fix to TB 3?21:39
micahgasac: they are testing b4 with users this thursday21:42
micahgI was going to try to build a b4 package21:42
micahgasac: I'll try to fix up SM this week to work with SM221:43
ftamicahg, a bunch of users asked me to do b4 in my PPA as i used to do in the past23:06
ftabut i wanted to do that in a better place23:06
ftaso i needed to discuss that PPA re-org topic with asac23:07
micahgok, well, I create a stable testbed PPA for myself, fta23:22
micahgso I'll upload it there and propose a merge with the changes23:22

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!