[01:52] <Laibsch> Does http://packages.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-laptop-mode still serve a purpose?  It hasn't been updated for ages and there is the generic laptop-mode-tools package available.  Time for removal?  Where to request?
[02:41] <Legendario> is joão pinto here?
[02:43] <ScottK> No
[06:14] <LLStarks> hi. can i get action on this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitpim/+bug/395830
[06:14] <LLStarks> patch is posted, just needs packaging.
[06:15] <LLStarks> bitpim is pretty much non-functional without it and root.
[06:19] <fabrice_sp> LLStarks, why don't you prepare a debdiff, and subscribe u-u-s?
[06:20] <fabrice_sp> fyi, if the sponsors are not subscribed, nothing will be done
[07:25] <wrapster> guys it was all working fine .. but all of a sudden when dpkg-buildpackage was executed i get this http://pastie.org/652564
[07:40] <dholbach> good morning
[08:02] <RAOF> I note that seb's listed as the gnome-shell maintainer.  The last upload is missing a b-d on libcroco3-dev, and I was wondering whether he's got a maintainer-lock on gnome-shell.
[08:02] <dholbach> RAOF: I don't think
[08:05] <JDahl> I asked a question on #UbuntuOne,  but the channel seems idle...    after the latest Karmic updates, my Desktop folders got a green marker.  I gather this means that those folders have been synchronized with UbuntuOne servers - is that correct?  If so this is very questionable and unfortunate (to say the least), since I never asked any folders to uploaded
[08:06] <dholbach> JDahl: that's bug 450112
[08:08] <JDahl> dholbach, ok, thank you.
[08:11] <RAOF> Hey, the new gnome-shell application- based alt-tab is pretty cool.
[09:43] <AnAnt> Hello, can someone ack https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sabily-themes/+bug/449651 ?
[09:44] <joaopinto> hum, gdm themes for karmic ?
[09:45] <AnAnt> joaopinto: it's an icon theme, you can set GDM themes by setting GTK/Icon/Metacity themes for gdm user
[09:46] <joaopinto> ah ok :)
[09:46] <joaopinto> you mean, gtk/gnome themes for the gdm user :P
[09:49] <AnAnt> btw, lintian version on REVU needs to be updated
[09:51] <AnAnt> can some sponsor this: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=6920 ? It's FFe request has been approved (LP 440153)
[10:08] <AnAnt> siretart: ping
[10:08] <siretart`> AnAnt: pong
[10:08] <AnAnt> siretart`: lintian version on REVU needs to be updated
[10:10] <siretart`> AnAnt: ii  lintian             2.2.17ubuntu1       Debian package checker
[10:10] <siretart`> AnAnt: I don't think so
[10:11] <AnAnt> siretart`: it gives false alarms
[10:12] <AnAnt> siretart`: one of the warnings it gives is: newer-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.7.3)
[10:15] <siretart`> AnAnt: older uploads are not re-scanned
[10:15] <siretart`> sistpoty updated it last week
[10:24] <AnAnt> ah
[11:42] <\sh> moins...
[11:43] <\sh> can someone do me a favor and try to rebuild latest karmic quilt package (sbuild would be great)
[11:47] <Laney> \sh:
[11:47] <Laney> 20 commands (17 passed, 3 failed)
[11:47] <Laney> the mail stuff broke
[11:48] <\sh> Laney, ok...my sbuild is ok :) http://paste.ubuntu.com/292281/ <- very same output I think
[11:48] <Laney> yep
[11:48] <\sh> wonderful
[11:48] <Laney> i guess that test needs patching
[11:49] <\sh> Laney, tried to do a backport of debhelper from karmic to jaunty..and I need karmics quilt..the very same happens on jaunty ;)
[11:49] <Laney> heh
[11:50] <wrapster> will anyone help me with a basic question on mercurial? here..
[11:54] <\sh> bug #401982
[11:55] <\sh> there it is
[12:05] <\sh> Laney, please test the debdiff from bug #401982 pls :)
[13:05] <AnAnt> ScottK: Hello, sabily-xsplash-artwork is in the new queue now
[13:32] <ScottK> AnAnt: I saw that.  I'll try and have a look at it tonight.
[13:37] <AnAnt> ScottK: thanks
[14:27] <ari-tczew> is anybody here from security team?
[14:31] <walterl> hi
[14:32] <walterl> what are the odds of still getting an upstream release into karmic?
[14:32] <joaopinto> walterl, you mean a new upstream version for an existing package ?
[14:32] <walterl> joaopinto: yes
[14:32] <joaopinto> !ffe
[14:33] <walterl> joaopinto: yes, i've read that. is it still possible this close to the final freeze?
[14:33] <joaopinto> afaik yes
[14:33] <walterl> :D
[14:33] <walterl> awesome, thanks
[14:33] <Unggnu> hi all
[14:34] <joaopinto> if you have a good ffe reason
[14:34] <joaopinto> hello Unggnu
[14:34] <ari-tczew> I have good ffe reason for my debdiff :P
[14:34] <Unggnu> hi joaopinto
[14:34] <Unggnu> Could somebody please look at this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mail-notification/+bug/435789
[14:34] <joaopinto> ari-tczew, a bug fix does not require ffe, i think :P
[14:34] <ari-tczew> yes, CVE fix
[14:35] <Unggnu> It is annoying that mail-notification has SSL disabled but if I can build it on my own it isn't such a big problem. But even this isn't possible atm
[14:35] <Unggnu> I don't know how the build system was able to compile mail-notification for Karmic with this
[14:38] <stefanlsd> ari-tczew: try #ubuntu-hardened
[14:39] <ari-tczew> thanks!
[14:53] <bddebian> Heya gang
[14:55] <randomaction> Unggnu: I think the problem is bug 443406
[14:57] <Unggnu> randomaction, Why is this the problem?
[14:58] <Unggnu> The problem with the SSL support of mail-notification is a stupid, chauvinistic license discussion. The problem that it isn't possible to compile it on our own is that a lib is missing/replaced but mail-notification still depends on it.
[14:59] <\sh> kklimonda, need a sponsor for bug #447617?
[14:59] <randomaction> Unggnu: there's a new version in Debian which doesn't depend on libeel2-dev
[14:59] <Unggnu> randomaction, I know but it isn't in Karmic :)
[15:00] <Unggnu> That's why I am posting it here
[15:00] <randomaction> it can't go there because it FTBFS
[15:00] <Unggnu> ok, so it can be build too
[15:00] <Unggnu> How was the build system able to compile mal notification for Karmic?
[15:01] <Unggnu> *can't
[15:01] <randomaction> I guess libeel2-dev was still available back in April
[15:02] <Unggnu> randomaction, So what is the solution/planned?
[15:02] <Unggnu> removing mail-notification :D
[15:03] <randomaction> hmm, maybe I should subscribe sponsors to review my patch
[15:04] <\sh> ls -al
[15:04] <\sh> argl
[15:04] <Unggnu> :)
[15:06] <randomaction> but Evolution upstream suggests a different way of doing things, and I could use some help there
[15:07] <iulian> Hi bddebian.
[15:09] <Unggnu> randomaction, Ok, now I understand the problem
[15:10] <Unggnu> randomaction, What was/is the solution of Debian?
[15:11] <bddebian> Hi iulian
[15:20] <randomaction> Unggnu: just dropped the dependency, it's unnecessary
[15:21] <Unggnu> randomaction, And it isn't possible for Karmic because of the Freeze?
[15:23] <randomaction> Unggnu: it's quite possible, but it won't build anyway
[15:40] <kklimonda> \sh: yes - I wasn't sure who to ask now that it was moved to main though
[15:47] <\sh> kklimonda, yeah..that striked me, too..I thought it's still in universe..now I can't upload your change :(
[17:33] <LLStarks> fabrice_sp, i have no idea how to do a proper debdiff nor do i care to subscribe to a new mailing list.
[17:34] <LLStarks> bitpim isn't functional and the onus isn't on me to fix it when a patch is readily available.
[17:34] <LLStarks> it's only a few lines of code ffs.
[17:41] <micahg1> can I get an FFe for a phpmyadmin security update (it's already in debian)
[17:41] <joaopinto> MichiSoft, afaik , if it's a bug fix you dont need an FFe
[17:42] <joaopinto> ops, micahg
[17:48] <micahg> joaopinto: so, I just subscribe motu-release?
[17:48] <joaopinto> micahg, if you already have a proper debdiff, yes
[17:49] <micahg> joaopinto: well, it would be an sync with debian I would think...do I still need a debdiff?
[17:49] <joaopinto> oh, that's a sync request
[17:49] <joaopinto> !sync
[17:49] <joaopinto> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess
[17:50] <micahg> joaopinto: process is the same still?
[17:51] <joaopinto> I guess so
[17:59] <LLStarks> ah. micahg, can you look at this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitpim/+bug/395830
[18:00] <LLStarks> i mean joaopinto
[18:00] <LLStarks> has a patch. only needs packaging.
[18:02] <joaopinto> LLStarks, checking
[18:03] <LLStarks> i have confirmed that it works btw
[18:05] <joaopinto> LLStarks, it's a bit odd that the init function is called with arguments which have no purpose
[18:05] <LLStarks> i only have a cursory familiarity with python.
[18:06] <LLStarks> this is quite out of my league
[18:06] <joaopinto> LLStarks, uper(requestheader,self).__init__(**dict) -> the dict is being passed for some reason.. however your init function is just a dumb function to prevent the error
[18:06] <LLStarks> it's not my patch.
[18:06] <LLStarks> it works though.
[18:06] <LLStarks> function is restored.
[18:08] <joaopinto> LLStarks, I will create a debdiff on the ground that it fixes for you, it wil be MOTUs to decide to accept it or not
[18:08] <LLStarks> thank you.
[18:08] <LLStarks> does bitpim have a designated packager?
[18:09] <joaopinto> LLStarks, there is no such thing on Ubuntu, the packager is a team
[18:12] <LLStarks> joaopinto, should i talk to Bhavani Shankar
[18:13] <joaopinto> LLStarks, no idea who are you talking about :)
[18:13] <LLStarks> the uploader of the current package.
[18:13] <joaopinto> LLStarks, like I said, packages on Ubuntu are maintained by a team, MOTU
[18:17] <joaopinto> I will also file a bug report for debian
[18:18] <LLStarks> thanks again.
[18:23] <joaopinto> LLStarks, could you test a .deb package just to be sure ? I mostly concerned about the identation of the code
[18:24] <LLStarks> i kinda suck at packaging and listing deps.
[18:24] <LLStarks> ]
[18:24] <joaopinto> LLStarks, you just need to install the app, and test it with the case that was crashing
[18:25] <LLStarks> oh ok.
[18:25] <LLStarks> is the package on a ppa?
[18:25] <joaopinto> no, i will upload it to an http server
[18:25] <LLStarks> okay
[18:25] <joaopinto> LLStarks, 32 or 64 bits ?
[18:26] <LLStarks> i686
[18:26] <joaopinto> it has some non python code
[18:47] <joaopinto> LLStarks, http://abs.getdeb.net/bit/, please test the .debs from there
[18:51] <LLStarks> still requires sudo access even after modifying the udev rules.
[18:52] <LLStarks> or do i need to restart?
[18:54] <LLStarks> thoughts joaopinto?
[18:54] <LLStarks> also, these instructions haven't been fully integrated: http://www.bitpim.org/help/howto-linuxusb.htm
[19:00] <joaopinto> LLStarks, sorry, baby time
[19:00] <LLStarks> ah okay
[19:06] <joaopinto> LLStarks, can I trigger the bug without a phone device ?
[19:13] <LLStarks> joaopinto, not that i know of.
[19:13] <joaopinto> ok, I didn't understood your questions, did you instal the packages I have built ?
[19:13] <micahg> ping iulian
[19:13] <LLStarks> yes.
[19:13] <joaopinto> LLStarks, and it works as expected ?
[19:14] <LLStarks> no. root should not be needed to read the devices.
[19:14] <joaopinto> LLStarks, tha is another bug, one thing at the time, does it work with root with this patch ?
[19:14] <LLStarks> yes.
[19:14] <joaopinto> ok, debdiffing and subscribing sponsors
[19:15] <LLStarks> here's the bug for root: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bitpim/+bug/426736
[19:16] <joaopinto> LLStarks, please add the instructions link to the bug report
[19:16] <LLStarks> instructions?
[19:16] <joaopinto> the one you posted here
[19:17] <joaopinto> LLStarks, I am not familiar with udev rules, so that's nothing something I can work at this stage in development
[19:18] <LLStarks> it's supposed to be 60-bitpim-rules
[19:18] <LLStarks> not 40
[19:20] <joaopinto> hum, that's just the load order I guess, does it fixed the problem for you ?
[19:22] <LLStarks> it hasn't worked for a few weeks
[19:22] <LLStarks> but i do recall it worked once
[19:22] <joaopinto> ok, so let's fix it for lucid :P
[19:24] <joaopinto> LLStarks, bug 395830 updated
[19:43] <fabrice_sp_> Hi about bug #425640: the FFe has been approved for 2.36-1, but Debian has 2.39-1. Is the ack valid or it should go for another FFe round?
[19:49] <micahg> ping mdeslaur re security update syncs from debian during FFe
[19:52] <mdeslaur> micahg: yes?
[19:53] <micahg> mdeslaur: I was wondering about the wireshark bug
[19:53] <micahg> to upgrade to 1.2.2, if I should change it to a sync request
[19:53] <Futbolista> juego de boxeo online http://www.kobox.org/kobox-fande-Nourine.html
[19:53] <micahg> bug 435817
[19:57] <mdeslaur> micahg: no, a ffe is fine, you need to subscribe motu-release to the bug though
[19:57] <micahg> ok, so syncs need motu-release subscribe during ffe?
[19:58] <micahg> and should I do the same for the phpmyadmin new release?
[19:59] <mdeslaur> micahg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess look at the Universe section
[19:59] <micahg> ok, thanks
[20:00] <randomaction> fabrice_sp_: according to sistpoty in the comment #6 to this bug, I think a word from Debian maintainer would be enough
[20:01] <fabrice_sp_> randomaction, that was my feeling, but I'm not sure ScottK would share this :-)
[20:02] <randomaction> he can sync what he pleases anyway :)
[20:14] <av`> mdeslaur, hi
[20:14] <mdeslaur> hi av`
[20:14] <av`> mdeslaur, there is a guy who is getting something strange with winbind on jaunty-updates, e.g fails to install
[20:15] <mdeslaur> av`: oh?
[20:15] <av`> mdeslaur, let me link you the bug
[20:15] <av`> mdeslaur, the version he is complaining about is 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.2
[20:15] <av`> mdeslaur, which is exactly the one on jaunty
[20:15] <av`> mdeslaur, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/449814
[20:16] <av`> mdeslaur, don't see the title, he missed the package
[20:18] <av`> mdeslaur, in the beginning I thought he was running karmic
[20:18] <av`> mdeslaur, but then I saw the 9.04 release on the report
[20:19] <mdeslaur> av`: let me try, hold on
[20:19] <av`> mdeslaur, k
[20:20] <mdeslaur> av`: wow, that's a weird error
[20:21] <mdeslaur> av`: I can't reproduce, unfortunately, it installs fine for me
[20:21] <av`> mdeslaur, no one ever reported it, and if it is *really* broken it would have been reported
[20:22] <mdeslaur> av`: yes. There's something broken on his machine, but beats me what it is
[20:22] <av`> mdeslaur, I suggested him to give an apt-get update to refresh stuff
[20:22] <av`> mdeslaur, or maybe he is using some unsupported repos
[20:22] <av`> mdeslaur, e.g home-made ones
[20:22] <av`> and not the official ones
[20:23] <mdeslaur> av`: looks like his chown utility is broken
[20:23] <mdeslaur> I mean chmod
[20:23] <av`> yes
[20:24] <mdeslaur> but whatever it is, It's not a bug with the package
[20:24] <av`> mdeslaur, coreutils 6.10-6ubuntu1 [modified: bin/chmod]
[20:24] <av`> mdeslaur, chmod broken
[20:24] <av`> looks at dependencies file log
[20:25] <mdeslaur> av`: yep, there you go
[20:25] <av`> mdeslaur, let's close the report
[20:25] <mdeslaur> av`: sure, go ahead
[20:25] <av`> mdeslaur, thanks and sorry for bothering
[20:26] <mdeslaur> av`: np!
[20:26] <mdeslaur> av`: thanks to you
[20:27] <av`> :)
[20:55] <Technoviking> how do I add an ubuntu-bug report to an existing bug in LP?
[20:57] <micahg> Technoviking: apport-collect BUGNUM
[21:05] <fabrice_sp_> Do we know the date for the Final freeze for Universe?
[21:07] <Technoviking> micahg: thanks
[21:12] <zul> ScottK: ping can we get a FFE for ebox-dhcp-1.3 it was uploaded before feature freeze and never got into the archive
[21:27] <norsetto> when is the last date when we can upload bug fixes without bothering motu-release?
[21:28] <av`> 15 of october
[21:28] <av`> is the final freeze --> motu-release needed
[21:28] <av`> norsetto, ^^
[21:29] <norsetto> av`,  ok, thx
[21:29] <av`> you have two 1 day ~
[21:29] <av`> depending on your timezone
[21:30] <norsetto> av`, well, usually it is at 0utc on the given day ;-)
[21:30] <sebner> hiuhi norsetto :D
[21:30] <norsetto> sebner, ahoy
[21:30] <av`> norsetto, then one day, but you can do some works during night then
[21:30] <av`> eheh
[21:31] <sebner> norsetto: everything fine down there?
[21:31] <norsetto> av`, indeed, thats why I'm asking, I have hope to hunt down another one in one day ...
[21:31] <norsetto> sebner, everything fine here in hell ;-)
[21:32] <sebner> norsetto: why hell? =)
[21:32] <norsetto> sebner, you said down there ...
[21:32] <sebner> norsetto: I mean Italy :P
[21:32] <norsetto> sebner, yes, isn't that hell !?
[21:33] <av`> norsetto, I agree, italy is hell atm
[21:33] <av`> norsetto, but it will get better soon
[21:34] <norsetto> av`, sure, when the pigs will fly
[21:34] <av`> lol
[21:34] <sebner> norsetto: you are the one living down there so I have to believe what you are saying :D
[21:35] <geser> Hi sebner, norsetto
[21:35] <norsetto> geser,hi there
[21:35] <av`> damn, geser alwais forgets to say hi to me
[21:35] <sebner> laoha geser :D
[21:35] <av`> pretty bad
[21:35] <geser> Hi av`
[21:36] <av`> geser, heya, I'm a bit sad now you said hi to everyone apart me : /
[21:37] <av`> :)
[21:39] <geser> av`: didn't recognize your new nick
[21:40] <av`> geser, ah yeah, that's ok then :) I changed it like 2 weeks ago, so you couldnt know
[21:58] <Bodsda> Hi, I sent an email to the motu mentors email about 4 days ago and did not receive a reply. I am really interested in getting involved but would like a mentor to shove me in the right direction. Can anyone advise what I should do?
[22:01] <av`> Bodsda, ping porthose
[22:02] <Bodsda> porthose: ping
[22:02] <Bodsda> ty av`
[22:18] <kklimonda> anyone up for sponsoring bug 450747?
[22:24] <fabrice_sp_> kklimonda, subscribe u-u-s. I'll have a look tomorrow morning
[23:04] <porthose> Bodsda, pong, check your email inbox, I am working your application :).  FYI huats and nxvl are also on the team and can help you if I am not around.
[23:05]  * porthose afk for a bit must take dog for a walk
[23:06] <huats> porthose: get dholbach of that body (regarding the dog walk)
[23:38] <Bodsda> porthose: checking now, thanks :)