[00:24] <huayra> hi
[00:24] <huayra> Ubuntu members have a @ubuntu.com address
[00:24] <huayra> is it possible to use a SMTP authentication server to send from that address ?
[00:24] <huayra> instead og another address sending in behalf of the @ubuntu.com address?
[00:25] <huayra> I guess this is the wrong place to ask, but could think of any other place right now
[01:12] <huayra> If anyone has an answer please send me an email to huayra _@ t_ ubuntu _d00t. com
[01:12] <huayra> thanks :)
[02:45] <RenatoSilva> Why aren't duplicate bugs displayed in the bug list?
[02:45] <RenatoSilva> I have one that is not an exact match, but I marked as duplicate because fixing the other bug will also fix it.
[02:46] <lifeless> sounds like its not a duplicate.
[02:46] <RenatoSilva> but there's no other replation available
[02:46] <lifeless> to answer the question, because duplicates are *identical* bugs that were reported twice, so showing both reports would be a waste of space.
[02:46] <RenatoSilva> * relation
[03:37] <Saj0577> hey guys i got a moderated team, but is it possible to make a branch of the moderated team able to recieve bzr push from anyone(including people not in the team)
[03:46] <The_Tick> how do you close a ticket?
[03:46] <Saj0577> The_Tick: dont think there many people about tbh
[03:47] <The_Tick> I'm fine with idling for days
[03:47] <The_Tick> :)
[03:47] <The_Tick> moving to google code anyhow, this is just the only thing I need to figure out to do it
[03:47] <Saj0577> okayss
[03:52] <Darxus> The_Tick: Click the status and change it to fix released or invalid.
[03:52] <Darxus> Or won't fix.
[03:53] <The_Tick> did that
[03:53] <The_Tick> https://bugs.launchpad.net/growl/
[03:53] <The_Tick> oh bah
[03:53] <The_Tick> I was looking under "hot bugs"
[04:53] <lifeless> Saj0577: create a second team that allows anyone to join, push the branch under the new teams namespace
[04:54] <Saj0577> lifeless: okay, and then just make my old team a member of the new team do my previous team dont have to join two teams yeah?
[04:54] <lifeless> right
[04:55] <Saj0577> cheers will sort that tomorrow
[06:09] <micahg> Is it normal to get lazr.restfulclient.errors.HTTPError: HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable?
[08:25] <wgrant> micahg: A 503 normally indicates a timeout.
[08:30] <micahg> hmm, wgrant, I had that when I used your dupe script
[08:56] <milos_> where do I need to click to change my ssh key? I clicked on 'Change details' but can't find anything about ssh.
[08:57] <milos_> ups
[08:57] <milos_> sorry, figured out
[09:29] <stochastic> Hi all, I was just curious if a launchpad team can subscribe to a particular filtered subset of questions, such as the Ubuntu Vancouver LoCo subscribing to all Ubuntu questions that contain the word Vancouver?
[09:32] <wgrant> stochastic: Not at the moment.
[09:33] <stochastic> wgrant, are there any plans in the works for this feature?
[09:35] <wgrant> stochastic: Nothing that I know of.
[09:35] <stochastic> Are you just saying 'not at the moment' because this may possibly change one day, eventually?
[09:35] <wgrant> Of course. Anything could happen, and that would be a useful feature.
[09:35] <stochastic> I assume the next step would be either filing a whishlist bug or creating a blueprint?
[09:37] <wgrant> stochastic: I would file a bu.
[09:37] <wgrant> +g
[09:37] <stochastic> wgrant what are blueprints useful for anyway?
[09:38] <wgrant> stochastic: That is a very good question.
[09:38] <stochastic> lol, okay thanks.
[10:44] <francisco_t> Hi, Is the version name: kbackup (0.6.3~ppa1~karmic1) correct for my PPA?
[10:49] <tsimpson> looks fine, as long as there isn't a kbackup 0.6.3 in karmic
[10:54] <francisco_t> There isn't, thanks :)
[11:16] <maxb> francisco_t: That is an native package version, i.e. no .diff.gz, because it doesn't contain a -
[11:17] <maxb> That is not usually the right way to be packaging something, unless it doesn't exist as an upstream project and is produced direct for ubuntu
[11:27] <tsimpson> hmm, how did I not see that... sunday-blindness I guess
[11:28] <francisco_t> Sotty, I'm very begginer: https://launchpad.net/~leviatan1/+archive/ppa
[11:30] <francisco_t> It's build
[11:34] <tsimpson> francisco_t: the point is that if you change a part of the debian/ dir, you'll have to re-upload the entire source
[11:35] <tsimpson> if you call it "0.6.3-0~ppa1~karmic1" then you only need up upload the .diff.gz and .dsc, much smaller
[11:37] <francisco_t> -0, it's true! :(
[16:33] <sjamaan> Hi, can someone point me to documentation about "umbrella projects"?
[16:34] <sjamaan> I find information on launchpad a little hard to search through
[16:39] <exarkun> My project's branches page is a mess.  <https://code.launchpad.net/pyopenssl>.  How do I clean it up?
[16:48] <tsimpson> exarkun: what mess?
[16:52] <exarkun> 23 active branches
[16:52] <exarkun> More like 4 or 5, I'd say
[16:53] <exarkun> So how do I get rid of the extra?
[16:53] <exarkun> Most of the branches on that page are just clutter at this point.
[16:54] <tsimpson> you could request they are removed by filing a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[16:54] <exarkun> Is that the best thing to do?
[16:55] <exarkun> Also what does "removed" mean?  Deleted from launchpad?  Or removed from the display on that page?
[16:56] <zirpu> the users may need to delete their branches if they're nolonger used.  but i'm only guessing.
[16:56] <exarkun> Getting other people to cooperate is hard :)
[16:57] <zirpu> send tribbles. lots of tribbles.
[17:01] <sjamaan> Can someone point me to documentation about "umbrella projects"?
[18:54] <maxb> exarkun: That page is simply "show all branches with active status in that project" - if you don't want branches appearing there, then you need the owners of those branches to set them to "Merged" or "Abandoned" status
[21:53] <dreamcat4> hi im a little confused about the release / release url feature + milestones
[21:53] <dreamcat4> does LP only check the upstream file glob when a milestone is released?
[21:53] <dreamcat4> or at what other times?
[21:57] <dreamcat4> and will the release glob overwrite existing file from upstream if newer?
[21:57] <dreamcat4> (kindda need this)
[21:58] <dreamcat4> sunzui?
[22:05] <dreamcat4> i'll check back later
[22:06] <mwhudson> dreamcat4: it checks daily for new release tarballs
[22:06] <dreamcat4> ah okay
[22:06] <mwhudson> i don't know what happens if there is already a release in lp
[22:06] <dreamcat4> sounds like the release name is determined by the file glob
[22:07] <dreamcat4> so don't need to manually create a release / milstone entry within the series?
[22:13] <dreamcat4> i believe that's what sinuzi was saying the other day but its just not been documented anywhere yet
[22:14] <mtaylor> mwhudson: related to that question above - the memcached project tarballs are very out of date ... and also all have the wrong date on them (although I suppose that would be fine if the tarballs were right)
[22:14] <mtaylor> mwhudson: where do I look to fix that?
[22:18] <mtaylor> mwhudson: http://code.google.com/p/memcached/downloads/list/memcached-1.4.*.tar.gz is what's listed for the project... but it doesn't seem to have found any of those... should I change it to http://memcached.googlecode.com/files/memcached-1.4.*.tar.gz
[22:19] <mwhudson> mtaylor: i know very little about how this thing works i'm afraid
[22:19] <mtaylor> mwhudson: awesome
[22:20] <mwhudson> i can read the source i guess...
[22:20]  * mtaylor posits that perhaps using uscan under the covers wouldn't be crazy