[03:09] asac: fix for FTBFS for FF3.6 merge proposed === ripps_ is now known as ripps [08:24] micahg: thx === jtv1 is now known as jtv [08:26] hi asac [08:26] did you get my message about seahorse-lugins [08:28] micahg: not yet. [08:28] is that a mail? [08:28] micahg: seahorse plugins is the only one needing xul 1.9? [08:28] that one i got ... yes [08:28] yeah [08:28] I thikn that's it [08:28] from what I saw in the sources and packages file [08:28] micahg: and for ffox 3.0? [08:28] I jsut did a text search [08:28] yeah [08:28] none seem only to depend on it [08:29] they depend on ff | ff3.0 [08:29] ah cool. [08:29] micahg: can you file a bug on that aginats seahorse [08:29] ? [08:29] i am not sure why it depends on it... i was pretty sure i transitioned [08:29] it [08:29] maybe it was in a bzr brnach i ignored and next desktop team upload killed my transition [08:31] isn't it webkit based now? [08:40] micahg: seahorse? [08:40] dont ask me why it needs xulurnner-1.9 [08:43] micahg: want to prepare the seahorse debdiff? [08:43] ;) [08:43] oh its probably late [08:43] for you (time wise) [08:43] i should just do it [08:43] once i have the bug from you that would be great [08:44] micahg: oh ... did you only check main ... or also universe packages/soures ? [09:47] asac, fixed the tip vs default in all ff/xul branches [09:47] fta: just saw that ... very good. [09:48] fta: did it already work? [09:48] e.g. confirmed to help i mean [09:48] yes [09:48] nice [09:49] what exactly does that mean? [09:49] friday, i got rejects for both 3.5 and 3.6 so it made me sick and i fixed it [09:50] I saw the fixes, but I don't understand the difference between tip and default [09:50] tip is a messy thing ;) [09:50] thats the short version [09:50] more fta can tell ;) [09:52] tip is just to last commit of that branch. in fact, it's not really a branch as it contains sub-branches [09:52] -to+the [09:52] asac: what do I need to do to build a build1 for 3.6b1? [09:52] ok [09:52] so it gets the latest daily vs latest commit? [09:54] latest commit could be anything, like a seamonkey sub-branch, or a gecko-something sub-branch going backward compared to what we call trunk (the branch called default) [09:55] so it was wrong since the beginning [09:57] sm2 and tb3 probably need something similar [12:56] anyone know the command to debug sound? im guessing that is the command daniel wanted me to use [13:00] gnomefreak: ubuntu-bug alsa-base [13:00] i think [13:00] Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libequinox-osgi-java_3.5.1-0ubuntu6_amd64.deb [13:00] E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) [13:01] i will see if he likes that output [13:01] asac: failed to overwrite? [13:01] not sure [13:01] looks like it but you would have to look at the output ;) [13:02] bdrung: Unpacking libequinox-osgi-java (from .../libequinox-osgi-java_3.5.1-0ubuntu6_amd64.deb) ... [13:02] dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libequinox-osgi-java_3.5.1-0ubuntu6_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi.services_3.2.0.v20090520-1800.jar', which is also in package eclipse-rcp 0:3.5.1-0ubuntu2 [13:02] dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) [13:02] thats from eclipse, isnt it? [13:02] yep [13:02] * gnomefreak remembers this conversation in -devel last week (i think) [13:03] hmm [13:03] about equinox-osgi? [13:03] asac: dont recall if it was the binary or if it was eclipse (your making me rethink what i saw) [13:04] asac: unless you or ft*a talked about it it was in -devel but i dont keep logs anymore [13:04] yeah [13:04] let me check ecliupse bugs [13:05] bug 455023 [13:05] Launchpad bug 455023 in eclipse "package libequinox-osgi-java 3.5.1-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.osgi.services_3.2.0.v20090520-1800.jar', which is also in package eclipse-rcp 0:3.5.1-0ubuntu2" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/455023 [13:05] be back shes coming :( [13:05] bdrung: ^^ will you fix that ? [13:05] asac: easy enough to fix on your end [13:05] gnomefreak: sure. i just want the archive to be fixed [13:05] asac: i agree [13:05] i am not paid for getting my personal system worked-around ;) [13:05] true [13:05] oh yeah be back in a few [13:13] ok filing bug he can comment on it [13:32] and bug is filed and it makes me think its due to gnome panel not fully loading on reboot/restart === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [14:35] hey guys [14:38] hi [14:39] * gnomefreak thought i said hi to you already [14:49] lol === fenris__ is now known as ejat [15:00] ok finally getting to email [15:05] asac: yes, i will [15:08] hehe yes u did say hi to me already btw gnomefreak lol [15:11] oh this is going to get old === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [15:13] gnomefreak: = stuck in the revolving door [15:13] every time you try to get out it throws u back outside :P [15:21] gnomefreak: thought you were old already ;) [15:21] * asac ducks [15:21] :) [15:23] <[reed]> asac: fyi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/455474 [15:24] Error: This bug is private [15:26] [reed]: asked [15:28] <[reed]> "asked"? [15:28] in bug ;) [15:29] [reed]: can you subscribe Paul to lp bug too? [15:29] otherwise we should proabyl follow up in bugzilla [15:29] <[reed]> asac: I looked for a launchpad account for him, but doesn't look like he has one [15:30] <[reed]> asac: so, yeah, follow-up in bugzilla is fine [15:30] <[reed]> even if the bug is invalid on our side [15:30] <[reed]> people can still comment ;) [15:31] ok posted there too [15:38] ok be back another reboot :( [15:38] asac: how r you [15:38] busy ;) [15:38] but good [15:38] bbg [15:39] me 2 rough week this week [15:39] hope to get another extension down this weekend [15:39] 3 tests this week only week 3 of school [15:39] rendering a 255 frame simple animation for a friend of mine [15:44] heh [15:51] ok done with bugs. im going to cook and/or laydown my back hurts like hell. [15:55] im going to reboot [17:05] hi, [17:06] does anyone of you know why python-xpcom in karmic still depends on python2.5, and not python2.6? [18:26] thekorn: not sure. let me know if you find out ;) [18:26] would have to check [18:26] remind me tomorrow to do that ; ) [18:29] asac, ok, I think I will ping you tomorrow about this again, [18:29] asac, schoenen abend [18:30] u2 [19:23] fta: you dropped: [19:23] * Drop the general.useragent.extra.firefox key, it is now in the firefox package as debian/ubuntu-abrowser.js.tmpl - update pref/firefox-branding.js [19:23] in the abrowser-3.0 branch? [19:23] why that? [19:24] hmm [19:24] odd [19:24] ok [19:24] nevermind [19:24] uh? [19:32] fta: ok pushed bzr push lp:~mozillateam/firefox/awesome-browser-branding-3.5 and updated bzr push lp:~mozillateam/firefox/awesome-browser-branding [19:32] with bits needed for 1.9.1+ branches [19:33] bug 396156 [19:33] Launchpad bug 396156 in firefox-3.5 "Help→About does not function (abrowser-3.5, jaunty-proposed)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/396156 [19:36] asac, http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/10/issue-tracker-data-api-for-project.html seems ubottu can now be extended to support the google bug tracker [19:48] asac, just wanted to check that bug 452948 is valid before doing the work [19:48] Launchpad bug 452948 in ubufox "Report A Problem should have ellipsis per Gnome HIG" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452948 [19:49] micahg: hi [19:49] micahg: yes. out-of-scope this cycle [19:50] slipped through and i already banged my head because i forgot to do that in the last ubufox round [19:50] yes, I know [19:50] but I can still propose a merge for it for next cycle [19:50] micahg: go ahead. remember to also remove ellipsis for all locales [19:50] sure [19:50] micahg: just prepare it against the ubufox upstream branch [19:50] No, they need to be added :) [19:51] I'll do it after release or final freeze though [19:51] sure. atm your precious time is better spend on release help ;) [19:51] yes, I figured [19:51] e.g. spotting bad regressions that come in through bugs [19:51] maybe testing installs [19:51] (later this week and next week) [19:51] and all kind of other stuff [19:51] Yeah, I need to try to get a handle on the bugs that have been open inthe past few weeks [19:51] New bugs are now half [19:51] of ff3.5 [19:52] micahg: oh ... so what i am landing is the "firefox-3.5 takes over world thing" ... i am currently doing a ppa upload so we can pre-verify all kind of upgrade situations [19:52] micahg: thats how it works ;) [19:52] bug list always explode [19:52] ok, I saw the commit [19:52] micahg: did you check the universe list too? [19:52] so this will remove ff3? [19:52] or just main? [19:52] hmmm [19:52] thats the idea ... just need to double check everything. [19:53] ok, I think I only checked main [19:53] don't know why though [19:53] give me a minute [19:53] sure [19:53] so seahorse-plugins i will fix in the upload i will do [19:53] thats done then [19:53] for xulrunner-1.9 i think main looks good too [19:53] xulrunner-1.9 removal is not that important but would definitly be good too if possible [19:53] at least downgrade to universe is the goal [19:56] universe sources looks good [19:58] micahg: for firefox-3.0? [19:58] micahg: can you do the same checks for xulrunner-1.9? [19:59] I'm looking at Packages right now for ff3,0 uni [19:59] ok thats a good thing then [19:59] ffox 3.0 is top prio [19:59] xul 1.9 high prio === asac_ is now known as asac [20:01] asac: mozilla-imagezoom ff3.0 only [20:01] micahg: can you check if that works with 3.5? [20:01] that's it for ff3.0 [20:01] later tongiht [20:01] ok thanks [20:02] I'll check xul1.9 later tonight as well [20:02] we hav ea bug for this transition [20:02] you can add a target [20:02] its called "supersede ..." [20:02] so searching for supersede on ffox-3.5 should pop that up [20:02] a bug task for that package? [20:02] mozilla-imagezoom [20:03] ok [20:03] micahg: bug 455517 [20:03] assign to you? [20:03] Launchpad bug 455517 in xulrunner-1.9 "supersede firefox 3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 in karmic" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/455517 [20:03] yes [20:04] done [20:06] asac: can you look at an nm issue? [20:06] or rather possible nm issue [20:10] micahg: what problem? [20:11] Bug #417757 [20:11] Launchpad bug 417757 in network-manager "[karmic regression] all network apps / browsers suffer from multi-second delays by default due to IPv6 DNS lookups" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/417757 [20:11] that was on the mailinig list, right? [20:12] was it? [20:12] idk [20:12] i think so [20:12] on ubuntu-devel [20:12] raised today ;) [20:12] have to check with a few folks what they think [20:12] oh, ok [20:12] is that a list I should be on? [20:12] not sure what to best do it [20:12] disabling ip6 doesnt feel like a right solution [20:13] nope [20:13] we came from there a few releases back ;) [20:13] micahg: ubuntu-devel? i think so ... device-discuss is lots of ranting and stuff ... but -devel is usually low-traffic as you are only allowed to post after getting whitelisted [20:13] ok [20:13] low == depends on what is low obviously ;) [20:13] more traffic than nothing ;) [20:14] and more than on -announce lists obviously [20:14] av`: could you check mozilla-imagezoom in ubuntu? [20:14] it seems the only one depending on firefox-3.0 but not firefox-3.5 [20:15] would be great to get that fixed [20:15] its bug Bug 455517 [20:15] Launchpad bug 455517 in xulrunner-1.9 "supersede firefox 3.0 and xulrunner-1.9 in karmic" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/455517 [20:15] asac, sure [20:15] so if we need to just bump maxVersion thats bets [20:15] if we need new snapshot that sok most likely too [20:15] asac, gonna have a shower then I'm on it [20:15] av`: you can even take a bath ;) [20:16] :D [20:16] asac, I can prepare you some debdiffs for all the packages listed there [20:17] seahorse-plugins needs a respin for gecko --> webkit transition [20:17] it actually supports ephy plugin but ephy is no more available with gecko [20:17] e.g configure tests are made on gecko only [20:17] av`: i am taking care for seahorse plugin [20:17] already prepared it [20:17] have to dump the ephy part [20:17] the respin is for the xulrunner-1.9 build depend [20:17] you should see that ephy plugin is disabled [20:17] not sure if that makes sense at all [20:17] av`: i will disable ephy plugin, yes. [20:18] it's disabled by default [20:18] or are you saying its already disabled? [20:18] av`: hmm. from what i understood it gets enabled if build depends is there [20:18] wantd to just drop it [20:18] it's disabled by default on 2.28.0 [20:18] no [20:18] it does some tests [20:18] and maybe explicitly add --disable-epiphany ... though not needed [20:18] to check if ephy-gecko is there [20:18] they added some tests to test gecko version [20:19] hm. so xulrunner-1.9 was just for ephy-gecko support? [20:19] yes [20:19] ok will completely drop it then [20:19] go ahead [20:19] av`: oh wait. i am also supposed to do a full version bump [20:19] I did seahorse-plugins update for debina [20:19] * debian [20:19] so leave it to me i guess ... already committed to do that [20:19] so I investigated them a bit [20:19] av`: so you say: drop xulrunner-1.9 completely + drop epihphany-dev [20:20] yes [20:20] we definitly need to drop epiphany-dev so we can keep it in main [20:20] i am happy to fork out a binary package in lucid [20:20] asac, you should see Epiphany: disabled [20:20] after configure run [20:20] no [20:20] but i will check [20:20] didnt really build [20:20] ;) [20:20] just checked configure.ac [20:20] did you find gecko bits? [20:20] which in my impression would just disable it fi the epiphany build dep is not there [20:21] cant remember [20:21] i just checked when epiphany- gets enabled [20:21] actually we have ephy-webkit now [20:21] felt like dropping epiphany-dev from build dep would be enough but now that you say [20:21] dropping gecko also makese sense [20:21] so i will dot that [20:21] thanks [20:21] so it won't be enabled anyway [20:21] av`: we have epiphany-browser again ;) [20:21] yep :) [20:21] its just that its webkit now [20:21] yes [20:21] the tests are for gecko [20:22] so gwibber is completely fucked [20:22] seahorse-plugins needs to be ported to webkit by upstream [20:22] i think we shoudl really consider to go back to 1.2 branch [20:22] av`: ok. that makes sense ... thanks [20:22] np [20:22] asac, please ask me for GNOME stuff [20:22] haha [20:22] ok no problem [20:22] i will redirect stuff seb assigns to me ;) [20:22] not NM stuff :) [20:22] or asks me to do [20:23] NM is rarely packaging ... more digging in the deeps of oddities ;) [20:23] I will do some work for the desktop team for lucid [20:23] I talked with seb some days ago [20:23] he did some stuff for GNOME-Debian [20:23] too [20:26] asac, for imagezoom you just want it to work with ffox3.5 or do you want me to add all new m-d fields? [20:27] asac, anyway there is no new upstream release [20:27] av`: minimal is better here [20:27] folks will look at the diff most likely [20:27] so we should hope that hacking the install.rdf will make the work [20:34] asac, is 3.5 enough? [20:34] or do you want 3.5.*? [20:39] asac, the extension works fine but I'm unable to view the preferences menu [20:39] dunno if it worked with 3.0 [20:40] preferences don't work on 3.0 too [20:40] so I think it's ok [20:41] asac, gonna prepare the update later and upload it [20:45] bdrung, xpi:recommends is available on m-d 0.15 too? [20:45] imagezoom still uses xpi:depends under recommends field [20:45] av`: 3.5.* [20:46] thanks [20:46] asac: i think recommends was introduced in 0.16 [20:46] but you could use provides before [20:46] err xpi:depends (and put it in as recommends) [20:46] so I gonna just hack the install.rdf [20:46] av`: it's renamed in 0.16 (-> changelog) [20:46] and leave xpi:depends under recommends as it is [20:47] bdrung, ok thanks [20:47] won't bump m-d depends [20:47] we just need to have it working on ffox 3.5 actually [20:47] we gonna clean it up for lucid [20:47] together with all the other missing extensions [20:47] av`: switch to 0.16 [20:47] av`: and add provides and extends, too [20:48] asac: eclipse should work now for all [20:48] bdrung, actually this is mostly an upload to have it working with ffox3.5 not a clean-up [20:48] cause it will go through archive-admins [20:48] so changes should be minimal [20:49] hm [20:50] bdrung, maybe gonna add them as well [20:50] they are minor changes [20:53] bdrung: i will install eclipse a bit later ... had to remove that package for now ;) [20:53] so maybe not the best tester to see if this upgrade resolves the upgrade break [20:53] asac: i have build -0ubuntu2 and tested the upgrade from there ;) [20:54] * micahg has eclipse..but the eclipse version :) [21:00] micahg, still ok to take over songbird? [21:01] yes [21:01] but I need to find time to set it up [21:01] the bit [21:01] bot [21:01] or should I leave your bot and just commit fixes [21:01] you can do the fix 1st, and the bot later [21:01] ok [21:02] so I'll try to work on it in the next few days [21:02] wonderful [21:33] !grub2 [21:33] GRUB2 is the default Ubuntu boot manager in Karmic. For more information on GRUB2 please refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Grub2 [21:43] i keep breaking shit :( [21:48] asac, gonna do imagezoom tomorrow or the day after depending on how busy I am [21:48] asac: we are not changing the branding for ff 3.6 to official for Karmic? [21:48] asac, will be done before final freeze of course :) [21:49] av`: well. i have to pursue the firefox stuff tomorrow [21:49] * gnomefreak doesnt remember screwing imagezoom up [21:49] so if you dont make it its ok [21:49] av`: just tell me what to do [21:49] asac, gonna do it tomorrow morning before leaving then :) [21:49] av`: great [21:49] thats perfect [21:49] thx [21:49] np [21:50] are we even including 3.6 in karmic? [21:50] micahg: no i dont think so [21:50] if its not we wont [21:50] ok [21:51] heh [21:51] well. its basically too late [21:51] we could have considered putting it in [21:51] more concered about promises we made we are ng [21:51] but i failed the last few weeks on a bunch of things ;) [21:51] that was odd [21:51] asac: it happens :) [21:51] gnomefreak: promisses we made we are ng? [21:52] sorry. cannot parse that semantically [21:52] well, we can jump straight to 3.7 for Lucid hopefully [21:52] asac: official branding for 3.5 that we told everyone we would [21:53] micahg: it wont be ready so 3.6 needs to go in or we will let you handle all the upgrade to 3.6 bugs :) [21:53] gnomefreak: we never told anyone we would do official branding in jaunty if you mean that [21:53] they complain all the time ;) [21:53] asac: karmic [21:53] but thats not a false promise [21:53] gnomefreak: we have official branding [21:53] not sure what you see ... most likely just a daily ;) [21:53] asac: we said no to jaunty. my 3.5 still says shiretiro [21:53] install all the current karmic packages and you should see official branding [21:53] oops [21:53] shiretoko [21:53] gnomefreak: in jaunty yes. in karmic its official ... except dailies [21:54] asac: ah ok good [21:54] those are even upstream branded without official branding afaik [21:54] that explains that [21:54] if you run 3.5 dailies [21:54] gnomefreak: please verify that all is ok with the current karmic versions [21:54]