[00:54] hitting the pillow. gdnuit everyone [02:03] bdmurray: hey, could you comment on whether or not what's suggested in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-sugarteam/2009-October/001237.html is a bad idea? Bugs in packages in a "proposed" PPA shouldn't be reported against Ubuntu, even if they are intended to eventually land there, right? [02:19] What should I do for bug 404933? [02:19] Launchpad bug 404933 in apt "apt-get crash at reloading sources.list" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/404933 [02:29] looks like a legitimate bug / crash to me [02:34] lfaraone: generally speaking that is correct [02:36] bdmurray: okay, is this an exception? Right now the sugar packages in Karmic don't work at all, and this effort is the best we'll get to having working LTS packages. [02:37] lfaraone: is the person creating the ppa packages subscribed to the ubuntu packages? if so that seems fine - but again this is generally not okay [02:48] bdmurray: understood. [02:53] bdmurray: what should I do for it? [02:53] MTecknology: I'm trying to recreate it at the moment [02:54] You could check and see if all the dependencies of apt are ubuntu packages though [03:00] MTecknology: there incompleted for you. If it stil does happen I'd leave the bug open but get the priority set to low [03:00] eh, I set the priority now [03:02] bdmurray: ok, thanks [03:03] bdmurray: I'd like to get my bug list down to 0 :P [03:03] of course there's a couple that will never be closed.. [03:03] like "fix all security issues" [04:06] Who can I assign this to? 423930 [04:35] I found my bug! [04:35] I just marked mine as a duplicate [04:36] Bug #415023 [04:36] Launchpad bug 415023 in gnome-power-manager "brightness is broken on MSI WIND U100" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/415023 === dodger__ is now known as Hurtz === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo [13:28] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/+bug/437595 <- tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace <- any guides/wiki on how I would do this? [13:28] Launchpad bug 437595 in seamonkey "regchrome crashed with SIGSEGV" [Undecided,New] [13:32] ikt: hi, do what? [13:34] retrace [13:34] oh it's done it [13:38] ikt: yeah, it was done, but the process failed for some reason [13:38] so the information isn't very helpful [13:38] does it still need it? [13:38] is the bug reproducible? [13:38] good question, I'll check that now [13:46] yep [13:46] james_w: yes :) [13:46] I've got apport pop up in front of me [13:47] cool [13:47] are you up to date with all the latest packages? [13:47] as far as I can see [13:48] I get my updates from a local mirror, will change over to the main mirror and see [13:51] oh damnit [13:51] my local isp isn't updating there mirror quick enough -_- [14:39] james_w: hrmm installing latest updates seems to fix it [15:03] ikt: that's good [15:04] there is really something seriously broken with sound on karmic [15:17] there is really something seriously broken with sound on karmic <- pulseaudio[1960]: ratelimit.c: 32 events suppressed <- plenty of these in my log files :/ [15:48] i've got gigs of pulse fail in my logs. it doesn't get along with my alc883. [15:54] well, I have attempts to communitcate with a bluetooth audio device (which I don't have), and most sdl games just use 100% cpu [15:55] ALC888 here [16:09] joaopinto: there's always something broken with sound. [16:10] y? [16:10] what's frustrating is that what's broken tends to differ for each combination of hardware. [16:10] dtchen, right, except that on my case are regressions, and I see more people reporting the same problems [16:11] and I am not sure how my plain desktop hw is related to an attempt to connect to a bt device :) [16:11] there isn't one global configuration that you can tweak and make everything better. [16:12] joaopinto: is the BT module for PA loaded? [16:12] dtchen, how do I check that ? [16:12] janito@janito-desktop:~$ espeak test [16:12] bt_audio_service_open: connect() failed: Connection refused (111) [16:12] pactl list|grep 'Name: module-bluetooth' [16:12] it's not [16:13] is the bluetooth "service" running? [16:13] service bluetooth stop [16:13] root 29 2 0 16:01 ? 00:00:00 [bluetooth] [16:13] yes, but I did disabled before [16:13] and re-enabled [16:14] the SDL bit I'll be looking at today; don't know if bugabundo mentioned it to you [16:14] anyway I have no plans to use bluetooth on my desktop [16:14] ikt: is rtkit still installed? [16:14] ok, those are my two problems, which have been reported by other people also, and both have multiple bug reports [16:14] the SDL bit is SDL's fault [16:15] bt_audio_service_open and libsdl-alsa [16:15] I have no idea about BT & PA; I don't have any hardware to test. [16:15] libsdl-pulseaudio works fine [16:15] dtchen, I don't have any BT hw [16:15] this is a regular desktop [16:15] joaopinto: if it really bothers you, try working around it by unloading the kmods [16:15] blacklist them if necessary in /etc/modprobe.d/foo.conf [16:17] virtuald: unfortunately it's quite complex; different revisions of codecs can be initialized wrong by BIOSes [16:17] dtchen, it bothers me as, I would like to understand why is the sound initializaion trying to connect to a type of device which is not available, also because there are multiple bugs for this problem, and they are likely to increase :) [16:17] joaopinto: yes, I empathize [16:17] joaopinto: unfortunately I have no time to tackle every bug; at this point in Karmic, I'm tackling the egregious ones. [16:18] socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 [16:18] connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path=@"/org/bluez/audio"}, 110) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused) [16:18] dtchen, this is a regression [16:18] joaopinto: are you getting spammed in syslog or something? [16:18] ikt: is rtkit still installed? <- neg [16:19] no, I am checking an strace [16:19] it's ok, it's not a big issue, I think I reported it in a bug a while ago, will check [16:19] the bt_* errors are common stdout messages on application startup [16:19] joaopinto: well, that strace needs a bit more context. Do you have the latest dbus updates installed and have rebooted? [16:19] on the strace I see an /usr/share/alsa/bluetooth.conf before the error [16:20] ikt: do you always receive the spam, or does it only appear after a certain operation, like after resuming from suspend-to-*? [16:20] dtchen, yup, latest updates installed [16:20] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/433865 [16:20] Launchpad bug 433865 in pulseaudio "pulseaudio logs" [Undecided,New] [16:20] dtchen: do you think i should flash my bios? [16:21] dtchen: i have an asus p5k and there is a newer bios image [16:21] actually I don't have that issue anymore [16:21] virtuald: I would read the release notes first. [16:21] ok [16:21] ikt: err, which syslog spam issue are you experienciing _now_? [16:22] pulseaudio[1960]: ratelimit.c: 32 events suppressed <- what is the error message saying? I've got too many sound events happening at once? [16:22] dtchen, strace $(which espeak) [16:22] ikt: should be more info above [16:22] dtchen: in regards to the launchpad bug I linked, was that fixed when rtkit was uninstalled? [16:23] none, just cron [16:24] ikt: it's hard to tell without additional context? [16:24] ah np [16:24] ikt: just so we're on the same page, can you make sure that you have our staging PA package installed from the ubuntu-audio-dev PPA? [16:24] sure [16:25] ikt: the only functional changes are for the pm-utils bugs fixed and crappy BT patch being removed [16:27] installed [16:27] and updated, need restart? [16:28] ikt: killall pulseaudio should suffice [16:28] sweet :) [16:30] /var/log/user.log should have it, anyhow [16:31] ok, this one was easy, /usr/share/alsa/bluetooth.conf is making alsa attempt to connect to a bt service when it's not available [16:31] Fresh install of Ubuntu 9.01, log in screen, username, password, I start to see the desktop, bars at top at bottom some icons appear, then back to login the again. What package might be causing my problem? [16:32] joaopinto: I suppose you could deinstall bluez-alsa [16:32] we don't really have the functionality in alsa-lib yet to selectively disable virtual device probing at init [16:33] dtchen, the issue is, myself as many users are likely to disable bluetooth services on desktop systems, I don't need any blue* :) [16:35] but having a work around is sufficient for now, at least I am sure the other issues are not related to this error :P [16:56] dtchen, thanks for the hints, I am commeting some bugs which have incorrectly related broken sound issues to the BT error messages === scream is now known as Nichola [16:59] joaopinto: thanks! [17:02] can someone else test: espeak test; espeak test; espeak test; espeak test [17:03] it randomly fails to play, it seems it fails during initialization or something similar [17:06] yes, reproducible (for the reasons outlined in -+1) [17:06] -+1 P ? [17:07] bit weird [17:07] (#ubuntu+1) [17:07] err, wait. That's this channel, not +1. [17:07] bt_audio_service_open: connect() failed: Connection refused (111) <- but the sound 'test' was played correctly [17:08] ikt, just purge bluez-alsa [17:08] that's not part of the problem :P [17:08] is np [17:09] time to scroll on +1 === ogra__ is now known as ogra [17:10] dtchen, could you summarize on a single line please ? there's a long text to read :P [17:10] it's known, and it's being fixed ? === Nichola is now known as Juliana [17:11] joaopinto: it's known, and it's being investigated for 10.04 [17:12] is it espeak sppecific or library/backend related ? [17:13] at the very least the latter [17:14] could include the former, but that's part of the to-be-investigated [17:14] ok, adding to the bug report [17:17] dtchen, bug 425964, are we likely to move to libsdl PA as default ? [17:17] Launchpad bug 425964 in libsdl1.2 "SDL - Prefer Pulseaudio over ALSA" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/425964 [17:19] joaopinto: don't know. We have to mind Kubuntu and Xubuntu, who don't use PA. [17:19] oh :\ [17:20] yeah, it complicates things [17:20] other distros (e.g., Fedora, Mandriva) only have one audio config to worry about [17:20] we have two [17:22] what package do bugs in keyboard layouts go against [17:22] ?? === Juliana is now known as Katherine === Katherine is now known as Katherina [17:23] dtchen, this SDL issue is quite old, reported since May, is it likely to get fixed this weekend ? [17:25] joaopinto: no [17:25] ouch :\ === Katherina is now known as scream [17:27] joaopinto: we're five days from final release; it's not a kitten-killer bug [17:27] that said, I'll have packages in the ubuntu-audio-dev PPA [17:28] dtchen, having 50% of the games using 100% of the cpu by default, on random systems, is not a kitten-killer bug :) ? [17:29] IMO, no [17:29] "deletes files on boot" would be [17:30] what is what I call very low standards for bugs :) [17:37] I am considering to file a mega bug for the sdl issue, there are too many bugs filled for different packages for a backend problem [17:39] "mega bug"? [17:39] to set all those bugs as duplicate [17:39] I'd argue that it's best to triage them into categories, but it's not a big deal. I can enumerate all the bugs in the changelog. [17:40] most of them mention, game uses 100% cpu,blocks on exit, libsdl-pulseaudio fixes [18:38] james_w: re bug 371019 , is there a reason the "remember my authorization" checkbox has disappeared in Karmic? [18:38] Launchpad bug 371019 in policykit-kde "software updates password remember order wrong" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/371019 === asac__ is now known as asac [19:57] ;] === Enlik is now known as Enlik_ === Enlik_ is now known as Enlik [21:12] hi everyone [21:13] I'm using 9.10 Karmic, and keep having trouble in regards to disabling the emulate3buttons feature of xorg. I wrote a .fdi file and placed it in /etc/hal/fdi/policy [21:13] anyone know what might be my problem? === Enlik is now known as gz_oddziel === gz_oddziel is now known as Enlik