[00:24] wgrant: Packages building now thank you [00:24] leonel: Excellent. === micahg1 is now known as micahg [01:50] Packages.ubuntu.com down? [01:52] quentusrex: Yes, but that is nothing to do with Launchpad. Try #canonical-sysadmin [02:49] * kfogel is away: zzz [05:28] is ftp on ppa.launchpad.net down? i'm getting connection refused errors [05:28] jacob: It is :( [05:29] If no sysadmins show themselves soonish, there is a workaround. [05:29] somehow i feel like i broke something. uploaded one package fine a few minutes earlier, and all of a sudden it was down. :P [05:29] lifeless: ^^ [05:29] No, no, that FTP server has a habit of dieing sometimes [05:30] fun [05:30] ah well not a biggie i can upload tomorrow. [05:33] wgrant: any idea how long? [05:34] lifeless: Nearly an hour, i think. [05:35] (most people don't come in here to complain, they just whine elsewhere :() [05:35] its 6:30 am for elmo [05:36] I might give him a little more sleep ;) [05:36] That's what I suspected. [05:38] That service fortunately has a second instance. [05:38] on the same name ? [05:38] No. [05:38] upload.ubuntu.com [05:38] folk won't necessarily know how to use that though :) [05:39] No. But it is a useful workaround and reward for people who inform the channel that it's down :P [06:13] ugh, code.edge.lp keeps telling me to wait [06:13] or rather bazaar.lp [06:13] nm, finally got through === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant [07:32] Is ppa.launchpad.net down? [07:33] When I try to upload I get the following error [07:33] dfarning: It is. Try changing ppa.launchpad.net to upload.ubuntu.com in your dput.cf [07:34] wgrant, thanks! I didn't even have time to copy and paste my error [08:57] why I get "refused by server" when trying to upload to my ppa? is there something wrong with the server? [08:57] happyaron: Yes, the FTP server has crashed. Try replacing 'ppa.launchpad.net' with 'upload.ubuntu.com' temporarily in your dput.cf. [08:58] wgrant: oh, thanks [08:59] hi. i sent two posts to a lauchpad mailing list but none arrived. what could be the issue? [08:59] i've chacked that the sender is the right one [09:00] chomwitt: when did you sent them? [09:00] (I'm that list moderator, and I see no messages in the list waiting approval....) [09:00] The list is linux.sch.gr@lists.launchpad.net [09:01] alkisg: ok. tha first one was sent from wrong address. so i guess the last one i sent 30 minutes ago propably will arrive... [09:01] Ah, ok, let's wait, launchpad seems to be really busy due to the forecoming Karmic release.. :) [09:02] alkisg: thanks for the tip. [09:02] chomwitt: but even so, I should be seeing the first mail in my waiting-to-be-approved list... [09:10] I hope thi doesn't upload to the archive... [09:11] Laney: The upload path controls the target archive. [09:11] Not the server. [09:11] (plus Karmic is frozen, so it's no terrible disaster if you upload it there...) [09:11] yeah I know ;) [09:11] wgrant: is it still down? [09:11] 3~yes [09:12] lifeless: Yes. [09:12] And it's 10:11 on Sunday. [09:12] Seems reasonable enough. [09:12] Oh. 9:11. [09:12] * wgrant curses DST a bit. [09:13] better than waking elmo at 6:30/5:30 [09:14] 5:30 it would have been [09:14] anyhow, I've just rung him, because I would forget if I left it later [09:14] Yup. [09:14] Thanks. [09:18] fixed I'm told [09:18] Great. [09:18] mmm [09:18] the propose for merging link is in an odd place [09:19] It's not still under 'Branch merges'? [09:19] it is [09:19] but all the other actions are on the right for the branch [09:19] Right. [09:20] well, not all [09:20] many [09:20] That is The 3.0 Way™ [09:20] Only actions relating to the object itself, and not something presented elsewhere on the page, go in the sidebar. [09:21] 'Set branch reviewer' probably shouldn't be where it is. [09:21] But a couple of actions have already been removed from there since the initial redesign. [09:21] yeah [09:21] I know [09:21] just had a 'wheredafuck' moment [09:36] when did the activity log come back? [09:36] micahg: About three hours ago. [09:37] Was the issue with deleted files still being accesible fixed yet? [09:37] No. [09:37] (the activity log never went away; only the link did) [09:37] wouldn't it be prudent then not to display activity log again? [09:37] * micahg knows that :) [09:37] it just makes it less obvous [09:37] Only slightly. [09:38] I thought that was the reason the link disappeared [09:38] It was not related. [09:38] The link was removed because it was thought that the most important information was now presented on the main bug page too. [10:37] hello [10:38] how can I delete ppa's archive? [10:39] ari-tczew: you want to delete a package or the whole ppa? === ripps_ is now known as ripps [10:40] whole [10:40] I can delete one package manually, but there is no option to delete whole archive ;O [10:41] PPAs can only be disabled, not deleted, and then only by an admin. [10:41] Ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz [10:42] rofl, this is waste of resources [10:42] Not significantly. [10:45] so I must everytime ask for request delete one of my archives? [10:46] Yes. It is not, at this point, intended to be an option that is exercised frequently. [10:48] IMO if I create PPA, I should have permissions to delete my (as the name suggest) PERSONAL archive [10:49] you can [10:49] its just not automated [10:49] just like as creating teams [10:49] the request thing isn't to control the deletion [10:49] its because we haven't written the code to manage the deletion fully automatically [10:49] there are a bunch of separate things that need to be cleaned up, so a sysadmin has to do it. [10:50] ask wgrant says, file a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz [10:50] ehhh... OK [10:50] thnx [11:20] wow lp3.0 is slow when you ctrl-click many bugs at once [11:20] It's the JS. [11:20] For rendering the inline edit icons. [11:21] wgrant: is there a reason why those functions aren't centralized? [11:24] micahg: Hm? [11:24] if the js functions were in a .js file, they would be loaded once [11:25] They are. [11:25] ok [11:29] why lp 3.0 missed link to +activity ? [11:30] ari-tczew: Because they didn't think it was necessary. It returned earlier tonight. [12:47] In the past few days, I've been getting an error when attempting to visit +editemails - is this a confirmed issue? You can't change your e-mail addresses, currently? [12:50] Upon checking launchpad/+bugs, it doesn't look like it's been reported as an issue. [13:22] MenZa: I can access +editemails fine, both on lp.net and edge.lp.net [13:23] Hello, is there any repository for downloading quickly multiple PO files from launchpad instead of clicking all the time? [13:31] tsimpson: humm, I was doing it on edge.lp [13:32] MenZa: both work here [13:32] tsimpson: Weird. I wonder if it has anything to do with a recent account merge I had. [13:32] probably time to file another question then [13:33] I'll see if it resolves itself in the next couple of days, if not I think I will. [14:25] oh now I see link to activity log [14:25] thanks === eix is now known as Goundy [16:03] Hello, if there is a wrong URL in bug watch, how do I remove it ? [16:36] drop watching on url (Assigned to) [16:43] ok, thanks [16:46] mighty guys! [16:46] Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): [16:46] Connection failed, aborting. Check your network [Errno 111] Connection refused [16:46] help! [17:42] Hi all [17:42] i need some help [17:43] Apport is not working and i cant log in in launchpad [17:43] somebody can help me? [19:46] hi, is there a way to recover a launchpad username? === sale_ is now known as sale [20:40] stas: What do you mean by 'recover'? [20:54] wgrant: there's a username which is not active for several year, i wanted to ask if its possible to change my username to it [20:55] my bad, recover isn't the appropriate word [21:03] stas: If the other user has never done anything, you should be able to reclaim it. If they just haven't done anything recently, I don't know. It can't hurt to ask -- https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion. [21:09] wgrant: thanks, i send a question === doctormo_ is now known as doctormo [22:21] Hi, I uploaded some packages to the bcfg2 ppa before noticing I had to sign the code of conduct agreement and do a few other things; I'm wondering if that put them in some kind of limbo where human intervention is required, or if I just need to be more patient :) [22:29] I'm going to try just uploading a new version now that I think I've done all the proper registration steps. [22:42] djbclark: You should receive an email of acceptance or rejection within 5 minutes of uploading a package, as long as you have your keys set up correctly [22:49] wgrant: yeah now that I'm all set up it worked fine and I've gotten emails; thanks. [22:53] djbclark: Great. === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh