[01:57] <kklimonda> hmm.. I don't see an icon indicating private bugs neither in epiphany nor in android browser (edge server). Is this some webkit bug?
[02:04] <lfaraone> rockstar: is there a blueprint for implementing CNAME branded subdomains in launchpad?
[02:26] <wgrant> kklimonda: It's a bug in LP which shows up in WebKit.
[02:29] <micahg> yeah, I already showed him bug 397457
[02:33] <rockstar> lfaraone, not that I know of.
[04:18] <RenatoSilva> Can't find the bug watch feature!
[04:20] <wgrant> RenatoSilva: What do you want to do, and where are you looking?
[04:21] <RenatoSilva> link a bug from kde.org
[04:21] <RenatoSilva> I'm on the bug page
[04:21] <wgrant> To where?
[04:21] <wgrant> 'Also affects project'
[04:21] <wgrant> Select the relevant project.
[04:21] <wgrant> Enter the bug URL.
[04:24] <RenatoSilva> ah ok, thanks!
[04:24] <RenatoSilva> wait, the project may not be in LP
[04:25] <RenatoSilva> in fact it is not
[04:27] <wgrant> RenatoSilva: Then you need to create it.
[04:28] <RenatoSilva> wgrant: oh :(
[04:38] <RenatoSilva> can I link to a kde bug in any project? or does the project need to be configured by accepting that kind of bug tracker?
[04:46] <RenatoSilva> how to transfer a project's ownership to someone else?
[04:48] <RenatoSilva> http://bugs.kde.org/212351
[04:48] <RenatoSilva> Launchpad does not recognize the bug tracker at this URL. :(
[04:49] <spm> RenatoSilva: prject ownership - raise an LP question/answer against launchpad itself
[04:49] <RenatoSilva> spm: I wonder whether changing the maintainer worked, it seems I've lost the edit permissions, so I guess so
[04:50] <RenatoSilva> what is the right form of a kde bug?
[04:53] <thumper> RenatoSilva: hmm
[04:53] <thumper> RenatoSilva: I've used the kde bug tracker befoer
[04:55] <RenatoSilva> thumper: I think it's the short URL, it's a new feature of bugzilla not supported by LP yet iirc
[04:57] <RenatoSilva> it is, this one worked fine: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212351
[06:03]  * RenatoSilva leaving, goodnight
[06:34]  * mneptok staying. sorry.
[08:17] <dysmann> Hello there !
[08:18] <dysmann> I have a launchpad account with an empty ppa
[08:18] <dysmann> and I would like to change my nickname
[08:25] <noodles775> dysmann: it looks like your ppa there is deactivated rather than deleted. This is usually the case if you have at any point in the past published something to the PPA. Is that the case?
[08:25] <dysmann> no, it's not
[08:26] <noodles775> dysmann: great - so if you've never published anything to it, then you can request it to be deleted like this:
[08:26] <dysmann> I already asked to delete it but insteed it has been disabled
[08:26] <noodles775> ah, I see.
[08:26] <noodles775> Where's the question - I'll update it and re-assign it for you.
[08:26] <dysmann> I'm repporting a bug for that
[08:26] <dysmann> It would be great to be able to delete our PPAs
[08:27] <dysmann> thank you
[08:27] <dysmann> but can you just remove it so I can update my name ?
[08:29] <noodles775> dysmann: I can't - but you said you've already requested the deletion? Was that via a question, liake this one:
[08:29] <noodles775> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/86865
[08:30] <noodles775> And there's already a bug for deleting PPAs: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/392887
[08:30] <dysmann> noodles775:  It was via e-mail because I was asked to ask via e-mail
[08:31] <dysmann> ubottu : thanks
[08:31] <dysmann> :P
[08:31] <noodles775> dysmann: I see. OK, if you create a question like the one above I'll get it assigned so we can track it this time.
[08:31] <noodles775> Sorry for the hassle.
[08:32] <dysmann> okay, so I create a question I it will be deleted ?
[08:33] <noodles775> Yes - it's not something that I can do - it requires a Launchpad administrator, and they'll do a bunch of them next time they get to them and will close the question when it's done, so you'll be notified.
[08:34] <dysmann> ok
[08:34] <dysmann> thank you very much
[08:34] <noodles775> np
[08:38] <noodles775> dysmann: be sure to paste the link to the question here to me so I can assign it too.
[08:38] <dysmann> ok
[08:38] <dysmann> I'm going to send it
[08:39] <dysmann> I wrote it in English
[08:39] <dysmann> https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/87446
[08:42] <noodles775> dysmann: great, I've updated and assigned it.
[08:49] <dysmann> noodles775: thank you
[09:28] <triew> The Packages file for chromium-browser amd64 is out of date as far as I can see (http://ppa.launchpad.net/chromium-daily/ppa/ubuntu/dists/jaunty/main/binary-amd64/Packages) - the latest package listed is 4.0.226.0, but https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa shows the latest build as 4.0.229.0. Is this a known/expected problem?
[09:29] <wgrant> triew: If you look at https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages, you'll see that it failed to build.
[09:32] <triew> wgrant: Thanks, I was just looking at the published packages list at the bottom of the ppa page. I didn't understand that published just meant that package had been uploaded to the build system, and the build could still fail - though of course this makes sense. Thanks.
[09:32] <wgrant> triew: that currently just lists the source packages. this is suboptimal.
[09:32] <noodles775> We need to update the PPA main index to display binaries instead.
[13:53] <dnjl> mmh, is there a problem with the builders? i have to wait 8h for a build and there are only 3 ppa-builders per architecture available...
[13:56] <tsimpson> as far as I know, sometimes the PPA builders are set to build official packages sometimes
[13:56] <tsimpson> especially around release time
[14:16] <dnjl> mmh, well...
[14:21] <adeuring> can anybody tell how i can make a branch private? I don't see any related UI element on the "change details" page
[14:24] <tsimpson> if you want a private branch, why not just store it on your local machine?
[16:05] <maxb> adeuring: I believe it's phrased as "Keep this branch confidential"
[16:05] <adeuring> maxb: yeah ;)
[17:45] <carresmd> rockstar, is there a way to import a PGP key manually? I'm unable to import a PGP key for the whole day..
[17:46] <carresmd> it probably has to do with keyserver.ubuntu.com being crappy lately.
[17:47] <Spads> carresmd: you can import from any other public keyserver, as they're all synchronized with one another
[17:48] <carresmd> Spads, no it isn't (I spoke to you earlier at #canonical-sysadmin btw). My key is at pgp.mit.edu and keyserver.ubuntu.com, but launchpad tells me it couldn't import my key the whole day
[17:50] <carresmd> Spads, I meant: no I can't
[17:51] <rockstar> carresmd, well, so if it isn't on the other servers, it may be that those servers are having a hard time replicating it.
[17:51] <rockstar> carresmd, what's the key id?
[17:52] <carresmd> rockstar, the key id is; 6D0C8C55
[17:53] <carresmd> it is known at pgp.mit.edu, keyserver.ubuntu.com and a server elmo (from #canonical-sysadmin) told me but forgot the name
[17:55] <rockstar> carresmd, so when you say "manually" what do you mean?
[17:55] <rockstar> carresmd, it looks like keyserver.ubuntu.com is indeed being hammered right now.
[17:56] <carresmd> rockstar, somehow add the key to the launchpad system using the public key or something? (not sure HOW launchpad works in the background though)
[17:56] <carresmd> rockstar, keyserver.ubuntu.com is hammered / down all the time.. :-(
[17:57] <rockstar> carresmd, that's a bit of an exaggeration.  Ubuntu 9.10 released yesterday, so there's heavy traffic.  We don't normally have problems.
[17:58] <carresmd> rockstar, sure it has to do with the 9.10 release. But the last few months it has been hammered / down a lot.
[17:59] <rockstar> carresmd, unfortunately, I think we just need to be patient.  I wish I had more info for you.
[18:01] <carresmd> rockstar, the only real 'info' I got today is that they are working on a 'fix' for the keyserver.
[18:01] <carresmd> rockstar, I'll wait until tomorrow and try again then
[18:01] <hggdh> are we having issues with edge? I am getting an OOPS-1399ED644 when trying to save a comment to a bug
[18:02] <carresmd> rockstar, thanks anyway!
[18:02] <rockstar> hggdh, what is the bug number?
[18:02] <hggdh> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/465192
[18:03] <rockstar> hggdh, I will chase this in just a bit.  For now, may I suggest you disable redirection to edge?
[18:03] <hggdh> OK, thanks, will do
[20:32] <RenatoSilva> Is there any problem with the download counter?
[20:32] <salgado-afk> RenatoSilva, yes, bug 458835
[20:33] <RenatoSilva> ok thanks
[20:40] <tfogal> Hi, I've got an issue with my PPA's when I make only minor changes to my package, s.t. there's no version change upstream.
[20:40] <tfogal> In that case, the .orig.tar.gz filename doesn't change, and launchpad rejects my PPA upload because of that
[20:40] <carresmd> keyserver.ubuntu.com is up and running again, but launchpad still 'refuses' to import my PGP key. What is going on?
[20:41] <tfogal> The file *has* changed -- I've made minor changes in the software package, which I also maintain -- and so really I'd like launchpad to just overwrite the old .orig.tar.gz
[20:41] <tfogal> is there perhaps a dput option that forces an overwrite?  Or any other way that I can say "upstream has changed but the version number is equivalent".  Or other advice on managing this?
[20:44] <carresmd> tfogal, what about adding something like '-0ubuntu1' or something similar to the version?
[20:44] <carresmd> isn't that an option?
[20:59] <carresmd> no one?
[21:13] <tfogal> carresmd, et al.: would that actually change the .orig.tar.gz filename?
[21:13] <tfogal> I've been appending the svn revision numbers from the 4 repos that make up the software to these debs, and those are changing
[21:14] <tfogal> but only after a ~ in the filename -- perhaps it must go after the "-" but before the "~"?
[21:14] <tfogal> "it" being an increasing version number
[21:33] <tfogal> confirmed; updating the version after the - in my .deb filename (i.e., the "debian version" or "ubuntu version") does not change the .orig.tar.gz name.  Is there any other way I could upload multiple debs of the same upstream revision to a PPA?
[21:34] <wgrant> tfogal: By definition, the orig.tar.gz does not change. You should not modify it from the upstream release.
[21:34] <wgrant> Even if you are upstream.
[21:34] <tfogal> The issue is that this isn't the "release" per se; I'm trying to get some sort of nightly build into my PPA
[21:35] <wgrant> You need to change the orig.tar.gz version every time you change the file.
[21:35] <wgrant> eg. append +bzr1234
[21:35] <tfogal> ahh, a plus will do it!  awesome.
[21:35] <wgrant> You must rename the orig.tar.gz itself, and stick it in the changelog.
[21:41] <tfogal> =)  I think I've got a workable solution then, now.  Thanks, wgrant !
[21:42] <wgrant> tfogal: Just paste your version number here, so I can check you're doing it right.
[21:45] <tfogal> wgrant: imagevis3d_1.2.0+2-1~ppa~svn53~1243~1356~1216~
[21:45] <tfogal> the "2" will increase every time I generate a new deb
[21:46] <wgrant> tfogal: That's not how you want to do things.
[21:46] <tfogal> wgrant: How can I version it better?
[21:46] <wgrant> tfogal: the ~svn is really part of the upstream version, isn't it?
[21:46] <tfogal> wgrant: Yes.  So you're saying put that before the "-"?
[21:46] <wgrant> The bit before the final '-' specifies what is in the orig.tar.gz
[21:47] <tfogal> Ahh, I see && agree with your logic, then.
[21:47] <wgrant> So anything describing what is in the orig.tar.gz should be before the '-'.
[21:47] <wgrant> eg. 1.2.0~svn53-0ppa1
[21:47] <wgrant> (assuming that svn r53 is precursor to release 1.2.0)
[21:49] <zsquareplusc-liv> i find it a bit weird to get an OOPS message saying something about the edge server when i'm trying to file a bug on bugs.launchpad.net
[21:50] <zsquareplusc-liv> and i can't file a new bug for ubuntu
[21:51] <tfogal> wgrant: Yep, it is.  + thanks
[21:51] <wgrant> zsquareplusc-liv: There's a bug causing the message to show up on launchpad.net when it shouldn't.
[21:51] <wgrant> zsquareplusc-liv: Try shortening your initial summary; you can increase it again once you see the list of possible duplicates.
[21:52] <zsquareplusc-liv> heh, ok
[21:52] <zsquareplusc-liv> that's not an obvious workaround ;-)
[21:56] <wgrant> zsquareplusc-liv: Indeed not :(
[22:12] <kiko> wgrant, zsquareplusc-liv: a fix is incoming!
[22:12] <wgrant> kiko: gmb's AJAX dupefinder work?
[22:58] <keffie_jayx> hello
[23:00] <keffie_jayx> I have been playing around with launchpadlib in python to get some work done for the locoteams... now I can't seem to get the api to display teams anymore with the code I had. I am traying to find documnetation on the changes od data structure if any, but I only find the apidocs and that still points to "teams" still existing and when testing I can't seem to get anything
[23:03] <wgrant> effie_jayx: What is the code that doesn't work?
[23:03] <wgrant> effie_jayx: Remember that teams live in the 'people' top-level collection.
[23:04] <effie_jayx> wgrant: ok let me check the code
[23:04] <effie_jayx> wgrant: got it
[23:05] <effie_jayx> was it always like that?
[23:05] <wgrant> effie_jayx: I think so.
[23:05]  * effie_jayx doesn't remember the code much
[23:10] <effie_jayx> wgrant: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/305485/ here is the code...
[23:12] <effie_jayx> wgrant: found the glitch it seems a db error
[23:12] <effie_jayx> my bad
[23:12] <effie_jayx> thanks :D
[23:12] <wgrant> effie_jayx: Great!