=== iWolf is now known as UbuntuX === UbuntuX is now known as iWolf === iWolf is now known as Phenomenon === Phenomenon is now known as UbuntuX === UbuntuX is now known as iWolf [03:24] Sorry [03:24] Alll of them are registered! [04:21] im getting segfaults in libc-2.10.1.so [04:22] definitely introduced in KKK [04:25] ...might not want to use that abbreviation [04:27] Really [04:27] Please post a bug [04:33] i'll leave that to others >;) [04:34] found it on google, same versions so i cant be the only one [04:39] kosmic: we need a lot more detail [05:26] I can boot to the splash with the moving white line then the screen blinks black, goes back to the splash and loops. Any ideas? [05:28] check in #ubuntu for support === micahg1 is now known as micahg [12:38] Hi all [12:38] Hello. [12:41] I've noticed lots of identifical bugreports about jaunty->karmic upgrading problems when users have ttf-mscorefonts-installer, maybe someone from Ubuntu developers can assign bug #464422 to the right person and increase importance ? Every day since karmic release about 10 identifical bugs are reported about this problem [12:41] Launchpad bug 464422 in baltix "fail to complete upgrade jaunty > karmic ttf-mscorefonts-installer" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/464422 [12:42] This problem appears because ttf-mscorefonts-installer always tries to download fonts from internet servers without asking if user wants to do this and returns an error if there are no access to the fonts download locations [12:44] Afail the Summary of that bug should be changed to: "ttf-mscorefonts-installer shouldn't return an error if there are no access to corefonts download servers" [12:44] I think ttf-mscorefonts-installer should display a dialog with buttons "Try again" and "Download later" (run dpkg-reconfigure ttf-mscorefonts-installer when you will have internet connection). [12:51] if someone had a working wi-fi card w/propreitary driver in use, did a clean install and ubuntu see's the card but doesn't recognise the appropriate driver for it, is that a regression? [14:57] !bug 453579 === Hellow is now known as Hellowskie === Hellowskie is now known as Hellow [16:48] is there a master bug for "sound problems" related to running 2.6.28 kernel on 9.10? [16:49] kklimonda: no, just been telling people how to fix it then letting them close them [19:06] I've just upgraded to 9.10 and now nm-applet crashes on startup if ath5k is loaded. Full information is here https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465849/ .... has anyone experienced this? [19:06] mjw: Error: This bug is private [19:07] Yeah... I'm not sure how to change this since apport generated and reported it. [19:08] It's a bit of a show stopper since I now have no network connectivity :( [19:14] mjw: you need to click the little edit button in the top right next to 'this report is private' [19:14] to set it to public [19:16] ikt; that's great thanks [19:16] :) [19:16] Hmm, I'm connected using ath5k right now [19:18] I'm not sure if I have something weird in my gconf that is causing this to barf somehow [19:19] wow, I don't even have access to that bug...the retracer must be looking at it now [19:19] maxb is ath5k working well for you? I had to revert back to ath_pci in 9.04 since ath5k at that point was giving me some very large ping times to my access point [19:20] mjw: do you have the backports installed? [19:20] linux-backports-modules-wireless-karmic-generic [19:21] micahg; I'm not sure if the core dump contains a load of my wireless access point passwords [19:21] micahg; nope... I might try that when I reboot back into ubuntu in a bit... thanks for the tip on that one. [19:22] well, you generally don't want to make a private bug public unless the retracer has looked at it and you're sure there is no private data in attachments [19:22] micahg; yeah... that is what I'm unsure about at the moment [19:23] try the backports, it almost fixed ath9k for me [19:23] micahg; this is with 9.10 right? [19:23] yes [19:23] ok; thanks [19:27] mjw: Well, it all depends on the hardware, I think. [19:27] On my AAO, ath5k has been decent since intrepid+lbm [19:28] On my ThinkPad T40p, ath5k has *never* worked [19:28] I'm on a lenovo T61 [19:29] ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5414 chip found (MAC: 0xa3, PHY: 0x61) [19:39] ok micahg, I'll give that a go... speak soon! === Adri2000 is now known as Guest44663 === fdd is now known as Guest43582 === nhandler is now known as Guest65456 === Guest44663 is now known as Adri2000` === Adri2000` is now known as Adri2000 [20:00] bouas [20:24] quick question.. anyone know what package I should report auto-dimming of a laptop screen against? [20:26] Chorca: gnome? [20:26] gnome-power-manager [20:27] kay.. was thinking it was that but couldn't find any mention in the wiki. I'll file it against that. === FireWolf is now known as iWolf[Ubuntu] [20:58] I Have To Restart Xchat [Amsg] [21:51] "Hardware Drivers" dialog says "No propriety drivers are in use on this system." but the list shows nvidia, and at the bottom "driver is activated and currently in use." http://dev.personnelware.com/carl/a/pdrv1.png [21:52] I have not installed any propriety drivers. I did install xserver-xorg-video-nouveau - before that the dialog did not show any drivers. [21:52] what should I bug? [21:57] CarlFK: the "jockey" source package [21:57] "ubuntu-bug jockey-gtk" in the command line to have apport help out in reporting [22:00] greg-g: got it - thanks [22:05] i did a bug report today and i wonder it is correct this way. maybe additional information are needed? it is bug 469475 [22:05] Launchpad bug 469475 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 "3 Screens with 2 NVIDIA graphics cards and Ubuntu" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/469475 [22:30] I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but the e-mail I was sent to confirm the OpenPGP key I entered trying to sign the code of conduct doesn't seem to want to decrypt. I enter the encryption key given to me, but Evolution says it's not the right one. Am I being stupid? [22:34] nstc: you can try #ubuntu for support [22:35] thanks :) [22:42] Hi, I wonder if I can get some help finding out if I need to file a bug report about a problem I'm having with Ubuntu? [22:44] if there is a bug then most likely you need to report it (or confirm it, if someone else reported it before you) [22:45] It relates to what looks like an endless loop while gdm is starting up. [22:47] that does sound like a bug ☺ [22:47] in #ubuntu-bugs-announce [22:49] Also, I don't appear to have any virtual text consoles. [22:49] Sorry, [22:49] Failed join command [22:49] :P [23:01] Okay, well I think I'll try to open up a bug report at launchpad.