[07:19] <ripps> fta: is there a way to change the priority of a ppa-bot run? in case I have a fix for a broken packages that I don't want to wait 36 hours for.
[08:50] <eagles0513875> morning
[20:07] <asac> micahg: hi
[20:07] <asac> finally here if you need me ;)
[20:07] <micahg> ok :)
[20:08] <micahg> just wanted to fix xul191 and xul192 in dailies yesterday fta helped me
[20:08] <asac> great
[20:09] <asac> anyone has a 64-bit install?
[20:09]  * micahg has 64 bit
[20:09] <asac> not sure what happened, but since release day my browser starts to block for a while regularly
[20:09] <asac> firefox 3.5 that is
[20:09] <micahg> asac: 3.5.5 is being released today
[20:09] <asac> i thought it was the sqlite update i added to -security PPA ... but that seems to be not the only reason
[20:10] <asac> micahg: right. i got that from backlog :/
[20:10] <asac> i think i will stay hard this time and dont stop vacation for that
[20:10] <asac> did that like 3 times in the past already
[20:11] <micahg> sqlite got bumped anyways, so it won't matter till lucid
[20:11] <asac> micahg1: sqlite got bumped in 3.5 branch?
[20:11] <micahg1> wait, it wasn't bumped until 3.5.6 I think
[20:11] <micahg1> yeah
[20:11] <micahg> 3.5.6
[20:12] <asac> ok. thats still some time for us to react
[20:12] <micahg> but 3.5.5 is being released today because of some crashes with 3.5.4
[20:12] <asac> not sure what to do
[20:12] <asac> yeah. it was a safe bet to see that coming
[20:12] <asac> they landed like 140+ bug fixes for 3.5.4 ...
[20:12] <micahg> I bumped it for the dailies
[20:12] <micahg> wow
[20:12] <asac> i wouldnt even be shocked if they do a 3.5.6 next week ;)
[20:13] <micahg> well, the GTK fixed was approved for 3.5.6
[20:13] <asac> yeah. but if they do a firedrill 3.5.6 they would push everything else back to 3.5.7
[20:14] <micahg> yeah
[20:14] <micahg> asac: where should I put the stuff I want to talk about for Lucid?
[20:14] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Lucid/Ideas
[20:14] <asac> thx ;)
[20:14] <asac> one second
[20:15] <asac> not sure if i already added anthe page
[20:17] <asac> ok added three things there
[20:17] <asac> damn ... wiki is slow ;)
[20:18] <asac> micahg: go ahead and add your stuff there ;)
[20:18] <asac> the brackets is just so one knows who added the idea  (e.g. no assignment etc.)
[20:19] <asac> micahg: which version did they bump sqlite to?
[20:19] <micahg> 3.6.16.1
[20:19] <asac> ok. thats just a minor bump then
[20:20] <asac> we have 3.6.16
[20:20] <micahg> yeah
[20:20] <micahg> maybe can get 3.6.16.1 as WRU?
[20:20] <micahg> *SRU?
[20:20] <asac> we probably have to
[20:21] <asac> the risk of internalizing a sqlite for xulrunner feels higher
[20:22] <micahg> is it clear we'll be moving to TB3 in lucid?
[20:23] <asac> there is no news about 16.1 :( http://www.sqlite.org/news.html
[20:23] <asac> micahg: i would think its safe to assume that. yes.
[20:23] <micahg> weird
[20:23] <asac> is tb3 out yet?
[20:23] <asac> anyway. we should push that up asap
[20:23] <micahg> which?
[20:24] <asac> tb3
[20:24] <micahg> RC1 should be later this month
[20:24] <micahg> I think we should wait for that
[20:24] <asac> yeah
[20:24] <micahg> will it take over the thunderbird package?
[20:24] <BUGabundo> bRoas o/
[20:24] <asac> but shouldnt matter ... the earlier the better
[20:25] <asac> micahg: i have no strong opinion on that
[20:25] <asac> on the one hand i already see folks screeming
[20:25] <micahg> well, I think it's better to put a stable version in
[20:25] <asac> if they get migrated to 3.0
[20:25] <asac> because of different memory footprint ;)
[20:25] <micahg> well, TB2 will be EOL shortly after lucid release
[20:25] <asac> otoh i dont think that tbird 2 will be supported much longer
[20:25] <micahg> we can't leave it
[20:25] <asac> especially not throughout the full LTS cycle
[20:25] <asac> right
[20:25] <micahg> I think it's easier if we just replace it
[20:26] <asac> so yeah. i dont think we have a choice and need to replace it
[20:26] <micahg> other major apps do it
[20:26] <asac> sure
[20:26] <micahg> the only problem will be TB2 on hardy
[20:26] <asac> not sure if we should automatically take over on first upload
[20:27] <asac> yeah
[20:27] <micahg> that's why I think we should wait for RC1
[20:27] <asac> but most rendering engine issues are not really issues for TB2
[20:27] <asac> so we might get through with backporting the rare security issues that pop up in the mail stack
[20:27] <asac> micahg: i am sure that even RC1 is not stable enough.
[20:27] <asac> tb is the most popuplar mailclient in ubuntu
[20:27] <asac> it will cause huge amount of complains etc.
[20:28] <micahg> asac: http://www.sqlite.org/src/vinfo/2a832b19b657ba02a2caaafbc15be19cc6b80fd9
[20:28] <asac> s/most popular/most popular based on the fact that users explicitly opt-in/
[20:28] <micahg> hmm
[20:28] <asac> micahg: yes. but where is the changelog ;)
[20:28] <micahg> well, maybe wait for release before upgrading if it's before Feb 2010
[20:29] <BUGabundo> then we will have a shirt test windows
[20:29] <asac> i think we should upload tbird 3 with versioned packaging scheme so users can opt-in now and report issues
[20:29] <asac> then we take the other package over later this cycle
[20:29] <asac> hopefully when tbird is at 3.0.2 or something
[20:29] <micahg> is that hard to do?
[20:29] <asac> no
[20:29] <asac> its what we do with firefox
[20:29] <micahg> ok
[20:30] <asac> have two versions in parallel ... then take over the older ones
[20:30] <asac> once we consider it ready enough
[20:31] <micahg> asac: http://www.sqlite.org/releaselog/3_6_16_1.html
[20:32] <asac> ok. so its a special-fix-for-mozilla ... i would guess
[20:32] <asac> thx
[20:32] <micahg> asac: can I get a testimonial on my wiki page? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/micahg
[20:34] <asac> micahg: when did you start on ffox bugs? april? jun? (sorry .. time runs fast ;))
[20:34] <micahg> april
[20:37] <asac> micahg: applying for motu or membership?
[20:37] <micahg> membership right now
[20:37] <micahg> MOTU when you get tired of pushing my uploads :)
[20:37] <BUGabundo> lol
[20:38] <av`> MOTU team has 3 months life
[20:38] <av`> ;)
[20:38] <micahg> oh, probably not worth it then :)
[20:38] <av`> then with archive reorg there will be a general Ubuntu Developers plus various seeds
[20:39] <BUGabundo> av`: chaning it again?
[20:39] <BUGabundo> ahh nice
[20:47] <asac> micahg: ok done
[20:48] <asac> my english had some hick-ups ... but i think that should be good ;)
[20:49] <asac> hi BUGabundo
[20:49] <asac> ;)
[20:49] <asac> hope you missed me ;) .... hehe
[20:49] <asac> will be off in an hour again and back on monday ;)
[20:50] <BUGabundo> asac: took you while :D
[20:50] <BUGabundo> enjoy the long weekend
[20:50] <asac> yep ;)
[20:50] <asac> that will be 8 days in total then
[20:50] <asac> ;)
[20:50] <BUGabundo> asac: I 've seen users
[20:50] <BUGabundo> getting again that assertion error
[20:50] <BUGabundo> on NM
[20:50] <asac> sorry. i lost context ;)?
[20:51] <BUGabundo> similar to the one I had a while ago with wireless networks
[20:51] <BUGabundo> out of range
[20:51] <asac> hmm. my brain sems to be tabula rasa atm ;)
[20:51] <asac> is there a bug i could check?
[20:52] <micahg> thanks asac
[20:52] <asac> very welcome
[20:52] <asac> micahg: how does memberswhip work nowadays?
[20:52] <asac> is that still done in a IRC meeting?
[20:52] <asac> like community council?
[20:52] <av`> asac, yes
[20:52] <asac> if so, ping me ahead so i can be there
[20:52] <micahg> can you help me with a TB3 daily breakage?
[20:53] <asac> sure :)
[20:53] <asac> will be here for another hour as it seems :)
[20:53] <asac> av`: thx!!
[20:53] <micahg> ok, I'm still waiting for the meeting to be planned
[20:53] <av`> community council process everything through irc as alwias :)
[20:53] <asac> yeah. i remember mammoth meetings in the past
[20:53] <micahg> ok, fta added a patch to fix the eula: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head/revision/34
[20:53] <asac> which made me think that maybe they redid the whole process
[20:53] <micahg> this landed which I think takes care of it: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.1/rev/f1b37d88d156
[20:54] <micahg> if it does, I'll just drop the old patch, but I wasn't sure
[20:55] <asac> hmm
[20:55] <asac> not sure why the initial patch was needed
[20:56] <asac> where was APP_EULA_BLOCK used?
[20:56] <asac> anyway
[20:56] <asac> they dropped the holw APP_EULA_BLOCK business
[20:56] <asac> so yeah
[20:56] <asac> i would just drop it
[20:56] <micahg> ok
[20:56] <micahg> I'll fix the daily then
[20:56] <asac> and see if somethign else causes issues
[20:56] <micahg> BTW, I started using fta's pbuilder script
[20:56] <micahg> it's nice
[20:56] <asac> micahg: yeah. graeat
[20:57] <asac> micahg: just include in the "drop" comment what landing triggered this
[20:57] <asac> but you probably do that automatically alreadcy ;)
[20:57] <micahg> it took me 3 hours to build xulrunner though
[20:57] <asac> micahg: hmm. maybe i should check them too ;)
[20:57] <asac> micahg: thats long
[20:57] <BUGabundo> asac: back
[20:57] <BUGabundo> no bug... at least not from memory
[20:57] <micahg> fta told me I should add -j4 to pbuilder
[20:57] <BUGabundo> PPA fixed it for me
[20:57] <asac> micahg: why does it take so long=? because setting up pbuilder tgz takes ages?
[20:58] <asac> micahg: well. 3 hours is rewally long. i mean on my quite old system xulrunner building takes about 20-25 minutes
[20:58] <asac> without -jX
[20:58] <asac> so just on a single core
[20:58] <micahg> wow
[20:58] <micahg> I have a P3 1Ghz dual core
[20:58] <micahg> wasn't tasking my system
[20:58] <micahg> but took forever
[20:58] <asac> micahg: oh. ok. P3 ... thats old
[20:58] <micahg> :) IBM x330
[20:58] <asac> micahg: i am not sure you want to use -j4 on that one ;)
[20:58] <av`> asac, up for sponsoring me a merge?
[20:59] <asac> i mean ... if you have like 1g of mem thats bad ;)
[20:59] <micahg> asac: I have 1.5G
[20:59] <mac_v> yeah asac's back \o/
[20:59] <asac> thats not good enough for -j4 either ;)
[20:59] <micahg> anyways, wwe got the PPAs back, so I won't need it as much
[20:59] <micahg> or rather the builders
[20:59] <asac> micahg: i mean .. .linking libxul.so takes about 1.5G ;)
[20:59] <asac> micahg: right. PPAs are better ... though builders are currently scares resource as it seems
[21:00] <asac> mac_v: hi ... dont be too happy. i will just drop out later today till monday ;)
[21:00] <asac> (or sunday ... not so sure yet :))
[21:00] <BUGabundo> dinner
[21:00] <BUGabundo> bbl later
[21:00] <asac> holy vacation ;)
[21:00] <micahg> we got the builders back: https://edge.launchpad.net/builders
[21:00] <mac_v> hehe ;)
[21:00] <asac> av`: what sponsoring?
[21:00] <av`> asac, zenity for desktop-team (main)
[21:00] <asac> micahg: grewat. so QA team has finished whatever thy did with them ;)
[21:00] <asac> those are QA team machines afaik... that only help out on ppa
[21:01] <mac_v> asac: just wanted to know if this Bug #386900 , was ever fixed... andrew marked it as fixed an now its not working... is it a regression or .. was it wrongly marked as fix released in th emiddle
[21:01] <asac> av`: i would prefer to ask someone from desktop team to do that ;) ... want me to prod someone ?
[21:02] <asac> mac_v: i havent fixed it. not sure why it was ever marked as fixed
[21:02] <mac_v> asac: yeah , my thoughts.. too... thanks :)
[21:02] <asac> mac_v: it was a papercut we never got toi
[21:02] <av`> asac, no, don't need to, it's a package I update in Debian too and there is a bug open and ubuntu-main-sponsors are already subscribed
[21:02] <asac> ok
[21:03] <asac> av`: if noone gets to it let me know i will do that on sunday then ;) (or if i check back before that, then)
[21:03] <av`> so will be done somewhen, just wanted to ask you if you were free :)
[21:03] <asac> i am free for chat ;)
[21:03] <asac> aka nice converstaions with mozillateam ;)
[21:03] <av`> ok, great, it's a really small merge, e.g one less B-D, watch file changed to look at unstable versions too
[21:04] <micahg> asac: should I note the bmo issue in the changelog for tb3?
[21:04] <av`> so nothing too hard, I gonna commit part of the delta to the Debian's SVN later
[21:04] <av`> ok, great, it's a really small merge, e.g one less B-D, watch file changed to look at unstable versions too :)
[21:04] <mac_v> asac: when we were checking what bugs were actually fixed in the papercuts , we found this was not ... thanks for confirming :)
[21:04] <av`> damn keyboard
[21:04] <asac> av`: ok. at best we would get to "sync" state again. is there a reason why ubuntu has a diff?
[21:05] <asac> mac_v: thx. add it for this cycle again. we definitly should fix it for LTS
[21:05] <asac> please not in round-1 ;)
[21:05] <av`> asac, the delta is just a less B-D and a watch file change, after this merge we can sync
[21:05] <mac_v> asac: lol , sure :)
[21:05] <asac> av`: why not directly sync then?
[21:05] <av`> asac, cause debian don't look at unstable versions
[21:05] <av`> and cause debian still has that B-D
[21:06] <micahg> asac: upstream broke lpia in xul193: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35181733/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-lpia.xulrunner-1.9.3_1.9.3~a1~hg20091105r34606%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[21:06] <asac> av`: right. so fix the B-D in debian and then sync ... the unstable watch file is not worse keeping a diff imo
[21:07] <asac> micahg: hmm. did you retry the build?
[21:07] <asac> oh wait. only me and fta can retry i guess
[21:07] <micahg> itt's been that way for days
[21:07] <asac> hmm
[21:07] <asac> ok
[21:07] <av`> asac, exactly, I gonna commit part of the delta but it won't be uploaded just for that, so we have to wait before syncing anyway :)
[21:07] <asac> ok
[21:08] <asac> micahg: do you have a netbook ;)?
[21:08] <micahg> nope
[21:08] <av`> but for sure it will be the last merge of zenity :)
[21:08] <asac> ok
[21:08] <av`> asac, I'm on a netbook
[21:08] <asac> av`: with lpia kernel?
[21:08] <asac> i guess you run i386?
[21:09] <av`> nope, I run i386
[21:09] <av`> yes
[21:09] <asac> micahg: do we know when this started? feels like its a change to tracemonkey triggering this
[21:09] <micahg> I can check
[21:10] <micahg> I"m testing TB3 now in my ppa without the patch
[21:10] <asac> kk
[21:10] <micahg> about 2 hours
[21:13] <micahg> asac: started on 31/10/2009
[21:13] <asac> huh?
[21:13] <micahg> lpia FTBFS
[21:13] <asac> av`: where is the bug id?
[21:14] <av`> asac, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474072
[21:15] <asac> av`: did you use "bzr" for that ;) ... just wondering because MoM seems to be down (found a mail from james_w)
[21:15] <asac> av`: debian .dsc plz
[21:15] <av`> asac, yeah, I just saw the bzr merge thing, it rocks! anyway I did that merge manually
[21:15] <av`> yes, just a second
[21:15] <asac> sure
[21:16] <asac> gimme .dsc ;)
[21:16] <av`> asac, http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zenity/zenity_2.28.0-1.dsc
[21:16] <asac> av`: why the diff on the Uploaders?
[21:16] <asac> just prepatch from debian svn?
[21:17] <asac> i assume you tested it?
[21:17] <av`> asac, it's autogenerated
[21:17] <av`> I'm a GNOME Debian member
[21:17] <av`> so I'm into gnome-pkg-tools
[21:17] <av`> that auto-generate the control file
[21:17] <micahg> I found a cool pull-debian-source tool in ubuntu-dev-tools
[21:17]  * asac runs debuild -S -sa -kasac@deb -v2.28.0-0ubuntu2
[21:18] <av`> check debian/control.in you'll see Uploaders: @GNOME_TEAM@
[21:18] <asac> kk
[21:18] <asac> pushed
[21:18] <av`> you rock thanks :)
[21:19] <asac> micahg: thx ;) ... i always thought there must be something for that :)
[21:19] <av`> asac, you didnt do an upload for me since ages, I feel happy now :)
[21:19] <micahg> I think it's pulling from unstable still
[21:19] <asac> av`: at least one count on my sponsoring list ;)
[21:19] <av`> lol
[21:19] <asac> haha
[21:19] <asac> welcome
[21:19]  * asac happy too
[21:19] <av`> :)
[21:20] <micahg> oops TB borked
[21:20] <asac> av`: my first upload to lucid ;)
[21:21] <av`> asac, yes! I hope you gonna remember it since it is your first upload into lucid!!! :)
[21:21] <asac> i will
[21:22] <av`> asac, I hope you gonna take a good word for me to seb when there won't be ubuntu-dev / ubuntu-core-dev anymore, e.g for joining desktop seed
[21:22] <av`> since I gonna focus on general uploads plus GNOME
[21:22] <av`> and mozilla stuff of course
[21:23] <asac> not during vacation ... but atm i feel positive on that
[21:23] <av`> not now, it will happen around genuary, so no hurry!!
[21:23] <asac> i try to avoid -desktop channel ;) ... otherwise rick will hunt me for working etc.
[21:23] <micahg> asac: apparently, there's no changelog history for TB3 in bzr. so do I need to add a changelog entry or just a bzr entry for the patch drop
[21:24] <asac> micahg: i think so far we didnt put anything in changelog ... so just drop with proper comment in bzr
[21:24] <av`> asac, desktop seed will be open in around 3-4 months, so you have time :)
[21:24] <micahg> ok
[21:24] <asac> maybe i will gen a gigantic changelog from bzr on first upload to archive
[21:24] <av`> it's not needed now
[21:24] <asac> not so sure yet
[21:24] <asac> av`: thx for the update on that. seems i have enough time to check out mozilla seed et al during UDS
[21:25] <micahg> well, I think we should generate it based on a diff of the debian dir between TB2 and TB3
[21:25] <av`> asac, yeah, please ask to have a mozilla seed, if not everyone will be able to upload extension's stuff
[21:25] <asac> micahg: i think we started a fresh branch when we forked it
[21:25] <asac> micahg: so its probably the whole bzr changelog
[21:25] <micahg> yeah, it seems that way
[21:26] <asac> dont ask me why we have a fresh brnach ;)
[21:26] <micahg> well this patch that I'm dropping was only added for TB3 AFAIK
[21:26] <asac> but we should add all tb2 changelog
[21:26] <asac> for sure
[21:26] <micahg> so tehre's no reason for it to be in the changelog
[21:26] <asac> right. but thats difficult to filter out manually
[21:26] <micahg> oh, can I set up the series in the tb project?
[21:27] <asac> will be back in 5 minutes ... hold still ;)
[21:32] <asac> micahg: we can setup series for tb projects ... prob is that we kind of misuse them in ffox
[21:32] <asac> usually the series should point to upstream branch not packaging branch
[21:32] <asac> how does it help?
[21:32] <micahg> bzr branch lp:thunderbird/series :)
[21:32] <asac> right
[21:33] <asac> is there a way to create "sub-seriesssed"?
[21:33] <asac> serieses
[21:33] <micahg> I was going to make 2.0, 3.0, and 3.1 with focus on 3.0
[21:33] <asac> like thunderbird/3.0/ubuntu-packing
[21:33] <asac> micahg: focus should always be trunk imo
[21:33] <asac> e.g. we should have a matching series for upstream branches
[21:34] <micahg> ok
[21:34] <asac> and only create versioned seriessses for things that go a branch != trunkJ/central
[21:34] <micahg> so focus on 3.1
[21:34] <micahg> or should I call the series trunk
[21:34] <asac> let me check
[21:34] <asac> ok since we use versions for firefox we probably should do the same for tbird
[21:35] <micahg> ok
[21:35] <micahg> so, focus on 3.1
[21:35] <asac> if that is what comes out of a plain build of comm-central clone then yes
[21:37] <asac> ok ... /me does some cooking too now ...
[21:37] <asac> ~30min
[22:12] <asac> back (for a bit)
[22:15] <micahg> ok, TB looks like it'll finish now, I'll update the branch in a little bit
[22:15] <asac> cool. go ahead
[22:16] <micahg> dropping 2 patches
[22:16] <asac> every patch gone is a clear win ;)
[22:44] <asac> micahg: someone updated stanfoird-pwdhash without updating branch ;) ... wanna hunt him down :)
[22:45] <asac> hmm
[22:45] <asac> ok
[22:45] <asac> micahg: someone updated stanfoird-pwdhash without updating branch ;) ... wanna hunt him down :)
[22:45] <asac> hmm ... doesnt look like it ended up in ubuntu
[22:45] <asac> maybe debian?
[22:46] <BUGabundo> asac: a few users being hit with DPI bugs on FF on clean installs?
[22:46] <asac> havent heard of it
[22:46] <asac> !whois quadrispro
[22:46] <BUGabundo> 4 reports on LoCo ML
[22:46] <BUGabundo> and a bug on LP
[22:46] <BUGabundo> to firefox 3.0
[22:46] <BUGabundo> DIUH
[22:46] <av`> asac, I know him
[22:47] <av`> asac, it's from the italian team
[22:47] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/220568
[22:47] <asac> 23:30 [freenode] [quadrispro(n=alessio@ubuntu/member/quadrispro)] hi, please apologize me, I've uploaded stanford-pwdhash just a moment  before reading this -> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/stanford-pwdhash.ubuntu :(
[22:47] <asac> 23:31 [freenode] [quadrispro(n=alessio@ubuntu/member/quadrispro)] going away, but again: I'm sorry
[22:47] <BUGabundo> asac: ^^^^
[22:47] <asac> av`: can you check with him?
[22:47] <asac> i said: "please replay and submit a merge request
[22:47] <asac> "
[22:47] <asac> but he was gone
[22:47] <asac> but now i dont even see any upload for that package
[22:47] <av`> why he uploaded that?
[22:47] <asac> seems he failed to spot that its done in extension team
[22:47] <asac> but not sure where it is
[22:47] <BUGabundo> man, so many 3G modems probs :(
[22:48] <BUGabundo> I told the release guys :(
[22:48] <asac> av`: yeah so its uploaded
[22:48] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stanford-pwdhash/+publishinghistory
[22:48] <asac> what a mess
[22:48] <asac> av`: tell him to do a 1.7+real-0ubuntu1
[22:48] <asac> using branches so we can produce it uses get-orig-source etc.
[22:49] <asac> av`: let me send him a mail and CC you
[22:49] <asac> av@ubuntu.com?
[22:49] <jcastro> hey asac
[22:49] <av`> yes
[22:49] <jcastro> are you back from holiday?
[22:49] <av`> asac, damn it, we had to update m-d stuff there : /
[22:49] <BUGabundo> jcastro: lol
[22:53] <asac> av`: av@ubuntu.com ?
[22:53] <asac> jcastro: no ... please don't tell my boss :-P
[22:53] <asac> monday
[22:53] <jcastro> asac, I swear to god I will
[22:53] <jcastro> :)
[22:53] <av`> asac, yes, or andrea.veri89@gmail.com
[22:53] <asac> ok sent
[22:53] <asac> thanks
[22:55] <av`> np, gonna slap him tomorrow
[22:55] <av`> ehehe
[22:56] <asac> be nice ;)
[22:56] <asac> its a clear win if he understands how to use the branches in future
[22:56] <asac> he seems to like stanford-pwdjhash ;)
[22:56] <asac> maybe also tell him to fix the mozilla-devscripts part :-P
[22:56] <asac> whzile he is at it ...
[22:56] <asac> of course not mandatory ;)
[22:59] <asac> micahg: anything else you need from me before i drop out again?
[22:59] <asac> same for anyone else ;) of course
[23:01] <micahg> asac: I don't think so, there's one file I have to remove form the TB.install file (license.html), but I think I shoul dbe ok
[23:01] <micahg> asac: when will you return?
[23:01] <av`> lol, I will, finishing an SRU now
[23:01] <asac> sunday?
[23:01] <micahg> ok
[23:01] <asac> is that ok?
[23:01] <asac> good
[23:01] <micahg> of course :)
[23:01] <asac> i might be here tomorrow during day
[23:02] <asac> but then a friend comes and i wont be back till sunday afternoon
[23:02] <micahg> I just know not to ping you if I need something
[23:02] <asac> hmm
[23:02] <asac> i will set my irc client to away
[23:02] <asac> i think i will see all pings when back then
[23:02] <micahg> ok
[23:02]  * asac didnt do that the last few days
[23:02] <asac> so ... now away ;)
[23:02] <micahg> ok, have fun
[23:03] <asac> so at least your pings are not lost
[23:03] <asac> thx
[23:03] <asac> byebye and greetz to fta if he comes back ;)
[23:03] <micahg> ok