[00:01] <kizzo> wgrant: Cool, thanks.
[00:21] <racecar56> how can i unsubscribe from all bugs with a few clicks
[00:21] <racecar56> or just make it where it doesn't send me emails or something
[00:22] <wgrant> That is what we call patience.
[00:45] <lfaraone> wgrant: thanks.
[00:45] <lfaraone> wgrant: is there a bug about that? :)
[00:46] <wgrant> lfaraone: Probably, but I don't know the number.
[04:06] <ub3rst4r> does anyone know how to report a project?
[04:07] <micahg> ub3rst4r: what do you mean report a project?
[04:08] <ub3rst4r> i found a project thats registered and its just registered to point people to a website to download a product
[04:09] <ub3rst4r> https://launchpad.net/winsystemcleaner
[04:10] <ub3rst4r> i dont think thats following the rules of the apache license
[04:12] <ub3rst4r> and english isnt a programming language...
[04:35] <spm> bleh. s/he's gone. oh well: ub3rst4r, thanks; have disabled and noted on the whiteboard for that project that it
[04:35] <spm> s just a placeholder.
[05:03] <micahg> sorry spm, got distracted :)
[05:03] <spm> heh. no worries.
[07:18] <mwhudson> how can i see the changelog entries for other than the most recent upload of a package in the ppa?
[07:18] <mwhudson> i guess i can read the changelog in the .diff.gz...
[07:19] <wgrant> mwhudson: You could alternatively search for superseded packages as well.
[07:20] <mwhudson> wgrant: ah yes
[09:16] <cristim> hello, would it be possible to have the opportunity to rename packages when copying them from another person's PPA into one's, for another ubuntu version
[09:16] <bigjools> cristim: no, that will never be possible
[09:16] <cristim> like from jaunty3 to karmic1?
[09:16] <cristim> and what's the proper way to do it?
[09:17] <bigjools> that sounds like a version, not a name?
[09:17] <cristim> yes
[09:17] <bigjools> you don't need to change the version
[09:17] <bigjools> in fact you should not, because it would be confusing to have the same source with different versions
[09:18] <cristim> isn't weird that you have a karmic package named foo-1.0-jaunty3?
[09:18] <bigjools> that's how Ubuntu works too, it just means the package was promoted from a lower series
[09:18] <cristim> ok, so there's no problem
[09:19] <bigjools> yep :)
[09:19] <cristim> sorry for asking dumb questions, today I started packaging for ubuntu and I had no debian packaging experience
[09:20] <cristim> the procedure is a lot more complex than what I was used to when making gentoo ebuilds for my overlay
[09:29] <cristim> and is it ok co copy packages from another person's PPA, where thay fail to build?
[09:30] <cristim> so that I can fix them and their deps in my PPA
[09:30] <bigjools> the best thing to do in that case is to download their source package, then fix it
[09:30] <bigjools> otherwise you'll just be re-building a failing package
[09:30] <bigjools> if you want packaging tips, a good place to go is #ubuntu-motu
[09:31] <cristim> the source may not be broken, but it may miss a dependency that I compiled in my PPA
[09:31] <cristim> thanks!
[09:31] <bigjools> ah in that case copy it
[09:31] <bigjools> you're welcome
[09:32] <cristim> I'm moving to -motu
[09:45] <glen> how do i enable cvs/svn like keywords ($Id:$ $Date:$) expansion in launcpad, is it possible afterall?
[10:09] <pkern> Are pings to Launchpad supposed to work?
[10:12] <wgrant> pkern: They work for me.
[10:15] <pkern> Yay connectivity restored.
[10:15] <pkern> wgrant: Well they ended at telia for me.
[10:31] <GaryvdM> Hi - I just want to confirm, If I have a branch that has other branches stacked on it, can I safely rename it.
[10:31] <GaryvdM> i.e. will the other branches be pointed to the new name?
[10:43] <moradan> hello, for some days a po file is in the state "needs review" - when can I expect it?
[10:44] <moradan> project is "rugretl"
[11:45] <GaryvdM> moradan - I'm a translations noob, but I just thought I could have a go at you question. Where do you see that status. I see nothing here: https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/rugretl
[11:46] <GaryvdM> *your
[13:25] <maxb> If there's an admin around with a spare moment, perhaps they could hit the 'approve mailing list' for https://edge.launchpad.net/~svn -- thanks! :-)
[13:27] <dholbach> hello
[13:30] <dholbach> does anybody know what I'm doing wrong if   launchpad.people["ubuntu-cl"]   gives me https://api.edge.launchpad.net/beta/~ubuntu-cl (as lazr.restfulclient.resource.Entry) and  team.owner  gives me  AttributeError: 'Entry' object has no attribute 'owner' ?
[13:33] <maxb> dholbach: launchpad.people['ubuntu-cl'].team_owner
[13:33] <dholbach> argh
[13:34] <dholbach> thanks a lot maxb
[13:34] <goundy> hey
[13:34] <goundy> what's that code ?
[13:34] <dholbach> I got confused with the naming of keys in my own database
[13:34] <dholbach> thanks maxb
[13:34] <dholbach> goundy: https://launchpad.net/loco-directory
[13:34] <goundy> thanks :)
[13:41] <maxb> Ursinha: Are you someone who can authorise mailing list requests?
[13:41] <Ursinha> maxb, yes sir
[13:42] <maxb> team ~svn would like one, if you don't mind. It's a group of people collaborating on a PPA, which I think qualifies it as more 'Launchpad' than 'Ubuntu'
[13:50] <Ursinha> maxb, I see the requested ml
[13:50] <Ursinha> maxb, it's approved
[14:34] <maxb> "Policy:  You must be a team member to subscribe to the team mailing list. " --- is this configurable? Or is it just boilerplate displayed confusingly near to the configuration options?
[14:51] <Goundy> guys
[14:51] <Goundy> Is it possible to change the launchpad layout ?
[14:51] <Goundy> for my project
[14:51] <Goundy> Actually I don't want to set a custom one, I just want to get back the old launchpad template
[14:51] <Goundy> it's much more good looking than the current one
[15:33] <Goundy> Is it possible to change the launchpad layout ?
[15:34] <Goundy> Actually I don't want to set a custom one, I just want to get back the old launchpad template for my project
[16:46]  * apw wonders if launchpad just went poof
[16:46] <apw> both edge and main server seem absent
[16:50] <Ursinha> hi apw, what's going on?
[16:51] <apw> i think both edge and main launchpad servers are hanging on me
[16:51] <Ursinha> apw, what are you trying to do? seems to be working here
[16:52] <apw> load any bugs at all
[16:52] <Ursinha> apw, do you have an url, please? :)
[16:52] <apw> perhaps its just edge now ...
[16:53] <apw> it was caliming to be waiting on just launchpad.net, but they are all now waiting on edge
[16:53] <apw> seems to be back now, ignore me
[16:54] <Ursinha> :)
[16:55] <Ursinha> no problem apw, thanks for reporting it
[16:55] <Ursinha> apw, please, come back if you hit this issue again
[16:55] <Ursinha> thanks
[16:55] <Ursinha> :)
[16:55] <apw> you can be sure if it :)
[18:32] <edsu> is it possible to remove a lp repo?
[18:33] <beuno> edsu, sure, just delete the branch
[18:37] <edsu> is it not possible to make https://code.launchpad.net/pymarc 404 ?
[18:38] <beuno> edsu, I don't think so
[18:38] <beuno> you would need to delete the whole project
[18:38] <beuno> what's the problem?
[18:38] <edsu> is it not possible to delete the whole project then?
[18:39] <beuno> edsu, do you own it?
[18:39] <beuno> if you do, ask a question in Launchpad, and a sysadmin will look at it
[18:40] <edsu> i do own it yes
[20:15] <glen> ok, so now my items are in failed state. what should i do next? try uploading once again? https://translations.launchpad.net/eventum/trunk/+imports
[20:16] <glen> i got hit by this bug they said: https://launchpad.net/bugs/464161
[20:16] <glen> danilos: you're around?
[21:03] <webm0nk3y> is bazaar.launchpad.com having problems?
[21:20] <thumper> webm0nk3y: I'm chasing some issues
[21:39] <bialix> hello, I have problem with codehosting
[21:40] <bialix> yesterday I've upgraded trunk branch of qbzr project to 2a format and pushed it to LP
[21:40] <bialix> now it available as lp:qbzr
[21:40] <bialix> couple of pushes was OK, now the branch is "stuck"
[21:41] <rockstar> bialix, hi
[21:41] <bialix> I'm still can push, but page on LP permanently said that branch is updated
[21:41] <bialix> and no email with notifications arrive
[21:41] <bialix> hi rockstar
[21:41] <rockstar> thumper, ^^
[21:42] <bialix> it's more than 7hours nopw
[21:42] <bialix> it's more than 7hours now
[21:42] <bialix> does it related to 2a format?
[21:42] <bialix> I hope our upgarde to 2a was not mistake
[21:42] <thumper> I'm chasing an issue about our server processes not running
[21:42] <thumper> which includes email sending
[21:42] <bialix> oops
[21:43] <thumper> bialix: I don't think it is related to your change :)
[21:43] <bialix> OK, that's good
[21:43] <bialix> thumper: email notification can wait, I'm mostly interesting that access by http will work too
[21:44] <bialix> so if you say that problem is known, then I won't bother you today anymore
[21:44] <thumper> bialix: check loggerhead
[21:44] <bialix> thanks
[21:45] <thumper> bialix: or bzr revno http://...
[21:45] <bialix> loggerhead page is uptodate
[21:47] <bialix> can I help with other info?
[21:47] <bialix> thumper: http is fine.
[21:47] <thumper> bialix: cool
[21:48] <thumper> bialix: it just looks like the crons for all the branch jobs were stopped
[21:48] <thumper> and I'm trying to find out why
[21:48] <thumper> I don't have access to those machiens
[21:48] <bialix> ah, understand
[21:48] <bialix> so I assume nothing terrible serious
[22:53] <bt> hi, im subscribed to a duplicate bug on in ubuntu on lp, however i don't have permission to view the parent bug. is this normal?
[22:58] <micahg> bt: possibly, you can check in #ubuntu-bugs to see if someone can make it public
[22:58] <bt> it was an apport reported bug, i'm not too interested in it, just wondered why i couldn't see
[22:59] <bt> thanks :)
[23:00] <wgrant> bt: The bug probably contains a core dump, which could contain sensitive info.
[23:00] <bt> ah wicked
[23:00] <bt> i'll leave them to it