[00:01] <hggdh> _Narc_: and what are your usual times on IRC (i.e., here)?
[00:05] <_Narc_> hggdh: I'm usually around all day, but more active from noon to 7 pm and back later at night like now.
[00:06] <mrand> _Narc_:  timezones matter on IRC :-)
[00:08] <_Narc_> mrand: yes :) They tend to matter in my daily life too because it's almost like I live in another country than mine. Intellectually I mean.
[00:17] <hggdh> _Narc_: thank you. I will check tomorrow with a possible mentor, and will let you know
[00:17] <hggdh> meanwhile, please keep on asking us questions
[00:18] <_Narc_> hggdh: Ok, no problem. Thank you very much. I certainly will.
[00:23] <nigel_nb> when a bug's problem is upstream, what is the procedure we follow?
[00:23] <nigel_nb> just ask the user to file a bug upstream?
[00:28] <hggdh> nigel_nb: we usually do it
[00:28] <nigel_nb> hggdh: so the sensible thing for me to do is take the info the user has filed and file a bug upstream?
[00:28] <nigel_nb> bug 248839
[00:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 248839 in nautilus "List of network servers is not updated" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/248839
[00:30] <hggdh> nigel_nb: yes
[00:31] <hggdh> if you can confirm on current Karmic level, even better
[00:31] <nigel_nb> oops I gave the wrong bug
[00:31] <nigel_nb> its 368611
[00:31] <nigel_nb> bug 368611
[00:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 368611 in nautilus "by pushing a key/entering a string, nautilus does not focus the fitting folder/file" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/368611
[00:35] <hggdh> nigel_nb: can you reproduce it?
[00:36] <hggdh> I cannot, so worksForMe (Karmic)
[00:39] <nigel_nb_> sorry
[00:39] <nigel_nb_> got disconnected
[00:40] <nigel_nb> hggdh: i just realized that i cannot reproduce
[00:40] <nigel_nb> i'm getting a jaunty vm set up
[00:40]  * tonyyarusso giggles
[00:40] <tonyyarusso> Oh, you mean the *bug*!
[00:40] <tonyyarusso> :P
[00:43] <nigel_nb> tonyyarusso: hehe
[01:17] <hggdh> tonyyarusso: there is, actually, a xkcd talking about it: http://xkcd.com/583/
[01:17] <tonyyarusso> hggdh: well done.
[01:29] <nigel_nb> can someone mark bug 72843 as triaged for me?
[01:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 72843 in nautilus "No notification about failed mount of usb drive" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/72843
[01:30] <nigel_nb> hggdh: the xkcd rocks
[01:31] <hggdh> nigel_nb: indeed -- and bug marked triaged. Good work there
[01:31] <nigel_nb> :)
[01:31] <erichammond> Looking for advice: Would it be acceptable to mark bug 296610 as "High" since there now appears to be a working patch for this horrible user experience on common Dell hardware?
[01:31] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 296610 in linux "ALPS DualPoint Touchpad flaky performance" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/296610
[01:31] <hggdh> looking
[01:38] <hggdh> erichammond: I agree it can be set as high, not because there is a workaround, but because it seems to affect a nice chunk of users
[01:39] <erichammond> hggdh: Thanks.  I've been trying to be objective even though it has been driving me crazy :-/
[01:40] <hggdh> erichammond: I understand...
[06:06] <micahg> nigel_nb: are you still around
[06:23] <cdinz> the Ubuntu karmic-updates has an expected date of april 24, 2011.. Is that the right date? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/karmic-updates
[06:25] <nigel_nb> micahg: yes
[06:25] <micahg> nigel_nb: hi, how much longer will you be up
[06:25]  * micahg is making dinner
[06:26] <nigel_nb> 1 hour more
[06:26] <micahg> cdinz: yes, that is the final day for anything in karmic-updates as it will be EOL then
[06:26] <micahg> nigel_nb: ok, did anyone show you how to use hugday tools yet?
[06:27]  * micahg will be back in a few minutes
[06:27] <nigel_nb> no... i figured it out ;)
[06:27] <cdinz> micahg: so say there is this bug #446146 and the fix has been committed... Wen does it get released to the general public?
[06:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 446146 in linux "Several Huawei USB dongle don't work with kernel 2.6.31-12.40 (2.6.31.1 update related)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/446146
[06:32] <astechgeek> hi maco
[06:33] <astechgeek> im observing just got home from my hack attack/defend class
[06:34] <maco> hi
[06:34] <maco> thats a freakin weird coincidence. i just got home from hanging out with 2 scary hackers
[06:36] <nigel_nb> there is this bug 368611, I cant reproduce it on jaunty or karmic
[06:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 368611 in nautilus "by pushing a key/entering a string, nautilus does not focus the fitting folder/file" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/368611
[06:36] <nigel_nb> is there anything I should do in that case?
[06:37] <micahg> cdinz: as soon as it's ready
[06:37] <micahg> cdinz: more correctly most likely after going through -proposed
[06:38] <micahg> nigel_nb: can you confirm?
[06:39] <nigel_nb> micahg: I just set up jaunty on my vm
[06:39] <nigel_nb> tried to reproduce the bug, but can't
[06:39] <nigel_nb> its working as expected
[06:39] <micahg> nigel_nb: you can try to confirm in karmic anyways
[06:40] <cdinz> michahg: thanks...
[06:40] <nigel_nb> I tried both jaunty and karmic... no bug
[06:40] <micahg> ok
[06:41] <micahg> nigel_nb: well,  is there a newer version of nautilus in jaunty since 2009-08-25?
[06:41] <nigel_nb> micahg: I installed from the CD and did not update it
[06:42] <micahg> oh
[06:42] <nigel_nb> micahg: so it should be the default version
[06:42] <micahg> nigel_nb: default versions can have bugs :)
[06:42] <micahg> or lack thereof
[06:42] <nigel_nb> oh
[06:42] <micahg> maybe it was a regression idk
[06:42] <nigel_nb> so what do I do here?
[06:43] <micahg> well, I'd check here to see if there was a different version from time reported to time updated to now: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus
[06:44] <micahg> nigel_nb: there was one update before the bug was reported
[06:44] <nigel_nb> yes 2009-05-06
[06:44] <micahg> that was the only change the whole release
[06:45] <micahg> ??, I only see 2009-04-20
[06:46] <nigel_nb> 2009-04-14 was main release...
[06:49] <nigel_nb> micahg: anyway, so you want me to confirm the bug is not there in the new one too?
[06:50] <micahg> yes :), also, the reporter seems to have a modified version
[06:51] <nigel_nb> is there a way to only install updates for one package?
[06:51] <micahg> sure, in aptitude
[06:51] <micahg> or synaptic
[06:52] <micahg> just navigate to the package and mark only it for updates
[06:52] <nigel_nb> but it might go to the very latest version
[06:52] <micahg> nigel_nb: there was only one update in jaunty
[06:53] <nigel_nb> okay..lemme boot my vm
[06:53] <micahg> nigel_nb: actually, if it doesn't exist in karmic...
[06:54] <nigel_nb> micahg: it can be invalid?
[06:54] <micahg> maybe you don't have to try
[06:54] <micahg> it's definitely not something SRUable
[06:55] <micahg> you can ask the user if they've upgraded to karmic
[06:58] <micahg> nigel_nb: have you seen this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Old%20untouched%20bugs
[06:58] <nigel_nb> ah, will do that
[07:00] <nigel_nb> micahg: updated, still can't reproduce :)
[07:00] <micahg> yeah, that response I gave you is probably best, you can also note the tests you tried
[07:01] <nigel_nb> okay
[07:07]  * nigel_nb is going to have lunch, brb
[07:44] <nigel_nb> micahg: I'm calling it a day
[07:45] <nigel_nb> catch you 2morrow
[08:18] <micahg> are the apport restart rules the same as karmic?
[08:19] <micahg> eakron: ping
[08:31] <^_Pepe_^> .
[09:30] <eakron> micahg: pong!
[13:11] <m4rtin> hi, I've found a bug in the bash completion script for ssh/scp. Can someone please help me find which package should I report the bug under? I also have written a fix...
[13:13] <m4rtin> I'm going with "bash-completion"
[13:14] <ripps> Is anybody working on #432252? It has around 20 dupes, but the original is marked as private, so I can't tell if any work has been done on it
[15:16] <hggdh> bug 432252
[15:16] <ubot4> hggdh: Bug 432252 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/432252 is private
[15:18] <hggdh> it is now public
[15:31] <bddebian> Boo
[15:38] <nigel_nb> hggdh: would daniel be available now?
[15:41] <hggdh> nigel_nb: which Daniel?
[15:42] <nigel_nb> daniel chen
[15:43] <hggdh> nigel_nb: his nick is the letters d t c h e n all together. He is logged in with the nick ending in a _
[15:44] <nigel_nb> hggdh: I know, but I dont want to bug him if he's not available
[15:46] <nigel_nb> dtchen_: this is about bug 477154
[15:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 477154 in alsa-driver "When headphones are plugged in, the speaker does not get muted automatically." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/477154
[15:46] <hggdh> nigel_nb: only waty to find is by pinging him. Please state whatr it is about on the ping
[15:46] <nigel_nb> we tried going to runlevel S/1, but it still doest work
[15:47] <nigel_nb> hggdh: I just realized tht now, pinged him
[15:52] <hggdh> I will be out for some hours -- today is Dallas Museum of Arts day :-)
[15:52] <nigel_nb> hggdh: have fun
[16:05] <qense> happy bug day everyone!
[16:42] <dacone> hi there
[16:42] <dacone> who can i search for a bug that i _think_ i just found?
[16:42] <dacone> how
[16:57] <astechgeek> well i signed up for a mentor in the bug squad... 8-)
[17:16] <micahg> should the  how to enable apport page show before karmic and karmic enabling steps?
[17:23] <qense> micahg: you want to ask if it should provide explanations for all supported Ubuntu releases? I don't know if there's an official policy for that, but doing it does make sense to me.
[17:56] <WeatherGod> is there some way to remove replies made by someone in a bug report?
[17:57] <WeatherGod> I have a report where some random person decided to also do a apport-collect and I have no clue who they are
[17:57] <WeatherGod> just clutter
[18:02] <qense> WeatherGod: It is not possible for us, although I thought that LP administrators can remove comments, so they can get rid of spam.
[18:02] <fcuk112> how do i get a list of triaged bugs?
[18:04] <qense> fcuk112: you can use the advanced search, which can be found at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?advanced=1
[18:05] <fcuk112> cool thanks.
[18:05] <qense> yw
[18:05] <WeatherGod> qense, ok... I guess it isn't that important
[18:06] <qense> ok, well, we could use some better tools to manage the discussion anyway, removing comments, or at least hiding them, would be nice sometimes
[18:06] <micahg1> WeatherGod: unfortunately that's common
[18:06] <micahg1> people seem to think apport-collect is magical
[18:07] <micahg1> and will fix their problem
[18:07] <WeatherGod> it wouldn't be so bad if all the attachments were consolidated into one reply
[18:07] <WeatherGod> micahg, haha
[18:07] <WeatherGod> kinda like "me, too!" replies, right?
[18:07] <qense> apport-collects are more useful than metoos
[18:08] <micahg> yep
[18:08] <qense> only when used by the right persons, though
[18:08] <qense> otherwise they cause a lot of mess
[18:09] <WeatherGod> curious, does LP have some sort of mechanism to detect and block abuse of the apport tools?
[18:09] <qense> I'm not sure if they do, could imagine it, though. They already mark duplicates automatically, so they could be checking the reports for other things as well.
[18:10] <WeatherGod> but, yet, I don't see LP marking those web-submitted dupes when someone accidentially resubmits their bug
[18:11] <WeatherGod> unless I am just seeing it before LP gets around to it
[18:17] <qense> Apport only checks for it when retracing, or maybe even later.
[18:19] <WeatherGod> ah
[18:31] <jberry> I'm trying to triage my first bug. Do I somehow associate my name with the bug to let others know I am working on it?
[18:34] <qense> jberry: no, you just start with a reply thanking the reporter for posting the bug and than start the triaging with asking the questions you want to ask and explaining the actions you're taking
[18:35] <qense> Assigning is only used when someone is working on actually fixing the bug, or by some other teams that have a different workflow (i.e. different way of handling bugs and using the statusses, etc)
[18:36] <jberry> So it's kind of implied that if I thank the reporter, I am therefore in the middle of triaging this bug.  Right?
[18:37] <qense> yes, other people will see you've started a conversation and now you're the one caring about it
[18:38] <qense> they may still set a status or post a reply if they think it's necessary, but that's nothing to worry about. You don't own the bug, you're just the person who took the responsibility of triaging it.
[18:39] <jberry> thanks... much appreciated.
[18:39] <qense> you're welcome
[18:57]  * bcurtiswx_ waves to room
[18:57] <fcuk112> i am triaging a bug request from some 14y old kid who wants opera to appear in the software centre.  not sure what i should tell him?
[18:58] <WeatherGod> Italian or French opera?
[18:58] <fcuk112> lol
[18:58] <WeatherGod> sorry, couldn't resist
[18:59] <qense> fcuk112: I would kindly explain him the process of adding software to Ubuntu, the way software shows up in Ubuntu Software Centre and the process of requesting a package to be added to the archives.
[18:59] <WeatherGod> I guess you could tell him that Opera has to choose to make it available
[18:59] <WeatherGod> might be the easier option
[18:59] <bcurtiswx_> qense: USS has all packages from all repositories.. right?
[18:59] <qense> Although iirc there are some licence problems with it, that's why they aren't included in the repositories.
[19:00] <qense> bcurtiswx_: If I'm correctly it uses the same *-install-data packages gnome-app-install uses.
[19:01] <fcuk112> qense: erm, 1. i am not quite sure how s/w appears in the software centre and 2. he raised a bug request to package opera; isn't that the way stuff gets added to the archives?
[19:01] <bcurtiswx_> ok, thought so
[19:03] <qense> fcuk112: maybe marking the bug Invalid right away isn't the right option, just asking him to follow the process guidelines would be better. It's explained at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages
[19:03]  * bcurtiswx_ waves at micahg
[19:03]  * micahg waves back
[19:04] <fcuk112> qense: alrighty, thanks.
[19:05] <qense> fcuk112: although there is something to say for marking it as invalid since Opera can't be included because of licence issues anyway
[19:05] <qense> if I'm correct, at least
[19:06] <qense> I just read somewhere that an unedited version of Opera can be packaged legally
[19:06] <qense> i.e. no patches and other source code changes
[19:07] <bcurtiswx_> Opera is a browser right?
[19:07] <fcuk112> bcurtiswx_: yup.
[19:08] <WeatherGod> but not a real one, :-P
[19:08] <bcurtiswx_> what OS?
[19:08] <WeatherGod> any
[19:08] <fcuk112> i don't want to break his heart, he looks so sweet - http://my.opera.com/DanielHendrycks/about/
[19:08] <bcurtiswx_> was it built for one in specific originally tho?
[19:08] <qense> It uses QT
[19:08] <qense> I'm not sure if it was built for one OS only.
[19:09] <qense> Probably not considering the UI toolkit.
[19:09] <WeatherGod> it was originally a paid-for browser back in the days of netscape
[19:09] <bcurtiswx_> ah ok..
[19:09] <qense> It's still not a very open one.
[19:09] <qense> But you can get its source code.
[19:10] <WeatherGod> qense, really?
[19:10] <qense> I think so.
[19:11] <qense> The information about packaging I gave you earlier was from an ArchLinux forum about its removal from their repositories. That means they got the sourceode from some where.
[19:14] <WeatherGod> wikipedia lists it as closed source
[19:14] <qense> it has a lot of restrictions on its source code
[19:15] <WeatherGod> might as well call it closed then
[19:15] <bcurtiswx_> yeah, that IMO deems it invalid.. go ahead
[19:15] <bcurtiswx_> beat it down with a few sticks too since its not open souce
[19:15] <bcurtiswx_> source even
[19:15] <qense> I'm not really into the details, you'd have to find that out on your own.
[19:16] <bcurtiswx_> hows the bug day going for everyone?
[19:17] <qense> It's my most productive bugday so far. ;)
[19:17] <WeatherGod> sorry, the RMS in me just came out
[19:18] <bcurtiswx_> pedro V is kicking our butts tho... not saying thats a bad thing
[19:18] <WeatherGod> oh, it is bug day?  :-P
[19:20] <qense> yes!
[19:20] <qense> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091112 has all the lists
[19:20] <bcurtiswx_> since i'm at work im tackling the easier incompletes
[19:22] <WeatherGod> I have been cleaning up all my old bugs, which status should we focus on?
[19:22] <WeatherGod> the new or the incompletes?
[19:22] <bcurtiswx_> both
[19:23] <bcurtiswx_> none is more important than the other
[19:23] <qense> WeatherGod: read the descriptions for each table, they explain what actions are required for the bugs.
[19:24] <WeatherGod> I can do a bunch of the gnome ones, I got an account there
[19:25] <qense> Forwarding bugs upstream is a very good thing to do since it's the only way the developers will hear about them.
[19:25] <qense> We should strive to get at least that list all green.
[19:25] <atrus> ubuntu-bug gave me a URL when I used it on my remote system via ssh (good). however, the url results in: "We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience" repeatably. any other way to get this reported?
[19:26] <qense> atrus: What did the url look like?
[19:26] <atrus>   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+filebug/llEf3tp6kmaawfmkdGmK7l2irX1?
[19:27] <qense> atrus: it's not about the bug you wanted to report, but it is an error in Launchpad, the platform used to track the bugs.
[19:27] <atrus> yeah, i know. i'm just not sure what to do now.
[19:27] <qense> You probably have to rerun ubuntu-bug since the old report wasn't sent to the server properly.
[19:28] <atrus> yeah, i've tried that, and it just does the same thing again.
[19:28] <qense> really?
[19:28] <atrus> yep.
[19:28] <qense> That could be a bug!
[19:28] <atrus> i mean, i different url, but the same problem.
[19:28] <atrus> qense: yeah, i should really think about reporting it. ;)
[19:29] <WeatherGod> you know, ubuntu would look better if it didn't report any bugs... :-P
[19:29] <qense> Apparently the report at the server is damanged somehow, or cannot be accessed.
[19:29] <jberry> If I am unable to reproduce a problem, and I have just added a note indicating I need more information, do I change the status from 'new' to something else?
[19:30] <qense> jberry: In that case the bug report is still incomplete because it doesn't contain enough information to be processed and the status should therefore be Incomplete.
[19:30] <qense> jberry: Did you read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
[19:30] <qense> ?
[19:31] <qense> That pages explains all the statuses.
[19:31] <jberry> Time to review :-)    There are so many docs -- still trying to get a handle on the whole process.  thanks.
[19:32] <qense> yw, getting to know the documentation and its content takes some time, but you'll get it eventually
[19:36] <jberry> the problem I have seen in the "real" world is that there is always a lack of documentation -- this is really a pleasure.
[19:37] <qense> There is never enough documentation. Feel free to edit a page if you think they've forgotten something or written something wrong. But take care with large changes.
[19:42] <bcurtiswx_> who's using the bzr approach to hug day?
[19:45] <qense> What's that?
[19:46] <bcurtiswx_> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Tools
[19:49] <WeatherGod> once I finish with a bug (I linked it upstream), what do I do with it?
[19:49] <qense> I'm using hugday-tools as well, but I installed it with the ubuntu-qa-tools package.
[19:50] <qense> WeatherGod: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091112 explains what to do next
[19:50] <qense> you add your name to the column manually or use hugday-tools for it.
[19:50] <WeatherGod> ah, I was thinking it was automatic
[19:51] <fcuk112> what's the PATH/TO/MOZILLA/COOKIE for hugday?
[19:51] <qense> It depends on your Firefox profile.
[19:52] <fcuk112> none the wiser - how do i find out what it is?
[19:52] <qense> It's mostly /home/{username}/.mozilla/firefox/{profile_id}.default/cookies.sqlite
[19:52] <BUGabundo> howdy
[19:52] <BUGabundo> sick man entering the room
[19:52] <BUGabundo> hey look its qense :)
[19:52] <qense> hi BUGabundo!
[19:53] <qense> don't be sick on a hug day!
[19:53] <fcuk112> qense: awesome thanks.
[19:53] <qense> yw
[19:54]  * bcurtiswx_ waves at BUGabundo
[19:54] <BUGabundo> hey curtis
[19:56] <bcurtiswx_> WeatherGod still editing the bugday page>
[19:56] <bcurtiswx_> ?
[19:56] <WeatherGod> sorry, just finished...
[19:57] <WeatherGod> I think...
[19:57] <bcurtiswx_> why be sorry? just wondering so i can go ahead and edit
[19:57] <WeatherGod> didn't know it acted like cvs
[19:59] <WeatherGod> ok, go ahead
[19:59] <WeatherGod> I gotta get some of my "real" work done
[19:59] <WeatherGod> probably come back tonight for some more
[20:00] <bcurtiswx_> this is real work... its just volunteer
[20:00] <WeatherGod> yeah, well, the people who pay me want their stuff done, too
[20:01] <bcurtiswx_> yeah mine too... they'll be pretty dissappointed tomorrow...
[20:01] <bcurtiswx_> j/k
[20:03] <qense> We don't go by the table every day after a hug day to see if everyone was active enough. ;)
[20:07] <fcuk112> is it just me or is LP all messed up?
[20:07] <qense> what problems are you having?
[20:09] <bcurtiswx_> fcuk112: fine here.. whats going on?
[20:09] <fcuk112> http://bayimg.com/jaeFAaaCN
[20:10] <fcuk112> killed + restarted firefox several times.
[20:10] <fcuk112> maybe it's time for a reboot?
[20:11] <bcurtiswx_> turn off compiz?
[20:11] <qense> that really looks weird
[20:12] <qense> you could ask at #launchpad
[20:12] <bcurtiswx_> do other pages look fine?
[20:12] <fcuk112> yea other websites look ok
[20:12] <fcuk112> i'll try to reboot first... brb
[20:15] <bcurtiswx_> reboot before turning off compiz.... odd choice
[20:19] <fcuk112> hummm still the same, what's the LP channel?
[20:20] <fcuk112> is there a channel for launchpad?
[20:20] <Pici> #launchpad
[20:21] <fcuk112> thx.
[20:23] <jberry> the Status docs are not clear on this.. what if I am able to reproduce the bug on 8.10 but I see that it is already fixed (i.e., not reproducable) on 9.10. What should the status be changed to in that case?
[20:27] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Fixed%20in%20Development%20release%20while%20still%20existing%20in%20a%20previous%20release
[20:27] <micahg> modify text for karmic
[20:29] <fcuk112> ctrl-f5 to fix that problem. :)
[20:32] <BUGabundo> what's the reason for cups to have an higher version on karmic security then on lucid main?
[20:32] <BUGabundo> built faster?
[20:34] <micahg> BUGabundo: the lucid version FTBFS
[20:34] <BUGabundo> ah ok
[20:34] <micahg> should be 1.4.2-1
[20:34] <BUGabundo> tanks
[20:34] <BUGabundo> ^h
[20:34] <BUGabundo> but its not
[20:34] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups
[20:34] <BUGabundo> since I still have BOTH repos from the distupgrade
[20:34] <BUGabundo> I'm seeing it pull karmic version
[20:34] <qense> tzdata was newer in jaunty-updates than in karmic until today as well
[20:35] <qense> although it could have been published to karmic-proposed
[20:35] <qense> rather than karmic
[20:35] <qense> I remember having to force a downgrade for tzdata and tzdata-java on all systems I upgraded
[20:36] <qense> maybe this one slipped through as well, that was the point I wanted to make with this story ;)
[20:37] <qense> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/1.4.2-1 All architectures failed to build.
[20:39] <bcurtiswx_> anyone here falling in love with omgubuntu.co.uk
[20:39] <bcurtiswx_> <3 that site
[20:39] <BUGabundo> didn't even knew it
[20:41] <qense> I really like it, it's a good source of Ubuntu news
[20:43]  * bcurtiswx_ waves at seb128
[20:43] <seb128> hi bcurtiswx
[20:44] <BUGabundo> hey seb128
[20:45] <seb128> hi BUGabundo
[20:49] <qense> Well, I'm off for today. Good bye everyone!
[20:50] <fcuk112> laters qense.
[20:50] <bcurtiswx_> well, class time. adios
[22:45] <yoasif> micahg: heya
[23:55] <hggdh> ah, home sweet home