=== ursula is now known as Ursinha [09:46] I think the bazaar.launchpad.net web viewer is down [09:47] Internal Server Error [09:47] mdke_: Works for me after a few refreshes. [09:47] wgrant: ah, thanks. Yes four or five refreshes did the trick [10:48] hello [11:13] OOPS-1412C2347 [11:13] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1412C2347 [11:30] hi all, where should i request the removal of an old team ppa ? [11:31] bencer: file a question on launchpad and an admin can disable it [11:32] they can't be removed yet unless they're empty [11:32] s/empty/never used/ [11:32] ok thx bigjools [12:41] Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): Connection failed, aborting. Check your network [Errno 111] Connection refused [16:10] Can I view open bugs sorted by age? [21:10] Hi. When viewing packages from my PPAs it says in synaptic that Canonical provides critical security updates to those packages. Seeing as I am not employed by Canonical, what should I change to correct this? [22:05] AskHL_: I guess that's a bug in synaptic [22:10] maxb, thank you [22:13] AskHL_: More specifically, I expect it's applying a fixed long description to all components named 'main', when that should only be applied to the 'main' component of the official archive [22:13] AskHL_: More specifically, I expect it's applying a fixed long description to all components named 'main', when that should only be applied to the 'main' component of the official archive [22:14] AskHL_: Which version of Ubuntu are you using? [22:15] wgrant, I just updated to Karmic. This was also present in Jaunty, but I figured I'd wait to see if it would be fixed [22:16] maxb, that sounds like a realistic explanation [22:19] wgrant, should I file a bug report (or are you doing something like that presently :))? [22:19] AskHL_: I'm not. You should. [22:20] wgrant, I will. [22:25] Which components (main, universe, something entirely different) should one actually use for PPAs? [22:26] AskHL_: PPAs only support main. [22:26] wgrant, thanks. [23:27] hi everyone! i've been seeing a lot of critical stuff about ubuntu 9.10 - problems etc. is it as stable and pretty as the developers promised? [23:45] lunatic: This channel concerns Launchpad, not Ubuntu [23:46] thank you)