[00:04] <fta> and songbird of course
[00:04] <fta> red for weeks
[00:04] <micahg> right :)
[00:09] <fta> [reed], what's the status of Electrolysis? is it usable right now?
[00:09] <fta> [reed], is phase 2 complete?
[00:47] <EzraR> does xulrunner-dev include npupp.h anyone know?
[00:47] <EzraR> i am getting build errors
[00:48] <dtchen_> I think libxul-dev
[00:49] <dtchen_> i.e., no, that package doesn't appear to
[00:50] <fta> libxul-dev is long dead
[00:51] <EzraR> i am trying to move from libxul-dev to xulrunner-dev
[00:51] <micahg> ugh, we still have libxul-dev
[00:51] <EzraR> and get error: npupp.h: No such file or directory
[00:51] <EzraR> is there a way around this
[00:52] <fta> mozilla 455458
[00:53] <micahg> EzraR: you should be using xulrunner-1.9.1-dev
[00:53] <EzraR> nice find fta
[00:54] <EzraR> micahg: xulrunner-dev points to that so that we can sync with debian without changing it in every package no?
[00:55] <micahg> oh, yeah, I guess it does
[00:55]  * micahg was thinking of xulrunner
[00:55] <EzraR> so I will replace all npupp.h's with npfunctions.h and pray
[00:56] <EzraR> pray that the author didnt use the ""shortcut" macros" they aparently took out
[01:05] <fta> micahg, i've just benched the builders, the build part takes 20 min, the rest is pbuilder/sbuild setting up and destroying the env. We won't gain anything there :(
[01:05] <fta> that's amd64
[01:05] <micahg> ah
[01:05] <fta> i386 is slower
[01:05] <fta> at it's emulated
[01:05] <fta> -at+as
[01:06] <fta> too bad
[01:06] <fta> we can still gain 1h per dist with the 3 xul
[01:07] <micahg> that's good
[01:07] <fta> tb31 failed
[06:23] <micahg> fta: would it help if we apply the xul fixes to tb31?
[06:24] <micahg> fta: the stuff to build faster I mean
[09:08] <micahg> fta: I fixed TB31, but I need it reviewed, so when I get online later, someone can review and I'll push up the changes
[13:16] <eagles0513875> is anyone around in here
[13:16] <eagles0513875> im having issues with fire fox just eating up cpu power
[13:16] <eagles0513875> last i saw was using 91%
[13:20] <fta> most probably flash
[13:20] <fta> use flashblock
[13:20] <eagles0513875> O_o ok
[13:21] <eagles0513875> wouldnt it be better then to change the kubuntu-restricted-extras package to point to flashblock instead of flash-nonfree plugin
[13:23] <fta> eh? flashblock is an addon, it blocks flash by default and let you enable it when you need it
[13:24] <eagles0513875> thing is its not all the time
[13:26] <eagles0513875> fta: are you on kde or gnome or xfce
[13:32] <fta> gnome
[13:32] <eagles0513875> nm then i think i found a bug in a theme
[13:33] <eagles0513875> and firefox. does gnome have the obsidian theme
[13:33] <fta> no idea
[13:35] <eagles0513875> so hard to find any kubuntu devs
[13:36] <fta> especially here
[13:38] <fta> *sigh* "Your membership in the Ubuntu Bug Control (ubuntu-bugcontrol) team has expired."
[13:38] <eagles0513875> who me
[13:38] <eagles0513875> or u
[13:39] <fta> me
[13:39] <eagles0513875> ouchie
[13:39] <eagles0513875> speaking of bugs i need to invalidate one of mine
[13:40] <fta> i've been told that it's ok to let it expire, as i'm an ubuntu-dev, i'll see
[13:42] <eagles0513875> wish i could get unbanned in there both ubuntu and kubuntu-dev
[13:43] <eagles0513875> need to setup a chroot environment to get working on lucid extensions
[13:43] <fta> unbanned? what did you do?
[13:45] <eagles0513875> this was a while back got too eager to help out and knew nothing
[13:45] <eagles0513875> now that im linux certified im working on learning alot about development starting with asac encouraging me to help with firefox extensions
[13:45] <eagles0513875> and im experimenting alot on my own as well
[13:49] <fta> ok
[13:52] <eagles0513875> would give anythign to be given another chance