[00:04] and songbird of course [00:04] red for weeks [00:04] right :) [00:09] [reed], what's the status of Electrolysis? is it usable right now? [00:09] [reed], is phase 2 complete? [00:47] does xulrunner-dev include npupp.h anyone know? [00:47] i am getting build errors [00:48] I think libxul-dev [00:49] i.e., no, that package doesn't appear to [00:50] libxul-dev is long dead [00:51] i am trying to move from libxul-dev to xulrunner-dev [00:51] ugh, we still have libxul-dev [00:51] and get error: npupp.h: No such file or directory [00:51] is there a way around this [00:52] mozilla 455458 [00:52] Mozilla bug 455458 in Plug-ins "clean up npupp.h and rename it to npfunctions.h" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455458 [00:53] EzraR: you should be using xulrunner-1.9.1-dev [00:53] nice find fta [00:54] micahg: xulrunner-dev points to that so that we can sync with debian without changing it in every package no? [00:55] oh, yeah, I guess it does [00:55] * micahg was thinking of xulrunner [00:55] so I will replace all npupp.h's with npfunctions.h and pray [00:56] pray that the author didnt use the ""shortcut" macros" they aparently took out [01:05] micahg, i've just benched the builders, the build part takes 20 min, the rest is pbuilder/sbuild setting up and destroying the env. We won't gain anything there :( [01:05] that's amd64 [01:05] ah [01:05] i386 is slower [01:05] at it's emulated [01:05] -at+as [01:06] too bad [01:06] we can still gain 1h per dist with the 3 xul [01:07] that's good [01:07] tb31 failed [06:23] fta: would it help if we apply the xul fixes to tb31? [06:24] fta: the stuff to build faster I mean === micahg1 is now known as micahg [09:08] fta: I fixed TB31, but I need it reviewed, so when I get online later, someone can review and I'll push up the changes [13:16] is anyone around in here [13:16] im having issues with fire fox just eating up cpu power [13:16] last i saw was using 91% [13:20] most probably flash [13:20] use flashblock [13:20] O_o ok [13:21] wouldnt it be better then to change the kubuntu-restricted-extras package to point to flashblock instead of flash-nonfree plugin [13:23] eh? flashblock is an addon, it blocks flash by default and let you enable it when you need it [13:24] thing is its not all the time [13:26] fta: are you on kde or gnome or xfce [13:32] gnome [13:32] nm then i think i found a bug in a theme [13:33] and firefox. does gnome have the obsidian theme [13:33] no idea [13:35] so hard to find any kubuntu devs [13:36] especially here [13:38] *sigh* "Your membership in the Ubuntu Bug Control (ubuntu-bugcontrol) team has expired." [13:38] who me [13:38] or u [13:39] me [13:39] ouchie [13:39] speaking of bugs i need to invalidate one of mine [13:40] i've been told that it's ok to let it expire, as i'm an ubuntu-dev, i'll see [13:42] wish i could get unbanned in there both ubuntu and kubuntu-dev [13:43] need to setup a chroot environment to get working on lucid extensions [13:43] unbanned? what did you do? [13:45] this was a while back got too eager to help out and knew nothing [13:45] now that im linux certified im working on learning alot about development starting with asac encouraging me to help with firefox extensions [13:45] and im experimenting alot on my own as well [13:49] ok [13:52] would give anythign to be given another chance === quinda1 is now known as etali === jdstrand is now known as jdstrand_ === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand === jdstrand is now known as jdstrand_ === yoasif_ is now known as yoasif