[05:57] <[reed]> asac: get me kiko
[05:57] <[reed]> bmo just upgraded to Bugzilla 3.4 ;)
[05:59] <micahg> [reed]: so now we can link to LP?
[05:59] <[reed]> micahg: yep
[05:59] <micahg> [reed]: should I go back an link all the bugs I'm subscribed too?
[05:59] <micahg> *to
[05:59] <[reed]> sure... I'm not exactly sure the format LP will want to use
[05:59] <[reed]> might be better to wait
[06:00] <micahg> oh, I thought it was just a URL?
[06:00] <[reed]> I know kiko or somebody needs to set stuff up
[06:00] <[reed]> on LP's side
[06:00] <[reed]> for it to work
[06:01] <micahg> [reed]: http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.4.3/release-notes.html#v34_feat_see
[06:02] <[reed]> yeah, but do you use URLs with bugs.launchpad.net or just launchpad.net or what
[06:02] <[reed]> that's what I don't know
[06:02] <micahg> has to be bugs.lp
[06:04] <micahg> [reed]: who has access to see also?  I can't seem to set it
[06:04] <[reed]> hmm
[06:04] <[reed]> give me a bug?
[06:04] <[reed]> what bug are you trying to set
[06:04] <micahg> mozilla 514151
[06:04] <micahg> I can set it on mine
[06:05] <micahg> which is the one that blocks that one
[06:05]  * micahg is just a regular user in bmo
[06:05] <[reed]> ah
[06:05] <[reed]> what's your bugmail address?
[06:13] <micahg> [reed]: now I can help you guys when I'm searching and find dupes
[06:27] <micahg> [reed]: I see the shorter URL works
[06:32] <micahg> [reed]: LP started importing comments from bmo
[09:09] <[reed]> mireally?
[09:41] <[reed]> micahg: really?
 [reed]: LP started importing comments from bmo
[09:41] <[reed]> where?
[09:44] <micahg> bug 477513
[09:45] <micahg> bug 212759
[09:45] <micahg> [reed]: ^^^
[09:46] <[reed]> neat
[09:46] <[reed]> micahg: if you wouldn't mind, tag bugs like that with the launchpad url
[09:46] <micahg> [reed]: I was thinking the same thing ;)
[09:46] <micahg> it might take me a while though
[09:47]  * micahg expects about 200+
[09:47] <[reed]> :)
[09:48] <micahg> [reed]: what do you think of mozilla 528831
[09:49] <[reed]> hmm
[09:49] <[reed]> ubuntu should just get rid of their workaround
[09:49] <[reed]> same for debian
[09:49] <[reed]> I think
[09:49] <micahg> [reed]: is it just Ubuntu?
[09:49] <micahg> and debian
[09:49] <[reed]> unsure
[09:50] <micahg> well, I added linux@distro, so I hope some fedora people will pipe up
[17:11] <asac_> hi ;)
[17:13] <[reed]> asac_: how's Texas?
[17:20] <asac_> [reed]: not so sure what to answer ;)
[17:20] <[reed]> lol
[17:20] <asac_>  we are in dallas ;)
[17:20] <asac_> not even in dallas
[17:20] <asac_> odd city if you ask me ;)
[17:38] <micahg> asac: I might be a few minutes late to the firefox-desktop discussion
[17:49] <micahg> asac_: is it worth coming into the firefox upgrade discussion half way through?
[17:53] <asac_> micahg: we will reschedule it
[17:53] <asac_> [reed]: ^^
[17:53] <asac_> at least i hope we can do that still as the security team cannot attend
[17:53] <micahg> I don't want to mess up everyone else's schedule...
[17:54] <micahg> how's the conference so far?
[18:23] <av`> asac_, around?
[18:54] <fta> av`, if it's as usual, don't count on asac for the whole week, unless he gets really bored during a session
[18:55] <av`> fta, yeah, you're right, I hope he gonna be around somewhen :)
[19:43] <micahg> fta: how did TB3 jump to 3.0.1?
[19:55] <micahg> asac: were you able to reschedule the ff upgrade session?
[19:59] <fta> micahg, probably because 3.0 is in a mini branch
[20:01] <fta> lots of people are requesting lightning along with tb3
[20:01] <micahg> do you want to start a daily for lightning?
[20:01] <micahg> songbird is code broke right now, not just patches
[20:02] <micahg> that's why it's taking me so long
[20:02] <micahg> do you have time to review TB31 commits?
[20:02] <Mook_sb> micahg: are you using --with-system-sqlite? (I don't think we support that... and it never worked; we just moved it to vendor-binares/ )
[20:03] <asac> micahg: yes. its not thursday
[20:03] <micahg> Mook_sb: yes, I'll remove it and try again
[20:03] <asac> how
[20:03] <micahg> Mook_sb: are you the songbird contact?
[20:03] <Mook_sb> just here to help, not trying to hurry you or anything
[20:04] <Mook_sb> micahg: I'm.. one of the songbird people; so is stevel :)
[20:04] <micahg> ok, good to know :)
[20:04] <fta> Mook_sb, we don't want those vendor-binaries; we want to build our own binaries
[20:05] <Mook_sb> fta: yes, I do understand that - hence you'd be building them out of the vendor/ sources :)
[20:05] <Mook_sb> (or, have a patch to actually support --with-system-sqlite so I can try to poke our build guy into r+ing it)
[20:06] <fta> asac, micahg: ppa builders are now building our stuff faster
[20:06] <micahg> i saw. daily ppa is almost done
[20:06] <fta> with lots of red
[20:06] <micahg> and badwindow patch landed on 3.6
[20:06] <asac> fta: cool. what did they do? special case our ppa or use a better scheduling approach?
[20:06] <fta> better scheduling approach
[20:06] <micahg> asac: do you have a time on thursday?
[20:07] <fta> but it seems they no longer respect the push order
[20:07] <fta> like here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages
[20:07] <fta> hardy is building while intrepid is still waiting
[20:08] <asac> micahg: not yet ... i think the summit system needs to be refreshed - so maybe chcek later today
[20:08] <micahg> ok
[20:08] <asac> bug 478691
[20:09] <micahg> fta: building for different versions shouldn't matter as long as push order for the same version is respected
[20:10] <fta> well, i just pointed at this as a proof. in this case, it's not a problem, but but earlier this year, we had an issue because of that
[20:11] <fta> i had to insert delays in the bot
[20:12] <micahg> fta: can you review: http://pastebin.com/f2e521d1a
[20:12] <av`> asac, can I ask you a favour via PM?
[20:13] <asac> go ahead ... i might not b ereally helpful this week though
[20:13] <asac> fta: isnt the upload order important for the orig.tar.gz only?
[20:13] <micahg> asac: build-deps
[20:14] <fta> asac, yes, but who knows how out of order it is now? ;)
[20:15] <fta> micahg, about lightning, i don't know the status of the branch, if any. but would be nice if someone could update it to be daily buildable
[20:15] <micahg> fta: I can look at it this weekend
[20:16] <asac> fta: i dont think its an issue ... the orig.tar.gz problem happens before it enters the queue ... all that is needed is that the orig.tar.gz is accepted before we upload the orig.tar.gz less stuff
[20:16] <asac> so all this is before the whole build scheduling etc.
[20:16] <asac> if you get rejects let me know
[20:17] <micahg> asac: do I need to create a new branch for sunbird/lightning for .head?
[20:18] <micahg> actually...there's no .jaunty branch either
[20:20] <micahg> asac: should I create a .jaunty and .karmic for sunbird and then rename ubuntu-0.x to ubuntu.head?
[20:21] <fta> is the current package recent?
[20:21] <fta> i mean, using cdbs & quilt?
[20:22] <fta> or is it the old stuff?
[20:22]  * micahg is looking
[20:23] <micahg> nd quilt
[20:23] <micahg> yes, cdbs and quilt
[20:24] <fta> strange
[20:24] <fta> but good
[20:39] <fta> chromium-browser                 20296   1.53%      3639    9124    7529       4
[20:39] <fta> google-chrome-unstable           16832   1.27%      4531    6187    6098      16
[20:39] <fta> \o/
[20:39] <bdrung_> asac: ping
[20:55] <fta> dtchen_, how far is sdl on your todo list? i'm getting desperate :(
[21:10] <micahg1> fta: can you review: http://pastebin.com/f2e521d1a <-- tb31 fixes
[21:27] <fta> micahg, diffs of diffs are difficult to read :P
[21:28] <fta> micahg, and btw, it's a new package, so changelog should end-up with just "* Initial release" or something, i'm not sure about how to do give credits in there
[21:30] <micahg> fta: which one?
[21:30] <fta> let me read the bug 1st. mozilla 490817
[21:31] <fta> lol
[21:31] <micahg> fta: the only diff in there was just rebased
[21:32] <fta> wanted to know why license.html was gone
[21:32] <fta> looks ok
[21:33] <micahg> so I'll push the changes then
[21:33] <fta> ok
[21:34] <micahg> do you want to commit your use all cores change on top of it
[21:34] <micahg> ?
[22:05] <fta> i will
[23:40] <fta> micahg, did you fix xul 1.9.2?
[23:49] <micahg> fta: I will later
[23:49] <micahg> the badwindow patch landed
[23:49] <fta> k