[00:03] ari-tczew: Can you please stop touching random old bugs? I emailed you about this before [00:31] Hello [00:33] I need to reopen a launchpad bug that was marked "Fix released". Should I set it back to "In Progess" or should I file a new bug ? [00:34] depends on how precisely sure you are that the bug you are seeing is the direct result of a regression to the fix in the old bug [00:34] in other words, it's better when in doubt to open a new bug [00:34] and have the bug triaging people decide whether or not it's a dupe [00:34] Actually the bug was only partially fixed [00:35] jdong, It's this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xf86-input-evtouch/+bug/401039 [00:36] Launchpad bug 401039 in xf86-input-evtouch "Add support for TouchPack family touchscreens (Clevo TN120 series tablets / ASUS eeeTOP and other devices)" [Undecided,Fix released] [00:37] jdong, The I only fixed support for Clevo tablets [00:37] Laney: don't panic [00:54] jdong, ok I fixed the bug anyway, [00:55] Now I need someone who can review & upload the changes [01:00] i am getting the following error when building a package under vbox : http://www.pastie.org/701953 [01:01] ROFL the build system runs a test suite that needs a SDL display? [01:07] can i still use pbuilder build for this package under vbox? [01:08] wgrant: ^-- [01:11] Ah, build system != Soyuz. === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v [04:49] can we murge something from unstable if needed? [04:50] EzraR: Yes, if there's a reason to do so. [04:50] a package in testing relies on a package only in unstable for example [04:51] How did that happen? [04:51] that should probally be a debian bug though [04:51] Yes, it should :) [04:51] i dont know...electric sheep has flam3 in the depends [04:52] Aaaah. You're looking at making electricsheep actually work? Cool. [04:52] yeah [04:52] i got it built but we dont have lam3 in ubuntu [04:53] flam3 seems to be in testing. [04:53] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/flam3 [04:53] This might just need to get picked up in the autosync. [04:54] (next autosync) [04:58] strange i just did a search for it and didnt find it...nice [04:59] thats probally a good sign that its bed time :) [05:01] would it catch it in pbuilder if a depend wasnt met? [05:02] just reliezed i was trying to install it in karmic to test it [05:02] flam3 wouldnt be in karmic [05:03] Indeed it would not :) [05:06] hehe deff time for bed [07:05] Hello, I am uploading texlive2009 packages (which have just hit Debian experimental) to my karmic PPA (ppa:aelmahmoudy/tl2009) if anyone wants to try them out [07:06] i tried pbuilder build on my main workstation but still getting http://www.pastie.org/701953. strange. [07:21] i guess the question is, how do i enable the frame buffer in karmic? [07:27] fcuk112, inside your pbuilder? you don't [07:31] ah, it seems there is a bug in LP for it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/428519 [07:31] Launchpad bug 428519 in grub2 "Unable to enable framebuffer modes with grub 2" [Undecided,New] [07:31] directhex: i guess i need to set up the frame buffer on my main workstation or the VM for the package build to succeed. [07:32] frankly, i'd patch the build system [07:32] requiring compilation only on run-capable machines is *dumb* [07:33] that's an idea... === war10ck is now known as pan1nx [07:48] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsoup2.4/+bug/483826 do i do uscan -verbose in the old source folder to do the sync? i seem to get back 2.28.1, not 2.28.1.3 as described in the bug. [07:48] Launchpad bug 483826 in libsoup2.4 "Sync libsoup2.4 2.28.1-3 (main) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New] [07:52] fabrice_sp, Thanks :) [08:06] hi, now that bug 411262 is fixed in lucid and tested in karmic-proposed, what's left to do to get it into karmic-updates? [08:06] Launchpad bug 411262 in rott "package rott 1.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/411262 === maxb is now known as Guest71681 [08:09] yofel: two more days of testing, and an archive-administrator to perform the task [08:10] DktrKranz: ok, so the testing phase is always >=1 week? (It's my first SRU) [08:19] Hello, is there a reason that upstream usually (if not always) don't use -Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS ? [08:23] AnAnt: mostly because they are not aware of the benefits of that option, I suppose [08:23] there are some cornercases where it is actually harmful, though. [08:26] is there a difference between an update and a sync? [08:28] I see [08:29] siretart`: actually I was trying to compile gwave with -Wl,--as-needed, and build did fail ! [08:30] AnAnt: probably upstream did not declare all libraries to ld. this would be a bug then [08:31] yofel: at least a week, depending how quick users test the update [08:31] finding those bugs is the main reason why that linker option is a good diea [08:31] DktrKranz: ok, thanks [08:32] you're welcome, and thanks for your interest := [08:32] :) [08:36] <\sh> moins [08:48] editing Makefile.am; does that need to be added to quilt? === YDdraigGoch is now known as Richie [09:11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autohell [09:12] * LucidFox chuckles [09:12] such a nice redirect :) [09:12] accurate too [09:32] LucidFox, totally stealing that for twittering purposes [09:49] directhex> Ugh, Twitter === ghostcube_ is now known as ghostcube [11:21] <\sh> siretart, FAI ubuntu karmic devel version fetch from svn://svn.debian.org/svn/fai/people/shermann/ubuntu-3.3.1/ <- just building the packages === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v [11:51] \sh: wohooo! :-) - url noted. [11:52] <\sh> siretart, I've build some packages and just testing on a local vmware image [11:53] we ordered new machines that will hopefully be delivered this or next week. then I can join you with testing them [13:07] hello [13:07] umm === warp10__ is now known as warp10 [13:07] does anyone here know how to do OS development [13:08] no [13:08] master: What do you mean by OS development? === master is now known as ashiswin [13:08] like [13:09] programming an OS from bootloader up [13:10] does anyone know how? [13:11] <\sh> siretart, looks good [13:11] ashiswin: Even if anyone knew this is not the channel for that kind of discussion. [13:11] i mean [13:11] could someone pm me about it please [13:13] \sh: with unionfs-fuse, or with karmic's in-kernel aufs? [13:13] <\sh> siretart, default kernel aufs [13:13] that would indeed be great! [13:14] let's just hope that it won't get broken again in lucid's kernel [13:14] <\sh> siretart, I'm now at install stage...and it looks really good [13:14] <\sh> siretart, it will..there are problems with squeeze already [13:14] <\sh> siretart, something to do with update-initramfs divertion of fai [13:14] great [13:14] :-/ [13:15] <\sh> siretart, let's get karmic rolling first, thomas deals with squeeze, too...and we are running into the same problems with lucid, hopefully the issues are fixed by then :) [13:16] agreed [14:34] DktrKranz, would you mind if I did the gl-117 merge/sync? [14:38] porthose_: please go ahead :) [14:38] ok ty :) [14:41] DktrKranz: why did you ping me about pidgin-facebookchat t'other day? [14:44] Heya folks [14:45] hi bddebian [14:45] Hi Laney [14:45] Laney: my error, sorry [14:45] heh heh [14:45] it had gone out of my scrollback === chuck_ is now known as zul [15:24] <\sh> siretart, svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/fai/people/shermann/fai-3.3.2ubuntu1 <- fai 3.3.2 for karmic working [15:25] * siretart` hugs \sh! [15:26] <\sh> :) [15:26] \sh: will you upload to karmic then? [15:26] we can backport in our ppa anyways.. [15:26] <\sh> siretart, to karmic? nope that's not possible...I'll create some ppa packages [15:26] why not? [15:26] <\sh> karmic is released? [15:28] dammit. lucid I mean [15:28] <\sh> siretart, lucid based on squeeze , fai on squeeze == fail [15:29] <\sh> siretart, well..I'll check tomorrow, if this fai version works with lucid from tomorrow...something really strange happened on squeeze, someone from gonicus reported that [15:30] <\sh> siretart, http://pastebin.com/d74d46de5 <- that was his output...last lines update-initramfs not creating an initrd [15:31] <\sh> siretart, btw..I can upload to ppa:fai/ppa, right? [15:36] \sh: yes, feel free. [15:38] \sh: I've made you admin of ~fai now. you're obviously way more active than me :-) [15:40] <\sh> siretart, lol...I have a problem now [15:40] <\sh> Rejected: [15:40] <\sh> fai_3.3.2ubuntu1~ppa1.dsc: Format is not 1.0. This is incompatible with dpkg-source. [15:40] <\sh> dpkg-source failed for fai_3.3.2ubuntu1~ppa1.dsc [return: 9] [15:41] \sh: may I suggest that you take the fai-3.3.2.tar.gz as orig.tar.gz, and upload it as non-native format 1.0 package? [15:41] that's what I did for the last uploads [15:42] and makes it easy for thomas to review the ubuntu changes. they will end up in the .diff.gz [15:42] <\sh> siretart, thomas reviews them inside SVN ;) [15:42] yes [15:42] <\sh> .dsc file tells me: Format 3.0 (native) [15:43] \sh: try removing debian/source/format [15:44] <\sh> a jetzt ja, eine insel [15:44] v3 support will come soon *sic* [15:47] <\sh> well...if this upload succeeds now, you can go and test it on your local infra :) [15:51] <\sh> siretart, uploaded and building [15:54] excellent [15:56] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/d-shlibs/+bug/484194 uscan -verbose doesn't bring anything back, how do i get at the updated source in debian testing? [15:56] Launchpad bug 484194 in d-shlibs "Please sync d-shlibs 0.41 (main) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] [15:58] which is the best method to make a meta deb file which takes care of just the dependencies? i tired to add them in the control file, the meta deb has no source in it, i used dpkg-deb -b doest seem to do the job [15:59] g33k: look at equivs [16:01] siretart, actually as of now, i have few lot of shell scripts which are checking if the required dep is present if not doing an apt-get, using is cdbs is better? me looking at equivs also what do u suggest sir? [16:03] parse error, bailing out [16:05] * g33k stacktrace for parse error === RoAkSoAx is now known as RoAkS [16:47] fcuk112: get at the updated source? you mean, download it? === RoAkS is now known as RoAkSoAx [16:48] randomaction: yes. [16:48] how can i check if a package has been auto synced to lucid? [16:48] EzraR: Check Launchpad [16:49] fcuk112: pull-debian-source or http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages or http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html === chuck_ is now known as zul [16:51] StevenK: ok so if i cant find it on launchpad it didnt get synced? [16:51] EzraR: Which package are you concerned about? [16:52] StevenK: flam3 [16:52] StevenK: im trying to workout electricsheep and it depends on it [16:55] is ajmitch around? [16:56] StevenK: its in debian testing [16:57] i'm trying to get a package synced for lucid [16:57] i suppose everyone is doing UDS stuff [16:57] :/ [16:59] i guess i could grab the debian package and test with that, then if there is a problem i would already have a head start on it [16:59] yup [17:01] it WILL get synced though right? [17:02] have debian packages all been synced? [17:02] that's why i'm here [17:03] some apparently haven't === Ng_ is now known as Ng [17:06] randomaction: thanks for that. [17:07] so should we just wait for a bit then? [17:12] I think so, and if the package in question doesn't get synced, you can ask the AAs or file a manual sync request [17:13] actually, I took a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration and found that "auto-sync" is a relatively involved process === chuck_ is now known as zul [18:26] take into account also that 3.0 packages cannot be synced right now [18:28] hello [18:30] hello [18:30] fcuk112, a sync request has to be put as new to get sponsorship [18:31] fabrice_sp_: do you work today on sponsorship? [18:32] in half an hour (just back from work), and got scared by the volume of bugs reports waiting for sponsorship :-) [18:32] :) [18:35] how long autosync is work? [18:35] ari-tczew: I just ran one ... [18:36] But it will be run until the Debian Import Freeze [18:38] I'm asking about this because I saw syncs requests of packages which wasn't changed after sync from Debian - I see no reason for requesting this if autosync will done this [18:38] StevenK: Are people processing sync requests? Nothing seemed doing last week and I guess now it's on hold for UDS [18:42] Laney: I've been doing some, but I've mostly been distracted by sessions [18:44] I've had some sitting for 2 weeks now [18:44] seems unusual [18:44] but, oh well, not complaining [18:54] Laney: Would you like me to process one? [18:54] (Or two? I have a few seconds spare) [18:54] StevenK: No, not urgent, just observing [19:03] jdong, do you have time to have a look at bug #401039? [19:03] Launchpad bug 401039 in xf86-input-evtouch "Add support for TouchPack family touchscreens (Clevo TN120 series tablets / ASUS eeeTOP and other devices)" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/401039 [19:19] pace_t_zulu: you were looking for me for something? === Richie is now known as WelshDragon [19:32] fabrice_sp_: you're acked [19:33] cool. Thanks! I will be able to demonstrate to my son that I do something for Ubuntu :-) (even if it's only sponsoring something ;-) ) === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage [19:34] hahahaha [19:35] sponsoring is good! :) [19:35] it absolutely is [19:36] one of the biggest complaints I hear is that the sponsorship queue is too latent [19:37] what do I need to do to get the latest version of 'mr' in lucid? is it as simple as requesting a sync? [19:38] there is no ubuntu delta, so I'm thinking yes [19:39] jbernard_: If there is no Ubuntu delta, don't bother -- it will get autosync'd [19:39] StevenK, ahh, perfect [19:40] StevenK: when will this occur? [19:40] jbernard_: We have the latest package in Lucid that is in testing? [19:41] StevenK: oh, that's whats going on, is it possible to pull from sid? [19:41] im guessing no [19:41] 0.43 is in sid, too? [19:41] But yes, we can, if needed [19:42] my mistake, i had not seen that 0.43 was already in lucid [19:42] that solves my problem [19:42] StevenK: thanks [19:42] jbernard_: No problem [19:49] randomaction, I know :-) But try to explain that to a 10 years old kid, and you'll see :-D === chuck_ is now known as zul [20:01] Timeout error [20:01] Our edge server has a lower timeout threshold than launchpad.net, so we can catch those before they hit a wider audience. As a member of the Launchpad Beta Testers team, you're more likely to experience them. If this is blocking your work, you can disable redirection. [20:01] Disable redirection for 2 hours [20:01] Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad. [20:03] ari-tczew: then report it in #launchpad === RoAkSoAx is now known as RoAkS [20:08] OK === RoAkS is now known as RoAkSoAx [20:35] hi, could someone from the motu-sru team please review and if ok sponsor the patch in bug 484322? [20:35] Launchpad bug 484322 in treeline "Treeline Won't Even Run in 9.10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/484322 [20:35] oh y'all kids [20:36] not even waiting for lp bugmail to propagate :) [20:36] *looks* [20:36] hey jdong ^^ [20:36] shocking, isn't is [20:38] it's not as good as bugs against revu because a .changes file is needed [20:39] we are going to get syncs request over than 200! :D [20:39] ? [20:40] many syncs == good interaction with Debian :) [20:40] I guess it could be looked at that way [20:47] ari-tczew: We so aren't === fabrice_sp__ is now known as fabrice_sp [21:01] ajmitch: yea i was checking in about debian package syncing for lucid [21:02] I'm not the person to ask about it, and you just need to wait :) [21:02] first few weeks before/around UDS can be funny [21:04] ajmitch: ty [21:04] ajmitch: just trying to stay on top of it [21:08] yofel: see comment. [21:15] ajmitch: who is the person to ask about it? [21:21] jdong: done [21:23] awesome [21:24] pace_t_zulu: I''d say the archive team, but they probably won't appreciate getting repeated pokes about their queue of sync requests :) [21:25] like cjwatson ? [21:32] I noticed some got done, good work StevenK! [21:33] jdong: where do I get a sponsor for the debdiff again? [21:34] grrrrrr [21:34] lol [21:34] I'll look back here in 30 minutes [21:34] and if you don't have a sponsor I'll do it at that time :) [21:34] Laney: There is a looooooooong list [21:35] StevenK: we'll try not to mercilessly nag you then [21:35] Hah [21:35] I'm not the only archive admin to nag :-P [21:37] I know, but you're easier to nag [21:37] timezones & all [21:37] Certainly not currently, I'm not .... [21:37] no, you're 5 hours out rather than 2 :) [21:38] 5 hours yesterday, which is more the pity [21:39] I don't envy you the flights there & bacck [21:39] ajmitch: It's easier than Europe. I got here in 17 hours, whereas I only get to London after 20 [21:40] 20 hours to london? luxury! === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === micahg1 is now known as micahg === korn_ is now known as c_korn === yofel_ is now known as yofel