| micahg | I didn't know you were repushing :) | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| dtchen_ | fta: honestly, it's fairly low. I'm coordinating with bddebian (who maintains it in Debian) | 00:15 |
| dtchen_ | fta: I'm also on assignment this week and don't expect to do much Ubuntu work [but probably will be forced into doing it due to bug reports] | 00:15 |
| fta | micahg, tb31 failed again | 00:49 |
| fta | didn't you try it? | 00:49 |
| micahg | I saw it | 00:50 |
| micahg | yes | 00:50 |
| micahg | https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+build/1346595 | 00:50 |
| fta | nsNNTPProtocol.cpp:917: error: no matching function for call to 'nsIStreamListenerTee::Init(nsCOMPtr<nsIStreamListener>&, nsCOMPtr<nsIOutputStream>&)' | 00:52 |
| fta | this should go upstream | 00:53 |
| fta | unless there's already a bug for it | 00:53 |
| fta | mozilla 529057 | 00:54 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 529057 in General "Fix build bustage after bug 515051 land" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529057 | 00:54 |
| micahg | yep | 00:54 |
| micahg | just ofund it | 00:54 |
| fta | [reed], I hate bugzilla showing all time in PST | 00:55 |
| micahg | fta: you can change that now in 3.4.3 | 00:56 |
| fta | hm, i'm no longer auto logged in | 00:57 |
| micahg | they probably got rid of the sessions as the password storage changed in 3.4.3 | 00:57 |
| fta | i want to install a bugzilla for my own projects, but i don't know if the deb package is any good | 01:04 |
| [reed] | fta: so, fix it | 01:13 |
| [reed] | fta: preferences, timezone | 01:13 |
| micahg | deb packages are out of date for bugzilla | 01:15 |
| micahg | asac: let me know if you think I should listen in on the FF translations sesion | 01:16 |
| micahg | [reed]: I see a 3.6 bug without a status flag set for fixed | 01:32 |
| [reed] | ? | 01:33 |
| [reed] | bug #? | 01:33 |
| micahg | mozilla 259199 | 01:33 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 259199 in General "Tooltips don't work in the sidebar" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259199 | 01:33 |
| micahg | they started setting status flags to know when something was fixed in the cycle | 01:33 |
| micahg | but this bug has none set | 01:34 |
| micahg | but I didn;t know if target milestone was enough | 01:34 |
| [reed] | hmm | 01:35 |
| [reed] | micahg: ok, fixed | 01:36 |
| micahg | thanks, should I ping you if I see more like this? | 01:36 |
| [reed] | sure | 01:36 |
| micahg | ok | 01:36 |
| fta | Source: bugzilla | 02:17 |
| fta | Version: 3.2.4.0-3ubuntu1 | 02:17 |
| fta | [reed], you should maintain the package | 02:18 |
| [reed] | fta: who is the maintainer? | 02:19 |
| fta | Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> | 02:19 |
| fta | Original-Maintainer: Raphael Bossek <bossekr@debian.org> | 02:19 |
| micahg | and this guy has the upstream link in LP: https://edge.launchpad.net/~name87 | 02:19 |
| fta | btw, i didn't say the deb was bad, i was wondering if it was good | 02:21 |
| fta | i want something ready to use | 02:21 |
| [reed] | it's definitely out of date | 02:21 |
| [reed] | I wouldn't recommend it | 02:21 |
| fta | at least there's a package, unlike lp | 02:22 |
| micahg | debian bug 544367 | 02:22 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 544367 in bugzilla3 "bugzilla3: New upstream release (3.4.1)" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/544367 | 02:22 |
| micahg | bug 415451 | 02:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 415451 in bugzilla "Please upgrade bugzilla to version 3.4.1" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/415451 | 02:23 |
| [reed] | micahg: https://edge.launchpad.net/~name87 seems to also be https://edge.launchpad.net/~justdave | 02:23 |
| [reed] | justdave was Canonical's first employee | 02:23 |
| [reed] | he's now a sysadmin for MoCo | 02:23 |
| [reed] | and the head of the bugzilla project | 02:23 |
| micahg | so it makes sense then :) | 02:24 |
| [reed] | but I doubt he's had anything to do with packaging bugzilla | 02:24 |
| [reed] | since at least 2005 | 02:24 |
| [reed] | what would it take to be a maintainer? | 02:27 |
| fta | not much, just do the work, find a sponsor when you need to upload, and try to become a motu once you're bored asking for sponsorship | 02:29 |
| fta | maybe motu is even no longer needed, it's possible to gain upload privileges per packages now | 02:30 |
| fta | ok, it's late, i'm off | 02:30 |
| micahg | [reed]: the debian maintainer is active | 02:37 |
| micahg | so, you might just want to comment on the debian bug what the latest stable release is | 02:37 |
| micahg | it seems like he's getting ready to package it up | 02:38 |
| [reed] | well, wasn't really too serious about even wanting to take it over | 02:42 |
| [reed] | just looking at the docs | 02:42 |
| === pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu | ||
| === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v | ||
| micahg | [reed]: you know that bug that you just set the upstream for, unfortunately, it never should have hit bmo... | 08:36 |
| [reed] | indeed | 08:36 |
| [reed] | figured I'd link it anyway | 08:36 |
| [reed] | since it already got filed | 08:36 |
| micahg | yep, thanks | 08:36 |
| micahg | I already talked to the person who suggested going upstream :| | 08:37 |
| [reed] | so, you're at UDS in Texas? | 08:37 |
| micahg | [reed]: no | 08:37 |
| [reed] | ah, thought you were for some reason | 08:37 |
| * micahg wishes he was there | 08:37 | |
| micahg | [reed]: what do you think about mozilla 296002 | 08:39 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 296002 in Widget: Gtk "drop-down menus fail when gtkmozembed is moved to different toplevel" [Major,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296002 | 08:39 |
| micahg | epiphany-gecko is gone | 08:39 |
| [reed] | embedding bugs like that have a very low chance of getting fixed on our end, sadly | 08:39 |
| [reed] | nobody really owns/touches that code anymore | 08:39 |
| micahg | well, the program the bug was in no longer exists | 08:39 |
| [reed] | does Debian still ship it? | 08:41 |
| micahg | yes for some odd reason | 08:42 |
| micahg | let me see | 08:42 |
| micahg | no, it's gone from unstable | 08:42 |
| micahg | testing still has the version | 08:42 |
| micahg | it's compiled against xul-1.9 which will be EOL in 2 months | 08:44 |
| micahg | I guess we wait two months | 08:45 |
| [reed] | wait | 08:45 |
| [reed] | er | 08:45 |
| [reed] | yeah | 08:45 |
| micahg | I'm closing out the LP bug | 08:45 |
| micahg | we won't fix it at this point | 08:46 |
| [reed] | sure | 08:46 |
| === jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
| === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v | ||
| === jtv-afk is now known as jtv | ||
| asac | dtchen_: there? | 17:15 |
| asac | how bad do you expect the lucid alsa userspace stuff to be broken with .31 kernel? | 17:15 |
| asac | do you know about significant changes there? | 17:15 |
| bdrung | asac: hi | 17:16 |
| bdrung | asac: am i upload the fix for m-d? | 17:17 |
| asac | bdrung: your decision :) ... i probably cannot review it today | 17:19 |
| asac | is it just the one bug fix? | 17:19 |
| bdrung | asac: yes | 17:20 |
| bdrung | asac: which version number is preferred for it: 0.17.1 or 0.18? | 17:20 |
| eagles0513875 | hey asac in the process of setting up the necessary ssh stuff as well as the packaging packages | 17:40 |
| eagles0513875 | should be on the bandwagon soon | 17:40 |
| asac | bdrung: 0.18 ... unless we do a minibranch that cherry picks something | 17:41 |
| asac | eagles0513875: ok | 17:41 |
| fta | i wonder how long it will take before users ask for the "magnet:" protocol in all browsers | 19:43 |
| micahg | what is magnet? | 19:44 |
| fta | http://thepiratebay.org/blog/175 | 19:44 |
| [reed] | fta: and we'll reject it, just as we've rejected almost every other request for silly p2p protocol handlers like that | 21:33 |
| av` | asac, still there? | 21:37 |
| asac | yes ... not time though | 21:37 |
| av` | asac, bouncing the mail to you | 21:37 |
| asac | [reed]: based on what criteria will mozilla consider a protocol handler non-silly? | 21:38 |
| asac | av`: kk ... will get to it asap | 21:38 |
| [reed] | something that's actually useful | 21:38 |
| av` | asac, sent | 21:38 |
| av` | asac, thanks a lot alex :) | 21:38 |
| asac | [reed]: based on what critieria does mozilla consider something useful ;)? | 21:38 |
| [reed] | anyway, programs are free to add their own protocol handlers | 21:38 |
| asac | right | 21:39 |
| micahg | asac: should I be at the translation session tomorrow morning? | 21:39 |
| asac | micahg: if you have ideas etc. sure. btw, the major/minor version upgrade session is now friday | 21:39 |
| asac | 12:00 afaict | 21:39 |
| micahg | oh, was set for yesterday at noon | 21:40 |
| asac | http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-l/presidente/ | 21:40 |
| asac | micahg: right. but we cancelled that (remember?) | 21:40 |
| micahg | oops | 21:40 |
| micahg | meant tomorrow | 21:40 |
| micahg | I guess it got moved again :) | 21:40 |
| asac | yeah ... it was a mess ;) | 21:41 |
| asac | the scheduling system is not really up to the task ... but i think this one is now final ;) | 21:41 |
| fta | [reed], but distros will add it anyway | 21:41 |
| micahg | I should be able to make that | 21:42 |
| asac | great | 21:42 |
| micahg | asac: any other ff sessions I should attend? | 21:42 |
| asac | i dont think we have anything else this time ;) ... we had KDE today | 21:42 |
| asac | wihch got interestingly enough quite a lot of folks attending | 21:43 |
| asac | in contrast what we had in intrepid UDS | 21:43 |
| asac | ok off to another sesion again | 21:46 |
| bdrung | asac: which version of firefox and thunderbird will going into lucid? | 21:47 |
| micahg | bdrung: most likely ff3.6 and tb3.0.x | 21:49 |
| bdrung | thx | 21:49 |
| micahg | fta: BTW, the reason TB jumped is they tagged the RC | 21:52 |
| fta | that's what i said yesterday | 21:52 |
| fta | sort if | 21:52 |
| fta | of | 21:52 |
| micahg | right | 21:52 |
| === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo | ||
| BUGabundo | ola meninos | 22:09 |
| === micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!