[00:02] <micahg> I didn't know you were repushing :)
[00:15] <dtchen_> fta: honestly, it's fairly low. I'm coordinating with bddebian (who maintains it in Debian)
[00:15] <dtchen_> fta: I'm also on assignment this week and don't expect to do much Ubuntu work [but probably will be forced into doing it due to bug reports]
[00:49] <fta> micahg, tb31 failed again
[00:49] <fta> didn't you try it?
[00:50] <micahg> I saw it
[00:50] <micahg> yes
[00:50] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+build/1346595
[00:52] <fta> nsNNTPProtocol.cpp:917: error: no matching function for call to 'nsIStreamListenerTee::Init(nsCOMPtr<nsIStreamListener>&, nsCOMPtr<nsIOutputStream>&)'
[00:53] <fta> this should go upstream
[00:53] <fta> unless there's already a bug for it
[00:54] <fta> mozilla 529057
[00:54] <micahg> yep
[00:54] <micahg> just ofund it
[00:55] <fta> [reed], I hate bugzilla showing all time in PST
[00:56] <micahg> fta: you can change that now in 3.4.3
[00:57] <fta> hm, i'm no longer auto logged in
[00:57] <micahg> they probably got rid of the sessions as the password storage changed in 3.4.3
[01:04] <fta> i want to install a bugzilla for my own projects, but i don't know if the deb package is any good
[01:13] <[reed]> fta: so, fix it
[01:13] <[reed]> fta: preferences, timezone
[01:15] <micahg> deb packages are out of date for bugzilla
[01:16] <micahg> asac: let me know if you think I should listen in on the FF translations sesion
[01:32] <micahg> [reed]: I see a 3.6 bug without a status flag set for fixed
[01:33] <[reed]> ?
[01:33] <[reed]> bug #?
[01:33] <micahg> mozilla 259199
[01:33] <micahg> they started setting status flags to know when something was fixed in the cycle
[01:34] <micahg> but this bug has none set
[01:34] <micahg> but I didn;t know if target milestone was enough
[01:35] <[reed]> hmm
[01:36] <[reed]> micahg: ok, fixed
[01:36] <micahg> thanks, should I ping you if I see more like this?
[01:36] <[reed]> sure
[01:36] <micahg> ok
[02:17] <fta> Source: bugzilla
[02:17] <fta> Version: 3.2.4.0-3ubuntu1
[02:18] <fta> [reed], you should maintain the package
[02:19] <[reed]> fta: who is the maintainer?
[02:19] <fta> Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>
[02:19] <fta> Original-Maintainer: Raphael Bossek <bossekr@debian.org>
[02:19] <micahg> and this guy has the upstream link in LP: https://edge.launchpad.net/~name87
[02:21] <fta> btw, i didn't say the deb was bad, i was wondering if it was good
[02:21] <fta> i want something ready to use
[02:21] <[reed]> it's definitely out of date
[02:21] <[reed]> I wouldn't recommend it
[02:22] <fta> at least there's a package, unlike lp
[02:22] <micahg> debian bug 544367
[02:23] <micahg> bug 415451
[02:23] <[reed]> micahg: https://edge.launchpad.net/~name87 seems to also be https://edge.launchpad.net/~justdave
[02:23] <[reed]> justdave was Canonical's first employee
[02:23] <[reed]> he's now a sysadmin for MoCo
[02:23] <[reed]> and the head of the bugzilla project
[02:24] <micahg> so it makes sense then :)
[02:24] <[reed]> but I doubt he's had anything to do with packaging bugzilla
[02:24] <[reed]> since at least 2005
[02:27] <[reed]> what would it take to be a maintainer?
[02:29] <fta> not much, just do the work, find a sponsor when you need to upload, and try to become a motu once you're bored asking for sponsorship
[02:30] <fta> maybe motu is even no longer needed, it's possible to gain upload privileges per packages now
[02:30] <fta> ok, it's late, i'm off
[02:37] <micahg> [reed]: the debian maintainer is active
[02:37] <micahg> so, you might just want to comment on the debian bug what the latest stable release is
[02:38] <micahg> it seems like he's getting ready to package it up
[02:42] <[reed]> well, wasn't really too serious about even wanting to take it over
[02:42] <[reed]> just looking at the docs
[08:36] <micahg> [reed]: you know that bug that you just set the upstream for, unfortunately, it never should have hit bmo...
[08:36] <[reed]> indeed
[08:36] <[reed]> figured I'd link it anyway
[08:36] <[reed]> since it already got filed
[08:36] <micahg> yep, thanks
[08:37] <micahg> I already talked to the person who suggested going upstream :|
[08:37] <[reed]> so, you're at UDS in Texas?
[08:37] <micahg> [reed]: no
[08:37] <[reed]> ah, thought you were for some reason
[08:37]  * micahg wishes he was there
[08:39] <micahg> [reed]: what do you think about mozilla 296002
[08:39] <micahg> epiphany-gecko is gone
[08:39] <[reed]> embedding bugs like that have a very low chance of getting fixed on our end, sadly
[08:39] <[reed]> nobody really owns/touches that code anymore
[08:39] <micahg> well, the program the bug was in no longer exists
[08:41] <[reed]> does Debian still ship it?
[08:42] <micahg> yes for some odd reason
[08:42] <micahg> let me see
[08:42] <micahg> no, it's gone from unstable
[08:42] <micahg> testing still has the version
[08:44] <micahg> it's compiled against xul-1.9 which will be EOL in 2 months
[08:45] <micahg> I guess we wait two months
[08:45] <[reed]> wait
[08:45] <[reed]> er
[08:45] <[reed]> yeah
[08:45] <micahg> I'm closing out the LP bug
[08:46] <micahg> we won't fix it at this point
[08:46] <[reed]> sure
[17:15] <asac> dtchen_: there?
[17:15] <asac> how bad do you expect the lucid alsa userspace stuff to be broken with .31 kernel?
[17:15] <asac> do you know about significant changes there?
[17:16] <bdrung> asac: hi
[17:17] <bdrung> asac: am i upload the fix for m-d?
[17:19] <asac> bdrung: your decision :) ... i probably cannot review it today
[17:19] <asac> is it just the one bug fix?
[17:20] <bdrung> asac: yes
[17:20] <bdrung> asac: which version number is preferred for it: 0.17.1 or 0.18?
[17:40] <eagles0513875> hey asac in the process of setting up the necessary ssh stuff as well as the packaging packages
[17:40] <eagles0513875> should be on the bandwagon soon
[17:41] <asac> bdrung: 0.18 ... unless we do a minibranch that cherry picks something
[17:41] <asac> eagles0513875: ok
[19:43] <fta> i wonder how long it will take before users ask for the "magnet:" protocol in all browsers
[19:44] <micahg> what is magnet?
[19:44] <fta> http://thepiratebay.org/blog/175
[21:33] <[reed]> fta: and we'll reject it, just as we've rejected almost every other request for silly p2p protocol handlers like that
[21:37] <av`> asac, still there?
[21:37] <asac> yes ... not time though
[21:37] <av`> asac, bouncing the mail to you
[21:38] <asac> [reed]: based on what criteria will mozilla consider a protocol handler non-silly?
[21:38] <asac> av`: kk ... will get to it asap
[21:38] <[reed]> something that's actually useful
[21:38] <av`> asac, sent
[21:38] <av`> asac, thanks a lot alex :)
[21:38] <asac> [reed]: based on what critieria does mozilla consider something useful ;)?
[21:38] <[reed]> anyway, programs are free to add their own protocol handlers
[21:39] <asac> right
[21:39] <micahg> asac: should I be at the translation session tomorrow morning?
[21:39] <asac> micahg: if you have ideas etc. sure. btw, the major/minor version upgrade session is now friday
[21:39] <asac> 12:00 afaict
[21:40] <micahg> oh, was set for yesterday at noon
[21:40] <asac> http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-l/presidente/
[21:40] <asac> micahg: right. but we cancelled that (remember?)
[21:40] <micahg> oops
[21:40] <micahg> meant tomorrow
[21:40] <micahg> I guess it got moved again :)
[21:41] <asac> yeah ... it was a mess ;)
[21:41] <asac> the scheduling system is not really up to the task ... but i think this one is now final ;)
[21:41] <fta> [reed], but distros will add it anyway
[21:42] <micahg> I should be able to make that
[21:42] <asac> great
[21:42] <micahg> asac: any other ff sessions I should attend?
[21:42] <asac> i dont think we have anything else this time ;) ... we had KDE today
[21:43] <asac> wihch got interestingly enough quite a lot of folks attending
[21:43] <asac> in contrast what we had in intrepid UDS
[21:46] <asac> ok off to another sesion again
[21:47] <bdrung> asac: which version of firefox and thunderbird will going into lucid?
[21:49] <micahg> bdrung: most likely ff3.6 and tb3.0.x
[21:49] <bdrung> thx
[21:52] <micahg> fta: BTW, the reason TB jumped is they tagged the RC
[21:52] <fta> that's what i said yesterday
[21:52] <fta> sort if
[21:52] <fta> of
[21:52] <micahg> right
[22:09] <BUGabundo> ola meninos