[00:24] <asac> jcastro: there?
[00:26] <micahg> asac: we got complemented in the adopt an upstream session
[00:26] <asac> micahg: huh?
[00:27] <micahg> they said the mozilla team is doing a great job
[00:27] <asac> was that a community thing?
[00:27] <asac> ;)
[00:27] <micahg> it was a UDS session
[00:27] <micahg> yeah
[00:27] <asac> thanks for forwarding ;)
[00:27] <micahg> they apparently loved me in there too :)
[00:27] <asac> finally some good news
[00:28] <asac> jdstrand_: 15:00 ?
[00:28] <asac> micahg: oh ... so you contributed through IRC?
[00:28] <asac> nice
[00:28] <micahg> yes
[00:28] <fta> for once, it's not about us spamming the builders
[00:28] <asac> hehe
[00:28] <fta> (or me)
[00:28] <asac> fta: i think nobody who has a real clue complains a bout that
[00:28] <micahg> they want to make more documents and organize on helping with upstream
[00:28] <micahg> https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-lucid-adopt-an-upstream
[00:29] <asac> just random folks that are unhappy that are too lazy to do their daily packaging excersizes locally
[00:29] <micahg> the thing is, we're already doing most of what they are looking for
[00:29] <asac> darn ... gobby seems to be downish :/
[00:29] <micahg> was just using it
[00:30] <asac> yeah
[00:30] <asac> i actually would even say that partly of what their understanding is about what they want was inspired by us
[00:30] <asac> :-P
[00:31] <micahg> yes and I showed them the LP imports of upstream bmo comments
[00:31] <kaddi> hi for the last couple of days thunderbird keeps telling me that the certificate for yahoo.com is issued for yahoo.co.uk. I always have to click ok before I can get mail from any of my email accounts. How can I tell thunderbid that it should always accept the certificate of yahoo.co.uk for yahoo.com
[00:34] <asac> micahg: LP imports of upstream bmo comments?
[00:34] <asac> ;)
[00:34] <fta> *sigh* https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585577#c4
[00:34] <asac> is that something you did ;)
[00:34] <micahg> asac: no, when they upgraded to bugzilla 3.4.3, the comments started pouring in
[00:34] <fta> i wonder if evo is dead upstream
[00:34] <micahg> fta: I thought they were working on a new mail client
[00:35] <asac> fta: yeah. just wanted to ask ... i will check with seb ... maybe he can give us a good irc nick so you can diretly bug on IRC
[00:35] <fta> i've located my problem, the fix is easy, but i'm not sure they want it
[00:36] <fta> or how they want it
[00:36] <fta> micahg, really? do you have a link?
[00:36] <micahg> i saw somthing...let me see if I can find it
[00:39] <fta> asac, usually seb doesn't care about this kind of bugs as they are not packaging related, he sends me upstream
[00:39] <fta> and my bug is still untouched after 6+ months
[00:42] <micahg> no, evo seems to be planned for 3.0
[00:42] <asac> fta: right .... i want him to give the richt nick to bug him ;)
[00:44] <fta> micahg, what does that mean?
[00:44] <micahg> fta: I was wrong :)
[00:45] <asac> ok ... i will be downstairs now getting food and beer ;)
[00:45] <asac> the wifi is too sucky here on room anyway ;)
[00:45] <fta> as usual ;)
[00:45] <fta> wifi is always bad at uds
[00:45] <fta> too many geeks
[00:46] <asac> at uds its quite good this time actually ... just the rooms are bad (though it still works, which means its better than usual ) ;)
[00:46] <asac> ok ... talk to you tomorrow ;)
[00:46] <fta> ok, enjoy
[00:47] <micahg> fta: I'll fix ff3.7 later
[00:47] <fta> great, thx
[00:48] <fta> so we'll just have the lpia js segfault left
[00:48] <fta> [reed], ^^
[00:49] <[reed]> fta: bug filed?
[00:49] <[reed]> :)
[00:49] <asac> dont bother about lpia for now
[00:49] <fta> no, as i said, i can't provide a backtrace, no lpia here
[00:52] <asac> maybe we will disable lpia for ppa's ... tbd
[00:52] <fta> too bad, i thought for a moment that someone would fix bug 369112
[00:52] <micahg> I haven't had a chance to file the bug yet
[00:52] <asac> ok out for sure
[00:52] <asac> ttyt
[00:58] <JanC> can't you emulate lpia on qemu?
[02:49] <dtchen_> asac: newer userspace is nearly always safe. it's newer kernelspace that tends to present problems.
[05:58] <asac> dtchen_: cool. thanks a lot!
[06:02] <dtchen_> asac: np.
[07:17] <micahg1> asac: you're not still up, are you?
[15:02] <asac> jcastro: there?
[15:12] <asac> jcastro: not sure if i have rescheduling powers, but it definitly doenst work :) ...
[15:31] <[reed]> launchpad's code is so huge
[15:31] <[reed]> taking forever to pull it down
[15:40] <asac> hehe
[15:44] <[reed]> now LP is throwing 500 ISE
[15:45] <[reed]> for http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-devel/files
[16:23]  * [reed] tries to figure out how lp bzr branches work
[17:00] <micahg> fta: I have the fix for ff3.7 but wanted it reviewed
[20:05] <fta> micahg1, too late for today's run
[20:07] <micahg1> fta: ok, do you want to review now?
[20:07] <fta> sure
[20:18] <micahg> fta: http://pastebin.com/f568d519b
[20:22] <fta> hmm, strange
[20:22] <fta> all the urls have been dropped and replaced by only one unlocalized link?
[20:23] <fta> mozilla 522571
[20:28] <fta> micahg, ok, go on. thanks
[20:33] <micahg> fta: done
[20:56] <fta> !time
[20:56] <fta> hm
[21:15] <ripps> meh, the latest chromium-daily just broke a good junk of my extensions
[21:36] <BUGabundo> boas
[21:39] <fta> ripps, please file bugs, i don't use extensions so i don't notice
[21:39] <fta> BUGabundo, ola
[21:39] <BUGabundo> hey fta
[21:39] <BUGabundo> how is UDS going?
[21:39] <fta> i'm not in Dalas
[21:39] <BUGabundo> oh
[21:39] <fta> i decided to skip this time
[21:46] <ripps> fta: bug filed
[21:48] <fta> [reed], i'm not sure i understand mozilla 518506 correctly, you're patching pixman to fix the bug? or is it just needed for --disable-libxul and--enable-system-cairo?
[21:48] <fta> btw, --enable-system-cairo and a patched in-source pixman doesn't make sense to me
[22:12] <fta> anyone's good in python here?
[22:13] <BUGabundo> no me
[22:16] <fta> nm, i did it in 1 line of shell, as usual
[22:17] <BUGabundo> ahaah
[22:17] <fta> using python to give me a value in a python file would have been nice
[22:17] <[reed]> fta: no idea... ask in the bug?
[22:50] <fta> ripps, didn't you say earlier that chromium started to crash recently?
[22:50] <fta> or was it someone else?
[22:50] <ripps> fta: yeah, but the problem was resolved after a quick reinstall
[22:51] <fta> oh, ok
[22:52] <ripps> fta: btw, it seems that the chromium devs purposely broke the extension api in order to make it more secure, dozens of extension are going to need to be rewritten now
[22:53] <fta> hm, ok
[22:53] <fta> btw, is there a sane ad blocker now?
[22:53] <fta> i mean, something really blocking, not just hidding
[22:53] <fta> and no, i don't want to setup a proxy
[22:54] <fta> ripps, ^^
[22:55] <ripps> fta: well adblock+ works well, but I also use a tweaked hosts file that works better than any adblocker. I mostly use adblock+ to remove annoying webpage elements. http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/zero/
[22:56] <ripps> someonewhocares also has an rss feed. I use it know when it's updated and sync it with the one in /etc/hosts
[22:57] <fta> adblock+ in ff works fine for me (i use my own rules, not the lists), i'm looking for an equivalent, but all i can find is just hidding stuff
[22:59] <ripps> as far as I understand, it can't be done with chromium extensions because the extension api doesn't allow it. But the developers are clearly making changes to the api
[23:00] <fta> ok, thanks, so i'll continue to wait
[23:00] <ripps> fta: the hosts file technique works very well, and it works on all browsers, so consider checking it out.
[23:08] <ripps> What I really want is someone to make an autoscroll extension for Chromium Linux.
[23:08] <fta> i often block parts of websites, i want their content, but i block their ads, or js pulling ads from everywhere else
[23:45] <fta> http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10400487-264.html
[23:47] <fta> dtchen_, 1:0.9.20-0ubuntu2~~karmic~ubuntuaudiodev1  even longer than the mozilla ones
[23:48] <BUGabundo> LOLOLOL
[23:50] <fta> 1.9.2~b4~hg20091118r33017+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~karmic
[23:50] <fta> maybe not
[23:51] <BUGabundo> heh
[23:53] <BUGabundo> fta: I get a footer with "New! Chromium now has extensions and bookmark sync. "
[23:53] <BUGabundo> but both links are fw to google.com :\\\
[23:55] <fta> BUGabundo, btw, the daily PPAs now build for lucid too
[23:56] <BUGabundo> kool
[23:56] <BUGabundo> need to comment old karmic
[23:57] <fta> It's the 1st time i don't switch distro at day 1
[23:57] <micahg> I see tb31 trunk failed on amd64
[23:58] <BUGabundo> fta: you are getting old :))))
[23:58] <BUGabundo> not going to UDS
[23:58] <BUGabundo> not upgrading to p1
[23:58] <BUGabundo> *+1
[23:58] <fta> maybe i'm getting tired of all this
[23:58] <fta> who knows
[23:59] <BUGabundo> I know the feeling
[23:59] <BUGabundo> it takes a part of our soul
[23:59] <micahg> fta: tb3.1 already fixed for tomorrow upstream