[00:00] <micahg> i see the ppa finally balooned
[00:02] <BUGabundo> modem manager updates?
[00:02] <BUGabundo> what's coming down the pipes?
[00:02] <fta> balooned?
[00:02] <micahg> up to 14GB
[00:02] <BUGabundo> outch
[00:02] <micahg> was 5GB before lucid and TB31
[00:03] <fta> it should go down once yesterday's builds are removed
[00:03] <fta> the biggest is still chromium
[00:04] <fta> oh! ff 3.7 is still red
[00:05] <fta> well, since i moved chromium to lzma, it's way smaller, but still bigger
[00:05] <micahg> fta: same patch new problem I think
[00:06] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28287  \o/
[00:44] <[reed]> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28293 <-- uh, doesn't chromium include some non-BSD code?
[00:45] <[reed]> such as MPL, GPL, etc.... licenses where you're _required_ to release source code along with binaries
[00:45] <micahg> [reed]: 10 AM meeting :)
[00:45] <[reed]> ??
[00:45] <micahg> firefox
[00:45] <micahg> or did it get moved again?
[00:46] <micahg> firefox upgrade in ubuntu
[00:46] <[reed]> not sure what you're talking about!
[00:46] <[reed]> ah, I probably can't make any of the meetings due to class
[00:46] <fta> [reed], the source code of those stuffs is public
[00:46] <micahg> tomorrow, 10AM CT
[00:46] <micahg> ok
[00:46] <[reed]> fta: yes, and the licenses require that the actual source code used to build the binaries be released
[00:47] <fta> [reed], i'm not sure what you're talking about, i only ship stuff that i build, and the source tarball is public
[00:47] <fta> i'm talking about chromium here, not chrome
[00:47] <[reed]> oh, I'm not talking about ubuntu
[00:47] <[reed]> I'm talking about chromium
[00:47] <fta> chromium is 100% free
[00:47] <[reed]> well
[00:48] <fta> with tons of different licenses :P
[00:48] <[reed]> guh, I gotta run
[00:48] <[reed]> I'll explain what I mean when I get back
[00:48] <fta> i'll be gone
[03:16] <micahg> [reed]: can I change a bug to new if I can confirm?
[03:21] <[reed]> micahg: sure
[03:21] <[reed]> micahg: ensure there isn't a dupe
[03:21] <[reed]> if you can
[03:21] <micahg> check out mozilla 527980
[03:22] <micahg> [reed]: are there any mozilla 64 bit builds yet?
[03:22] <micahg> it doesn't happen with the mozilla version only the version I compiled
[03:22] <micahg> but I'm on 64 bit
[03:23] <[reed]> yes, I think there are
[03:23] <[reed]> check ftp.m.o
[03:23] <micahg> nope, linux-i686
[03:24]  * micahg is checking for nightlies
[03:24] <micahg> nope
[03:25] <micahg> [reed]: should I ask in the bug?
[03:25] <[reed]> huh, really thought we had x64 builds
[03:25] <[reed]> sure
[03:25] <[reed]> go ahead
[03:28] <micahg> should I subscribe you, I added linux@distro
[03:33] <[reed]> I watch both you and linux@distro
[03:34] <[reed]> you're welcome to CC me, if you wish, though
[04:26] <dtchen> fta: that's an sdl bug, not a pa bug. And, it's fixed already in sdl 1.2.14.
[07:35] <micahg> [reed]: you around?
[07:36] <[reed]> micahg: yes
[07:36] <micahg> do you thing bug 483929 is worth upstreaming?
[07:36] <micahg> I don't agree that there's an issue, but wanted another opinion
[07:40] <[reed]> micahg: sure, upstream that
[07:40] <[reed]> beltzner loves talking about Fitts' Law
[07:40] <micahg> ok
[07:40] <micahg> I don't know if it's even fixable
[07:40] <micahg> but ok
[07:40] <[reed]> make sure to cc beltzner@m.c, faaborg@m.c
[07:40] <[reed]> where m.c is mozilla.com
[07:40] <[reed]> (and CC me)
[07:40] <micahg> ok, is that second address with 2 a's?
[07:40] <[reed]> it's not Linux-specific, so don't CC linux@distro
[07:41] <[reed]> yes
[07:41] <[reed]> faaborg
[07:41] <micahg> ok
[07:41] <micahg> would you know offhand the component?
[07:42] <[reed]> yeah
[07:42] <[reed]> one sec
[07:42] <[reed]> let me make sure
[07:42] <micahg> found it
[07:42] <micahg> other: sesssion restore
[07:42] <[reed]> Firefox :: Session Restore
[07:42] <[reed]> yeah
[07:43] <micahg> it's it disrespectful to mark it trivial?
[07:43] <micahg> or is it enh?
[07:48] <micahg> hmm, can't set remote URL in advanced fields
[07:48]  * micahg will file a bugzillla bug :)
[17:00] <micahg> fta: I just wanted to run my commit comment bu you
[17:03] <fta> ok
[17:04] <micahg> fta: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/323493/
[17:07] <fta> what is that? ff3.7?
[17:08] <micahg> yeah
[17:10] <micahg> fta: you want the whole patch?
[17:10] <fta> yes, please
[17:10] <fta> (even if i assume it's correct)
[17:11] <micahg> fta: http://pastebin.com/f16d8d957
[17:16] <fta> ok, good
[17:17] <micahg> fta: pushed
[17:17] <fta> thanks
[20:15] <micahg> seems like upstream fixed lpia on 3.7
[21:00] <micahg> fta: ugh 3.6 failed
[21:25] <fta> micahg, do you receive the ftbfs emails? or are you monitoring lp?
[21:25] <micahg> monitoring lp
[21:31] <fta> do you want me to forward you those emails?
[21:32] <fta> i already to that for asac for nmt
[21:38] <micahg> sure
[21:44] <fta> done
[21:44] <fta> http://identi.ca/notice/15195777 ?
[21:45] <fta> that would be nice for asac, no security backports anymore
[21:46] <micahg> fta: we had a session today on ff upgrades
[21:47] <micahg> fta: I'll have to fix 3.6 sat night
[21:53] <fta> micahg, did you get a few emails?
[22:00] <micahg> fta: no
[22:10] <micahg> fta: just got one
[22:25] <fta> hm, you should have got a few already
[22:26] <fta> ff3.6 & songbird