| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === vorian is now known as v | ||
| === v is now known as vorian | ||
| dtchen | hyperair: pactl could use love; pacmd really isn't the way to go for scripts. | 03:29 |
|---|---|---|
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === manny__ is now known as mannyv | ||
| hyperair | dtchen: i agree with that. | 05:57 |
| consumeEarth | O prokleta kosovska večero, | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | kud ta sreća da grdne glavare | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | sve potrova i trag im utrije; | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | sam da Miloš osta na srijedi | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | sa njegova oba pobratima, | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | te bi Srbin danas Srbom bio! | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | Brankoviću, pogano koljeno, | 08:23 |
| consumeEarth | tako li se služi otačastvu, | 08:23 |
| Tm_T | !op | 08:23 |
| ubottu | Help! bhale, infinity, Hobbsee, jdub, thom, fooishbar, fabbione, mdz, lamont, or Keybuk | 08:23 |
| pecisk | hi people, there was gui for configuring policykit rules once, it is gone in karmic. Is it still available trough repos? | 10:25 |
| mac_v | pecisk: there is no gui atm | 10:34 |
| pecisk | mac_v, well, but is there plans to do so? Can be old tool ported to new pk api? | 10:35 |
| mac_v | pecisk: you need to ask the upstream devs... there isnt any at the moment and the old tool doesnt work | 10:36 |
| pecisk | allright | 10:37 |
| pecisk | thanks for info | 10:37 |
| mac_v | np | 10:37 |
| === DrKranz is now known as DktrKranz | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === aaaaaa is now known as abhinavmodi | ||
| maxb | Does Ubuntu have any means of providing armel test-builds for people other than the rare people with non-virtual PPAs? | 12:13 |
| maxb | I want to merge subversion from Debian but the latest version is FTBFS on armel only in Debian | 12:14 |
| fale | I can compile a package in lucid correctly, while in karmic I must add as dependences quilt. Why is that? | 12:29 |
| JanC | fale: I think the new dpkg source package format uses/supports quilt, or something like that? | 12:35 |
| JanC | not sure if that's supported in Lucid already though | 12:35 |
| souffledev | dear oh dear asking ubottu about udev and it doesn't understand it | 13:11 |
| Tm_T | !udev | 13:22 |
| ubottu | Sorry, I don't know anything about udev | 13:22 |
| fale | why is tor not included as package? | 13:24 |
| fale | how can I purpose it? (I already have the package working) | 13:24 |
| Laney | search ubuntu-devel(-discuss?) for why tor was removed | 13:33 |
| fale | Laney: ok, thankyou | 13:44 |
| fale | Laney: unmanteined | 13:44 |
| fale | I have been really close to compile the last boost.. but got in some syntax errors :S I'll try again... | 13:50 |
| fale | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33823851/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.boost1.40_1.40.0-2ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <-- anyidea? | 13:51 |
| geser | fale: see Debian bug #550300 | 14:09 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 550300 in boost1.40 "FTBFS with GCC 4.4: expected primary-expression before 'enum'" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/550300 | 14:09 |
| === bdefreese2 is now known as bddebian | ||
| fale | geser: awesome, thank you :) | 14:09 |
| geser | and btw: why are you trying to build boost1.40 1.40.0-2ubuntu1 as karmic already has 1.40.0-2ubuntu2? | 14:10 |
| fale | geser: mmm it was some month ago... but are you sure about the version in karmic? | 14:11 |
| fale | that's true :S | 14:11 |
| fale | geser: It was when karmic was still under development (more than 2 month ago ;)) | 14:12 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| === qense_ is now known as qense | ||
| sebp | hi | 18:42 |
| sebp | what's the process of importing packages from debian into ubuntu? | 18:43 |
| jpds | sebp: It's automatic if there are no Ubuntu changes. Otherwise it needs a merge: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging | 18:46 |
| ari-tczew | sebp, come on #ubuntu-motu | 18:57 |
| === j_ack_ is now known as j_ack | ||
| dmb | why is there no lib32 sdl devel package? | 21:48 |
| === YDdraigGoch is now known as WelshDraon | ||
| siretart | dmb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec | 22:02 |
| dmb | siretart, i don't see how this is implemented in 9.10 | 22:06 |
| dmb | unless there are more details somewhere | 22:06 |
| siretart | dmb: it isn't | 22:10 |
| dmb | siretart, it says Ubuntu 9.10 introduces support for installing packages from multiple architectures on a single system. This makes a wider array of 32-bit applications available to users of 64-bit Ubuntu. | 22:10 |
| dmb | is there something that describes that more? | 22:10 |
| siretart | not that I knew, but other might be more knowledable | 22:11 |
| ion | http://www.ubuntu-trading.com/media/site/images/titles/we_love_ubuntu.png | 23:04 |
| ion | http://www.ubuntu-trading.com/our-fairtrade-cola | 23:04 |
| ion | I wonder if it’s a random occurence they use a font very similar to the one used with the Ubuntu logo? :-) | 23:06 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
