[03:29] <dtchen> hyperair: pactl could use love; pacmd really isn't the way to go for scripts.
[05:57] <hyperair> dtchen: i agree with that.
[08:23] <consumeEarth> O prokleta kosovska večero,
[08:23] <consumeEarth> kud ta sreća da grdne glavare
[08:23] <consumeEarth> sve potrova i trag im utrije;
[08:23] <consumeEarth> sam da Miloš osta na srijedi
[08:23] <consumeEarth> sa njegova oba pobratima,
[08:23] <consumeEarth> te bi Srbin danas Srbom bio!
[08:23] <consumeEarth> Brankoviću, pogano koljeno,
[08:23] <consumeEarth> tako li se služi otačastvu,
[08:23] <Tm_T> !op
[10:25] <pecisk> hi people, there was gui for configuring policykit rules once, it is gone in karmic. Is it still available trough repos?
[10:34] <mac_v> pecisk: there is no gui atm
[10:35] <pecisk> mac_v, well, but is there plans to do so? Can be old tool ported to new pk api?
[10:36] <mac_v> pecisk: you need to ask the upstream devs... there isnt any at the moment and the old tool doesnt work
[10:37] <pecisk> allright
[10:37] <pecisk> thanks for info
[10:37] <mac_v> np
[12:13] <maxb> Does Ubuntu have any means of providing armel test-builds for people other than the rare people with non-virtual PPAs?
[12:14] <maxb> I want to merge subversion from Debian but the latest version is FTBFS on armel only in Debian
[12:29] <fale> I can compile a package in lucid correctly, while in karmic I must add as dependences quilt. Why is that?
[12:35] <JanC> fale: I think the new dpkg source package format uses/supports quilt, or something like that?
[12:35] <JanC> not sure if that's supported in Lucid already though
[13:11] <souffledev> dear oh dear asking ubottu about udev and it doesn't understand it
[13:22] <Tm_T> !udev
[13:24] <fale> why is tor not included as package?
[13:24] <fale> how can I purpose it? (I already have the package working)
[13:33] <Laney> search ubuntu-devel(-discuss?) for why tor was removed
[13:44] <fale> Laney: ok, thankyou
[13:44] <fale> Laney: unmanteined
[13:50] <fale> I have been really close to compile the last boost.. but got in some syntax errors :S I'll try again...
[13:51] <fale> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33823851/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.boost1.40_1.40.0-2ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <-- anyidea?
[14:09] <geser> fale: see Debian bug #550300
[14:09] <fale> geser: awesome, thank you :)
[14:10] <geser> and btw: why are you trying to build boost1.40 1.40.0-2ubuntu1 as karmic already has 1.40.0-2ubuntu2?
[14:11] <fale> geser: mmm it was some month ago... but are you sure about the version in karmic?
[14:11] <fale> that's true :S
[14:12] <fale> geser: It was when karmic was still under development (more than 2 month ago ;))
[18:42] <sebp> hi
[18:43] <sebp> what's the process of importing packages from debian into ubuntu?
[18:46] <jpds> sebp: It's automatic if there are no Ubuntu changes. Otherwise it needs a merge: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging
[18:57] <ari-tczew> sebp, come on #ubuntu-motu
[21:48] <dmb> why is there no lib32 sdl devel package?
[22:02] <siretart> dmb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec
[22:06] <dmb> siretart, i don't see how this is implemented in 9.10
[22:06] <dmb> unless there are more details somewhere
[22:10] <siretart> dmb: it isn't
[22:10] <dmb> siretart, it says Ubuntu 9.10 introduces support for installing packages from multiple architectures on a single system. This makes a wider array of 32-bit applications available to users of 64-bit Ubuntu.
[22:10] <dmb> is there something that describes that more?
[22:11] <siretart> not that I knew, but other might be more knowledable
[23:04] <ion> http://www.ubuntu-trading.com/media/site/images/titles/we_love_ubuntu.png
[23:04] <ion> http://www.ubuntu-trading.com/our-fairtrade-cola
[23:06] <ion> I wonder if it’s a random occurence they use a font very similar to the one used with the Ubuntu logo? :-)