[00:19] mwhudson: Will the EC2 AMIs automatically install new launchpad-dependencies deps? [00:20] wgrant: no [00:20] Curses. [00:20] they used to do that [00:20] Why don't they now? [00:20] but somehow i lost that behaviour at some point and haven't put it back [00:20] Ah. [00:20] i probably should [00:21] building new images for ec2 test is really easy though === Peng___ is now known as Peng_ [20:04] morning [20:17] hi thumper [20:17] morning [20:18] looks like you still need that coffee :) [20:19] I'm drinking some was we speak (so to say) [20:33] mwhudson: morning call? [20:47] thumper: yes [20:47] thumper: pick your technology [20:47] mwhudson: lp prod is down [20:47] thumper: !! [20:50] mwhudson: skype should be fine [20:51] thumper: heh, i reported that bug you just reported already :-) [20:51] thumper: don't see you online [20:52] hello [20:53] jml: hello [20:53] (I'm not working, but I thought I'd say hello) [20:53] hello jml [20:53] ajmitch, hi [21:45] So, how quickly do I get mauled if I tell people that Hardy machines will soon need a dpkg backport to run the test suite, and germanium/cocoplum/iron need it too? [21:50] mwhudson: hmm, the keyserver issue would explain why it couldn't validate my sig [21:50] thumper: yes [21:51] wgrant: i don't know [21:52] mwhudson: Who is likely to? [21:52] wgrant: i guess spm would be a good start to talk to [21:54] * thumper heads to get real coffee [21:58] spm: Once the disaster is sufficiently resolved, can you possibly assist with my earlier question? [22:21] * maxb has reassigned the ~launchpad-dev branches to ~launchpad-committers [23:02] mwhudson: call before lunch? [23:02] thumper: now you mean? [23:02] sure [23:02] mwhudson: yeah [23:48] wgrant: hi; your Q ref the dpkg backport? [23:54] spm: That one. [23:55] wgrant: no no mauling. :-) just shoot an email to the devs list explaining why/what etc and we can run from there. that stuff will break spectacularly is a fair reason. :-)