[00:16] <SoftwareExplorer> OK, it sounds like gstreamer. I set gstreamer0.10 as the package for the bug
[05:19] <vistro> Hey, can someone mark bug #486508 as wishlist? thanks!
[05:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486508 in empathy "feature request: esc key to close chat windows" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486508
[06:28] <bjio> omg, it works @_@
[12:47] <yofel> any identi.ca users here that could confirm bug 486631 in KDEµBlog?
[12:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486631 in kdeplasma-addons "FlashingLabel text is always black in Microblogging widget." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486631
[14:08] <bcurtiswx_> jcastro: are you available?
[14:28] <m4rtin> Could somebody please change 403717 to wishlist?
[14:31] <bcurtiswx_> m4rtin: done
[14:31] <m4rtin> ty
[14:31] <bcurtiswx_> jcastro: would you be able to extend my bug control membership?
[14:32] <m4rtin> does anyone have estimates on the timeframe for sponsorship review? Submitted 2 patches for bash-completion about a week ago and no response yet...
[14:34] <dtchen> m4rtin: last week many developers were at UDS-L
[14:35] <dtchen> it's unsurprising that most sponsorship reviews are languishing; some will probably be done this week.
[14:35] <m4rtin> dtchen: yeah, I clocked that; just was my first patch and therefore have no idea how long such things usually take
[14:37] <dtchen> m4rtin: well, it is a main source package, which means the pool of reviewers is much smaller than for universe
[14:37] <dtchen> never fear, someone will look at it
[14:40] <m4rtin> :)
[15:23] <bcurtiswx_> dtchen:  did my bug control membership extension reply make it to the mailing list?
[16:21] <magicfab> hi all - I need to remove/reload ath5k when coming back from suspend on a Samsung netbook. What package should I log a bug against for tihs ?
[16:35] <TeTeT> magicfab: got a new netbook?
[16:36] <magicfab> TeTeT, not, it's my wife's :)
[16:36] <magicfab> I think it's solved upstream: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14372
[16:36] <ubot4> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 14372 in Hibernation/Suspend "ath5k wireless not working after suspend-resume - eeepc" [Normal,Closed: code_fix]
[16:36] <magicfab> I am checking if I should have the fix or how can I get it faster
[16:37] <magicfab> or wait for 2.6.32 I guess :(
[16:38] <vistro> bug #486697 might be a wishlist item
[16:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486697 in transmission "Selection of download folder in Transmission doesn't work as supposed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486697
[17:51] <B_Lizzard> OK, I'm pretty sure the 100 papercuts thing is over, but here's an additional one:
[17:51] <B_Lizzard> Please make the GNOME keyboard indicator switch with any combination of the selected switch keys.
[17:52] <B_Lizzard> E.g.: Alt+Shift *and* Shift+Alt, not just Alt+Shift.
[17:52] <B_Lizzard> Unless there's an explicit and very good reason not to do so.
[17:53] <B_Lizzard> It's very hard to time your multiple press combinations consistently when writing a paper requiring multiple languages, and I'm about to smash my keyboard. :)
[19:37] <micahg> vistro: ping
[19:41] <yofel> any identi.ca/twitter users here that could confirm bug 486631 in KDEµBlog?
[19:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486631 in kdeplasma-addons "FlashingLabel text is always black in Microblogging widget." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486631
[19:42] <vistro> ?
[19:43] <micahg> vistro: I was going to suggest that if you suggest people to install flashplayer, you suggest flashplayer-installer as that works on i386 and 64 bit
[19:44] <dtchen> FSVO works
[19:44] <vistro> ah
[19:44] <micahg> except on hardy/intrepid it's called flashplayer-nonfree
[19:44] <vistro> This person is using 9.10
[19:44] <dtchen> beware nspluginwrapper -- it's either hellish or absolutely necessary
[19:44] <micahg> dtchen: no other option on 64 bit in ubuntu right now from the repos
[19:44] <dtchen> right.
[19:44]  * micahg wants to fix that in lucid
[19:45] <dtchen> we need a real 64-bit release before Adobe will even consider allowing it to be redistributed from archive.foo.
[19:45] <micahg> oh, so the problem is with adobe...
[19:45] <micahg> that makes it harder
[19:45] <dtchen> yes
[19:46] <dtchen> yeah, we've had a couple flashplugin-foo source changes to pull the 64-bit plugin, but those were all reverted
[19:47] <micahg> yes
[19:51] <micahg> vistro: BTW, the person you suggested it to was on i386 so you're ok
[20:30] <jtniehof> is there boilerplate response or additional debugging steps for "dpkg barfed" issues? e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/patch/+bug/486717
[20:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486717 in patch "package patch (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2" [Undecided,New]
[20:35] <yofel> hm, cd issue? (with all those /dev/sr0 I/O and SquashFS errors in dmesg)
[20:39] <jtniehof> yeah, that specific one smells like file corruption to me, but I'm wondering about the whole class of bug reports that just have the dpkg error...like getting at the actual dpkg log, rather than hoping dmesg is that informative. (That one has a dpkg terminal log attached, or something similarly named, but it's only a couple of timestamps...and LP's giving me issues again :) )
[20:41] <micahg> jtniehof: most of them have the apt tem log attached
[20:41] <mr_steve> Anyone knows what's going on with LP? I don't recall any maintenance notices..
[20:51] <porthose_> mr_steve, seems it is down at the moment, they are working on it :)
[20:51] <mr_steve> Bummer. Thanks for the reply
[20:53] <yofel> seems to work again... a bit slow though
[21:55] <BUGabundo> o/