[00:33] <dtchen> bisecting across three source packages is nasty.
[00:59] <fta> ripps, in case you missed my msg, the bot has a --force option to respin even if nothing has changed since last time
[01:00] <ripps> fta: yeah, I heard, it just doesn't seem to upload half the time...
[01:01] <fta> weird. you should paste me the output when this happens, it's difficult to locate the issue otherwise
[06:25] <micahg> asac: fta: don't commit to ff3.6.head
[06:28]  * micahg goofed
[06:55] <micahg> asac: fta: whoever I talk to first tomorrow, I have the fixed version and the old version on my server, I can either overwrite, or commit another revision on top of what's there that's fixed
[16:34] <jdstrand> asac: hi. what is the recommended way to enable/use flash in 9.10/amd64?
[16:35] <jdstrand> asac: it's for my dad. adobe-flashplugin is not available for amd64... he is seeing a lot of stability problems in firefox
[16:53] <fta> jdstrand, i use flashplugin-installer on amd64, it's using nspluginwrapper
[16:54] <jdstrand> fta: it is stable for you?
[16:54] <fta> it is. but i use ff3.7, not 3.5 so i don't know
[16:55] <jdstrand> I use flashplugin-installer, but I rarely use flash
[16:55] <jdstrand> fta: ok, I'll make sure everything is cleaned up and try that
[16:55] <jdstrand> fta: thanks
[16:56] <fta> np
[16:57] <fta> jdstrand, just make sure there's no copy of flash in ~/.mozilla/plugins/
[16:58]  * jdstrand nods
[17:05] <kbrosnan> I do testing of the Mozilla linux builds in 9.10. In 9.10 I am having trouble with the Firefox Ubunu settings being used for Mozilla builds. I would like to go back to the 9.04 behavior where this was not an issue.
[18:05] <[reed]> kbrosnan: it's very annoying, indeed
[18:06] <[reed]> kbrosnan: I just disable the add-on
[18:06] <fta> ?
[18:06] <[reed]> between 9.04 and 9.10, something about the way ubufox is handled changed
[18:06] <[reed]> so that it affects mozilla.org builds
[18:06] <[reed]> not just ubuntu builds
[18:06] <fta> oh, ubufox, i don't it either
[18:06] <[reed]> it's quite annoying
[18:07] <fta> +use
[18:24] <dtchen> fta: what're the contents of your /proc/asound/cards?
[18:25] <fta>  0 [Intel          ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel
[18:25] <fta>                       HDA Intel at 0xe6000000 irq 16
[18:25] <fta> dtchen, ^^
[18:25] <dtchen> and /proc/asound/Intel/pcm0p/sub0/prealloc ?
[18:26] <fta> 64
[18:26] <dtchen> 64KB, hmm.
[18:26] <dtchen> yeah, we *really* need to bump that up. Mandriva has been using 2MB for two releases, and Fedora has been using 4MB.
[18:27] <dtchen> echo -n 4096 > /proc/asound/NVidia/pcm0p/sub0/prealloc
[18:27] <dtchen> s/NVidia/Intel/
[18:38] <fta> dtchen, nope, i have jerky sound for just a few secs, then nothing, and i still have to kill the app. my load is of ~5 now :p
[18:40] <dtchen> fta: all apps? just openarena using sdl's pulse output?
[18:41] <fta> just tests openarena
[18:41] <dtchen> there definitely is an alsa-plugins bug
[18:41] <fta> tested
[18:41] <dtchen> I'm writing a test app for it
[18:46] <fta> dtchen, neverball seems good, cpu stays ok, sound is not jerky, and i can quit without killing it
[19:33] <micahg> fta: around?
[19:33] <fta> yep
[19:34] <micahg> ok, so I committed a patch that only patched one failed file out of two
[19:34] <micahg> I have the corrected version
[19:34] <micahg> should I just add another rev restoring the patch?
[19:35] <micahg> or rather adding the correctly fixed version
[19:38] <fta> micahg, just re-add the missing part in a commit on top, and explain in the commit log that it was missing in the previous commit
[19:38] <micahg> ok
[19:38]  * micahg panicked last night
[19:38] <fta> if it's a critical patch, i can respin the bot
[19:39] <micahg> it's firefox-profilename
[19:45] <micahg> fta: does this sound ok: * Correctly update patch that was "fixed" in rev 460 with the sixth patched file
[19:45] <fta> ok
[19:47] <mconnor> micahg: depends on your definition of "ok" ;)
[19:49] <micahg> fta: fixed
[19:50] <micahg> fta: might want to respin
[19:57] <fta> done
[19:59] <micahg> thanks
[21:55] <BUGabundo> o/
[22:01] <micahg> umd is beautiful, lots of green :)
[22:02] <fta> yeah
[22:02] <fta> but it's getting to big, i should split it
[22:02] <fta> too
[22:02] <micahg> why? you have 20GB in there
[22:03] <micahg> it's only using 10GB
[22:03] <BUGabundo> yet
[22:03] <fta> not too big by size, but by number of packages
[22:03] <BUGabundo> it will grow
[22:03] <micahg> why does that matter?
[22:04] <micahg> you could do a TB PPA
[22:07] <fta> most people just want to follow one package, say tb3 or ff3.7, they don't want 3.5 updated daily
[22:08] <micahg> yeah, but that seems like a lot more work to maintain if they're all in separate PPAs
[22:10] <BUGabundo> fta +1
[22:11] <fta> not really, on my side, it's just a few lines in my bot conf files, on yours, no change at all
[22:12] <fta> but asac don't want to split the 3 ff
[22:13]  * micahg agrees with asac
[22:13] <micahg> we should make a tutorial on apt-pinning
[22:13]  * micahg should create a blog and add to the planet
[22:15] <BUGabundo> micahg: we should make apt-pinning to be easy to do on apt :D
[22:15] <micahg> BUGabundo: file a feature request :P
[22:15] <BUGabundo> we better fix it, then making a workaround
[22:15] <micahg> anyways, asac and I were talking about a gui app for pinning
[22:15] <BUGabundo> micahg: I would, but it would just DUMP into the wish bugs table :(
[22:16]  * BUGabundo listens
[22:16] <micahg> where you can select when you want to follow a certain ppa/version of ff and it would configure the pin file for you
[22:23]  * BUGabundo gives micahg back his doll http://2155.sl.pt
[22:24] <micahg> BUGabundo: ??
[22:42] <fta> BUGabundo, you're running lucid right?
[22:42] <fta> BUGabundo, could you please pastebin lsb_release -a for me?
[22:42] <BUGabundo> fta: yes
[22:43] <BUGabundo> $ lsb_release -a | pastebinit No LSB modules are available. http://paste.ubuntu.com/325653/
[22:45] <fta> thanks
[22:45] <BUGabundo> np
[22:45] <BUGabundo> why, if you don't mind me asking ?
[22:45] <fta> do you have a debian unstable too?
[22:46] <fta> it's for chromium
[22:46] <BUGabundo> at work yes
[22:46] <BUGabundo> I use Hardy PPA :)
[22:46] <BUGabundo> anything higher and it breaks depencies
[22:47] <fta> i mean, a lsb on debian
[22:47] <fta> i have a lenny here
[22:48] <fta> (my last debian serv)
[22:50] <fta> BUGabundo, ^^
[22:51] <BUGabundo> fta: dent me tomorrow, and I'll get it for you
[22:51] <BUGabundo> but as I said: I have chromium hardy ppa on debian unstable :)
[22:51] <fta> you don't have ssh?
[22:53] <BUGabundo> eheh
[22:53] <BUGabundo> not to there
[22:53] <BUGabundo> I'm very low on the priv access list :)
[23:23] <micahg> BUGabundo: why did you give me that pic?
[23:23] <BUGabundo> micahg: was having fun... relax
[23:23] <BUGabundo> unless you wanna more :)
[23:23] <micahg> ok
[23:31] <fta> BUGabundo, nm the lsb stuff, i figured it out
[23:31] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/325683/
[23:32] <BUGabundo> .
[23:37] <BUGabundo> fta: ok