[00:33] bisecting across three source packages is nasty. [00:59] ripps, in case you missed my msg, the bot has a --force option to respin even if nothing has changed since last time [01:00] fta: yeah, I heard, it just doesn't seem to upload half the time... [01:01] weird. you should paste me the output when this happens, it's difficult to locate the issue otherwise [06:25] asac: fta: don't commit to ff3.6.head [06:28] * micahg goofed [06:55] asac: fta: whoever I talk to first tomorrow, I have the fixed version and the old version on my server, I can either overwrite, or commit another revision on top of what's there that's fixed === asac_ is now known as asac [16:34] asac: hi. what is the recommended way to enable/use flash in 9.10/amd64? [16:35] asac: it's for my dad. adobe-flashplugin is not available for amd64... he is seeing a lot of stability problems in firefox [16:53] jdstrand, i use flashplugin-installer on amd64, it's using nspluginwrapper [16:54] fta: it is stable for you? [16:54] it is. but i use ff3.7, not 3.5 so i don't know [16:55] I use flashplugin-installer, but I rarely use flash [16:55] fta: ok, I'll make sure everything is cleaned up and try that [16:55] fta: thanks [16:56] np [16:57] jdstrand, just make sure there's no copy of flash in ~/.mozilla/plugins/ [16:58] * jdstrand nods [17:05] I do testing of the Mozilla linux builds in 9.10. In 9.10 I am having trouble with the Firefox Ubunu settings being used for Mozilla builds. I would like to go back to the 9.04 behavior where this was not an issue. [18:05] <[reed]> kbrosnan: it's very annoying, indeed [18:06] <[reed]> kbrosnan: I just disable the add-on [18:06] ? [18:06] <[reed]> between 9.04 and 9.10, something about the way ubufox is handled changed [18:06] <[reed]> so that it affects mozilla.org builds [18:06] <[reed]> not just ubuntu builds [18:06] oh, ubufox, i don't it either [18:06] <[reed]> it's quite annoying [18:07] +use [18:24] fta: what're the contents of your /proc/asound/cards? [18:25] 0 [Intel ]: HDA-Intel - HDA Intel [18:25] HDA Intel at 0xe6000000 irq 16 [18:25] dtchen, ^^ [18:25] and /proc/asound/Intel/pcm0p/sub0/prealloc ? [18:26] 64 [18:26] 64KB, hmm. [18:26] yeah, we *really* need to bump that up. Mandriva has been using 2MB for two releases, and Fedora has been using 4MB. [18:27] echo -n 4096 > /proc/asound/NVidia/pcm0p/sub0/prealloc [18:27] s/NVidia/Intel/ [18:38] dtchen, nope, i have jerky sound for just a few secs, then nothing, and i still have to kill the app. my load is of ~5 now :p [18:40] fta: all apps? just openarena using sdl's pulse output? [18:41] just tests openarena [18:41] there definitely is an alsa-plugins bug [18:41] tested [18:41] I'm writing a test app for it [18:46] dtchen, neverball seems good, cpu stays ok, sound is not jerky, and i can quit without killing it [19:33] fta: around? [19:33] yep [19:34] ok, so I committed a patch that only patched one failed file out of two [19:34] I have the corrected version [19:34] should I just add another rev restoring the patch? [19:35] or rather adding the correctly fixed version [19:38] micahg, just re-add the missing part in a commit on top, and explain in the commit log that it was missing in the previous commit [19:38] ok [19:38] * micahg panicked last night [19:38] if it's a critical patch, i can respin the bot [19:39] it's firefox-profilename [19:45] fta: does this sound ok: * Correctly update patch that was "fixed" in rev 460 with the sixth patched file [19:45] ok [19:47] micahg: depends on your definition of "ok" ;) [19:49] fta: fixed [19:50] fta: might want to respin [19:57] done [19:59] thanks [21:55] o/ === yoasif_ is now known as yoasif [22:01] umd is beautiful, lots of green :) [22:02] yeah [22:02] but it's getting to big, i should split it [22:02] too [22:02] why? you have 20GB in there [22:03] it's only using 10GB [22:03] yet [22:03] not too big by size, but by number of packages [22:03] it will grow [22:03] why does that matter? [22:04] you could do a TB PPA [22:07] most people just want to follow one package, say tb3 or ff3.7, they don't want 3.5 updated daily [22:08] yeah, but that seems like a lot more work to maintain if they're all in separate PPAs [22:10] fta +1 [22:11] not really, on my side, it's just a few lines in my bot conf files, on yours, no change at all [22:12] but asac don't want to split the 3 ff [22:13] * micahg agrees with asac [22:13] we should make a tutorial on apt-pinning [22:13] * micahg should create a blog and add to the planet [22:15] micahg: we should make apt-pinning to be easy to do on apt :D [22:15] BUGabundo: file a feature request :P [22:15] we better fix it, then making a workaround [22:15] anyways, asac and I were talking about a gui app for pinning [22:15] micahg: I would, but it would just DUMP into the wish bugs table :( [22:16] * BUGabundo listens [22:16] where you can select when you want to follow a certain ppa/version of ff and it would configure the pin file for you [22:23] * BUGabundo gives micahg back his doll http://2155.sl.pt [22:24] BUGabundo: ?? [22:42] BUGabundo, you're running lucid right? [22:42] BUGabundo, could you please pastebin lsb_release -a for me? [22:42] fta: yes [22:43] $ lsb_release -a | pastebinit No LSB modules are available. http://paste.ubuntu.com/325653/ [22:45] thanks [22:45] np [22:45] why, if you don't mind me asking ? [22:45] do you have a debian unstable too? [22:46] it's for chromium [22:46] at work yes [22:46] I use Hardy PPA :) [22:46] anything higher and it breaks depencies [22:47] i mean, a lsb on debian [22:47] i have a lenny here [22:48] (my last debian serv) [22:50] BUGabundo, ^^ [22:51] fta: dent me tomorrow, and I'll get it for you [22:51] but as I said: I have chromium hardy ppa on debian unstable :) [22:51] you don't have ssh? [22:53] eheh [22:53] not to there [22:53] I'm very low on the priv access list :) [23:23] BUGabundo: why did you give me that pic? [23:23] micahg: was having fun... relax [23:23] unless you wanna more :) [23:23] ok [23:31] BUGabundo, nm the lsb stuff, i figured it out [23:31] http://paste.ubuntu.com/325683/ [23:32] . [23:37] fta: ok