=== asac_ is now known as asac [12:44] hi!!!! [12:45] * asac just woke up after a ~14h sleep :) [12:45] never had that before ;) [12:45] damn travel ;) [13:35] asac, hey :) [13:35] asac, any news for the mail? [13:35] I guess you forgot it, too many stuff to do in one time [13:35] eheh :)) [13:48] av`: what was the mail title? [13:48] * asac has 1.8k unread mails in main inbox [13:48] ;) [13:48] asac, AM report for Andrea Veri [13:48] av`: you forwardewd [13:48] asac, yes [13:48] i need a bounche [13:48] bounce [13:48] not forward [13:49] otherwise it will not be properly threaded [13:49] asac, I forwarded you the mail as an attachment [13:49] can you do that? [13:49] ah [13:49] let me check [13:49] so you can get the message ID [13:49] and you're done [13:56] av`: will you stop after becoming a DD ? [13:56] ;) [13:57] asac, becoming a DD is the starting point I would say [13:57] asac, what do you think? :) [13:57] asac, I finished all the tests in around ~10 days, I'm happy :) [14:04] av`: so did anyone object yet? [14:04] asac, what do you mean? [14:04] asac, I received 6 DDs advocations since now on the -newmaint list [14:04] meaning: did anyone object yet [14:04] yes [14:04] no objections? [14:05] good [14:05] just wondered if i was any objection i should address [14:05] oh...everything fine :) [14:05] all very good recommendations [14:05] and that made me more than happy :) [14:05] and you really need my reply still ;)? [14:06] your my first sponsor, I learn a lot from you, so I really care about your recommendation [14:06] * learnt [14:07] if not I would have asked you :) [14:07] * would no [14:07] * not [14:07] damn keyboard [14:07] http://paste.ubuntu.com/326117/ [14:07] is that good enough? [14:07] otherwise tell me what i should write [14:07] ;) [14:09] asac, it looks simply great [14:09] thanks :) [14:10] av`: sent [14:11] asac, thanks a lot :) [14:11] np [14:11] welcome [14:11] will ping you when that will happen [14:11] gonna drop you a mail with my @debian.org mail address [14:11] hehe [14:14] asac, maybe someone will send you some notifications about the fact you didnt sign it [14:14] hmm [14:14] happened before to a DD who didnt sign [14:16] av`: resetn [14:17] asac, thanks, I prevented you to receive some comments like [14:17] 'you forgot to sign' or 'were you really Alexander Sack' and more :) === kenvandif is now known as kenvandine [16:22] fta: the bzr date feature got committed afaict :) [17:36] [reed], x64 is not a supported platform??? [17:36] fta: +1 [17:37] +1000 actually [17:37] <[reed]> fta: not tier 1 currently, but we do build x64 builds for linux [17:41] in recent ubuntus, it's between 25% and 35% [19:36] asac: ping [19:46] anyone using daily for firefox 3.6? [20:07] fta: looks like songbird jumped to 1.6 [20:08] yeah, we branched [20:09] Mook_sb: will you be around this weekend? [20:09] some day, I'll be able to stop crying and there will be an actual release [20:09] micahg: likely, yes [20:09] I want to try to fix the dailies [20:09] <3 [20:10] Mook_sb: what's the timetable for a 1.5 release? [20:10] if any? [20:10] micahg: honestly, I have no idea :( [20:10] fta: is it worth trying to get a 1.5 version into lucid? [20:11] Mook_sb: is there anything like mxr for songbird? [20:11] micahg, i don't think so, nothing has changed wrt the issues that prevented it to enter the repo 1/2/3+ years ago [20:12] micahg: http://src.songbirdnest.com/source/ [20:12] fta: so, I should just try to get trunk to work then and not worry about a 1.5 branch? [20:12] it doesn't deal with branches :( [20:12] micahg, have a look at the need-packaging bug [20:13] thanks Mook_sb [20:13] micahg, yep, follow trunk, we can do releases in another ppa, but most people are happy with trunk [20:15] micahg: 1.5 is almost certainly not going to be a publicly stable release, so i wouldn't bother trying to make 1.5 packages [20:15] i would just go to trunk. [20:16] 1.5 was, for all intents and purposes, an internal release for us to slot bugs into while we work on video - which is spanning two releases (1.5 & 1.6) [20:16] stevel: is songbird like gnome in version conventions then? [20:17] micahg: i'm not familiar with GNOME's versioning scheme.. ? care to educate me? [20:17] :) [20:17] odd point releases are devel, even are stable [20:18] micahg: ah, no. that's just coincidence [20:18] we've normally tried to make every release a public stable release. [20:18] 1.5 & 1.6 is the first time we've explicitly planned to not release a build [20:18] though we fubar'd up and had issues with 1.3 & 1.4, so ended up not releasing those as well [20:19] 1.3 wasn't released either [20:19] right, which is why i said "explicitly" :) 1.5 has never been planned from the start to be released [20:19] whereas 1.3 & 1.4 was us sucking [20:19] :( [20:19] ok [20:19] we keep whipping Mook_sb as hard as we can, but he just won't code any faster [20:19] :( [20:21] stevel: you need to do things that I don't _like_ [20:21] TMI [20:44] kenvandine, if possible, please remove the patch in the gwibber packaging branch (and the cdbs include) [20:44] sure [20:47] kenvandine, i guess i've already read http://jordanhall.co.uk/ubuntu-linux/gwibber-large-fonts-in-ubuntu-9.10-karmic-koala-issue/ [20:47] i have a fix for that [20:47] including the preferences ui that lies [20:49] fta, i want to see why ryan was doing the +2 thing [20:49] seems very wrong [20:49] but aside from that, the preferences UI says you can over-ride fonts [20:49] but you can't [20:50] so i have a branch that fixes that [20:51] maybe Ryan needs glasses ;) [20:56] hehe [20:57] ok... it was to compensate for a bug in an older webkit version [20:57] so he isn't just blind [22:48] [reed], gosh, 5 minutes to exit from ff 3.7 :P zillions of madvise(x, y, MADV_DONTNEED) [22:49] with 100% cpu of course, and lots of i/o [23:11] galeon 29439 2.20% 2882 26142 408 7 [23:11] songbird 27564 2.06% 1504 25186 695 179 [23:11] chromium-browser 21679 1.62% 4545 10014 7116 4 [23:11] google-chrome-unstable 17914 1.34% 4542 6967 6388 17 [23:11] next target for chromium is to crush songbird, then galeon ;) [23:15] fta: where are those number from? [23:15] popcon [23:15] i don't see % [23:16] i have a wrapper [23:17] http://paste.ubuntu.com/326455/ [23:21] micahg, let me know if you want my script [23:21] seems interesting [23:21] but I'm wondering why galeon still exists [23:23] popcon is distro agnostic, so it doesn't know the difference between karmic, hardy, dapper [23:23] ah, I'm wondering going forward though [23:23] last release was a year ago [23:23] to make it compatible with ff3 [23:23] or rather xul1.9 [23:24] I guess we'll see in dec if it's pulled from debian [23:29] micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/326461/ my dirty script :) [23:42] thanks fta