[12:44] <asac> hi!!!!
[12:45]  * asac just woke up after a ~14h sleep :)
[12:45] <asac> never had that before ;)
[12:45] <asac> damn travel ;)
[13:35] <av`> asac, hey :)
[13:35] <av`> asac, any news for the mail?
[13:35] <av`> I guess you forgot it, too many stuff to do in one time
[13:35] <av`> eheh :))
[13:48] <asac> av`: what was the mail title?
[13:48]  * asac has 1.8k unread mails in main inbox 
[13:48] <asac> ;)
[13:48] <av`> asac, AM report for Andrea Veri <andrea.veri89@gmail.com>
[13:48] <asac> av`: you forwardewd
[13:48] <av`> asac, yes
[13:48] <asac> i need a bounche
[13:48] <asac> bounce
[13:48] <asac> not forward
[13:49] <asac> otherwise it will not be properly threaded
[13:49] <av`> asac, I forwarded you the mail as an attachment
[13:49] <asac> can you do that?
[13:49] <asac> ah
[13:49] <asac> let me check
[13:49] <av`> so you can get the message ID
[13:49] <av`> and you're done
[13:56] <asac> av`: will you stop after becoming a DD ?
[13:56] <asac> ;)
[13:57] <av`> asac, becoming a DD is the starting point I would say
[13:57] <av`> asac, what do you think? :)
[13:57] <av`> asac, I finished all the tests in around ~10 days, I'm happy :)
[14:04] <asac> av`: so did anyone object yet?
[14:04] <av`> asac, what do you mean?
[14:04] <av`> asac, I received 6 DDs advocations since now on the -newmaint list
[14:04] <asac> meaning: did anyone object yet
[14:04] <asac> yes
[14:04] <asac> no objections?
[14:05] <asac> good
[14:05] <asac> just wondered if i was any objection i should address
[14:05] <av`> oh...everything fine :)
[14:05] <av`> all very good recommendations
[14:05] <av`> and that made me more than happy :)
[14:05] <asac> and you really need my reply still ;)?
[14:06] <av`> your my first sponsor, I learn a lot from you, so I really care about your recommendation
[14:06] <av`> * learnt
[14:07] <av`> if not I would have asked you :)
[14:07] <av`> * would no
[14:07] <av`> * not
[14:07] <av`> damn keyboard
[14:07] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/326117/
[14:07] <asac> is that good enough?
[14:07] <asac> otherwise tell me what i should write
[14:07] <asac> ;)
[14:09] <av`> asac, it looks simply great
[14:09] <av`> thanks :)
[14:10] <asac> av`: sent
[14:11] <av`> asac, thanks a lot :)
[14:11] <asac> np
[14:11] <asac> welcome
[14:11] <av`> will ping you when that will happen
[14:11] <av`> gonna drop you a mail with my @debian.org mail address
[14:11] <av`> hehe
[14:14] <av`> asac, maybe someone will send you some notifications about the fact you didnt sign it
[14:14] <asac> hmm
[14:14] <av`> happened before to a DD who didnt sign
[14:16] <asac> av`: resetn
[14:17] <av`> asac, thanks, I prevented you to receive some comments like
[14:17] <av`> 'you forgot to sign' or 'were you really Alexander Sack' and more :)
[16:22] <asac> fta: the bzr date feature got committed afaict :)
[17:36] <fta> [reed], x64 is not a supported platform???
[17:36] <micahg> fta: +1
[17:37] <micahg> +1000 actually
[17:37] <[reed]> fta: not tier 1 currently, but we do build x64 builds for linux
[17:41] <fta> in recent ubuntus, it's between 25% and 35%
[19:36] <micahg> asac: ping
[19:46] <micahg> anyone using daily for firefox 3.6?
[20:07] <micahg> fta: looks like songbird jumped to 1.6
[20:08] <Mook_sb> yeah, we branched
[20:09] <micahg> Mook_sb: will you be around this weekend?
[20:09] <Mook_sb> some day, I'll be able to stop crying and there will be an actual release
[20:09] <Mook_sb> micahg: likely, yes
[20:09] <micahg> I want to try to fix the dailies
[20:09] <Mook_sb> <3
[20:10] <micahg> Mook_sb: what's the timetable for a 1.5 release?
[20:10] <micahg> if any?
[20:10] <Mook_sb> micahg: honestly, I have no idea :(
[20:10] <micahg> fta: is it worth trying to get a 1.5 version into lucid?
[20:11] <micahg> Mook_sb: is there anything like mxr for songbird?
[20:11] <fta> micahg, i don't think so, nothing has changed wrt the issues that prevented it to enter the repo 1/2/3+ years ago
[20:12] <Mook_sb> micahg: http://src.songbirdnest.com/source/
[20:12] <micahg> fta: so, I should just try to get trunk to work then and not worry about a 1.5 branch?
[20:12] <Mook_sb> it doesn't deal with branches :(
[20:12] <fta> micahg, have a look at the need-packaging bug
[20:13] <micahg> thanks Mook_sb
[20:13] <fta> micahg, yep, follow trunk, we can do releases in another ppa, but most people are happy with trunk
[20:15] <stevel> micahg: 1.5 is almost certainly not going to be a publicly stable release, so i wouldn't bother trying to make 1.5 packages
[20:15] <stevel> i would just go to trunk.
[20:16] <stevel> 1.5 was, for all intents and purposes, an internal release for us to slot bugs into while we work on video - which is spanning two releases (1.5 & 1.6)
[20:16] <micahg> stevel: is songbird like gnome in version conventions then?
[20:17] <stevel> micahg: i'm not familiar with GNOME's versioning scheme.. ? care to educate me?
[20:17] <stevel> :)
[20:17] <micahg> odd point releases are devel, even are stable
[20:18] <stevel> micahg: ah, no. that's just coincidence
[20:18] <stevel> we've normally tried to make every release a public stable release.
[20:18] <stevel> 1.5 & 1.6 is the first time we've explicitly planned to not release a build
[20:18] <stevel> though we fubar'd up and had issues with 1.3 & 1.4, so ended up not releasing those as well
[20:19] <micahg> 1.3 wasn't released either
[20:19] <stevel> right, which is why i said "explicitly"  :) 1.5 has never been planned from the start to be released
[20:19] <stevel> whereas 1.3 & 1.4 was us sucking
[20:19] <stevel> :(
[20:19] <micahg> ok
[20:19] <stevel> we keep whipping Mook_sb as hard as we can, but he just won't code any faster
[20:19] <stevel> :(
[20:21] <Mook_sb> stevel: you need to do things that I don't _like_
[20:21] <stevel> TMI
[20:44] <fta> kenvandine, if possible, please remove the patch in the gwibber packaging branch (and the cdbs include)
[20:44] <kenvandine> sure
[20:47] <fta> kenvandine, i guess i've already read http://jordanhall.co.uk/ubuntu-linux/gwibber-large-fonts-in-ubuntu-9.10-karmic-koala-issue/
[20:47] <kenvandine> i have a fix for that
[20:47] <kenvandine> including the preferences ui that lies
[20:49] <kenvandine> fta, i want to see why ryan was doing the +2 thing
[20:49] <kenvandine> seems very wrong
[20:49] <kenvandine> but aside from that, the preferences UI says you can over-ride fonts
[20:49] <kenvandine> but you can't
[20:50] <kenvandine> so i have a branch that fixes that
[20:51] <fta> maybe Ryan needs glasses ;)
[20:56] <kenvandine> hehe
[20:57] <kenvandine> ok... it was to compensate for a bug in an older webkit version
[20:57] <kenvandine> so he isn't just blind
[22:48] <fta> [reed], gosh, 5 minutes to exit from ff 3.7 :P  zillions of madvise(x, y, MADV_DONTNEED)
[22:49] <fta> with 100% cpu of course, and lots of i/o
[23:11] <fta> galeon                           29439   2.20%      2882   26142     408       7
[23:11] <fta> songbird                         27564   2.06%      1504   25186     695     179
[23:11] <fta> chromium-browser                 21679   1.62%      4545   10014    7116       4
[23:11] <fta> google-chrome-unstable           17914   1.34%      4542    6967    6388      17
[23:11] <fta> next target for chromium is to crush songbird, then galeon ;)
[23:15] <micahg> fta: where are those number from?
[23:15] <fta> popcon
[23:15] <micahg> i don't see %
[23:16] <fta> i have a wrapper
[23:17] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/326455/
[23:21] <fta> micahg, let me know if you want my script
[23:21] <micahg> seems interesting
[23:21] <micahg> but I'm wondering why galeon still exists
[23:23] <fta> popcon is distro agnostic, so it doesn't know the difference between karmic, hardy, dapper
[23:23] <micahg> ah, I'm wondering going forward though
[23:23] <micahg> last release was a year ago
[23:23] <micahg> to make it compatible with ff3
[23:23] <micahg> or rather xul1.9
[23:24] <micahg> I guess we'll see in dec if it's pulled from debian
[23:29] <fta> micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/326461/  my dirty script :)
[23:42] <micahg> thanks fta