[00:36] <Deathstalker> If you are triaging, do you set yourself as Assigned to?
[00:36] <micahg> Deathstalker: no
[00:37] <Deathstalker> Okay
[00:37] <micahg> Deathstalker: Assigned to is for people making patches
[00:37] <micahg> !status
[00:37] <ubot4> Factoid 'status' not found
[00:37] <micahg> ugh
[00:37] <micahg> should get that fixed
[00:48] <Riotta> goodnight
[03:51] <Deathstalker> I'm a member of the Bugsquad but it does not let me change Importance.  Is this suppose to happen?
[03:52] <dtchen> that is intentional, yes
[03:52] <micahg> yes Deathstalker, only members of bug-control can
[03:52] <Deathstalker> ok
[04:40] <HFSPLUS> !ops\
[04:40] <ubot4> Factoid 'ops\\' not found
[04:40] <HFSPLUS> !ops
[04:40] <ubot4> Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach
[04:40] <Hobbsee> HFSPLUS: ?
[04:40] <HFSPLUS> ban me
[04:40] <HFSPLUS> come on nailoth
[04:40] <nhandler> HFSPLUS: He is doing this in several #ubuntu-* channels
[04:40] <nhandler> err Hobbsee
[04:40] <Hobbsee> oh joy
[04:41] <HFSPLUS> so ban me
[04:41] <HFSPLUS> !ops
[04:41] <ubot4> Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach
[08:20] <Toobazz> Hello. Despite the somewhat rude posting from the last subscriber, bug 486474 really should have its importance raised.
[08:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 486474 in software-center "software-center doesn't alert when trying to delete important packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/486474
[08:23]  * micahg is looking
[08:31] <micahg> Toobazz: I set it as high
[08:31] <Toobazz> micahg: thanks
[08:31] <micahg> it didn't seem critical as, I don't think most people try to uninstall random software
[08:32] <micahg> but someone else might change it
[08:34] <Toobazz> micahg: no, I think "high" is OK. I mean: it _is_ critical, but indeed only for a minority of unlucky users
[09:36] <slacker_nl>  can someone perhaps have a look at this bug 443167?
[09:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 443167 in debian-installer "mini.iso installs openoffice packages for cli systems" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/443167
[10:44] <TheNewAndy> the "Report a bug" link at launchpad.net/ubuntu redirects me to the wiki
[10:44] <TheNewAndy> Am I doing something wrong?
[10:47] <seb128> TheNewAndy, did you read the wiki page you are redirected to?
[10:48] <TheNewAndy> yes... just not well enough. "ubuntu-bug" it is then :)
[10:50] <TheNewAndy> however, I think the making the "Launchpad" link under "Filing bugs at Launchpat.net" take me back to where I just came from is cruel :)
[11:06] <^arky^> can anyone confirm bug 464442
[11:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 464442 in alsa-driver "alsa-util.c: snd_pcm_delay() returned a value that is exceptionally large: -4496252 bytes (-25488 ms)." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/464442
[11:28] <LimCore> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/475293
[11:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 475293 in cryptsetup "Upgrade to Karmic completely broke password prompt for cryptdisks at boot" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[11:28] <LimCore> please set prio to Medium
[12:51] <aburch> Hi.  Can someone set the priority of 94933, 237233 to wishlist, and 312051, 433545 to medium please?
[12:51] <titchy> Hi All, sorry if you are on #ubuntu too the next entry from me is a repost as suggested by a member of that list
[12:51] <titchy> Hi All, I just upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10 from the previous version, it killed my display as the new nv driver was unable to drive the Nvidia ION in my system, though it seemed to work previously. I had no choice but to install the proprietary drivers to get a system that works, even then I had to add them to the xorg.conf to get them to load. Is this a good enough place to say this so it helps the code change so others are not struck by a flashing t
[13:20] <lfaraone> Hey, I've got two bugs in my package autokey, both occur on package removal. I can't seem to reproduce, and I'm unable to find out any commonalities in the two. Bug 479131 and 485438.
[13:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 479131 in autokey "Autokey crashes on post-install, should "restart" if daemon already running" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/479131
[13:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 485438 in autokey "package autokey 0.54.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script pre-removal install? a retourn? une erreur de sortie d'?tat 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485438
[14:52] <FFEMTcJ> Bug #485076 has been fixed in the upstream.. Does the status need to be changed in ubuntus bug?
[14:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 485076 in gobby "Closing Gobby opens confirmation alert with the word "nevertheless"" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485076
[15:45] <bddebian> Boo
[16:18] <matti> ;]
[17:16] <LimCore> actually who can set bug's prio. We seem to have shortage of these guys
[17:18] <yofel> LimCore: feel free to apply once you think you're ready: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl
[18:15] <jldupont> micahg: hi?
[18:16] <micahg> jldupont: hi
[18:16] <jldupont> I am really struggling with Synaptic here...
[18:16] <jldupont> It's only my 3rd package on LP...
[18:16] <micahg> jldupont: is synaptic showing the new version at all or just not under origin?
[18:17] <jldupont> under ppa.launchpad.net/main, it is showing **but** not when I do a search on it.
[18:18] <jldupont> I don't understand why there is an "ubuntu" logo next to it also...
[18:18] <micahg> probably  because it's in main
[18:19] <jldupont> ok
[18:19] <jldupont> What could go wrong with the "quicksearch" under Synaptic?
[18:20] <jldupont> I tried "banshee" and it lists the packages OK.
[18:20] <micahg> idk
[18:20] <micahg> how are you searching?
[18:21] <jldupont> in the "Quick Search" when "ppa.launchpad.net/main" is selected on the left.
[18:22] <micahg> what do the docs say about how the search works?
[18:24] <jldupont> I can't find anything.
[18:25] <jldupont> For the "search filter", every knob is ON... it should search for everything/everywhere!
[18:26] <micahg> jldupont: what are you typing?
[18:26] <jldupont> "phidgets"
[18:27] <micahg> what should show up?
[18:27] <jldupont> https://launchpad.net/~jldupont/+archive/phidgets
[18:28] <micahg> jldupont: is it in the list?
[18:29] <jldupont> maybe the "quicksearch" only searches in the "text" associated with a package?
[18:29] <jldupont> micahg: yes it is in the list... just won't get displayed when I do a "quick search" for it
[18:32] <jldupont> http://tinypic.com/r/281vgx3/6
[18:32] <jldupont> that's what shows up... without the "quicksearch"
[18:35] <jldupont> any idea?
[18:36] <Riotta> can somebody help me testing a bug? requirements are Karmic/Gnome and 5 minutes of time
[18:40] <jldupont> does Synpatic rebuild its database "on the fly" or is it a scheduled task of some sort?  ( I know about the Reload button )
[18:52] <WeatherGod> jldupont: synaptic searches whatever is contained in its cache
[18:53] <WeatherGod> Reload is one method of updating that cache
[18:53] <jldupont> @WeatherGod: thanks for the input.  Is there something special between "quick search" and "search" then?
[18:53] <WeatherGod> idk
[18:54] <WeatherGod> I would presume it is the difference between searching the summaries and the descriptions
[18:54] <WeatherGod> but I am only guessing here
[18:55] <jldupont> that's an interesting theory... I shall investigate.
[21:41] <BUGabundo> bRoas
[22:08] <awardle> Could someone set bug 487840 to wishlist
[22:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 487840 in ubufox "flash plugin can only be installed by sudoers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/487840
[22:17]  * micahg is looking awa
[22:17] <micahg> awardle:
[22:21] <Riotta> yofel: are you around?
[22:22] <yofel> yep
[22:22] <Riotta> can I pm you?
[22:22] <Riotta> or you are busy
[22:23] <micahg> awardle: done
[22:23] <awardle> thanks
[22:57] <hexpill> hi, can someone help me with a bug re: ubuntu 9.10 and x over ssh?
[22:57] <BUGabundo> hi hexpill
[22:57] <BUGabundo> wrong place
[22:57] <BUGabundo> please try on #ubuntu
[22:57] <hexpill> alright
[22:57] <BUGabundo> this channel is meant for bug triaging
[23:16] <esr> Hi., I'm here to report a serious regression from 9.04 and that it's being systematically misdiagnosed on the Ubuntu forums.  Any maintainers responsible for the X.org packages here?
[23:18] <greg-g> esr: I would ask in #ubuntu-x
[23:21] <esr> greg-g: Thanks, will do.