/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/11/24/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
LLStarkshi.01:31
LLStarksi was wondering how i would best go about requesting a change in dev trees for onscripter?01:31
dtchenLLStarks: does it not appear in Debian testing's/unstable's 0.0.20091011-1 source package?01:33
LLStarksit is.01:33
dtchenmeaning "it" does appear in that source package?01:33
LLStarksbut onscripter should be dumped in favor of mion's onscripter-en01:33
dtchenhas this proposal been discussed in Debian?01:34
LLStarksno.01:43
LLStarkshow do i request a new package?01:43
RoAkSoAxLLStarks, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages01:44
LLStarksfor debian01:44
jdongquassel needs a much more violently strobing systray icon01:45
jdongbut I fear I might be alone in this opinion01:45
JontheEchidnakonversation's has a nice violent red blink.01:47
micahgLLStarks: this should get you started: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/01:50
=== YDdraigGoch is now known as Richie
Buuntuwill someone mentor me?  I tried emailing the mentor-mailing list but I haven't gotten a response in over a week02:33
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, you might wanna ping nxvl or huats... prolly nobody answered because of the UDS02:34
RoAkSoAxbut you can start reading the packaging guide... don't get discouraged... sometimes it is hard to provide mentors to all of those people who want one02:35
BuuntuRoAkSoAx, UDS? it doesn't seem like they're online02:35
BuuntuRoAkSoAx, I've read through it02:35
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, yes last week was the UDs02:35
BuuntuRoAkSoAx, found it really confusing though so I wanted to get a mentor - just to get started mostly02:35
Buuntuubuntu development summit?02:35
ScottKdevelopers/development, but you have the basic idea02:41
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, I started by myself then got a mentor :). Just start reading, if you read it is gonna help u get started when you get your mentor02:43
RoAkSoAxheya ScottK how's it going02:43
BuuntuRoAkSoAx, ehh, how can I contact nxvl or huats since they aren't online atm, just catch them at a later time or what?02:44
ScottKRoAkSoAx: OK.  Still tired from UDS.02:44
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, just try to find them online02:45
RoAkSoAxScottK, yeah same here... but now i have so much stuff to do i can't rest :(02:45
Buuntunxvl, hey02:49
nxvlhi...02:49
Buuntunxvl, RoAkSoAx said I should ping you because I'm interested in a mentor ^^02:50
nxvloh02:50
nxvlyeah02:50
Buuntunxvl, I already tried emailing the mailing list but I didn't get a reply02:50
nxvlsend an e-mail to....02:50
nxvlmmm, let me find the link02:50
nxvllet me find your e-mail02:50
nxvl_Buuntu: what's you real name?02:54
Buuntunxvl_, Gabriel Abud02:55
nxvl_Buuntu: i don't see your e-mail inthere02:56
Buuntunxvl_, ubuntu-motu-mentors@something.com right?02:56
nxvl_Buuntu: motu-mentoring-reception@reponses.net02:56
* Buuntu doesn't remember exactly02:56
Buuntunxvl_, oh, I sent it to the wrong one then02:57
Buuntunxvl_, I used ubuntu-motu-mentors@lists.ubuntu.com, do you want me to resend it to the correct adress?02:57
nxvl_Buuntu: let me check02:59
nxvl_Buuntu: i don't see it there either02:59
Buuntunxvl_, lol, I'll resend it, which email should I send it to?03:00
nxvl_Buuntu: motu-mentoring-reception@reponses.net03:02
Buuntunxvl_, sent03:02
Buuntunxvl_, well?03:09
nxvl_Buuntu: my e-mail is slow03:11
nxvl_:D03:11
=== nxvl_ is now known as nxvl
Buuntunxvl, ?03:22
nxvlBuuntu: still don't see it03:24
Buuntunxvl, T_T03:24
Buuntunxvl, lol can I just copy and paste it to you?  I don't know why you're not getting it...03:25
nxvlBuuntu: so, you have no experience and you don't know anything about packaging or ubuntu?03:32
Buuntunxvl, oh no, I know stuff about ubuntu03:33
nxvlBuuntu: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide03:33
Buuntunxvl, not about packaging though03:33
Buuntunxvl, yeah I read through some of that03:33
nxvlBuuntu: read that, start in that package03:33
nxvlugh03:33
nxvlstart packaging and playing with it03:34
Buuntunxvl, got kind of confused though03:34
nxvlas here then03:34
nxvlask*03:34
nxvlthe mentoring program is basically for the last mile on the process, not for the first one03:34
Buuntunxvl, ah03:34
Buuntunxvl, well I mean I get how to do it, but that guide doesn't really explain how it works03:35
nxvlthe guide is just that, a guide03:36
nxvlfor more information you need to read the debian Policy03:37
nxvlhttp://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/03:37
nxvlyou can find more documentation here aswell: http://www.debian.org/devel/03:37
Buuntunxvl, how do you do this: "Apply the unzipped .diff.gz to the unpacked source directory. "03:41
Buuntunxvl, what does apply mean?03:41
nxvlwhere is that?03:42
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, patch -p1 < *.diff.gz03:42
RoAkSoAxBuuntu, patch -p1 < name.diff.gz03:42
Buuntunxvl, 3.1 Packaging from Scratch of the complete guide03:42
Buuntunxvl, oh wait, I didn't read that - it was explaining what apt-get source does :P03:44
Buuntunxvl, sorry03:44
Buuntunxvl, what about this : dh_make -e your.maintainer@address, is that my email or what?03:50
nxvlyup03:51
=== Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth
Buuntunxvl, what language do the files like rules use?  I wasn't aware that make was a programming language...04:16
nxvlBuuntu: dash04:19
BuuntuBuuntu, dash? hmm... never heard of it04:20
Buuntunxvl, Enter passphrase: gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session?04:22
Buuntunxvl, I set up gpg with a passphrase though...04:22
HFSPLUS!ops04:41
ubottuHelp! Hobbsee, Riddell, sladen, fbond, mneptok, gnomefreak, Seveas, dholbach, elkbuntu, PriceChild, or jpds!04:41
Hobbseesigh04:41
lifelessHobbsee: you know you want to04:42
Hobbseelifeless: which is why i just went to #freenode asking about a kline, yes04:42
lifeless\o/04:42
Hobbseelooks like someone was already onto it04:43
=== mzz_ is now known as mzz
micahganyone want to sponsor a package?04:56
sladenmicahg: what is it, is it syncable from Debian?04:58
micahgno, it's a u-u-s debdiff04:58
micahgI wanted to get it into lucid, so I can get an SRU to karmic04:59
micahgsladen: ^^^05:01
sladenmicahg: what's the diff/package?05:03
micahgsladen: bug 47751305:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 477513 in uim "FireFox crashes routinely karmic i386" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47751305:04
micahgsladen: I made the upload for lucid, and the patch is from upstream, but the user never tested it05:04
micahgshould I have the user test the karmic version before I push the patch to lucid?05:04
micahgor is upstreams commit good enough?05:05
sladengah, looking at this when I was about to go to bed was silly05:15
micahgyeah, that's why I was wondering if there was a night owl here :)05:18
fabrice_spporthose__, about debian bug 557598: I think that the icons are the ones uuencoded in debian directory05:20
ubottuDebian bug 557598 in xtide "xtide: Icons missing copyright information" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/55759805:20
fabrice_spWaVeR, waver_ got your email. What do you want exactly? :-)05:24
RoAkSoAxhey guys anyone know how's it possible to make dh7 rerun autotools?05:26
fabrice_spmdbtools made it in override_dh_auto_configure05:29
fabrice_spRoAkSoAx, this is also what has been done in gshare by Laney05:32
fabrice_spyou can have a look at those 2 pacakges05:32
RoAkSoAxfabrice_sp, ok cool, i'll take a look at those packages. thanks for the tip05:32
fabrice_spyw ;-)05:32
porthose__fabrice_sp, Ok, but the copyright information is still missing, so the is bug still relevant correct?  :)05:34
fabrice_spyes: it's only that in the Debian bug report, you mentioned other icons ;-)05:35
fabrice_spporthose__, ^05:35
porthose__fabrice_sp, ok i will fix it :)05:35
fabrice_sp;-)05:35
porthose__fabrice_sp, I am not a big emac user (just started playing with it) so no I am not sure that change is still needed, should I turn bug #485689 into a sync request?05:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 485689 in nxml-mode "Please Merge nxml-mode 20041004-8 (universe) from Debian testing (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48568905:38
fabrice_spporthose__, neither am I :-) it's only that I'm not been able to reproduce it, so I'm not sure the change is still required05:41
fabrice_spdon't know also what is the future of emacs21 and emacs22, as we already have emacs2305:41
fabrice_sphhm: emacs21 is not packaged in lucid05:42
fabrice_spif we can get rid of emacs22, this package can be deleted also05:43
porthose__IIRC nxml-mode is included in emacs23, hmm05:43
fabrice_spdon't know the impact :-D05:43
fabrice_spyes05:43
fabrice_spemcas package is provided by emacs23 in lucid, so upgrade path seems to be covered05:43
fabrice_sp"emacs package"05:44
porthose__fabrice_sp, how about we wait on this until the fate of emacs22 is known, sound good :)05:45
fabrice_spporthose__, you can perhaps ping an archive admin, to have his opinion on removing emacs22. otherwise, emacs22 will still be in lucid :-)05:46
sladenmicahg: how long has that bug been going on;  is it also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=37780805:47
ubottuDebian bug 377808 in uim "uim can cause crash of X" [Normal,Open]05:47
sladenmicahg: is  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/440110  a dup aswell?05:47
ubottuLaunchpad bug 440110 in firefox-3.5 "Flash intermitently crashes FireFox 3.5" [Undecided,Incomplete]05:47
porthose__fabrice_sp, ok I'll do that in the am, it's bed time for me night ;)05:48
fabrice_spgood night porthose__ :-)05:48
* micahg is looking sladen05:54
micahgsladen: the first debian bug doesn't seem to be it as it's too old05:54
micahgthat other LP bug does look like a dupe though05:56
micahgsladen: oh, you pushed it, thanks06:00
micahgshould I prepare the SRU?06:00
sladenmicahg: go ahead, but you'll need to get somebody else, the patch is pretty simple06:05
micahgok, I'll follow the sru procedure, thanks for approving that06:05
micahgsladen: ugh06:10
micahgI thought I checked debian...seems they do have it06:10
micahgin unstable06:10
micahgslytherin: are you up for a question06:17
slytherintell me06:18
micahgso, I thought I checked debian for a patch and ended up patching myself and geting the upload sponsered, but debian did have it in unstable06:18
* micahg mistook 1.5.6-2 for 1.5.6-0ubuntu206:18
micahg:)06:18
micahgshould I request a sync now to fix it?06:19
slytherinNot a big deal. When Debian package gets migrated to testing, you can request a sync.06:19
micahgok06:19
micahgI used the same patch number, just a different patch name06:19
slytherinwhen you request sync, your changes are all going away, so patch name doesn't matter06:21
micahgok06:21
micahgdo I have to watch for it, or will it happen automatically?06:22
micahgI jsut wanted to get an SRU to karmic06:22
slytherinkarmic? I thought you were talking about package in lucid.06:23
micahgI already got the fix in Lucid, but only because that was on the SRU procedure06:23
micahgthat was the one that debian has the fix for and got someone to sponsor06:23
micahgnow I'm trying to finish getting the SRU into -proposed for karmic06:23
slytherinOk.06:24
micahgI'm waiting for i386 and lpia to finish building in my ppa, then I'll upload the debdiff to the bug06:25
LucidFoxhttp://kernelslacker.livejournal.com/39760.html07:05
=== pan1nx is now known as info
=== info is now known as help
dholbachgood morning07:56
=== goshawk is now known as goshawkATPoliMi
siretart`hi dholbach - morning folks!08:06
dholbachhi siretart`08:06
\shmoins08:08
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
AndrewGeeHi. Any MOTUs available to review my package with already one advocation? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gpxviewer - Thanks :)10:08
DktrKranzAndrewGee: _o/10:18
AndrewGeeDktrKranz: Thanks :)10:18
Whoopiejdong: Hi, why was the ticket assigned to me? -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/48144810:50
ubottuLaunchpad bug 481448 in vlc "VLC lacks build-dep on libupnp3-dev" [Undecided,New]10:50
=== asac_ is now known as asac
DktrKranzAndrewGee: commented11:08
AndrewGeeDktrKranz: Thanks :)11:08
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
waver_Hi, any MOTUs available to review my package? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/hiawatha12:24
akheronmine too: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/jansson12:37
lfaraoneHey, when I run "pbuilder create" on my 9.10 system, I get "Unknown distribution: karmic"13:45
lfaraoneAny idea why?13:45
=== ogra_ is now known as ogra
slytherinlfaraone: surprising13:48
cyphermoxlfaraone, are you in karmic?13:50
lfaraonecyphermox, slytherin, yes, I'm running karmic.13:59
cyphermoxanything special in .pbuilderrc?14:01
lfaraonecyphermox: not afaict. let me check14:02
lfaraonecyphermox: nevermind, I was missing "karmic" in .pbuilderc14:03
cyphermoxlfaraone, in, say, UBUNTU_SUITES?14:04
cyphermoxlfaraone, because normally it doesn't need to be anywhere in .pbuilderrc -- that file could not exist and pbuilder still recognizes karmic as a valid distribution14:06
slytherinlfaraone: Do you have correct version of debootstrap package installed?14:10
=== porthose__ is now known as padpuck
=== padpuck is now known as porthose
jldupontI've got a small issue with a makefile: http://jldupont.pastebin.com/m395171f115:01
jldupontcould someone help me?  I believe it is really simple, I just know some guru out here will figure out!15:01
azeemjldupont: I think the clean rule in the upstream Makefile should not run "rm" unconditionally15:06
azeemi.e., it should run "rm -f"15:06
jldupont@azeem:  good point !  THANKS!15:07
jldupontcyphermox: thanks to you too! (private reply)15:08
cyphermoxjldupont, you should post to the channel with all your stuff though, not just directly to me15:08
cyphermoxso that others can potentially benefit from it15:08
jldupontcyphermox: you are totally right... my bad... I'll be more diligent next time!15:11
ari-tczewis anybody here?15:19
slytherinazeem: isn't 'rm -f' same as running rm unconditionally?15:20
slytherinari-tczew: lots of people are here.15:20
azeemslytherin: it doesn't exit with failure if the file to remove does not exist AFAIK15:20
azeemunconditionally was maybe the wrong term...15:20
ari-tczewcould someone review this bug 39392315:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 393923 in agg "agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes <limits.h> and <stdlib.h> so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39392315:20
ari-tczewis it need fix?15:21
azeemari-tczew: are you saying you attached a patch to the bug and want it reviewed?15:21
ari-tczewno, I'm looking for answer, that whether this need patch, if it needs a patch, then I'll do debdiff15:22
lfaraonecyphermox: yes, in UBUNTU_SUITES.15:24
alex-weeejthe CERN ROOT packages don't seem to include the Python bindings... does anyone know how to get them?15:24
alex-weeejthis is with root-system and libroot-python5.18...15:25
alex-weeejthe manifest for libroot-python5.18 doesn't seem to suggest it includes any python libraries...15:25
randomactionwhat about libroot-python-dev?15:27
tseliothi all15:41
tseliotthe next meeting of the Motu council should take place on Friday, 26th November 2009, 17:00 UTC15:41
tseliotbut November 26 is on Thursday15:41
tseliotwhat's the right date?15:41
ari-tczewtseliot, #ubuntu-metting15:42
ari-tczewnow just someone is talking15:42
Laneyhuh?15:43
Laneyhe asked for the date15:43
tseliotari-tczew: yes, I'm there, but that's a DMB meeting15:44
tseliotgeser: ^^15:44
bddebianHeya gang15:45
gesertseliot: fixed, the 2nd meeting of a month is always on the 4th Thursday15:47
tseliotgeser: ok, thanks a lot15:48
ari-tczewso 27th november?15:49
tseliotari-tczew: 2615:49
ari-tczewah thursday, right,15:49
geseraccording to my calender the 4th Thursday is on Nov 2615:49
ari-tczewI'm pretty tired today15:49
ari-tczewIf I want to candidate to member of MOTU, can I request this 26th thursday?15:54
macoari-tczew: you're supposed to put in a week in advance15:54
ari-tczewmaco, thanks15:55
ari-tczewso I'll do another once15:55
iulianbddebian: Hello.15:55
geserari-tczew: the MC could process you on Fri, Dec 11th if you apply till Dec 4th15:58
ari-tczewwhere can I apply this?16:04
bddebianHi iulian16:04
geserari-tczew: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopers#Applying16:07
al-maisanHello there! Quick question: are there any rules re. the age of files that comprise a package?16:25
al-maisanOne of geser's packages was rejected by Soyuz because the files therein had "Thu Jan  1 10:13:08 1970" time stamps16:25
al-maisanjust trying to figure out whether this is a Soyuz bug or an issue with his package16:26
al-maisanThe package in question is upload php-auth_1.6.2-1, see also: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36001574/upload_1361070_log.txt16:27
ScottKI can't imagine those time stamps being correct, so I'd be cursious how they got that way?16:27
al-maisangeser: can you elaborate please?16:28
LaneyI can imagine it happening with tar -mtime in conjunction with a get-orig-source rule to make it deterministic16:28
ScottKal-maisan: 1970 being described as 'in the future' is clearly wrong in any case.16:29
al-maisanScottK: yes, I acknowledged that as a bug already.16:29
ScottKOK.16:29
RoAkSoAxpkern, what are your feelings about changing the localization to US rather than UK (bug #485408)16:35
ubottuLaunchpad bug 485408 in gobby "en_US users see en_UK spellings" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48540816:35
jldupontAnyone using the Bazaar plugin under Eclipse?  How can I "ignore" a file from a directory under revision control ?16:41
geserScottK: one moment, I've to look at the package (php-auth; imported from Debian)16:42
geserScottK: they are already in the upstream tarball: http://download.pear.php.net/package/Auth-1.6.2.tgz16:45
geserthe interesting fact is, that the Debian deb has all timestamps current while I could reproduce this timestamps in my lucid pbuilder16:46
ScottKWeird16:47
geseras the package is arch:all I can't check the Debian buildd log :(16:47
geserrebuilding the package in a lenny pbuilder shows the same timestamps (from 1970)16:53
ScottKIt might be worth a mail to the Debian maintainer to ask him how he builds the package.16:53
ScottKSome of them have 'unique' approaches for arch all packages.  My favorite being the one where the maintainer's home directory name was hard encoded in the maintainerscripts.16:54
* geser hopes Debian starts rebuilding arch:all packages soon upon upload16:55
EzraRScottK: are you familiar with the automake/python.my problem with dist-packages vs site-packages?16:57
EzraRpython.m4 rather16:57
ScottKEzraR: Not really.  It's pretty easy to fix these things when distutils is used.  Possibly the easiest thing to do is just move everything in debian/rules.16:59
EzraRScottK: yeah pycentral i believe does that automaticlly...the problem with this particular package is it uses the value with sed to change the source17:00
EzraRpycentral does not fix that17:01
ScottKI don't have an easy suggestion for you and no time to review it in depth now.  Sorry.17:01
EzraRScottK: np, i thought i had seen your name when i was tracking down the automake stuff17:02
ScottKI've worked on packages like that before, it's just been awhile.17:02
EzraRright now the package is broken for python 2.6 but say if i changed the source after install it would break it for < 2.617:04
EzraRor do i need to worry about people not having 2.6?17:05
EzraRi can put a condition to change if over 2.517:05
ScottKIn Lucid, we only have 2.6, so it's fine.17:05
EzraRkarmic too?17:06
ScottKKarmic has 2.5 and 2.6.17:08
ScottKA more general solution is preferable.  It'd be useful for Debian if not for us.17:08
EzraRi believe that would take fixing automake which the bug is curently makred fixed17:09
EzraRhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.6/+bug/35001617:17
ubottuLaunchpad bug 350016 in python2.6 "wrong quoting in aclocal's python.m4 check" [High,Fix released]17:17
EzraRScottK: oh and btw the package ive been talking about isnt in debian17:27
ScottKOK, then that simplifies things.17:27
EzraRhowever if someone installed the package when they had python 2.5 then upgraded to 2.6 it would break17:33
jldupontHow come that my PPA doesn't appear in Synaptic?  When I press the "origin" button, my PPA isn't listed?18:06
micahgjldupont: it just lists ppa.launchpad.net18:07
jldupontmicahg: thanks for the reply.  ok then, why isn't my package listed when I search for it **but** I can install it using apt-get ?18:08
micahgdo you have just the deb line or deb and deb-src?18:08
jldupontjust the deb18:08
jldupontI need deb-src??18:09
micahgmaybe that's it, but I'd say that's a bug if it is18:09
jldupontlet me try... a sec.18:09
jlduponteven with the deb-src it's still doesn't show in Synaptic **but** it is installed as per apt-get...18:10
jldupontwhat did I do wrong in the packaging ??18:11
ScottKNeither PPA nor Synaptic are particularly on topic for this channel.18:11
jldupontScottK: I tried #launchpad but nobody responds...18:11
ScottKThat doesn't magically change the topic of this channel.18:12
micahgjldupont: lets go to #ubuntu-bugs18:13
mac_vhi... will the fix for Bug #439077 , be available for Karmic?18:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 439077 in vlc "enable globalhotkeys in karmic vlc" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/43907718:59
mac_vhmm , is this the right room for the question ? :)19:00
m4rtinmac_v: only has a lucid patch at the moment19:02
m4rtinmaco: nice interview :)19:02
ScottKmac_v: It's on topic for the channel.  Not sure who can answer.19:02
randomactionmac_v: SRU was not requested19:02
mac_vrandomaction: hmm , how do we do that?19:03
randomaction!sru19:03
ubottuStable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates19:03
mac_vthe bug was actually filed for karmic , as mentioned in the title19:03
fabrice_spmac_v, the fix is alwasys uploaded for the dev version, so Lucid in that case19:05
fabrice_spafter it's fixed in the dev version, a SRU has to be done, to 'backport' it19:05
mac_vhmm , reading the wiki , I'm not sure if this is SRU worthy , but seems more for the backports..19:06
mac_vah ok19:06
ari-tczewdevs, could someone check bug 393923, is it needs a fix?19:07
ubottuLaunchpad bug 393923 in agg "agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes <limits.h> and <stdlib.h> so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/39392319:07
fabrice_spari-tczew, I don't think so: if the package works fine, I don't see the point of fixing something that we don't use. Check it with av`19:13
RoAkSoAxScottK, I would like yout opinion in the patch attached for bug #401048 fixes the issue?19:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 401048 in havp "havp fails to (re)start because of mounted /var/spool/havp in Karmic" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/40104819:13
ari-tczewsure fabrice_sp19:14
* ScottK looks19:14
ScottKRoAkSoAx: You can ask cemc what testing he's done on this.  I don't have a havp setup to test with, but I generally trust his work on clamav packages.19:16
micahg1anyone interested in pushing through an SRU?19:17
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
RoAkSoAxScottK, ok I'll ask him then :)19:17
cemcRoAkSoAx: well, I attached that patch... and I think it fixes the problem, but I have to look at it a bit more. I know it's still an issue in Karmic19:20
RoAkSoAxcemc, ok so if its still an issue in Karmic, it might be in lucid as well19:22
cemcRoAkSoAx: yes, Lucid has the same version as Karmic19:22
RoAkSoAxcemc, Yes, I was about to merge the new upstream version however I though to wait for the fix on that bug before uploading it to Lucid19:23
cemcRoAkSoAx: 0.91-1 from testing?19:24
RoAkSoAxcemc, yes19:24
macom4rtin: thanks19:26
cemcRoAkSoAx: I dont' see any bugreports in Debian for this. I'll file one, maybe they'll fix it and then you can merge (and maybe do an SRU for Karmic). how does this sound?19:28
RoAkSoAxcemc, awesome! I'll hold the merge a few days then!! :)19:29
fabrice_spis fakeroot broken in lucid?19:29
fabrice_spI'm getting "ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded: ignored"19:30
fabrice_sphmm, it's not lucid fault19:36
fabrice_spfcuk112, ^19:36
fabrice_spthis is when I try to generate the source pacakge19:36
fabrice_spof libavg19:36
lars_Hello together! I've got some questions to the contribution process for people who are new to the whole thing (like me). I read many wiki articles, but I am still a little unsure about which things I need to do. I followed the tutorials, here you can see what I got so far: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcdproc/+bug/218374. I am not sure about the correctness of all what I did there... and I don't know what I still have to do. Can19:47
lars_ you help me?19:47
ubottuLaunchpad bug 218374 in lcdproc "LCD g15 driver is not compiled" [Medium,Confirmed]19:47
RoAkSoAxhey guys has anyone else receiving a "E: Could not connect to fiordland.ubuntu.com:25: Connection timed out (110)" message while requesting a sync with requestsync ?19:52
randomactionlars_: you should subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the bug. And the sponsors will most likely ask you to add the changelog entry (to debian/changelog), so you might do that as well :)19:54
lars_ok, I will do that19:55
fcuk112fabrice_sp: thanks i got your update.19:56
fcuk112fabrice_sp: how do i add the export line?  i just added export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/libavg:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH on line 2 of the debian/rules file.19:57
fabrice_spfcuk112, perhaps adding it when building the package? (in the buils target)19:59
fabrice_spyou don't have this error?19:59
fcuk112fabrice_sp: i do - but i saw some stuff on google that it could be ignored.  i guess it can't.20:00
fabrice_spnop, as it don't let you build the source package :-D20:00
fabrice_spScottK, do you have opinion on removing emacs22 from archive for lucid?20:01
ScottKfabrice_sp: I think it should go, but I'd ask siretart` as he's a heavy emacs user and would know better.20:03
fcuk112fabrice_sp: humm, moving the export line below debian/stamp-build%:20:03
fcuk112didn't help20:03
fabrice_spScottK, ok :-)20:03
fabrice_spporthose, ^20:04
fabrice_spfcuk112, can you check if the source package can be built without this line?20:04
fcuk112fabrice_sp: then i get the old error again: libavg.so missing =P20:05
fcuk112fabrice_sp: it should build, but only when i have that export entry in my .pbuilderrc.20:05
fabrice_spperhaps someone else can help you with the build error20:05
fcuk112fabrice_sp: ok - back to the drawing board :(20:06
fabrice_spdo you have the exact building error?20:06
fabrice_spgot it:20:07
fabrice_spdpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library avg.so.0 needed by debian/python-libavg/usr/lib/libColorNode.so.0.0.020:07
fabrice_spanyone know how to fix that^ ?20:07
siretartfabrice_sp: why do you want emacs22 removed?20:07
siretartScottK: in case this question turns up again: I think we should keep emacs22 in universe at least for lucid, probably until we get an emacs24 package (which might take some time..) - for now let's hope that emacs23 gets promoted soon20:08
fabrice_spsiretart, emacs is provided by emacs23, and this would allow to remove also another package (nxml-mode)20:09
fabrice_spok20:09
ajmitchis that still a good reason to remove it?20:10
fabrice_spsiretart, do you have an opinion on Bug #485689 ?20:10
ubottuLaunchpad bug 485689 in nxml-mode "Please Merge nxml-mode 20041004-8 (universe) from Debian testing (main)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48568920:10
ajmitchthough it's nice to cut down on the number of versions to carry20:10
fabrice_spajmitch, 3 times the same pacakge seems a good reason to remove at least one :-)20:10
fabrice_sp(at least, it seems to be the same package to me :- )20:11
ajmitchI'm just wary of taking a package from default in main ine one release to removed in the next20:12
ajmitchbut apart from that I don't know if there are good reasons to keep it around20:13
ajmitchor is emacs23 default in karmic? I can never remember :)20:13
siretartajmitch: no, emacs23 was not ready in time for wide testing. it is shipped in universe20:14
ajmitchright20:14
ajmitch'emacs --version' gives me emacs23 because I chose to install it, I guess20:14
=== IVBela1 is now known as IVBela
fabrice_spright: emacs is provided by emacs22 in karmic, and by emacs23 in lucid20:15
siretartfabrice_sp: err, nxml-mode got merged in emacs23, yes. so we need it for emacs22 only.20:16
ScottKsiretart: Why do we need two emacs versions?20:16
siretartfabrice_sp: I don't understand what's unclear on this bug?20:16
ajmitchbecause emacs is more than just an editor :)20:16
siretartScottK: for the same reason we ship multiple versions of python20:16
ScottKsiretart: How many versions of Python in Lucid?20:17
fabrice_spsiretart, I think it could be a sync, because I've not been able to reproduce the problem that generated the diff i Ubuntu20:17
ajmitchstill 5 at the moment, isn't it?20:17
ajmitchfrom 2.4 to 3.120:18
siretartScottK: sorry? I guess lucid will ship more than 2 versions.20:18
ScottKLucid only has 2.6 as a supported version.20:19
siretartfabrice_sp: what bug is that?20:19
ScottKsiretart: OK.  I guess when one recalls emacs is an operating system that happens to have an editor, it makes sense.20:19
fabrice_splet me check20:19
siretartScottK: I don't propose to ship more than one version of emacs in main. keeping the older version in universe is all I suggest20:19
ScottKOK.20:20
siretartScottK: nah, operating systems need to do scheduling and optionally paging. emacs does neither20:20
siretartScottK: rather think of emacs like an interpreter for a funky language (called elisp) that happens to have a graphical interface with an fancy editor :-)20:20
ScottKFair enough20:21
fabrice_spsiretart, Bug #14790420:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 147904 in nxml-mode "package nxml-mode 20041004-7 failed to install/upgrade: " [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/14790420:21
fabrice_spyou fixed it :-D20:21
siretartwow, that is an really old upload20:22
siretartI'd be surprised if it hadn't be fixed in debian in the mean time20:22
siretartso if you have verified upgrade still works, go ahead with the sync!20:22
fabrice_spthat's my point :-) I'll just make another check, but it was ok last time I checked (don't remember if it was an upgrade ar an install)20:23
=== YDdraigGoch is now known as Richie
=== ripps_ is now known as ripps
porthosefabrice_sp, just read the scroll back, I'll switch the bug from a merge to a sync :)21:33
fabrice_spperfect :-)21:35
fabrice_spbed time: bye ;-)21:36
porthosenite21:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!