[01:49] <ojn> Alright. Anyone here who has the patches for the lange51 kernel flavor? Seems like ARM doesn't care much about the GPL, none were provided with the systems they distributed. :(
=== Stskeepz is now known as Stskeeps
=== darkstar62 is now known as darkstar62[away]
[12:18] <asac> ogra: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35539315/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-armel.xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1.5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[12:19] <asac> IT ;)
[12:19] <asac> clearly
[12:19] <ogra> yep
[12:20] <ogra> i wonder if we could just start the transition away from FF already and drop all xul stuff from armel to get the image building
[12:20] <asac> hmm ... unlikely ;)
[12:20] <asac> i can quickly upload xul
[12:20] <ogra> for A1 the only target is "make it boot"
[12:20] <asac> i just want to know how to best test for target being v7
[12:20] <asac> i could probably check whether we are on lucid
[12:20] <asac> + armel
[12:20] <ogra> right, but you dont know for which files you have to add the IT hack in rules
[12:21] <asac> ogra: everywhere ;)
[12:21] <asac> i mean ... there are just a few files that have assembler
[12:21] <ogra> oh ... hmm, indeed
[12:21] <asac> i would have thought it doesnt hurt to add it
[12:21] <asac> obviously hiding stuff
[12:21] <ogra> no, it doesnt, and eventually the toolchain will use the IT flag by default anyway
[12:21] <asac> maybe i should file an upstream bug so it doesnt get lost ;)
[12:21] <asac> right
[12:22] <asac> so just on top level rules: if lucid + armel -> use it
[12:22] <ogra> which makes it only temporary anyway
[12:22] <ogra> right ...
[12:22] <asac> ogra: ok what exactly was that flag?
[12:22] <ogra> CFLAGS+=-Wa,-mimplicit-it=thumb
[12:22] <asac> thx
[12:23] <asac> wonder if i should also add that to CXXFLAGS
[12:23] <asac> probably better-safe-than-sorry ;)
[12:23] <ogra> well, given that xul dies in a cpp file ...
[12:24] <ogra> i wonder when doko will be back ... so the defaults change
[12:24] <asac> doko probably takes extensive holiday ;)
[12:24] <asac> as usual after UDS
[12:24] <ogra> well deserved
[12:24] <asac> yep
[12:25] <ogra> but if its to extensive we should actually start a list with packages we added that workaround to :)
[12:34] <asac> dyfet``: did you merge the ssd spec in the other blueprint?
[12:34] <asac> somehow the url isnt valid anymore ;) ... so unless you say you didnt do anything i will assume its now properly merged?
[12:35] <asac> ogra: you think that option would hurt on compilers that dont support it?
[12:35] <asac> e.g. can you try on a karmic compiler?
[12:36] <asac> hmm it fails becaues of unrecognized option
[12:36] <asac> too bad
[12:58] <ogra> yeah
[13:00] <ogra> it might work on karmic if you add the other options too ... -march=cortex-a8 at least
[13:00] <ogra> but then it might produce incompatible binaries, not sure what it implies for the binaries
=== Q_Continuum_ is now known as Q_Continuum
[14:47] <dmart> Can anyone suggest the best way for me to suggest resolutions for build failures?  Should I raise a bug, or something else?
[14:50] <dmart> apex and ffmpeg should be built with -marm
[14:51] <dmart> (apex is a bootloader, with low-level hacks which won't work with Thumb-2 without porting; ffmpeg contains a lot of optimised assembler)
[15:07] <ogra> dmart, apex is used only on nslu2 ... so i didnt bother to fix it yet
[15:07] <ogra> i'll add the -marm and i think it also needs a -march option to build for v5
[15:11] <ogra> dmart, the proper way is indeed to file a bug, or if you can catch someone here to add a quick fix just use the shortcut through IRC
[15:53] <dmart> ogra: OK
[15:55] <dmart> Did we agree a standard tag for the v7/T2 migration issues?
[15:58] <dmart> I will start tagging with "armv7", though we can change that later if needed.
=== bjf is now known as bjf-afk
[18:47] <talat> hi all,
[18:47] <talat> I open Ubuntu Q&A website - http://www.ubuntu-tr.net