=== yoasif_ is now known as yoasif
[01:47] <Abhlash> hello
[03:50] <shankhs> hi
[06:03] <giantpune> hi.  i am looking for maybe a fix for a bug i am having.  or if there is not yet a fix, i would like to submit it
[06:03] <giantpune> im not sure what app it is a problem in
[06:03] <spO> http://tinyurl.com/y9das4b  <--- this is the bug that causes me problems and I cannot play 1080p movies well now that I installed karmic. I wrote my comments at the bottom of that page. This bug is labeled critical or high prority..IE, it is very important
[06:03] <spO> i think the bug affects only 3000-3999 series ati cards
[06:04] <micahg> giantpune: what problem?
[06:05] <giantpune> whatever is responsible for detecting the battery charge when the power cable is unplugged is what i believe has a bug.  my battery is completely charged.  but when i pull the power, i am told that the battery is dead and the computer dies
[06:05] <giantpune> here is the battery info   http://paste.ubuntu.com/329099/
[06:06] <micahg> giantpune: have you confirmed the battery works in another environment?
[06:06] <giantpune> yes.  it works 100% in win xp
[06:07] <micahg> giantpune: which power manager are you using?
[06:08] <giantpune> whatever comes with ubuntu 9.10 i believe.
[06:10] <micahg> giantpune: start by filing a report: ubuntu-bug gnome-power-manager
[06:10] <micahg> giantpune: wait
[06:12] <giantpune> i found a bug report from july 2007 with the same issue as me, but i dont see that is was ever addressed
[06:12] <micahg> giantpune: which bug
[06:12] <giantpune> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/127083
[06:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 127083 in ubuntu "Laptop immediate hibernates when unplugged regardless of battery level" [Undecided,Invalid]
[06:13] <micahg> giantpune: do you have a similar machine?
[06:14] <giantpune> no.  mine is a laptop.  other than that, they are different machines
[06:17] <micahg> maybe bug 481312
[06:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 481312 in gnome-power-manager "Laptop suspends when I connect/disconnect AC" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/481312
[06:18] <micahg> giantpune: have you tried turning it back on unplugged?
[06:18] <giantpune> yes.  no luck.
[06:19] <micahg> giantpune: it won't turn back on?
[06:20] <giantpune> no.  the power light turns orange.  in winXP the orange light happens when it is suspended.  but nothing i do can make it turn back on
[06:21] <micahg> giantpune: how do you get it back on?
[06:21] <giantpune> hold the power button till the light goes off and then restart it
[06:23] <spO> do you guys think that book will be assigned soon, how long do things like this usually take?
[06:25] <micahg> giantpune: from XP you can resuem from suspend?
[06:25] <micahg> spO: ?
[06:26] <spO> http://tinyurl.com/y9das4b
[06:26] <spO> [22:03:34] <spO> i think the bug affects only 3000-3999 series ati cards
[06:26] <spO> i might as well just buy a new motherbaord+ integrated ccard if there is no prograesss, otehrwise i will use jaunty
[06:26] <micahg> bug 440233
[06:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 440233 in fglrx-installer "fglrx fails at startup because of missing amdpcsdb.default + removal leaves bad settings in Xorg.conf" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/440233
[06:27] <giantpune> yes
[06:27] <giantpune> it works perfectly in xp
[06:28] <micahg> spO: I would suggest checking in #ubuntu-x tomorrow morning
[06:28] <micahg> giantpune: so it seems that you have 2 problems
[06:28] <giantpune> i really dont care about suspend
[06:28] <giantpune> i never use it
[06:28] <micahg> giantpune: one that you suspend when the AC is pulled
[06:28] <spO> yeah cause a new motherboard would cost me around 150
[06:29] <micahg> giantpune: 2 you can't start the computer after suspend from linux
[06:29] <micahg> giantpune: if you plug it back in and boot into XP, what battery life does it show?
[06:29] <giantpune> any way to have it do nothing when the plug is pulled?
[06:29] <micahg> 100%?
[06:29] <giantpune> high 90s
[06:29] <giantpune> not 100%
[06:29] <micahg> giantpune: you'd have to check in #ubuntu for that
[06:29] <micahg> giantpune: ok, as long as it wasn't empty
[06:31] <giantpune> so it kind of makes my laptop into a desktop
[06:32] <micahg> giantpune: maybe bug 421985?
[06:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 421985 in linux "System Suspends/Hibernates when AC is unplugged" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421985
[06:34] <giantpune> i tried to set everything to "never"  but i cant select "dont do anything"  for when the batery is critically low
[06:35] <giantpune> if there was that setting id be happy
[06:35] <micahg> giantpune: have you tried another power manager?
[06:36] <giantpune> any suggestions?
[06:36] <micahg> kpowersave, xfce4-power-manager
[06:36] <giantpune> sec
[06:52] <giantpune_> nope. kpowersave installed fine and configured but doesnt stop the issue
[06:52] <micahg> i'd say you should subscribe to the kernel issue
[07:16] <thekorn> good morning
[08:30]  * mac_v scratches head... wondering where the bug for "flash buttons not working when compiz is enabled" is o.0
[08:33] <micahg> bug 410407
[08:34] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 410407 in flashplugin-nonfree "[READ DESCRIPTION] Flash is not recognizing mouse clicks in multiple situations" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/410407
[08:35] <mac_v> micahg: ah... thanks :)
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn
[09:02] <johe|work> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/227852
[09:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 227852 in gvfs "Nautilus get error when I try to open webdav directories" [Low,Fix released]
[09:03] <johe|work> hi
[09:03] <johe|work> this bug is not fixed in Hardy (just to tell)
[09:05] <micahg> johe|work: yep
[09:06] <johe|work> micahg, nice answer :-)
[09:07] <micahg> johe|work: usually low priority bugs are not backported to previous releases
[09:07] <micahg> also, there's no patch and no idea what's wrong
[09:07] <johe|work> well, its fixed to jaunty, shouldnt it be fixed for LTS ?
[09:08] <micahg> idk, let me ask someone
[09:09] <johe|work> we took the jaunty packages and replaced the gvfsd-dav komponent to get it go, would be nice to have it from repositry
[09:11] <micahg> johe|work: in order to patch it, we'd need to know what patch fixed it, if you can find me the patch, I could prepare the package
[09:12] <micahg> johe|work: there might be a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org if it wasn't just a fluke for ahrdy
[09:12] <micahg> *hardy
[09:14] <johe|work> couldnt just be the package be replaced?
[09:16] <micahg> johe|work: I don't know if gvfs could be backported, we can't replace the version in the archive, only patch
[09:17] <micahg> johe|work: I just checked, it has dependencies on stuff that can't easily be backported
[09:18] <micahg> so the only viable option would be to patch it
[09:19] <johe|work> okay, i see, i take a look if i can find anything andtell you
[09:19] <micahg> ok johe|work, good luck
[10:11] <johe|work> micahg, there is an 0.2.3-0ubuntu3.extra.diff which solves the problem as it seems
[10:12] <micahg> johe|work: for which package?
[10:12] <johe|work> gvfs-backends
[10:13] <johe|work> gvfs_0.2.3-0ubuntu3.diff        gvfs_0.2.3-0ubuntu3_extra.diff
[10:13] <micahg> johe|work: 0.25-0ubuntu8 is in ahrdy
[10:13] <johe|work> no, isnt
[10:14] <micahg> johe|work: in -updates
[10:14] <johe|work>  0.2.3-0ubuntu4
[10:14] <micahg> was released 5 months ago
[10:14] <johe|work> as apt-cache show says
[10:14] <micahg> do you have -updates enabled?
[10:15] <johe|work> sure
[10:15] <micahg> I can see the package in LP
[10:15] <micahg> can you show apt-cache policy gvfs-backends
[10:18] <johe|work> gvfs-backends:
[10:18] <johe|work>   Installed: 0.2.5-0ubuntu8
[10:18] <johe|work>   Candidate: 0.2.5-0ubuntu8
[10:18] <johe|work>   Version table:
[10:18] <johe|work>  *** 0.2.5-0ubuntu8 0
[10:18] <johe|work>         500 http://apt-proxy hardy-updates/main Packages
[10:18] <johe|work>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[10:18] <johe|work>      0.2.3-0ubuntu4 0
[10:18] <johe|work>         500 http://apt-proxy hardy/main Packages
[10:18] <micahg> johe|work: you have it :)
[10:19] <johe|work> weird
[10:19] <micahg> johe|work: it's still not working with that version?
[10:19] <johe|work> well no,
[10:20] <micahg> do you have a link to the patch?  I'll check the code
[10:20] <johe|work> but i ask again, must solve some things, maybe the crash belongs to us, we use an own build, and when we switch back to the system orig it does not work
[10:20] <johe|work> i could mail you,
[10:21] <micahg> oh, you patched it yourself?
[10:21] <johe|work> yes, maybe it cant be updated cause of our own source
[10:22] <micahg> you can pastebin it if you want
[10:22] <johe|work> not today :-)
[10:22] <johe|work> can i hl you again next week?
[10:22] <johe|work> :-)
[10:23] <micahg> johe|work: sure, what tz are you in?
[10:23] <johe|work> germany, UTC +1
[10:23] <micahg> ah, so I'm 7 hours behind you
[10:24] <micahg> johe|work: sure, ping me whenever
[10:24] <johe|work> thx a lot
[10:24] <micahg> johe|work: np
[10:59] <mac_v> a while ago i reported > Bug #417589  , this doesnt happen to me now , but users are reporting the problem again. should i reopen the bug or ask them to file a new bug?
[11:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 417589 in nautilus "Nautilus memory leak on regular usage for long hours" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/417589
[11:01] <mac_v> the bug has info only from my system , so not sure it is useful to fix the problems others are facing
=== dreimark_ is now known as dreimark
=== mtrudel_ is now known as cyphermox
=== nhandler_ is now known as Guest28428
=== yoasif_ is now known as yoasif
[17:36] <LimCore> hi, lack of no_vol_id  least to possible server with no SWAP so to easy DoS (or just to crash of applications).. please set prio; Perhaps medium.   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/474327
[17:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 474327 in cryptsetup "/lib/cryptsetup/checks/{un_,}vol_id should fail if vol_id from udev is not available" [Undecided,Confirmed]
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Guest28428 is now known as nhandler
[20:01] <dogatemycomputer> I am new to bug Triaging.   I'm looking at bug #489339.   The reporter is upgrading from Karmic to Lucid and is prompted to update a conf file he never touched himself.   Is it normal to confirm a diff for a file that has not changed since the package was initially installed?
[20:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 489339 in brltty "asks about non-touched conf file on upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/489339
[21:53] <awardle> Could some set bug 488948 to wishlist
[21:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 488948 in gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg "WVP2 Video/Image Codec not supported by gstreamer plugins or ffmpeg" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/488948
[21:58] <BUGabundo> olá ninos
[22:05] <awardle> BUGabundo: So every can understand what is happening please could you speak in English. Thank you
[22:06] <BUGabundo> lolol
[22:06] <BUGabundo> awardle: I was just saying hi
[22:06] <BUGabundo> now back to idling
[22:07] <BUGabundo> no prob here, Lucid is running fine
[22:44] <LimCore_> BUGabundo: que pasa?
[22:45] <BUGabundo> nothing special LimCore_
[23:34] <pace_t_zulu_> i have a hotkey issue with karmic
[23:35] <pace_t_zulu_> can someone help me?
[23:35] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu wrong place to ask
[23:35] <BUGabundo> and you know that
[23:35] <pace_t_zulu_> i have read this guide: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hotkeys/Troubleshooting
[23:35] <pace_t_zulu_> BUGabundo, would #ubuntu be a better place?
[23:35] <BUGabundo> usually yes
[23:36] <BUGabundo> but you are a ... regular... in here
[23:36] <pace_t_zulu_> i am quite sure it is a bug
[23:36] <BUGabundo> so shoot
[23:36] <BUGabundo> lets see if we can help you out
[23:36] <pace_t_zulu_> screen brightness hotkeys
[23:36] <BUGabundo> soooo troublshooting
[23:36] <pace_t_zulu_> they don't work
[23:36] <pace_t_zulu_> i've read that guide
[23:36] <BUGabundo> what PC/Laptop ?
[23:36] <pace_t_zulu_> macbook
[23:37] <BUGabundo> ehe
[23:37] <pace_t_zulu_> macbook 4,1
[23:37] <pace_t_zulu_> are you going to be mean to me because of my hardware?
[23:37] <pace_t_zulu_> :(
[23:37] <BUGabundo> I'm not
[23:37] <BUGabundo> its just HW
[23:37] <BUGabundo> right?
[23:37] <pace_t_zulu_> ok then
[23:38] <pace_t_zulu_> right
[23:38] <pace_t_zulu_> so the keys are correctly detected with the following command
[23:38] <pace_t_zulu_> xev | sed -n 's/^.*state \([0-9].*\), keycode *\([0-9]\+\) *\(.*\), .*$/keycode \2 = \3, state = \1/p'
=== aburch_ is now known as aburch
[23:39] <pace_t_zulu_> keycode 232 = (keysym 0x1008ff03, XF86MonBrightnessDown), state = 0x0
[23:39] <pace_t_zulu_> keycode 233 = (keysym 0x1008ff02, XF86MonBrightnessUp), state = 0x0
[23:39] <BUGabundo> pace_t_zulu karmic right?
[23:39] <pace_t_zulu_> BUGabundo, yes
[23:39] <BUGabundo> and stock kernel ?
[23:39] <pace_t_zulu_> yes
[23:40] <pace_t_zulu_> this was not a problem in jaunty .... the hotkeys functioned correctly
[23:40] <BUGabundo> anything on LP ?
[23:40] <BUGabundo> s/on/in/g
[23:41] <pace_t_zulu_> well i got pooled into a bigger bug that didn't get fixed and doesn't seem to be related
[23:42] <pace_t_zulu_> wait
[23:42] <pace_t_zulu_> i am finding something now
[23:43] <pace_t_zulu_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/434071
[23:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 434071 in hal "Brightness hotkeys not working on MacBook 5,2" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[23:43] <BUGabundo> well tehr you go
[23:43] <BUGabundo> a confirmed one too
[23:44] <pace_t_zulu_> BUGabundo, so what can be done to fix it besides me confirming it for my hardware?
[23:44] <BUGabundo> nag a dev that has the same HW :p
[23:45] <pace_t_zulu_> hmmm
[23:45] <pace_t_zulu_> that might be hard to find... an ubuntu dev with a macbook
[23:46] <BUGabundo> no no
[23:46] <BUGabundo> there are several
[23:49] <pace_t_zulu_> BUGabundo, i've added everything suggested at the troubleshooting guide https://bugs.launchpad.net/mactel-support/+bug/434071
[23:49] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 434071 in hal "Brightness hotkeys not working on MacBook 5,2" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[23:54] <pace_t_zulu_> brb
=== pace_t_zulu_ is now known as pace_t_zulu
[23:58] <pace_t_zulu> so i tried something that didn't work
[23:59] <pace_t_zulu> BUGabundo, how do you recommend i find a dev who has macbook hardware?
[23:59] <BUGabundo> email the devel-discuss ?