[00:00] <atrus> m4rk: ~/"Ubuntu One"
[00:01] <m4rk> atrus, i mean on the cloud
[00:02] <m4rk> it seems very slow :(
[00:04] <atrus> that's the cloud for you :)
[00:04] <atrus> i seriously have no idea. i sort of thought that was part of the point of cloud computing/storage.
[00:05] <m4rk> atrus, nevermind. I need to know
[00:05] <m4rk> bye
[01:20] <melvster1> hi all, is there a roadmap for ubuntu one?  Im curious to know if there will ever be clients for other OS's like Dropbox, and I couldnt find anything on the mailing list ... ?
[07:00] <psypher246> hi ubuntuone team, i need some assistance with OFFLINE syncing, i need to be able to upload all my files (30GB or so) once and then copy the u1 folder to several machines so that I don;t have to download it again to all those machines, completely unfeasble to do so.
[07:01] <psypher246> i have tried copying the matadata over as well but as soon as i reconnect u1 it redonwloads all the files and makes all the files that I copied manually as conflict
[12:16]  * rtgz wrote a skeleton diagnostic script. In python, not native language yet, so feel free to comment on the (absence of) code quality, style and general problems.
[12:16]  * rtgz put the link to the script here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RomanYepishev/UbuntuOne/Diagnostics
[13:37] <LiCeT> hi all
[13:42] <rtgz> LiCeT, hi
[13:52] <mandel>  /msg NickServ identify Qwerty
[13:53] <mandel> ups
[15:05] <vds> hello hello
[15:05] <vds> Desktop+ MEETING BEGINS:
[15:06] <teknico_> me
[15:06] <vds> aquarius Chipaca_ dobey urbanape teknico
[15:06] <vds> jblount:
[15:06] <vds> you know how it works
[15:06] <vds> say me to  join the company! :)
[15:06] <vds> me
[15:08] <vds> teknico: start please
[15:08] <teknico> VROOM VROOM
[15:08] <teknico> DONE: more updating of the Funambol code to v. 8.0 (#403435)
[15:08] <teknico> TODO: finish updating the Funambol code to v. 8.0 (#403435), review mandel's branch again, finally triage my 20 bugs
[15:08] <teknico> BLOCK: none
[15:08] <teknico> next: vds
[15:09] <vds> DONE: still fixing the two branches to port funambol v8 in sourcedeps, code review
[15:09] <vds> TODO: land them! code review
[15:09] <vds> BLOCKED: nope
[15:09] <vds> EOM
[15:09] <teknico> THEN WHO WAS PHONE
[15:39] <rodrigo_> hey, an Italian only standup today???
[15:39]  * rodrigo_ has an Italian brother-in-law!!
[15:42] <rtgz> Guys, sorry to bother you again, but could someone with python experience analyze the following code: http://code.google.com/p/ubuntuone-client-diagnose/source/browse/trunk/ubuntuone-client-diagnose.py ? I am interested especially whether there are some 'WTF???' statements present
[15:47] <verterok> rtgz: looks nice, I'ld use new style classes ;)
[15:47] <verterok> rtgz: but in general it looks ok :)
[15:49] <rtgz> verterok, new style classes... heh, new to the language and already using something old :)
[15:50] <rtgz> verterok, is it ok, to perform such class nesting as in BugHandlerCollection and later read the members from it or this is some kind of a hack?
[15:52]  * verterok looks
[15:53] <verterok> rtgz: why do you need the nested classes?
[15:54] <rtgz> verterok, because then I will not need to register the handlers anywhere, such as 'bug1': Handler1, 'bug2': Handler2
[15:54] <verterok> rtgz: what about having al the bug handlers in a module?
[15:55] <rtgz> verterok, you mean physycally in another file, yes, but then this will require at least 2 files to be downloaded. I could not find the way to declare a module, like just 'package Dead::Beef' in perl
[15:57] <verterok> rtgz: you couldregister the handlers in __init__
[15:58] <verterok> rtgz: as you'r defining one class per bug, you can have the bug number in a class level attribute
[15:59] <rtgz> verterok, but I should first find the name of the class to call __init__ leading to duplication, i.e. here is a class, and somewhere else this class is mentioned again and registered...
[15:59] <statik> wow, rtgz! thanks for all your hard work on triaging ubuntuone bugs
[15:59] <verterok> rtgz: and in the Bug.__init__ method register it in a gblobal list of handlers
[15:59] <rtgz> verterok, AH!!!
[15:59] <rtgz> verterok, yep, the base class!
[15:59] <verterok> rtgz: yeap :)
[16:00] <rtgz> verterok, it would be too easy then :).. thanks!
[16:01] <rtgz> verterok, aand it will save me one indentation level. cute :)
[16:01] <verterok> rtgz: e.g: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/329489/
[16:02] <verterok> s/bugnumber/number/ :)
[16:02] <verterok> rtgz: and no need to redefine __init__ on each class
[16:04] <rtgz> verterok, wow
[16:05] <verterok> rtgz: you need to remove the self.number = None in Bug.__init__ ;)
[16:05] <rtgz> verterok, I still feel guilty about writing my_var = 1, since this looks like it would create global var in JS... :)
[16:05] <verterok> :)
[16:06] <rtgz> verterok, okay, thanks for the info, I will patch that and return here later with another bunch of questions :)
[16:07] <verterok> rtgz: ok, thank you for working on that! :)