[00:10] <lifeless> eelik: there is no schedule for either. But you can just use a tree-less repository and a single working tree which you run 'bzr switch' to switch between.
[00:11] <eelik> I know, but it's clumsy
[00:11] <eelik> can't compete with git
[00:39] <lifeless> eelik: true; you're welcome to work on reducing the clumsiness
[00:39] <lifeless> (or on those other proposals)
[00:42] <mathrick> jelmer: poke?
[00:43] <mathrick> jelmer: bzr st on git branches seems wonky, it doesn't report modified files that haven't been added to the index
[00:43] <jelmer> mathrick, hi
[00:43] <jelmer> mathrick, you need to "git add" them again to see the changes
[00:43] <mathrick> yeah, I know, but I was expecting bzr st to tell me about the changes
[00:45] <jelmer> mathrick, you probably just want a bzr working tree in that case
[00:46] <lifeless> jelmer: It would be nice if 'bzr st' behaved as bzr does here.
[00:46] <lifeless> jelmer: that is, to refresh the index
[00:46] <mathrick> jelmer: possible, I use bzr-git as more bearable git for working on code with git upstream; what's the least painful setup in this case?
[00:46] <jelmer> lifeless: sure, but somebody would have to code that up
[00:46] <jelmer> lifeless: it's nontrivial since we can't really trust the index
[00:47] <jelmer> lifeless, but we also would like to avoid writing to the index on read operations
[00:47] <lifeless> jelmer: the index is ~= dirstate, and we write to the dirstate on read operations.
[00:50] <jelmer> lifeless: but that's just the stat cache though, isn't it?
[00:51] <jelmer> lifeless, modifying the actual contents of the index seems more dubious to me
[00:51] <lifeless> jelmer: we don't version or unversion things
[00:51] <lifeless> jelmer: but I'm not suggesting we do that here either.
[00:52] <jelmer> lifeless: not versioning/unversioning a particular file, but versioning a particular revision of a fil
[00:52] <jelmer> "git status" would give different output when run after "bzr status"
[00:53] <lifeless> jelmer: yes, it would match whats on disk more ;)
[00:53] <jelmer> lifeless: :-)
[00:53] <lifeless> jelmer:  you will get complaints either way ;)
[00:54] <jelmer> lifeless: Yes, and it is the way it is because it doesn't require any effort on my part ;-)
[00:54] <jelmer> *extra
[00:55] <mathrick> jelmer: the other way is more useful for the bzr-git user though
[00:55] <mathrick> I think it's fairly safe to assume that people who use bzr-git are expecting more bzr-like behaviour
[00:56] <mathrick> jelmer: anyway, how hard will it be to push/send patches upstream if I switch to a bzr tree instead of operating on the git tree directly?
[00:57] <jelmer> mathrick: it wouldn't be any harder/less hard than using a git repository locally I think
[00:57] <jelmer> mathrick: The index won't ever be a 1-to-1 match with a bzr working tree
[00:58] <jelmer> I think the best solution would be to keep a separate sha1-cache independent of the git index
[00:58] <jelmer> and use that for bzr-git
[01:04] <lifeless> spiv:
[01:04] <lifeless> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~spiv/testtools/test-parameterisation - might want to finish, or delete.
[01:13] <lifeless> \o/ bzr selftest selftest working with testtools test runner
=== jfroy_ is now known as jfroy
[10:17] <Peng> An autopack gave me an "inconsistent details in skipped record" message. "bzr pack" did not. What does that mean, exactly?
[10:18] <Peng> inconsistent details in skipped record: ('monty@askmonty.org-20091125073628-7fekfnr2hmkbjos1',) ('660427 67263 0 319', StaticTuple(StaticTuple(StaticTuple('monty@mysql.com-20091116153408-azpb6hq1zfp1kpvv',), StaticTuple('monty@askmonty.org-20091107103419-28zpi3oyre6kaf2l',)),)) ('1545757 266 0 319', ([('monty@mysql.com-20091116153408-azpb6hq1zfp1kpvv',), ('monty@askmonty.org-20091107103419-28zpi3oyre6kaf2l',)],))
[10:37] <christoph3141> hi, howcome there is no Arch Linux here: http://bazaar-vcs.org/Download ?
[10:48] <christoph3141> How do I best install qbzr and bzr-explorer in arch linux?
[10:51] <christoph3141> hm, bzr seems very ubuntu-centric
[10:51] <bob2> not really
[10:51]  * fullermd looks at all the computers around him with bzr installed, and notes that none of them run ubuntu   :p
[10:52] <bob2> just install them from source
[10:52] <bob2> or you could be the lucky arch user who packages them first :)
[10:52] <christoph3141> well, they are packaged in the aur, but the seem to be out-of-date
[15:12] <christoph3141> Hi, I just downloaded qbzr (I want to install bzr-explorer and it said to install qbzr first). What do I do with the extracted tarball? It doesn't have any INSTALL, and the README.txt doesn't say anything about installing :(
[15:34] <Glenjamin> christoph3141: python setup.py install
[15:57] <christoph3141> Glenjamin: thanks!
[16:01] <christoph3141> I followed the instructions at http://doc.bazaar-vcs.org/explorer/en/install-linux.html, but running "bzr explorer" says "bzr: ERROR: unknown command "explorer""
[16:01] <christoph3141> What do I do?
[16:10] <christoph3141> oh, it works now, I was in the wrong directory while running the command
[16:46] <jfroy> lol
[16:46] <jfroy> bzr thinks my Mac OS X box is a weird windows hybrid!
[16:46] <jfroy> Bazaar (bzr) 2.1.0b3
[16:46] <jfroy>   Python interpreter: /usr/bin/python26.dll 2.6.1
[18:08] <Noldorin> hi. would anyone have an idea how to get started setting up loggerhead for IIS7?
[18:08] <Noldorin> python is installed and running fine, but i'm lost from there on
[19:03] <blueyed> I have a branch derived from a tailor-generated branch. I know want to move it over to a branch created via Launchpad's vcs-import. How would I do that? There's no common ancestor.
[19:14] <blueyed> hum.. does not seem to be possible (easily).. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/318620
[19:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 318620 in bzr "When merging two branches without common ancestry, Bazaar provides no means to map file IDs" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[19:15] <blueyed> I guess I'll do a merge with "-r", manually compare the directories and then commit..
[20:28] <lifeless> moin
[20:34] <meoblast001> hi
[20:35] <meoblast001> where can i get the special SSH for Bazaar?
[20:38] <lifeless> what special SSH?
[20:40] <awilkins> meoblast001, AFAIK all the packages now install or cause to be installed sufficient SSH for it to work.
[20:41] <meoblast001> ?
[20:41] <meoblast001> lifeless: the one that lets 2 people work on the same project
[20:42] <meoblast001> without being in the same UNIX group
[20:42] <lifeless> meoblast001: do you mean the launchpad ssh server?
[20:42] <meoblast001> yup
[20:42] <lifeless> meoblast001: because that requires the same UNIX group, by having /everyone/ be in the same unix group and doing its own checking first.
[20:43] <lifeless> meoblast001: in the launchpad source code.
[20:43] <meoblast001> i tried downloading launchpad and it tried to screw with my system
[20:43] <lifeless> meoblast001: yes, it will be a lot of work to reuse that code.
[20:43] <meoblast001> :/
[20:43] <meoblast001> does every version control system have this problem :/
[20:43] <lifeless> yes.
[20:44] <meoblast001> are there any other SSH servers that can fix my problem?
[20:44] <lifeless> you haven't described your problem.
[20:44] <lifeless> so I can't answer that question.
[20:44] <meoblast001> i have someone who wants to help me on a project i'm doing, this is a personal project so i'm using my Bazaar server
[20:45] <meoblast001> but i don't want to put him in the same group as me on my server
[20:45] <meoblast001> well, i don't want him to ahve access to everything i have access to
[20:45] <lifeless> make a new group?
[20:45] <meoblast001> but then he can't access my code for this project
[20:46] <lifeless> chown the project to that new group ?
[20:46] <meoblast001> then i can't access it
[20:46] <lifeless> put yourselfin the group too
[20:46] <meoblast001> then he can access all my projects
[20:47] <lifeless> how?
[20:47] <lifeless> they are in a different group
[20:47] <meoblast001> wait, can a user be in more than 1 group?
[20:47] <lifeless> of course
[20:47] <meoblast001> *gasp*
[20:47] <meoblast001> learn something new everday i guess
[20:47] <meoblast001> so i just have a group for each project then?
[20:49] <lifeless> something like that, yes.
[20:50] <lifeless> you may want to do some reason on this under general unix sysadmin knowledge.
[20:50] <meoblast001> do you know of any better solutions?
[20:50] <meoblast001> i don't like to put my personal projects on launchpad because they're really not official, generally just things i make when i'm bored
[20:51] <gutworth> there's always +junk
[20:51] <meoblast001> +junk?
[21:00] <gutworth> you can push stuff to ~yourid/+junk/
[21:00] <gutworth> like this https://code.launchpad.net/~gutworth/+junk/mod2format
[21:00] <meoblast001> what if i want it on my server though >.<
[21:00] <meoblast001> anyways, i'm a hacker, i enjoy experimenting ;)
[22:40] <Noldorin> hi. does anyone have any suggestions how to use Loggerhead on IIS7?
[22:41] <lifeless> apparently theres some isapi thing
[22:41] <lifeless> if you mail the like awilkins, who does that, may see.
[22:41] <lifeless> he may have blogged about it already in fact.
[22:41] <lifeless> oh hmm, awilkins does the smart server on windows... but I wouldn't be surprised if he has loggerhead too
[22:42] <Noldorin> lifeless: ah right, i see
[22:42] <Noldorin> any chance of getting it on a shared server you think?
[22:42] <Noldorin> (virtual server i guess)
[22:42] <lifeless> I don't know what you mean
[22:43] <Noldorin> lifeless: well my point is that i don't have access to IIS7 directly
[22:43] <Noldorin> only a control panel - so i can't install arbitrary modules
[22:44] <lifeless> oh. well I've got no idea there sorry.
[22:45] <Noldorin> no worries
[22:46] <Noldorin> lifeless: loggerhead isn't purely web-based, right?
[22:46] <Noldorin> so it's going to require some hackery
[22:48] <lifeless> Noldorin: its a python wsgi web server
[22:48] <lifeless> you should be able to run it up, with some glue code, in any wsgi container
[22:49] <lifeless> or proxy to it from any proxy capable webserver (such as apache)
[22:49] <elli222> bzr-gtk makes nautilus crash in debian sid. anyone know a fix?
[22:49] <Noldorin> lifeless: i see. i'm not really a python coder (as you may remember), so that's probably asking for trouble
[22:49] <Noldorin> would be cool if someone else has already done it though
[22:50] <Noldorin> i guess if there's some sort of python web app equivalent to loggerhead, that would be ideal
[22:51] <lifeless> loggerhead is a python web app
[22:53] <Noldorin> lifeless: hrrm. probably just showing my ignorance here. i'm an ASP.NET guy mainly.
[22:53] <Noldorin> and python is installed on my server as well, but i guess i'm not sure exactly what that means
[22:55] <lifeless> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0333/
[22:55] <lifeless> http://code.google.com/p/isapi-wsgi/
[22:55] <lifeless> (just quickly googled for wsgi python and wsgi python isapi)
[22:58] <Noldorin> lifeless: yeah, guess i'll just have to ask my web admin then
[22:58] <Noldorin> thanks anyway
[22:59] <Noldorin> lifeless: oh, in case you're curious...if you remember those problems i was having with bzr via ftp on my iis server. seems upgrading to iis 7 solved it :P
[23:00] <lifeless> Noldorin: the crazy file system stuff?
[23:00] <lifeless> Noldorin: I'm curious if there were any other system changes made at the same time
[23:00] <Noldorin> lifeless: that's right. where we concluded the ftp server wasn't conforming to the rfc and such
[23:00] <Noldorin> so am i...
[23:00] <Noldorin> there was an upgrade to win server 2008 too
[23:01] <Noldorin> but i wouldn't know anything more
[23:02]  * lifeless guesses at the OS change being it. 
[23:03] <Noldorin> lifeless: you think? more likely than the version of iis?
[23:03] <Noldorin> meh. once either gets completely phased out, your problem is solved anyway :P
[23:04] <lifeless> only another 10 years :)
[23:05] <lifeless> Noldorin: yeah, much more likely to be OS level - DFS stuff - than IIS
[23:05] <Noldorin> mm, makes sense i guess.
[23:05] <Noldorin> lifeless: probably not quite that long, but yeah :P
[23:05] <Noldorin> at least the problem is rare enough anyway
[23:06] <elli222> bzr-gtk makes nautilus crash in debian sid. anyone know a fix?
[23:08] <jelmer> elli222: Did this start recently? I was using nautilus with bzr-gtk installed for quite a while without problems
[23:10] <elli222> nope its happened whenever i've installed it
[23:10] <elli222> (in debian sid)
[23:12] <jelmer> elli222, in that case, no idea - sorry
[23:13] <elli222> well, what was your idea anyway? it might work regardless
[23:13] <jelmer> in that case it wouldn't be caused  by e.g. a new version of nautilus being introduced that's incompatible with bzr-gtk
[23:14] <elli222> it only crashes when trying to go into a directory containing SVN controlled folders. i don't have any native bzr ones.
[23:14] <jelmer> you should be able to disable the bzr-gtk integration in nautilus, that should at least allow you to use the other bits of nautilus
[23:14] <jelmer> elli222, does using bzr manually in those folders work?
[23:14] <elli222> hmm, i'll check
[23:15] <elli222> i assume bzr pull would be the same as svn up?
[23:16] <elli222> OK~ thats wrong
[23:18] <jelmer> no, bzr up
[23:19] <elli222> that appeared to work
[23:19] <elli222> yep, it worked
[23:19] <jelmer> can you try accessing a native bzr branch with nautilus?
[23:19] <jelmer> you should be able to create one with 'bzr init'
[23:21] <elli222> that also appeared to work
[23:22] <elli222> yep, seems like nautilus dosen't like bzr-gtk and bzr-svn
[23:24] <elli222> looks like bzr-gtk has a spasm with SVN aswell
[23:26] <jelmer> and what about e.g. "bzr log" in a svn working copy?
[23:27] <elli222> that works fine
[23:30] <jelmer> hmm, that's odd
[23:30] <jelmer> do you have any something likme nautilus-svn installed as well perhaps?
[23:31] <elli222> nope
[23:46] <pace_t_zulu_> hey i've got a bzr problem that i can't solve on my own
[23:47] <lifeless> perhaps you should describe it and ask a question :)
[23:48] <jelmer> elli222, not quite sure what's happening then
[23:49] <jelmer> elli222: please file a bug report
[23:49] <jelmer> elli222, you should be able to work around the problem by uninstalling either nautilus-bzr or bzr-svn if you are not using either of them
[23:49] <jelmer> *one
[23:51] <pace_t_zulu_> http://pastebin.com/d42185bf3
[23:51] <pace_t_zulu_> lifeless, ^
[23:51] <pace_t_zulu_> when i try to commit i get that error message
[23:53] <spiv> pace_t_zulu_: run bzr break-lock lp:~jhaitas/gnome-panel/panel-layout
[23:53] <pace_t_zulu_> spiv, ty
[23:54] <pace_t_zulu_> later
[23:56]  * igc out for a few hours -bbl