[03:16] <pilif12p> im just wondering, why are all the floodbots in #ubuntu now?
[03:28] <elky> they always were...
[03:29] <pilif12p> oh
[03:29] <pilif12p> then they're fighting...
[03:29] <pilif12p> :p
[03:29] <pilif12p> Why is there more than one?
[03:36] <elky> pilif12p, in case of netsplits
[03:36] <pilif12p> ah
[03:37] <pilif12p> i see
[03:37] <pilif12p> one for each server?
[03:37] <elky> not quite
[03:37] <elky> there'd be like 15 floodbots if that were the case
[03:37] <elky> (there's not)
[03:38] <pilif12p> oh
[03:38] <pilif12p> mozilla only has 2 server... but i guess freenode is about 5x bigger then moznet
[03:49] <elky> um... and then some.
[03:50] <pilif12p> heh
[03:51] <pilif12p> 49971 users on when i joined
[03:51] <pilif12p> (here)
[03:51] <pilif12p> 1302 (There)
[14:39] <cyphermox> hi, could somebody please set up my cloak as ubuntu/member? my LP profile is here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl
[14:50] <Pici> cyphermox: Sure thing
[14:51] <Pici> cyphermox: Is ubuntu/member/pdpc.supporter.active.cyphermox okay?
[14:51] <Pici> Thats usually how we setup dual cloaks
[15:08] <cyphermox> Pici, yes, it is
[15:22]  * m4v is lightly annoyed how some spanish LoCo channels are even less moderated than u-es
[15:31] <Pici> cyphermox: sorry for the long wait, I'm doing a few things at once, it shouldnt be much longer.
[15:32] <cyphermox> Pici, no worries, I'm quite busy here too :)
[15:57] <Pici> cyphermox: You're all set. Congrats
[15:58] <cyphermox> thanks
[17:55] <DJones> Hi, Just had an email come through on the Ubuntu IRC mailing list headed Kindly Enroll sent from bhagat.taran@***.com Does anybody know what its for, there's no message, just the title
[17:58] <jussi01> DJones: I dont think its anything to worry about.
[17:59] <Mamarok> the same guy who asks people to fill in a birthday list?
[18:00] <Pici> Theres nothing in the message... weird.
[18:00] <DJones> I thought it looked like spam to be honest
[18:01] <jpds> Organization: dimondmines - weird.
[18:02] <DJones> Presumably I'm not the only person receiving it, if its gone to the list, i guess every subscriber has had it
[18:04] <Pici> DJones: it didn't drop into mailman's spam queue so we didn't get a chance to catch it before it hit the real list
[18:06] <DJones> Pici: Sounds a reasonable explanation, I'll treat it with the respect it deserves and press delete
[18:07] <Pici> DJones: Thats what I did
[18:08] <DJones> Thanks for checking anyway
[18:15] <m4v> *sighs*
[18:17] <m4v> d-coy doesn't want to stop highlighting/insulting me in several ubuntu channels, does any op want to talk with him?
[18:20] <JanC> m4v: you best ask the ops of those channels (I'm not sure which channels you're talking about)
[18:21] <JanC> or at least tell us which channels
[18:21] <m4v> eh, then it would be just #kubuntu, the other channels are LoCo and doesn't have much op presence
[18:22] <m4v> he's taking revenge over a ban I gave him in #ubuntu-es-offtopic
[18:22] <m4v> "revenge"
[18:23] <JanC> is #kubuntu managed bij the Ubuntu IRC team?
[18:24] <JanC> apparently it is
[18:24] <m4v> I guess i should go to #ubuntu-ops, I thought I wasn't needed
[18:24] <m4v> it*
[18:24] <JanC> m4v: you can try #ubuntu-ops for #kubuntu
[18:26] <JanC> well, I guess this channel might be okay too
[18:26] <m4v> yeah, but I'll only get him stop in #kubuntu, where he justs highlights me, in #ubuntu-mx he's a lot more rude
[18:27] <JanC> for #ubuntu-mx ask the -mx ops
[18:27] <Pici> #kubuntu-ops actually forwards to #ubuntu-ops
[18:28] <m4v> JanC: I know that. there's none at the moment
[18:28] <m4v> just a bot
[18:28] <JanC> might be useful if they got more ops then  ;)
[18:30] <JanC> although, I'm the only op in #ubuntu-be currently, so I shouldn't tell any other locoteam that  ;)
[18:30] <JanC> well, me & freenode staff in case of emergency
[18:48] <m4v> JanC: ok, problem solved at least in #kubuntu, thanks for your concern
[18:49] <m4v> now I should hunt down fetova for #u-mx
[18:56] <JanC> m4v: there are several other peopel with operator rights on the -mx channel
[18:56] <JanC> you can use the following command to get a list: /msg chanserv access #ubuntu-mx list
[18:58] <m4v> JanC: thanks, but usually I don't see the other ops, and I know fetova better.
[18:59] <m4v> of course if I see one I will contact
[19:00] <JanC> seems like "maggit", "leonel" & "MaoP" are registered as the main ops; if they are never on-line, then ubuntu-mx might want to change that to somebody who's on-line more often...
[19:01] <JanC> but whatever
[19:01] <JanC> not my business I suppose  ;)
[20:34] <topyli> looks like i need a new cloak. Pici?
[20:39] <Pici> topyli: sure!
[20:42] <topyli> Pici, what do i do? reconnect?
[20:43]  * topyli needs to find his irssi
[20:43]  * erUSUL hands topyli a copy of his irssi. it is free software after all
[20:43] <Pici> topyli: You won't need to do anything... but there needs to be a freenode staffer around first so that they can process my request.
[20:45] <Pici> topyli: wooo
[20:45] <topyli> i like the "won't need to do anything" part
[20:45] <topyli> ohhh. thanks
[20:48] <Pici> topyli: congrats again, you deserve it
[20:49] <topyli> thanks for your support, very valuable
[21:06] <JanC> hm, wouldn't it be good to check the #ubuntu* channels for chanserv access list sanity?
[22:51] <tsimpson> JanC: that's one of the objectives we discussed at UDS: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Roadmaps/Lucid/IRCCouncil
[22:52] <JanC> tsimpson: I was also thinking about channels not managed by the IRC team
[22:53] <JanC> currently, some channels have 1 or 2 out of 10 people listed who are around sometimes
[22:53] <tsimpson> JanC: LoCo channels control their own access lists, for all other channels it's IRC Council
[22:54] <JanC> well, that's not true
[22:54] <tsimpson> though the effort will be on "core" channels
[22:54] <tsimpson> JanC: what's not true about it?
[22:54] <JanC> most "core" channels have their own access list currently
[22:54] <tsimpson> currently, yes. but soon we'll use LP teams
[22:54] <JanC> if you include core developer channels
[22:55] <JanC> ah, okay
[22:55] <JanC> "currently" is what I was looking at  ;)
[22:55] <tsimpson> all core operators will be given access to all core channels, with capability for channel-specific ops too
[22:55] <tsimpson> it get's a little complicated there ;)
[22:56] <tsimpson> but we plan on getting the bot (ubottu) to manage the access lists, pulled directly from LP teams
[22:56] <JanC> well, it's easy enough to add the freenode staff & irc council people to ops currently
[22:56] <JanC> or ubuntu members (cloaked)
[22:57] <tsimpson> but not all ubuntu members should be ubuntu operators :)
[22:57] <JanC> but that's not always exactly what most people want
[22:57] <JanC> yeah, right
[22:58] <tsimpson> we'll be making a team for core operators, ones who should be ops in all core channels. there'll also be teams for specific channels, which the core team will also be a part of
[22:58] <JanC> there are a lot of ubuntu members I respect for their skills, but being an op is not always their strength  ;)
[22:58] <tsimpson> so the bot will simply pull all all members (and sub-members) of a channels team, and update the access list from there
[22:58] <tsimpson> well, "simply" isn't quite true atm
[22:59] <tsimpson> but eventually, that's the goal
[22:59] <JanC> I'll keep an eye on it  ;)
[23:48] <JanC> garrythefish (n=fisher@unaffiliated/garrythefish) has been spamming several channels with anti-female messages
[23:49] <jpds> JanC: Reported to staff.
[23:50] <jpds> tomaw: ^^
[23:50] <tomaw> jpds: I removed him
[23:50] <JanC> jpds: yeah, I know you saw already in -server
[23:50] <jpds> tomaw: Woohoo.
[23:52] <JanC> thanks tomaw
[23:52] <tomaw> np