/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/12/03/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

CarlFKis this a bug: (lucid) http://dpaste.de/XOOU/ "Error! DKMS tree already contains: nouveau-0.0.15+git20090823You cannot add the same module/version combo more than once."00:18
hggdhCarlFK: might be -- it depends on what happened on the first try00:22
CarlFKhggdh: i have a fresh install on a box that does not have an nvidia card - other than not being able to see X, should the install part be the same?00:42
hggdhCarlFK: the error suggests you had already installed nouveau, but the installation did not complete00:43
CarlFKhggdh: sounds about right00:45
hggdhCarlFK: I would say this is a bug, but we *really* need to know how it failed on first install00:49
CarlFKError! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 2.6.32-6-generic (i686)Consult the make.log in the build directory  http://dpaste.de/chEp/00:50
CarlFKwhere is the build dir?00:50
hggdhare you running Lucid?00:51
=== asac_ is now known as asac
hggdhand to answer your question: /var/lib/dkms/nouveau/0.0.15+git20090823/build/00:52
CarlFKyes, lucid00:54
hggdhCarlFK: then, I am sorry to say, you are not supported on this channel. Please go to #ubuntu+100:55
hggdhCarlFK: no matter what, I think the installation should gracefully recover from an incomplete install00:56
CarlFKI wasn't asking for support, was asking if it was a bug that should be reported00:56
hggdhCarlFK: :-) my last answer pretty much cover it: yes, I think it is worth a bug00:56
CarlFKno answer in u+1, wondering if I should bother reporting it00:56
CarlFKk00:56
hggdhCarlFK: the bug would be for recovering from previously failed install, I think00:57
CarlFKhggdh: my last paste was from a fresh lucid install00:58
CarlFKso 2 bugs?00:58
hggdhhum00:58
hggdhyou can do it in two bugs, yes00:58
hggdhbut be sure to include the dpkg log *and* the build log00:59
CarlFKmake.log: /var/lib/dkms/nouveau/0.0.15+git20090823/build/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c: In function 'drm_sysfs_create': /var/lib/dkms/nouveau/0.0.15+git20090823/build/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c:110: error: 'struct class' has no member named 'nodename'00:59
CarlFKguessing thats why it failed to install the first time00:59
hggdhsounds correct, yes.00:59
CarlFKIll just post both and let someone else sort it out00:59
hggdhteh build failed, and the install went with it01:00
greg-gwasn't there an #ubuntu-mozilla at one time? what am I thinking of?02:09
greg-gaha! #ubuntu-mozillateam02:09
micahghi greg-g02:20
greg-ghiya micahg02:21
greg-gthanks for helping out dogatemycomputer last night02:21
micahggreg-g: np, you need something from Mozilla Team?02:22
greg-gI told him that you and the mozillateam would know better what to do next with that bug was working on, just confirming the channel name :)02:22
micahgah, ok02:22
greg-gwhich brought me to Triaging Lesson #1: Knowing where to go for help. :)02:23
micahggreg-g: I thought that's an ongoing learning process02:24
dtchenmicahg: did you need something earlier from me?02:25
nigel_nbhey everyone :)02:25
greg-gexactly, it is. I guess it should be "Not being afraid to ask for help"02:25
* greg-g waves to dtchen 02:26
micahgdtchen: bug 386104, is it worthwhile to make pulseaudio first02:26
ubot4Launchpad bug 386104 in libsdl1.2 "[karmic] skipping audio when using libsdl1.2debian-alsa" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/38610402:26
micahggreg-g: I think that's the key we need to make clear to all the mentees02:26
dtchenmicahg: installing libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio only works around the issue, and then there's the minor inconvenience that it would need to be seeded explicitly in the ubuntu-desktop seed02:29
dtchenmicahg: i.e., currently libsdl1.2debian-alsa is pulled in as an rdep02:30
micahgdtchen: right, but only because it's the first option02:30
dtchenmicahg: it does not make sense to do so until both Kubuntu and Xubuntu ship PA02:30
dtchenalso, the real issue is that alsa-plugins is broken02:31
micahglibsdl1.2debian is pulled in and it pulls the first option02:31
dtchenthere is a very subtle race condition02:31
micahgdtchen: ok, that's why I figured I should ask you :)02:31
dtchenI have no problem making such a change, but it would be wise to consider how many people would be affected by it02:32
micahgdtchen: ok, what's the next step then02:33
dtchenmicahg: triage them duplicates of 48548802:33
dtchenand, of course, fix alsa-plugins02:34
dtchenpatches welcome! ;-)02:34
micahgdtchen: done02:35
micahgdtchen: unfortunately, I don't know enough about alsa to patch it02:36
dtchendon't worry. To make it more confusing, it's also hardware-dependent. And driver-dependent.02:37
nigel_nbmicahg: did u see the mail to the group about something related to thunderbird?02:50
micahgnigel_nb: yes, I haven't had a chance to look into it yet03:20
nigel_nbits a bit nasty03:20
nigel_nband rude03:20
micahgnigel_nb: I think we need to be more clear about people not waiting indefinitely if they need something03:20
micahgnigel_nb: it's on my list for the meeting next week03:20
nigel_nbyeah we need to get the triagers to report upstream instead of the reporter03:21
nigel_nbchange the canned response too if possible03:21
nigel_nbof course, there is the fact tht the reporter was to change the status of the bug to new once he gave the information03:22
micahgnigel_nb: not just that, people need to know they can come in here if no one has responded within a certain period of time03:22
nigel_nbyes, that too03:22
micahgnigel_nb: there's nothing wrong with reporters upstreaming if that's the correct action03:23
nigel_nbmicahg: once you read the mail and the thread in the bug03:23
nigel_nbits very difficult to supress the feeling to flame03:24
nigel_nb:P03:24
nigel_nb"Again, why does this report remain "Incomplete" 10 months after having been introduced and all obvious proofs have been given?03:24
nigel_nbDoes Ubuntu really appreciate bug reports?"03:24
nigel_nbbug 233990, its an interesting read03:25
ubot4Launchpad bug 233990 in thunderbird "Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23399003:25
micahgnigel_nb: there have been numerous blog posts recently with similar sentiments03:25
nigel_nbmicahg: oh, then its some we put our foot down and did something about it03:26
micahgnigel_nb: nah03:26
nigel_nbmicahg: looks like someone did write him a nice reply03:26
micahgnigel_nb: we need to get more efficient and show people how they can help03:26
nigel_nbmicahg: that's what i meant about doing something about it03:27
=== jonathan__ is now known as Zilu54
Zilu54hi guys, just trying xchat if it works03:43
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
hggdhheh. I did write André a reply, but not really *that* nice04:05
micahghggdh: any chance to test my apport pacakge?04:06
hggdhgetting to do it now, micahg04:06
micahghggdh: great, thanks...I can't wait to be able to tell people to submit apport crashes again :)04:06
hggdh:-)04:07
hggdhmicahg: with upstart, how do I force-start apport?04:18
micahgsudo service start apport force_start=104:18
hggdhyep, just found it04:19
hggdh:-)04:19
hggdhmicahg: works like a charm04:20
micahghggdh: yay!, I'll push my branch and propose a merge tonight04:20
micahghggdh: I'm assuming you set /etc/default/apport to 0 before testing?04:21
hggdhyes, and I checked it04:21
micahghggdh: awesome :)04:21
hggdh(forced a sigsegv on gedit to verify apport was indeed stopped)04:21
hggdhthen ran a force_start, and sigsegv-ed gedit again -- got apport-gtk running04:22
micahghggdh: perfect, I'll add that as a test case to the bug04:23
hggdhcool. Good work, Micah.04:23
micahghggdh: I just copied the part of the patch from Lucid :)04:24
hggdhstill. You got it done. I did not even know it was an issue...04:24
micahgafter 2 or 3 people complained apport wasn't working, I got suspiscious04:25
* micahg likes asking for apport crash reports04:25
* hggdh also, but been away lately04:26
micahgfirefox is notorious for getting reports, firefox crashed with 3 tabs open...fix it04:27
nigel_nbmicahg: sorry, about that, got disconnected04:40
hggdhnigel_nb: re. bug 233990, then last (two) comments are mine04:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 233990 in thunderbird "Thunderbird's mdn (receipt) message may contain 822bis-violating bare lf which is rejected by Qmail" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/23399004:43
nigel_nbhggdh: good reply04:43
hggdhbut now I am unsure about the reporter's description04:44
nigel_nbI thought of replying but was afraid I'd lash out.  Was thinkin of asking you or micah g to reply04:44
hggdh:-) *never* lash out. It is not worth the time, or the shame to downgrade oneself04:45
micahgBTW, last time I checked qmail was 12 years old04:45
nigel_nb:O ^^ 12 years?04:45
hggdhyes, something like that. But Bernstein usually writes sound software04:45
nigel_nbsound is an understatement04:46
nigel_nbits awesome software04:46
hggdhhe is also famous for being extremely rude if contradicted ;-)04:46
nigel_nboh04:47
nigel_nbstill, can't help but amaze at the strong code that he must've written04:47
hggdhyup04:48
nigel_nbhow do we see if a software has an apport hook?04:50
nigel_nbI forget04:50
hggdhlook at /usr/share/apport/package-hooks04:50
hggdhif it has one it is there with the source package name04:51
nigel_nbthanks, I wanted to confirm if pulseaudio had one04:51
hggdhor 'pull-lp-source <package> [<release>], and look at the source04:51
micahgdpkg -L PKGNAME | grep apport04:51
hggdhwhy is it I always suggest the most complex way?04:52
micahghggdh: you suggest tried an true methods04:52
micahg*and04:52
hggdhthank you, but still complex ;-)04:52
hggdhthis is it. Bed calls me04:52
hggdhg'night, all04:52
nigel_nbnite hggdh :)04:52
hggdhoh. 'dpkg -L04:53
hggdh ' will only work if the package is installed04:53
micahghggdh: correct04:53
nigel_nbwhich one works if its not installed?04:53
* micahg should have specified that04:53
micahgnigel_nb: hggdh's last method04:54
nigel_nbah04:54
hggdhor (maintaining the standard of giving complex solutions) 'apt-file search apport | grep PKGNAME'04:54
micahgpull-lp-source requires registering ubuntu-dev-tools with LP, you can also use apt-get source PKGNAME if you have the deb-src enabled04:54
nigel_nbno wonder pull-lp-source wasn't working for me04:55
micahghggdh: E: The cache directory is empty. You need to run 'apt-file update' first.04:55
micahg:)04:55
nigel_nbapt-file is not installed04:56
nigel_nbi have to install it first04:56
nigel_nb:P04:56
hggdhmicahg: well, yes, that happens ;-)04:57
nigel_nbcan someone wishlist bug 491451 please04:59
ubot4Launchpad bug 491451 in openoffice.org "OpenOffice menus still have icons which should be removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49145104:59
nigel_nbbug 491655 is reported against totem, but its about getting the screensaver activated when there is no video/audio playing.  Is the package correct?05:09
ubot4Launchpad bug 491655 in totem "No screensaver after movie has finished playing" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49165505:09
micahgnigel_nb: most likely totem is not releasing its block on the screensaver05:32
micahgnigel_nb: so yes05:32
nigel_nbso, I'll confirm it05:32
micahgnigel_nb: did you reproduce?05:33
nigel_nbdoing05:33
micahgor were there me toos?05:33
micahgnigel_nb: ah, sorry, that's what you mean05:33
micahg*meant05:33
nigel_nbmicahg: unusual05:37
nigel_nbmy screensaver starts05:38
micahgnigel_nb: do you have the same version?05:39
nigel_nbi'm on 64-bit05:39
nigel_nbbug's on 32-bit05:39
nigel_nbjust noticed05:39
nigel_nbbut the package should be the same05:40
nigel_nbif its totem truoble05:40
micahghmm05:40
nigel_nbcould you wishlist bug 491451 for me?05:41
ubot4Launchpad bug 491451 in openoffice.org "OpenOffice menus still have icons which should be removed" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49145105:41
micahgnigel_nb: done05:42
nigel_nbmicahg: thank you :)05:42
micahgnigel_nb: have you checked upstream for the totem bug?05:43
nigel_nbsince I couldn't reproduce it...05:44
nigel_nbI wasn't sure what to do05:44
micahgnigel_nb: you noticed you are on a different platform05:44
micahgthe next best thing to you confirming is to find someone who already has :)05:44
nigel_nboh05:44
nigel_nblemme look around05:44
nigel_nbgnome 152814 looks like it :)05:53
ubot4Gnome bug 152814 in general "Don't disable the screensaver when playback is stopped" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15281405:53
nigel_nbbut its marked as fixed05:53
micahgnigel_nb: well, that's really old, just shows that it worked at some point06:02
nigel_nbthats the only bug I find about screensavers06:03
nigel_nbmicahg: I can confirm that bug 491552 is true06:03
ubot4Launchpad bug 491552 in nautilus "DVD Drive not unmounting disc when ejected" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49155206:03
nigel_nbbut I think more info needs to be added06:04
nigel_nbwhat should I ask here?06:04
micahgnigel_nb: seems like a common thing, check for dupes in LP and/or a bug upstream06:05
nigel_nbnothing :O06:07
nigel_nbmicahg: my mistake06:11
nigel_nbbug 476654 sounds similar, can you take a look?06:11
ubot4Launchpad bug 476654 in devicekit-disks "CD eject but not unmount when using drive button" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47665406:11
nigel_nbI was checking under nautilius, forgot that the package might be wrong06:12
* micahg iss looking06:12
micahgnigel_nb: yep, you found the dupe :)06:12
* nigel_nb jumps with joy06:13
nigel_nbwhen i report a dupe, the bug stays as new or confirmed?06:13
micahgnigel_nb: I don't change the status06:14
nigel_nbbut wouldn't that show up as new bug...?06:15
* nigel_nb hits hit head06:15
nigel_nbgot it, dupes dont get shown in results06:15
nigel_nbmicahg: still here? one last doubt06:48
micahgnigel_nb: will you be around in 30 minutes?06:51
* micahg was about to go home06:51
nigel_nbno problem06:51
nigel_nbI figured out what to do06:51
nigel_nbits a mess of a report :)06:51
micahgok06:52
dpmgood morning bug squashers!08:22
micahghi dpm08:29
thekorngood morning and happy hug day everybody :)08:43
dpmhappy hug day thekorn, hi micahg09:00
nperryMorning :)09:02
micahgdpm, can you mark the ubuntu-translations portion of bug 339326 triaged...there's nothing further for the translation team to do until firefox fixes matchos09:06
ubot4Launchpad bug 339326 in ubuntu-translations "[MASTER] some parts of Firefox are not localized" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33932609:06
dpmmicahg, done, thanks09:08
micahgdpm: thank you :)09:09
=== nperry_ is now known as nperry
nperryThis is my first bug hug day, I've requested an old bug to be updated, bug 336939, Do i put my name as triager to follow through?09:15
ubot4Launchpad bug 336939 in language-pack-ar "Nothing in the Title bar" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/33693909:15
micahgnperry: maybe check for a master bug for RTL not showing anything in ubuntu09:17
nperrySorry, whats RTL :s09:18
micahgnperry: right to left09:18
micahgas in the bug09:18
nperryAh, i've already looked and cant seem to see anything09:20
nperryTLabic09:21
micahgdpm can you triage bug 363264, more work to be done upstream09:21
ubot4Launchpad bug 363264 in ubuntu-translations "Crimean Tatar/Crimean Turkish (crh) firefox/xulrunner translations are not being packaged" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/36326409:21
dpmmicahg, I have to hop on a call, but I'll look at it afterwards09:26
micahgdpm: sorry, I meant just set to triage, not actually triage :)09:26
dpmmicahg, ah, ok, np. Done, then :)09:27
micahgthanks09:27
^arky^Any help regarding bug 49129410:09
ubot4Launchpad bug 491294 in josm "Sync with upstream version" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49129410:09
^arky^how to request a sync from debian ?10:10
nperryIf its public shouldnt the deb bugtracker and lp talk?10:11
nperryIts already been passed upstream10:12
^arky^yes nperry10:12
^arky^but I don't quite get you10:12
micahg^arky^: there's a requestsync tool, but there's already a bug report10:13
micahgwhat version does debian have?10:13
nperryAnd debian devlopers have already uploaded the new package10:13
nperryjosm (0.0.svn2255-1) unstable; urgency=low10:13
nperryThis means it wont be in ubuntu till 10.1010:14
micahg^arky^: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess10:14
micahgnperry: it's already in squeeze10:14
micahg^arky^: just modify the current bug to be a sync request10:15
nperrymicahg: Is it squeeze we are syncing from for LTS?10:17
nperry^arky^: Would you like me to request sync or are you ok?10:18
dogatemycomputerGreetings:   I suspect bug #491787 should be set to Wishlist.10:36
ubot4Launchpad bug 491787 in evolution "Categories not imported - .pst-file import (calender, contacts) from outlook XP (German) to Evolution 2.28.1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49178710:36
LimCorehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/48526611:31
ubot4Launchpad bug 485266 in kdepim "kmail crash" [Undecided,Invalid]11:31
LimCoreI reported a bug in LP.  Same bug is reported in bugs.kde.org ... BUT it is reproted there also from Ubuntu!11:33
LimCoreso this makes my LP bug report invalid (as upstream's fault) or confirmed??? I think obviously it is confirmed.11:33
pedro_LimCore, correct, that's a valid report11:36
LimCorepedro_: although, I read more into the KDE bug and there another reported says he "confirmed it in trunk" so it would seem to be not kubuntu but upstream fault after all11:37
LimCore#5  0x00007fdbea87e127 in KMMessage::transferInProgress (this=0x435bd40) at ../../kmail/kmmessage.cpp:27011:40
dpmhola pedro_, good morning!11:40
LimCoreif I would have time I would kick that bug's lowereback stupid kmmessage.cpp11:40
pedro_good morning dpm!11:42
pedro_brb11:45
dpmpedro_, bdmurray (or anyone else who'd like to comment). What do you think of the https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Filing%20translation%20bugs section? We'd like to have some simple instructions on how to file bugs on translations against the ubuntu-translations project. Do you think the section is clear enough? Needs rewording? Or have you got any other suggestions?12:15
thekorndpm, so ubuntu-translations is not for erroneous translations? - if so, you should maybe mention how and where this kind of bugs should be reported12:26
dpmthekorn, thanks for the feedback. Good point, wrong translations and spelling mistakes are also valid bugs.12:28
* dpm updates the wiki...12:28
dpmok, done12:32
thekorndpm, there is a typo transations -> translations12:34
dpmthekorn, I think the typo is no longer there, can you refresh the page?12:35
dpmmy bad12:35
dpmI'll fix it12:35
dpmthanks12:35
thekornno worries, just find out it's a wiki, so I could have changed it myself ;)12:37
dpmok, updated now, thanks :)12:50
pedro_dpm, is this really a bug 487873 ?13:12
ubot4Launchpad bug 487873 in ubuntu-translations "Search for translation bugs only reported in ubuntu and assign them to ubuntu-translations" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48787313:13
pedro_dpm, sounds to me like a discussion to happen on a mailing list rather13:13
pedro_morning kamusin13:13
kamusinhey pedro_13:14
dpmpedro_, yeah it is not a bug, Adi started using bugs flagged as tasks to keep track of things to do, but I'm not too sold on that13:15
dpmtagged as 'tasks', I meant13:16
pedro_ok i see, I'd prefer to keep those things in another place ie: wiki or another tool to track tasks rather than in a BTS13:19
pedro_but right it seems you're using the tag for such things there's plenty of them https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations/+bugs?field.tag=task13:19
pedro_so what we should do about those? just ignore them?13:20
pedro_because if we aren't part of the translations project we don't really know if we can set that as triaged, which importance, assigned to who, etc13:20
dpmpedro_, yes, I'd say ignore them for now13:24
dpmpedro_, the triaging process is new for the translations team, so we are still learning on the workflow.13:26
pedro_dpm, got it :-)13:29
pedro_dpm, thank you13:29
dpmpedro_, a ti :)13:29
dpmhey Mirv, how's it going?13:29
Mirvhi dpm :) fine, a bit hectic as usual. noticed today's agenda, but still at work for a couple of hours.13:30
dpmMirv, no worries, take care :)13:31
MirvI've seen you've been busy crafting lucid blueprints, since I'm subscribed to a quite a few of them :)13:31
dpmMirv, yeah, sorry for the spam :)13:44
dpmI should be finished by the end of today, I just need to write the final one13:45
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
arjonaahello, I'm trying to report a crash in brasero17:06
arjonaaso I followed the procedure to install debug symbols for it17:06
arjonaathe package is installed17:06
arjonaabut gdb says it can't find them17:06
pedro_arjonaa, can't find what? the binary?17:07
pedro_arjonaa, how are you running it?17:07
arjonaapedro_: pedro villavicencio?17:08
pedro_arjonaa, yes17:08
arjonaapedro_: I'm following the instructions here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace17:08
arjonaahttps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48904817:08
arjonaathis is the bug17:08
ubot4Launchpad bug 489048 in brasero "brasero crashes on right click on video file if preview is open" [Medium,Incomplete]17:08
pedro_looking17:09
arjonaahis is what gdb tells me17:09
arjonaaReading symbols from /usr/bin/brasero...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/brasero...done. (no debugging symbols found)...done.17:10
pedro_arjonaa, is brasero-dbgsym installed?17:10
arjonaayes17:10
pedro_if so, don't worry and get the backtrace anyways17:11
arjonaaok17:11
arjonaaanother question: is it kosher to change the status when I update the bug or you guys do that?17:11
pedro_arjonaa, you can do it as well, set it back to new when provided the requested info17:12
arjonaakk17:13
arjonaapedro_: it did generate some debug info but then I asked it for the full backtrace it said it had no stack17:15
arjonaahttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/36396761/gdb-brasero.txt that's what it got17:17
pedro_well there's nothing there to say that it's a brasero issue17:19
pedro_but that error is coming from xorg instead17:20
pedro_maybe running out of resources17:20
pedro_do you get the same message with another application ?17:20
arjonaanope17:20
pedro_did you tried rebooting to free some memory and try to open brasero again?17:20
pedro_there's no brasero error in there...17:20
arjonaait seems to happen when I rightclick to rename before it loads the preview17:20
arjonaayeah, I've had it happen after a fresh reboot17:21
arjonaait must be related to whatever the preview component is for media files because if I turn off the preview it doesn't crash17:22
pedro_i cannot reproduce that here, i've added a couple of videos and everything works fine with preview enabled17:23
pedro_let's set it back to new for now17:23
arjonaahere's the thing, if I had preview enabled it crashes, if i had preview disabled, add the file, then enable preview it doesn't17:23
arjonaasounds like some initialization issue maybe17:24
pedro_also tried both ways here, no crash yet17:24
arjonaais there any other way I can produce more debug info for you guys?17:25
hggdhperhaps running under GDB with --sync?17:27
hggdh(so that X calls will be synchronised?17:28
arjonaahggdh: is that a gdb option? mine doesn't seem to have it (I don't know much about gdb or low level programming)17:29
hggdhno, it is a GTK option -- run 'brasero --help-all'17:30
arjonaahggdh: seems to produce the same output17:33
arjonaathis is a 9.10 amd64 installation that was fresh installed as 9.10 beta and then upgraded online to the current stable17:35
arjonaaBug #467192 and Bug #477725 seem to be about the same thing17:38
ubot4Launchpad bug 467192 in brasero "brasero exit with error when I try preview video in open dialog" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/46719217:38
ubot4Launchpad bug 477725 in brasero "Brasero crash on file rename" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47772517:38
hggdharjonaa: indeed17:43
=== Afwas_ is now known as Afwas
vadi2Would like to bring https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/431217 to attention - 76 user comments, 30 or so duplicated, zero action or response17:50
ubot4Launchpad bug 431217 in msttcorefonts "package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 2.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Critical,Triaged]17:50
vadi2*duplicate bugs17:50
micahgvadi2: looks like it's already upstream17:58
micahgvadi2: our job is done as triagers17:59
vadi2Okay17:59
micahgvadi2: thank you though17:59
hggdharjonaa: we will need an xtrace, I guess17:59
vadi2Yeah doesn't help that everyone upgrading is running into it and it's still not fixed a month after :\17:59
micahgvadi2: did you read the upstream comments, it's not an easy fix18:00
hggdharjonaa: so you should run, in a terminal:   xtrace -D:9 -d:0 -k 2>&1 | tee ~/xtrace.log18:00
hggdharjonaa: on *another* terminal, run 'DISPLAY=:9.0 brasero --sync'18:00
vadi2micahg: yep. and it's still being broken and users unhappy. doesn't help the users that ubuntu isn't explaining that to the unhappy ones either, just ignoring it.18:00
vadi2micahg: aka "ubuntu is broken and nobody cares again" is what everyone thinks18:01
hggdharjonaa: wait for the error (or do whatever you need to get the error), then cancel the xtrace, and upload the resulting file, together with any output produced on the terminal running brasero18:01
vadi2micahg: thanks for the response though, I missed the upstream link. cheers18:01
hggdhvadi2: you could try to fix it also.18:02
arjonaahggdh: on it18:02
vadi2hggdh: I'm not going to post that, I don't represent Ubuntu. feel free to post it yourself18:02
hggdh?18:03
micahgvadi2: he wasn't suggesting posting18:03
vadi2oh lol. thanks for the offer then. I'll pass18:03
micahgvadi2: Ubuntu thrives on community contributions18:03
vadi2yeah I contribute in other ways :)18:03
hggdhvadi2: *all* ubuntu users represent Ubuntu. Most of us are volunteers18:03
vadi2ok. that's not helping those unhappy users and there is no communication is what I was pointing out18:04
micahghggdh: should I bother posting that the bug was upstreamed?  doesn't look like it was done18:04
hggdhmicahg: let me look at the bug18:07
hggdhthere seems to be more than one error there, but most are reporting a timeout18:10
hggdhso, for most of the reporters, it is a DNS resolution issue18:14
hggdhwhich means this bug is not really a bug, but a consequence of slow resolution18:16
hggdhmicahg: I am just unsure what is it we are not doing18:22
micahghggdh: I don't think anything, as upstream said the script is inherently flawed18:22
hggdhheh18:23
micahghggdh: I was just wondeing if we wanted to note that it's upstream now18:23
hggdhah, I see what you mean. Yes, I will add a comment on it18:23
micahghggdh: so people don't say (oh Ubuntu doesn't care) :)18:23
hggdh:-). It is much easier to complain than to help18:24
micahghggdh: yep, BTW, I just attached the debdiff the the apport bug18:24
hggdhcool... you might want to ping pitti on that18:25
arjonaahggdh: it generated a 4mb file. I have uploaded it to the bug.18:27
hggdharjonaa: yes, just saw it. Thank you, and now we have to wait for someone with X knowledge to look at it18:36
arjonaahggdh: cool. I just want to make sure I'm providing the maximum of useful debug info18:36
arjonaasince I can reproduce the problem reliably18:37
hggdhI *think* the error is shown at the end of the trace (the sequence of "unexpected reply"s), but I have no idea of what it means18:37
* hggdh is really not an X person18:37
hggdharjonaa: I also dupped the other two bugs to yours18:38
arjonaaafter seeing that xtrace I'm not sure if I'd want to be an X person18:38
hggdhheh. You very much mirror my own humble view :-)18:40
gawdzerHI! where can I report bugs?18:55
micahggawdzer: ubuntu-bug PACKAGENAME is probably the best way18:56
gawdzerWell I posted a message on https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/  but it seems like no one read it18:56
micahggawdzer: that list isn't for bug reports18:57
gawdzerSo where should I report the bug at?18:57
micahgwhich program gawdzer?18:57
gawdzeroh now I see18:58
gawdzerI posted it on the wrong location18:58
gawdzerwell micahg I think it is somehow related with libc18:58
micahggawdzer: what program is in though18:59
gawdzersomething I coded18:59
gawdzer(which works on FBSD and on CENTOS but no under Ubuntu of any version)18:59
gawdzernot under*18:59
micahggawdzer: might want to ask a question here: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu19:00
gawdzerThanks a bunch, I`ll do it19:00
gawdzerhere's the post if you're interested: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/9274019:02
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
Mirvok I guess I should join Bug Control first...19:47
Mirvwell, good to do that finally anyway19:54
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
WeatherGodHi everyone.... sorry for being so late today... thursdays are the worst for me20:52
WeatherGodanything I need to know for Hug Day today?20:52
WeatherGodso, what is the deal with setting these bugs20:57
WeatherGodare we setting them against the translation project or the original package20:57
WeatherGodor both?20:57
hggdhWeatherGod: as far as I can understand, against the transation project (per chat yesterday with the folks from translations20:58
hggdhBB in 2 hours20:59
WeatherGodok, thanks20:59
stochasticDoes anyone know how to subscribe an entire launchpad team to a particular build on the ISO tracker?21:19
micahgstochastic: maybe ask #ubuntu-quality21:20
* stochastic asks there21:21
WeatherGodfor bug 481472, the problem comes from the user using a PPA version of the package, not the stable version21:28
ubot4WeatherGod: Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/481472)21:28
WeatherGodon the PPA page, they say not to use these packages because they aren't meant for use21:29
micahgWeatherGod: maybe ask in #ubuntu-quality21:30
micahgoops21:30
micahgnot there21:30
micahgWeatherGod: #kubuntu-devel21:30
WeatherGodok21:30
WeatherGodI am not sure what else needs to be done for bug 8399322:10
ubot4Launchpad bug 83993 in language-pack-oc-base "New locale request for Occitan" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/8399322:10
WeatherGodfor bug 242801, how do I indicate that the project needs to do some testing to confirm if the bug still exists?22:27
ubot4Launchpad bug 242801 in language-pack-fr-base "Firefox 3.0 is in english after upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24280122:27
WeatherGodI left a note to that effect, but what should I set the status as?22:28
WeatherGoddo I just tag it as a "task"?22:30
WeatherGodok, well, I am gonna just tag it as a task and leave the status as "new" for the translation team22:35
WeatherGodmicahg, for bug 242801, there needs to be some testing done to see if the problem is still existing...22:38
ubot4Launchpad bug 242801 in language-pack-fr-base "Firefox 3.0 is in english after upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24280122:38
WeatherGodI have tagged the bug as a "task"22:38
WeatherGodbut is there anything else that should be done to the report to make sure that the upgrade path is tested for Lucid?22:39
WeatherGodmaybe a Nominate?22:39
micahgWeatherGod: is task an official tag?22:42
WeatherGodI believe so... it came up in the autocomplete list22:43
micahgI don't see it on the wiki22:43
WeatherGodheh, I saw it in a couple of other reports22:44
WeatherGodmonkey see, monkey do...22:44
micahgWeatherGod: idk, I need to talk to asac and the translation team about that bug22:45
WeatherGodok, so I should leave it be?22:45
micahgWeatherGod: yeah, I think so22:46
WeatherGodalright22:46
WeatherGodfor bug 83993, I don't think there really is a way to figure out what sort of headway have been made here22:47
ubot4Launchpad bug 83993 in language-pack-oc-base "New locale request for Occitan" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/8399322:47
WeatherGodheck, if anything, it might be a wishlist, if it hasn't been done already22:48
micahgWeatherGod: yeah22:50
micahgdo we still have a translation team member in herE?22:50
WeatherGodmicahg, looking around, I don't see a language pack for oci, so maybe it never was done?22:53
WeatherGodI gotta run, be back later tonight22:54
=== Jordan_U1 is now known as Jordan_U

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!