=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
powderluv | Folks anyone use rootstock to create Lucid rootfs ? It gets as far as the second stage but qemu doesnt seem to start (prints out usage and bails) so maybe some qemu parameters have changed?? | 01:09 |
---|---|---|
rcn-ee | powderluv, rootstock as isn't ready for lucid.. it need a couple changes: https://code.launchpad.net/~beagleboard-kernel/+junk/project-rootstock-lucid doing daily builds with it right now.. | 01:36 |
powderluv | rcn-ee: cool thanks i will check it out and let you know how it goes | 01:51 |
powderluv | rcn-ee: do you build ubuntu-minimal | 02:47 |
rcn-ee | powderluv, a lot of packages are in flux so keep it minimal.. although 'xfce4,gdm' worked on this morning's build.. | 03:24 |
powderluv | rcn-ee: fyi, ubuntu-minimal works. ubuntu-desktop failed on gedit. so these packages are all built with thumb2 already ? | 03:38 |
rcn-ee | powderluv, until atleast alpha-1 but it could be later it's really going to be very hit and miss with missing packages/dependices.. Yeap, everything should be thumb2, unless the package is broken.. It's still really early thou, i still haven't successfully built a kernel in a native lucid chroot for the beagleboard | 03:41 |
powderluv | ohh because of thumb2 or just churn in the packages ? | 03:44 |
rcn-ee | powderluv, both.. ubuntu has a tinkerbox style build status log, don't remember the address, lots of red for armel.. | 03:45 |
powderluv | ok i see. i will dig for it. have you tried running any of the lucid rootfs on a system. is it at a bootable state ? | 03:48 |
rcn-ee | powderluv, found it: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | 03:48 |
powderluv | thanks. we are leading the way in number of package failures :) | 03:50 |
rcn-ee | well i have a chroot setup for lucid on my beagleboard i use to build stuff, but lots of "illegal instructions" and random hardlocks. It would be interesting to run it on a another cortex-aX platform.. | 03:50 |
rcn-ee | i even have to rule out thumb mode, since i ran the gcc testsuite with it enabled and disabled, not much difference. which just leaves bad packages... | 03:53 |
powderluv | i will try them out let you know | 03:53 |
powderluv | do you recompile those packages independently with thumb disabled? | 03:53 |
rcn-ee | powderluv, full gcc bootstrap.. digs for the two reports.. | 03:54 |
rcn-ee | thumb: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg02447.html | 03:56 |
rcn-ee | nonthumb: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg02538.html | 03:56 |
=== powderluv_ is now known as powderluv | ||
OSS542 | Good Evening All | 09:09 |
OSS542 | anyone here using Zubuntu ? | 09:09 |
rek | i want an application like skype | 10:19 |
rek | can i have a flash player? | 10:20 |
armin76 | rek: you already asked that yesterday | 10:25 |
rek | really? | 10:39 |
rek | iis there a solution? | 10:39 |
kblin | yeah, reverse engineer the skype protocol and write an app supporting said protocol that compiles on arm | 10:48 |
OSS542 | anyone here using Zubuntu ? | 11:35 |
rek | hi i need an application to refresh my ip,i need also an application to manage a ftp server | 13:23 |
fta | asac, could you copy the codecs package to the arm ppa too? it's needed (dep) | 13:47 |
=== bjf is now known as bjf-afk | ||
=== Meizirkki__ is now known as Meizirkki | ||
Stskeeps | g w00t | 18:17 |
Stskeeps | err. | 18:17 |
asac | fta: why is it a dep if its not needed during build. should at most be recommends | 18:59 |
fta | asac, because it's loaded dynamically and is not a build-dep, but i made chromium depends in either the free or non-free set of codecs | 19:12 |
fta | asac, depends vs recommends because upstream didn't want us to change the user experience, that whole free vs non-free is just to give users the choice | 19:22 |
asac | fta: we already change upstream experience by allowing free/non-free, right? i think that recommends should be similarly ok. | 20:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!