[00:04] hi people [00:04] i need help [00:05] WaSeidel: just ask your question [00:07] a long, looong time ago i created an account on wiki.ubuntu.com but i don't log in almost 2 years ago, and now i'm trying to get in to edit my wiki to get reconected with the comunity and i get surprised when i encountered a launchpad integration an it asked for my old password at the wiki and it says me tha password is wrong [00:07] and i can't get in to my old account [00:08] sorry my english i'm from Colombia [00:08] WaSeidel: you can't get in using your LP credentials? [00:09] to launchpad i can get in but to wiki i can't [00:09] WaSeidel: try to clear your cookie for wiki.ubuntu.com, it should prompt you to use your launchpad credentials now [00:11] micahg: i yes i already do, and it ask me for my password and e-mail on launchpad i write and log in launchpad and it aske again for the password on wiki.ubuntu.com my old user in the wiki was waseidel [00:11] i don't know if the user can be deleted and i create it again... [00:12] if i ask for a forgotten password it send me to remember my password but in launchpad [00:12] and i need the password on wiki.ubuntu.com for the user waseidel [00:13] WaSeidel: try asking in here: #ubuntu-website\ [00:13] oops...without the backslash [00:13] hmm ok micahg thanks [00:14] you was so helpfull [00:18] Is it known that loggerhead is being broken? giving a 500 internal server error a when trying to download a file [00:44] where are the instructions for adding ppa sources to pbuilder? [01:04] is there a way to cancel a package waiting to build in a PPA? [01:04] I realized I uploaded a bad one, it claims to have 16 hours left in the queue, so I'd like to cancel it [01:06] I see I can delete the pending package, perhaps that wlil work [01:38] mrooney: IIRC, yes, it will work [01:50] any staff here please ? [01:57] McPeter: Not likely on a weekend. What do you need? [01:57] big problem on launchpad user account [01:57] sorry for my english .. i'm french [01:58] an user create an account to … put a pedo link [01:58] (really sorry for my english) [01:58] McPeter: Ah, wonderful. Ask a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion, and an admin will disable the account. [01:58] you know abuse address ? [01:58] ah ok [01:58] thanks [01:59] mrooney: Or, you can just upload a new version - the superseded version will then not start to build. [01:59] bjsnider: Do there need to be instructions? [01:59] maxb: Deletion achieves the same thing. [02:00] Yes, I'm just saying you don't need to bother if you're uploading a new version anyway [02:00] Member since: 2009-12-04 [02:00] :\ [02:00] Ah. [02:00] two account [02:00] pfuu -__- [02:09] maxb, if not, how is it done? [02:09] i did it awhile back and forgot how it was accomplshed [02:09] bjsnider: The same as any other repository? [02:12] there's nothing about it in the wiki instructions [02:16] sorry wgrant "https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion" is public or private ? [02:21] bjsnider: A PPA is just another apt repository. Why would PPAs have special documentation about pbuilder? [02:23] maxb, how are new repositories added to pbuilder? [02:23] ah, now we're getting closer to the issue :-) [02:24] In which case I would say : Not a launchpad issue, please transfer to #ubuntu-motu [02:24] meh, nm [02:24] Or, sulk. :-( [02:35] McPeter: That's public. [02:36] ok thanks .. i send mail [02:36] i thinks is better (for not diffuse accounts) [02:45] wgrant: the pending versions are gone from the main page of https://edge.launchpad.net/~mrooney/+archive/wxbanker-testing but it still says they are pending builds, is that a problem? [02:56] mrooney: The moment a buildd attempts them, it will see that they are superseded, and abort the attempt. [02:57] wgrant: okay, so they are superseded by deletion, even though I didn't upload a new version? [02:58] mrooney: Right. [02:58] because right now it shows the most recent version as "superseded" which is slightly confusing [03:05] mrooney: You mean it shows as 'Deleted' when you filter for 'Superseded'? [03:49] wgrant: it seems well now, thanks :) [03:49] oh boy internal server error on http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~habnabit/wxbanker/wxbanker-fixed-imports/revision/428 [03:50] that's my favorite [03:54] Hi [03:55] I am running in to Error ID: OOPS-1436A479 [03:55] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1436A479 [03:55] any idea? [03:57] sachin6870: What were you attempting to do? [04:45] I am trying add bug. [04:46] wgrant, sorry for late repply [04:46] reply [04:46] I am trying to add a bug as "Need packaging" [05:24] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1436A479 -> OperationalError at /oops.py/ database is locked [05:24] this is somewhat ironic [05:24] matsubara-afk: hi :-) [05:25] mwhudson: Awesome. [05:25] sachin6870: Try using a shorter summary to start of with. [05:25] sachin6870: I suspect it's taking too long to find similar bugs. [05:32] ok [05:42] @ wgrant, Thanks, your suggestion worked!!! [05:44] sachin6870: Great. There's ongoing work to resolve this issue. [05:47] ok [10:33] hi! is there anything wrong with people.ubuntu.com login? I get an auth error [10:46] sayakb: Try #canonical-sysadmin [10:46] wgrant: thanks [11:11] hi! loggerhead is spewing out 500s all the time! [11:53] hi [11:53] always any staff member here ? [11:57] tshirtman, :) [11:57] hi, I think someone should check this, very offending "projects" on launchpad please see https://launchpad.net/~staiaheat and https://launchpad.net/~stragglgrtgu there is *pedo*pornography in theses... thanks [11:57] McPeter: :) [11:57] rhaa tshirtman :--( [11:58] tshirtman, discret ☭☠@⎈⁂㌶☣⚡☠ [11:58] tshirtman: you should report them at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [11:59] tshirtman, i report them [11:59] by mail yesterday [11:59] i won't post them on public area [12:00] yes I know, but it's a long time reaction for such a thing [12:00] (sorry for my english .. i'm french) (again) [12:00] tshirtman, account created 04 december [12:03] LOSAs: ^^ [12:10] mwhudson, fixed [12:28] loggerhead is still 500'ing [12:28] whatever I do on it [12:32] tshirtman, i found 4 new account [12:32] :'( [12:33] 6 accounts [12:34] McPeter: at least they used easy to identify tags === sayakb_ is now known as sayakb [17:50] my .diff.gz file is almost entirely a bunch of automake stuff... it really clutters up my patch... why does it do that? [17:50] i only changed 3 or 4 lines of an Makefile.am, but there are thousands of lines of modified stuff in the .diff.gz [17:56] That's automake for you. The alternative is to run the autotools generation as part of the build [18:02] maxb: you mean as part of the debuild before I upload? or... [18:04] No, as part of what runs on the buildds [18:05] maxb: how would one go about doing that? [18:08] example... i have a huge diff from mypackage-0.26/aclocal.m4 the original was generated by aclocal 1.10.1, the new by aclocal 1.10.2 [18:09] maybe if i had the same version autotools as the original? but then id have to downgrade some ubuntu packages on my build system.... [18:17] maxb: thank you for the information... im signing off. [18:23] hi. By mistake I have deleted the message from Martin Albisetti with the balsamiq activation . Does someone still have that email in his/her inbox ? Thanks! [18:35] adiroiban: try the web archive of the list [18:38] maxb: tried that... but the serial is not archived :( [18:45] hmmmm [18:45] loggerhead is broken whole day [18:49] domas: Weekends are unfortunate :-( === sayakb_ is now known as sayakb [18:54] launchpad seems to have some trouble with branches [18:55] every time I try view the contents of the branch I get "Internet Server Error", goes away after refreshing, happens with everything inside the content, i.e. navigating inside the content [18:57] [20:45:15] loggerhead is broken whole day [18:57] =) [18:57] and yes [18:57] would be nice if anyone fixed it [18:57] is that why this is happening? [18:58] loggerhead is the BZR web interface [18:58] aw :( [19:00] domas: thanks for letting me know, I'll work around it :) [19:01] you can bzr pull it somewhere and run loggerhead yourself! :) [19:02] actually, someone wanted to see a file in what I pushed, I'm askin them to pull :) [19:03] hehe, I blogged yesterday, and one of two links have been to BZR revision: http://mituzas.lt/2009/12/05/on-replication-compatibility/ [19:03] now Launchpad spoils my joe [19:03] joke [19:03] entirely [19:04] to an extend if u refresh a coupla times, it comes on [19:04] d [19:04] doesn't come up even after twenty [19:04] :( [19:04] okay, that joke got entirely spoiled :P [19:05] that revision was removal of large chunk of code [19:05] aww [19:05] the joke was way too good to trust launchpad :( [19:05] now everyone will think the joke is about internal server error [19:05] yep [19:05] :( [19:06] I guess the breakage is in the revision part [19:06] you can open the files if u refresh enough [19:09] doh, had to add patch myself [19:09] http://p.defau.lt/?d712JuNmD2DXJMjcT_GCxg :) [19:09] now you can see the joke! [19:13] domas: that big bunch of comments are yours right? [19:13] nooooo [19:13] I just nuked the code [19:13] all of it [19:14] haha [19:53] <_habnabit> I'm getting a 500 error when I try to view the content of branches. Known issue? [19:54] <_habnabit> Hmm. I haven't found a branch that I *can* view the content of. [19:54] _habnabit: yes, loggerhead is down [19:55] <_habnabit> Ah dang. [19:56] <_habnabit> (Any idea when it'll be back up?) [19:56] soon, hopefully [19:56] no clue :( [19:56] me too waiting fer it to be up [19:58] thanks mwhudson :) [19:58] nigel_nb_, _habnabit: should be back now [19:58] <_habnabit> Sweet. There it is. [19:58] <_habnabit> Thanks! [19:58] thank you [20:04] hooray for having a sysadmin in nz now :) [20:04] mwhudson: hehe [21:01] hi, i'm the admin of a team on launchpad. How do I remove that team from another team (ie deactivate it). Not seeing it on the help site, and I can' t seem to find where to do it. [21:12] I would imagine that it would be on https://launchpad.net/~otherteam === nigel_nb_ is now known as nigel_nb [21:43] Any idea why packages published to my PPA a couple days ago are not showing up yet as available updates on user's computers [21:44] ^^^^ specifically this package here: https://launchpad.net/~kde3-maintainers/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/893248/+listing-archive-extra ? [21:46] Anyone? :) [21:49] kb9vqf: They're in the archive, so it's not a Launchpad problem. [21:50] wgrant: OK, any idea why an apt-get update would fail to recognize them as updates? [21:50] kb9vqf: The user is either behind a transparent proxy, is on an architecture not supported by your PPA, or is not running Karmic. [21:50] The user is me :) [21:50] I am running Karmic, hmmm...maybe the proxy [21:50] OK, then you are either behind a transparent proxy, is on an architecture not supported by your PPA, or is not running Karmic. :P [21:50] * kb9vqf goes to check [21:56] looks like someone snuck past the account creation challenge question: ~adipex [22:00] mars: There is a rather more sinister version of that, a few instances of which were reported overnight. [22:01] wgrant, even better: check this page out: http://www.downarchive.com/dl/https:launchpad.net~carolannhaney+product+https:launchpad.net~aubrianawesse+seeding+https:launchpad.net~gyldatakah++https:launchpad.net~brikhooke+saf.html [22:01] even better still, try highlighting some text [22:02] we should just search for every project with the word "Buy" in it [22:03] darn, that's the second time the proxy has bitten me wrt Launchpad [22:03] thanks for the pointer though! [22:03] * kb9vqf feels like an idiot [22:04] wgrant, http://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Alaunchpad.net+intitle%3ABuy&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:official&client=firefox-a [22:05] mars: That seems to work quite well. [22:05] :D [22:06] wgrant, I'll tell the LOSAs [22:06] O_o [22:06] I should set a Google Alert for that search [22:06] yikes [22:11] ah, at least, we reported more than a few {child,}porn "projects" on launchpad yesterday, I hope it will be solved quickly a search on "adult" found some too [22:11] eew [22:13] * thumper shakes his head [22:13] geez... some people [22:14] * ajmitch wonders how much log info is available about the people who registered such projects [22:44] lifeless: which ones should I bug? [22:46] Wasn't launchpad going to get more buildds? Right now, a PPA package has an estimated start of 15 hours (due to the large queue size) [22:54] mtaylor: chex or spm [22:54] spm will start in about 10 minutes [22:54] so I'd say spm [22:56] lifeless: awesome [22:57] spm: ping [23:07] mtaylor: heyo [23:08] spm: hi there [23:08] spm: wanted to chat with you about doing a server-side bzr upgrade of the drizzle branches to --2a [23:09] heh. can't for the life of me think why you'd rather do it that way ;-) [23:11] spm: :) [23:14] mtaylor: all of them? [23:14] mwhudson: I don't suppose we have any scripts yet do we? [23:15] thumper: jkakar wrote one, i think spm already has it [23:15] cool [23:15] unf it broke; so :-/ [23:16] thumper: that would be great... but lp:drizzle, lp:drizzle/build and lp:drizzle/staging would be the most important ones if all of them is an issue [23:16] mtaylor: any branch that is stacked on an upgraded one will be invalid after [23:17] mtaylor: when we did the LP branches, we did a kind of bait-and-switch [23:17] mtaylor: we made copies of the main branches [23:17] mtaylor: changed the stacking of all existing branches to point to the copies [23:17] mtaylor: then upgraded the main ones (kinda) [23:18] thumper: yeah - I think the stacked thing is the reason lifeless was suggesting we just upgrade all of the branches [23:18] mtaylor: we could probably do something similar [23:18] spm: what broke? [23:18] thumper: ah. I follow you with the bait-and-switch though [23:19] thumper: tbh, I don't recall; was about 2 weeks ago. jkakar seemed in "argh" mode, so it made sense to him. [23:19] hmm [23:19] spm: the script didn't break [23:20] spm: the data it was operating on was broken [23:20] spm: would you be interested in a server side script? [23:20] lifeless: details details. ;-) [23:20] thumper: sure [23:20] spm: important details [23:20] * thumper looks at the drizzle branches [23:21] thumper: read jkakars script; it does it all, when run by spm [23:23] spm: can you email me jkakar's script? [23:23] thumper: sure. see if I can find it. [23:24] spm: here is how to upgrade drizzle. [23:24] spm: 1) get mtaylor to patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26166834/fix-branch.py into Jamu's script. [23:24] 2) run the patched script [23:25] mtaylor: you have the script don't you? jkakar mailed it to you I think. [23:26] lifeless: was just looking... it doesn't look like I do [23:27] ah [23:27] lp:autolp [23:27] relies on [23:27] lp:commandant [23:30] mtaylor: yes. "You need to checkout lp:autolp and lp:commandant and put them in your Python path." [23:30] mtaylor: have you tried a 2a conversion locally for drizzle? [23:31] thumper: I have [23:31] mtaylor: how long did it take? [23:31] thumper: well, I'm running one right now that's been running for 15 minutes [23:32] mtaylor: LP took ages [23:32] like 10 hours [23:32] oh, this doesn't take 10 hours [23:32] I think 20 - 30 minutes is about the norm [23:34] mtaylor: does 'bzr check' on lp:drizzle finish fine? [23:35] thumper: don't know - I've never run that [23:35] hmm.. [23:35] lifeless: isn't it advisable to run that first? [23:43] hello mtaylor, lifeless [23:43] hi poolie [23:45] thumper: yes. istr that was where we fellover with LS on a very old branch that was up first - by sheer chance. [23:46] * thumper runs `bzr check lp:drizzle` on devpad [23:47] seeing this for bzr progress is good... 53865KB 10166KB/s | checking commit contents:inventories 0/2 [23:47] 10MB/s :) [23:48] thumper: 241KB/s is what I get [23:53] thumper: I've checked drizzle already [23:53] thumper: it was in good shape [23:53] lifeless: ok, cool [23:53] lifeless: and you endorse jkakar's script? [23:53] he wrote it based on my advice ;) [23:54] which isn't quite the same thing ;) [23:54] but I think it will be fine [23:54] hahahahahahaha. brillian! :-D [23:54] ofcourse, I'm on leave, so anything goes ;) [23:54] Hiyas. :) [23:54] hey jkakar!!! [23:54] It really needs to have the "fix missing revision script" added to it to work well. [23:55] But if the branches you're trying to upgrade don't have that issue it *should* work. I've tested it on individual branches without that issue and it worked fine. [23:55] spm: Hiya. :) [23:55] jkakar: when are you going to integrate the fix missing revision bits? [23:55] thumper: It was on my todo list for last week but I didn't get to it. [23:56] thumper: I'll get to it this week since we need it to upgrade landscape-client brnaches. [23:56] jkakar: cool [23:56] thumper: I'm only here for a few minutes just now, or I'd do it now. [23:57] jkakar: slacker [23:57] jkakar: :) [23:57] thumper: You know me well. :)