[00:04] <WaSeidel> hi people
[00:04] <WaSeidel> i need help
[00:05] <micahg> WaSeidel: just ask your question
[00:07] <WaSeidel> a long, looong time ago i created an account on wiki.ubuntu.com but i don't log in almost 2 years ago, and now i'm trying to get in to edit my wiki to get reconected with the comunity and i get surprised when i encountered a launchpad integration an it asked for my old password at the wiki and it says me tha password is wrong
[00:07] <WaSeidel> and i can't get in to my old account
[00:08] <WaSeidel> sorry my english i'm from Colombia
[00:08] <micahg> WaSeidel: you can't get in using your LP credentials?
[00:09] <WaSeidel> to launchpad i can get in but to wiki i can't
[00:09] <micahg> WaSeidel: try to clear your cookie for wiki.ubuntu.com, it should prompt you to use your launchpad credentials now
[00:11] <WaSeidel> micahg: i yes i already do, and it ask me for my password and e-mail on launchpad i write and log in launchpad and it aske again for the password on wiki.ubuntu.com my old user in the wiki was waseidel
[00:11] <WaSeidel> i don't know if the user can be deleted and i create it again...
[00:12] <WaSeidel> if i ask for a forgotten password it send me to remember my password but in launchpad
[00:12] <WaSeidel> and i need the password on wiki.ubuntu.com for the user waseidel
[00:13] <micahg> WaSeidel: try asking in here: #ubuntu-website\
[00:13] <micahg> oops...without the backslash
[00:13] <WaSeidel> hmm ok micahg thanks
[00:14] <WaSeidel> you was so helpfull
[00:18] <vadi2> Is it known that loggerhead is being broken? giving a 500 internal server error a when trying to download a file
[00:44] <bjsnider> where are the instructions for adding ppa sources to pbuilder?
[01:04] <mrooney> is there a way to cancel a package waiting to build in a PPA?
[01:04] <mrooney> I realized I uploaded a bad one, it claims to have 16 hours left in the queue, so I'd like to cancel it
[01:06] <mrooney> I see I can delete the pending package, perhaps that wlil work
[01:38] <hggdh> mrooney: IIRC, yes, it will work
[01:50] <McPeter> any staff here please ?
[01:57] <wgrant> McPeter: Not likely on a weekend. What do you need?
[01:57] <McPeter> big problem on launchpad user account
[01:57] <McPeter> sorry for my english .. i'm french
[01:58] <McPeter> an user create an account to … put a pedo link
[01:58] <McPeter> (really sorry for my english)
[01:58] <wgrant> McPeter: Ah, wonderful. Ask a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion, and an admin will disable the account.
[01:58] <McPeter> you know abuse address ?
[01:58] <McPeter> ah ok
[01:58] <McPeter> thanks
[01:59] <maxb> mrooney: Or, you can just upload a new version - the superseded version will then not start to build.
[01:59] <maxb> bjsnider: Do there need to be instructions?
[01:59] <wgrant> maxb: Deletion achieves the same thing.
[02:00] <maxb> Yes, I'm just saying you don't need to bother if you're uploading a new version anyway
[02:00] <McPeter> Member since:  2009-12-04
[02:00] <McPeter> :\
[02:00] <wgrant> Ah.
[02:00] <McPeter> two account
[02:00] <McPeter> pfuu -__-
[02:09] <bjsnider> maxb, if not, how is it done?
[02:09] <bjsnider> i did it awhile back and forgot how it was accomplshed
[02:09] <wgrant> bjsnider: The same as any other repository?
[02:12] <bjsnider> there's nothing about it in the wiki instructions
[02:16] <McPeter> sorry wgrant "https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion" is public or private ?
[02:21] <maxb> bjsnider: A PPA is just another apt repository. Why would PPAs have special documentation about pbuilder?
[02:23] <bjsnider> maxb, how are new repositories added to pbuilder?
[02:23] <maxb> ah, now we're getting closer to the issue :-)
[02:24] <maxb> In which case I would say : Not a launchpad issue, please transfer to #ubuntu-motu
[02:24] <bjsnider> meh, nm
[02:24] <maxb> Or, sulk. :-(
[02:35] <wgrant> McPeter: That's public.
[02:36] <McPeter> ok thanks .. i send mail
[02:36] <McPeter> i thinks is better (for not diffuse accounts)
[02:45] <mrooney> wgrant: the pending versions are gone from the main page of https://edge.launchpad.net/~mrooney/+archive/wxbanker-testing but it still says they are pending builds, is that a problem?
[02:56] <wgrant> mrooney: The moment a buildd attempts them, it will see that they are superseded, and abort the attempt.
[02:57] <mrooney> wgrant: okay, so they are superseded by deletion, even though I didn't upload a new version?
[02:58] <wgrant> mrooney: Right.
[02:58] <mrooney> because right now it shows the most recent version as "superseded" which is slightly confusing
[03:05] <wgrant> mrooney: You mean it shows as 'Deleted' when you filter for 'Superseded'?
[03:49] <mrooney> wgrant: it seems well now, thanks :)
[03:49] <mrooney> oh boy internal server error on http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~habnabit/wxbanker/wxbanker-fixed-imports/revision/428
[03:50] <mrooney> that's my favorite
[03:54] <sachin6870> Hi
[03:55] <sachin6870> I am running in to Error ID:         OOPS-1436A479
[03:55] <sachin6870> any idea?
[03:57] <wgrant> sachin6870: What were you attempting to do?
[04:45] <sachin6870> I am trying add bug.
[04:46] <sachin6870> wgrant, sorry for late repply
[04:46] <sachin6870> reply
[04:46] <sachin6870> I am trying to add a bug as "Need packaging"
[05:24] <mwhudson> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1436A479 -> OperationalError at /oops.py/ database is locked
[05:24] <mwhudson> this is somewhat ironic
[05:24] <mwhudson> matsubara-afk: hi :-)
[05:25] <wgrant> mwhudson: Awesome.
[05:25] <wgrant> sachin6870: Try using a shorter summary to start of with.
[05:25] <wgrant> sachin6870: I suspect it's taking too long to find similar bugs.
[05:32] <sachin6870> ok
[05:42] <sachin6870> @ wgrant, Thanks, your suggestion worked!!!
[05:44] <wgrant> sachin6870: Great. There's ongoing work to resolve this issue.
[05:47] <sachin6870> ok
[10:33] <sayakb> hi! is there anything wrong with people.ubuntu.com login? I get an auth error
[10:46] <wgrant> sayakb: Try #canonical-sysadmin
[10:46] <sayakb> wgrant: thanks
[11:11] <domas> hi! loggerhead is spewing out 500s all the time!
[11:53] <McPeter> hi
[11:53] <McPeter> always any staff member here ?
[11:57] <McPeter> tshirtman, :)
[11:57] <tshirtman> hi, I think someone should check this, very offending "projects" on launchpad please see https://launchpad.net/~staiaheat and https://launchpad.net/~stragglgrtgu there is *pedo*pornography in theses... thanks
[11:57] <tshirtman> McPeter: :)
[11:57] <McPeter> rhaa tshirtman :--(
[11:58] <McPeter> tshirtman, discret ☭☠@⎈⁂㌶☣⚡☠
[11:58] <tsimpson> tshirtman: you should report them at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[11:59] <McPeter> tshirtman, i report them
[11:59] <McPeter> by mail yesterday
[11:59] <McPeter> i won't post them on public area
[12:00] <tshirtman> yes I know, but it's a long time reaction for such a thing
[12:00] <McPeter> (sorry for my english .. i'm french) (again)
[12:00] <McPeter> tshirtman, account created 04 december
[12:03] <wgrant> LOSAs: ^^
[12:10] <matsubara-afk> mwhudson, fixed
[12:28] <domas> loggerhead is still 500'ing
[12:28] <domas> whatever I do on it
[12:32] <McPeter> tshirtman, i found 4 new account
[12:32] <McPeter> :'(
[12:33] <McPeter> 6 accounts
[12:34] <tshirtman> McPeter: at least they used easy to identify tags
[17:50] <decora> my .diff.gz file is almost entirely a bunch of automake stuff... it really clutters up my patch... why does it do that?
[17:50] <decora> i only changed 3 or 4 lines of an Makefile.am, but there are thousands of lines of modified stuff in the .diff.gz
[17:56] <maxb> That's automake for you. The alternative is to run the autotools generation as part of the build
[18:02] <decora> maxb: you mean as part of the debuild before I upload? or...
[18:04] <maxb> No, as part of what runs on the buildds
[18:05] <decora> maxb: how would one go about doing that?
[18:08] <decora> example... i have a huge diff from mypackage-0.26/aclocal.m4      the original was generated by aclocal 1.10.1, the new by aclocal 1.10.2
[18:09] <decora> maybe if i had the same version autotools as the original? but then id have to downgrade some ubuntu packages on my build system....
[18:17] <decora> maxb: thank you for the information... im signing off.
[18:23] <adiroiban> hi. By mistake I have deleted the message from Martin Albisetti with the balsamiq activation . Does someone still have that email in his/her inbox ? Thanks!
[18:35] <maxb> adiroiban: try the web archive of the list
[18:38] <adiroiban> maxb: tried that... but the serial is not archived :(
[18:45] <domas> hmmmm
[18:45] <domas> loggerhead is broken whole day
[18:49] <maxb> domas: Weekends are unfortunate :-(
[18:54] <nigel_nb_> launchpad seems to have some trouble with branches
[18:55] <nigel_nb_> every time I try view the contents of the branch I get "Internet Server Error", goes away after refreshing, happens with everything inside the content, i.e. navigating inside the content
[18:57] <domas> [20:45:15]  <domas> loggerhead is broken whole day
[18:57] <domas> =)
[18:57] <domas> and yes
[18:57] <domas> would be nice if anyone fixed it
[18:57] <nigel_nb_> is that why this is happening?
[18:58] <domas> loggerhead is the BZR web interface
[18:58] <nigel_nb_> aw :(
[19:00] <nigel_nb_> domas: thanks for letting me know, I'll work around it :)
[19:01] <domas> you can bzr pull it somewhere and run loggerhead yourself! :)
[19:02] <nigel_nb_> actually, someone wanted to see a file in what I pushed, I'm askin them to pull :)
[19:03] <domas> hehe, I blogged yesterday, and one of two links have been to BZR revision: http://mituzas.lt/2009/12/05/on-replication-compatibility/
[19:03] <domas> now Launchpad spoils my joe
[19:03] <domas> joke
[19:03] <domas> entirely
[19:04] <nigel_nb_> to an extend if u refresh a coupla times, it comes on
[19:04] <domas> d
[19:04] <domas> doesn't come up even after twenty
[19:04] <domas> :(
[19:04] <nigel_nb_> okay, that joke got entirely spoiled :P
[19:05] <domas> that revision was removal of large chunk of code
[19:05] <nigel_nb_> aww
[19:05] <domas> the joke was way too good to trust launchpad :(
[19:05] <nigel_nb_> now everyone will think the joke is about internal server error
[19:05] <domas> yep
[19:05] <domas> :(
[19:06] <nigel_nb_> I guess the breakage is in the revision part
[19:06] <nigel_nb_> you can open the files if u refresh enough
[19:09] <domas> doh, had to add patch myself
[19:09] <domas> http://p.defau.lt/?d712JuNmD2DXJMjcT_GCxg :)
[19:09] <domas> now you can see the joke!
[19:13] <nigel_nb_> domas: that big bunch of comments are yours right?
[19:13] <domas> nooooo
[19:13] <domas> I just nuked the code
[19:13] <domas> all of it
[19:14] <nigel_nb_> haha
[19:53] <_habnabit> I'm getting a 500 error when I try to view the content of branches. Known issue?
[19:54] <_habnabit> Hmm. I haven't found a branch that I *can* view the content of.
[19:54] <nigel_nb_> _habnabit: yes, loggerhead is down
[19:55] <_habnabit> Ah dang.
[19:56] <_habnabit> (Any idea when it'll be back up?)
[19:56] <mwhudson> soon, hopefully
[19:56] <nigel_nb_> no clue :(
[19:56] <nigel_nb_> me too waiting fer it to be up
[19:58] <nigel_nb_> thanks mwhudson :)
[19:58] <mwhudson> nigel_nb_, _habnabit: should be back now
[19:58] <_habnabit> Sweet. There it is.
[19:58] <_habnabit> Thanks!
[19:58] <nigel_nb_> thank you
[20:04] <mwhudson> hooray for having a sysadmin in nz now :)
[20:04] <nigel_nb_> mwhudson: hehe
[21:01] <Joe_CoT> hi, i'm the admin of a team on launchpad. How do I remove that team from another team (ie deactivate it). Not seeing it on the help site, and I can' t seem to find where to do it.
[21:12] <maxb> I would imagine that it would be on https://launchpad.net/~otherteam
[21:43] <kb9vqf> Any idea why packages published to my PPA a couple days ago are not showing up yet as available updates on user's computers
[21:44] <kb9vqf> ^^^^ specifically this package here: https://launchpad.net/~kde3-maintainers/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/893248/+listing-archive-extra  ?
[21:46] <kb9vqf> Anyone? :)
[21:49] <wgrant> kb9vqf: They're in the archive, so it's not a Launchpad problem.
[21:50] <kb9vqf> wgrant: OK, any idea why an apt-get update would fail to recognize them as updates?
[21:50] <wgrant> kb9vqf: The user is either behind a transparent proxy, is on an architecture not supported by your PPA, or is not running Karmic.
[21:50] <kb9vqf> The user is me :)
[21:50] <kb9vqf> I am running Karmic, hmmm...maybe the proxy
[21:50] <wgrant> OK, then you are either behind a transparent proxy, is on an architecture not supported by your PPA, or is not running Karmic. :P
[21:50]  * kb9vqf goes to check
[21:56] <mars> looks like someone snuck past the account creation challenge question: ~adipex
[22:00] <wgrant> mars: There is a rather more sinister version of that, a few instances of which were reported overnight.
[22:01] <mars> wgrant, even better: check this page out: http://www.downarchive.com/dl/https:launchpad.net~carolannhaney+product+https:launchpad.net~aubrianawesse+seeding+https:launchpad.net~gyldatakah++https:launchpad.net~brikhooke+saf.html
[22:01] <mars> even better still, try highlighting some text
[22:02] <mars> we should just search for every project with the word "Buy" in it
[22:03] <kb9vqf> darn, that's the second time the proxy has bitten me wrt Launchpad
[22:03] <kb9vqf> thanks for the pointer though!
[22:03]  * kb9vqf feels like an idiot
[22:04] <mars> wgrant, http://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Alaunchpad.net+intitle%3ABuy&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
[22:05] <wgrant> mars: That seems to work quite well.
[22:05] <mars> :D
[22:06] <mars> wgrant, I'll tell the LOSAs
[22:06] <kb9vqf> O_o
[22:06] <mars> I should set a Google Alert for that search
[22:06] <mwhudson> yikes
[22:11] <tshirtman> ah, at least, we reported more than a few {child,}porn "projects" on launchpad yesterday, I hope it will be solved quickly a search on "adult" found some too
[22:11] <mars> eew
[22:13]  * thumper shakes his head
[22:13] <thumper> geez... some people
[22:14]  * ajmitch wonders how much log info is available about the people who registered such projects
[22:44] <mtaylor> lifeless: which ones should I bug?
[22:46] <nhandler> Wasn't launchpad going to get more buildds? Right now, a PPA package has an estimated start of 15 hours (due to the large queue size)
[22:54] <lifeless> mtaylor: chex or spm
[22:54] <lifeless> spm will start in about 10 minutes
[22:54] <lifeless> so I'd say spm
[22:56] <mtaylor> lifeless: awesome
[22:57] <mtaylor> spm: ping
[23:07] <spm> mtaylor: heyo
[23:08] <mtaylor> spm: hi there
[23:08] <mtaylor> spm: wanted to chat with you about doing a server-side bzr upgrade of the drizzle branches to --2a
[23:09] <spm> heh. can't for the life of me think why you'd rather do it that way ;-)
[23:11] <mtaylor> spm:  :)
[23:14] <thumper> mtaylor: all of them?
[23:14] <thumper> mwhudson: I don't suppose we have any scripts yet do we?
[23:15] <mwhudson> thumper: jkakar wrote one, i think spm already has it
[23:15] <thumper> cool
[23:15] <spm> unf it broke; so :-/
[23:16] <mtaylor> thumper: that would be great... but lp:drizzle, lp:drizzle/build and lp:drizzle/staging would be the most important ones if all of them is an issue
[23:16] <thumper> mtaylor: any branch that is stacked on an upgraded one will be invalid after
[23:17] <thumper> mtaylor: when we did the LP branches, we did a kind of bait-and-switch
[23:17] <thumper> mtaylor: we made copies of the main branches
[23:17] <thumper> mtaylor: changed the stacking of all existing branches to point to the copies
[23:17] <thumper> mtaylor: then upgraded the main ones (kinda)
[23:18] <mtaylor> thumper: yeah - I think the stacked thing is the reason lifeless was suggesting we just upgrade all of the branches
[23:18] <thumper> mtaylor: we could probably do something similar
[23:18] <thumper> spm: what broke?
[23:18] <mtaylor> thumper: ah. I follow you with the bait-and-switch though
[23:19] <spm> thumper: tbh, I don't recall; was about 2 weeks ago. jkakar seemed in "argh" mode, so it made sense to him.
[23:19] <thumper> hmm
[23:19] <lifeless> spm: the script didn't break
[23:20] <lifeless> spm: the data it was operating on was broken
[23:20] <thumper> spm: would you be interested in a server side script?
[23:20] <spm> lifeless: details details. ;-)
[23:20] <spm> thumper: sure
[23:20] <lifeless> spm: important details
[23:20]  * thumper looks at the drizzle branches
[23:21] <lifeless> thumper: read jkakars script; it does it all, when run by spm
[23:23] <thumper> spm: can you email me jkakar's script?
[23:23] <spm> thumper: sure. see if I can find it.
[23:24] <lifeless> spm: here is how to upgrade drizzle.
[23:24] <lifeless> spm: 1) get mtaylor to patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26166834/fix-branch.py into Jamu's script.
[23:24] <lifeless> 2) run the patched script
[23:25] <lifeless> mtaylor: you have the script don't you? jkakar mailed it to you I think.
[23:26] <mtaylor> lifeless: was just looking... it doesn't look like I do
[23:27] <mtaylor> ah
[23:27] <mtaylor> lp:autolp
[23:27] <mtaylor> relies on
[23:27] <mtaylor> lp:commandant
[23:30] <spm> mtaylor: yes. "You need to checkout lp:autolp and lp:commandant and put them in your Python path."
[23:30] <thumper> mtaylor: have you tried a 2a conversion locally for drizzle?
[23:31] <mtaylor> thumper: I have
[23:31] <thumper> mtaylor: how long did it take?
[23:31] <mtaylor> thumper: well, I'm running one right now that's been running for 15 minutes
[23:32] <thumper> mtaylor: LP took ages
[23:32] <thumper> like 10 hours
[23:32] <mtaylor> oh, this doesn't take 10 hours
[23:32] <mtaylor> I think 20 - 30 minutes is about the norm
[23:34] <thumper> mtaylor: does 'bzr check' on lp:drizzle finish fine?
[23:35] <mtaylor> thumper: don't know - I've never run that
[23:35] <thumper> hmm..
[23:35] <thumper> lifeless: isn't it advisable to run that first?
[23:43] <poolie> hello mtaylor, lifeless
[23:43] <mtaylor> hi poolie
[23:45] <spm> thumper: yes. istr that was where we fellover with LS on a very old branch that was up first - by sheer chance.
[23:46]  * thumper runs `bzr check lp:drizzle` on devpad
[23:47] <thumper> seeing this for bzr progress is good... 53865KB 10166KB/s | checking commit contents:inventories 0/2
[23:47] <thumper> 10MB/s :)
[23:48] <mtaylor> thumper: 241KB/s is what I get
[23:53] <lifeless> thumper: I've checked drizzle already
[23:53] <lifeless> thumper: it was in good shape
[23:53] <thumper> lifeless: ok, cool
[23:53] <thumper> lifeless: and you endorse jkakar's script?
[23:53] <lifeless> he wrote it based on my advice ;)
[23:54] <lifeless> which isn't quite the same thing ;)
[23:54] <lifeless> but I think it will be fine
[23:54] <spm> hahahahahahaha. brillian! :-D
[23:54] <lifeless> ofcourse, I'm on leave, so anything goes ;)
[23:54] <jkakar> Hiyas. :)
[23:54] <spm> hey jkakar!!!
[23:54] <jkakar> It really needs to have the "fix missing revision script" added to it to work well.
[23:55] <jkakar> But if the branches you're trying to upgrade don't have that issue it *should* work.  I've tested it on individual branches without that issue and it worked fine.
[23:55] <jkakar> spm: Hiya. :)
[23:55] <thumper> jkakar: when are you going to integrate the fix missing revision bits?
[23:55] <jkakar> thumper: It was on my todo list for last week but I didn't get to it.
[23:56] <jkakar> thumper: I'll get to it this week since we need it to upgrade landscape-client brnaches.
[23:56] <thumper> jkakar: cool
[23:56] <jkakar> thumper: I'm only here for a few minutes just now, or I'd do it now.
[23:57] <thumper> jkakar: slacker
[23:57] <thumper> jkakar: :)
[23:57] <jkakar> thumper: You know me well. :)