[00:06] <fta> or file a bug
[00:07] <BUGabundo> maybe its just me, but from my last streak of chromium bugs I've filled
[00:08] <BUGabundo> all ended up forgoten or won't fix
[00:08] <BUGabundo> it kinda puts you down
[00:10] <fta> looks like my moz bugs
[00:12] <BUGabundo> ah
[00:12] <BUGabundo> at least you can nag reed
[00:12] <BUGabundo> I don't know many ppl at google, much less on chromium
[00:16] <fta> BUGabundo, got 4 wontfix, 4 dupe, 15 fixed, 2 upstreamed, 3 assigned and 2 available
[00:16] <fta> none ignored
[00:18] <fta> just for the one i filed, but i jumped in many others that are fixed now
[00:19] <BUGabundo> fta how can the be upstreamed?
[00:19] <BUGabundo> isn't mozilla upstream already?
[00:19] <fta> i'm talking about chromium
[00:19] <fta> so upstream could be webkit or the zillions of libs they use
[00:19] <BUGabundo> aah
[00:20] <BUGabundo> (12:10:26 AM) fta: looks like my moz bugs
[00:20] <fta> it was for your "all ended up forgoten or won't fix" "it kinda puts you down"
[00:21] <BUGabundo> yes I know
[10:18] <asac> Nafallo: can you go and reset the broken armel builders ;)
[10:18] <asac> thanks!!!
[10:18] <asac> 4 out of seven are broken
[10:18] <asac> and we have huge backlog which puts our alpha-1 at risk ;)
[10:19] <asac> waiting for lamont wastes precious time ;)
[10:20] <asac> Nafallo: or do you need to do a pair action to get those things back up?
[10:21] <Nafallo> asac: I need to be in the right building :-/
[10:21] <asac> Nafallo: and only lamont can tell you where that is ;)?
[10:22] <Nafallo> nope. but I have another things to take down. ports.ubuntu.com is next on my list.
[10:22] <asac> http://ports.ubuntu.com/ is responsive ;)
[10:23] <asac> no action needed for the stupid outsider ;)
[11:14] <micahg> fta: asac: daily bustage was due to dbus problem :) https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/1.2.16-2ubuntu2
[12:42] <mac_v> argh! chromium is all messed up :(
[12:47] <asac> heh
[12:50] <mac_v> wave renders horribly and the page is not properly rendered :/
[12:51] <mac_v> yay... update available.. hope that fixes the problem :)
[13:01] <mac_v> fixed within 12hrs , nice ;)
[13:55] <gnomefreak> :)
[14:47] <nigel_nb> hey, there is a bug filed about firefox and I can confirm it, can any of you guys take a look?
[14:47] <nigel_nb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/493828
[14:56] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: im working on catching up email but i will look as soon as i can
[14:57] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: just so that you know, the user reports a site cannot be opened in firefox (linux) but okay with firefox (windows)
[14:57] <gnomefreak> k
[14:57] <nigel_nb> I can confirm the bug, and it works okay with epiphany
[14:57] <nigel_nb> can I go ahead and confirm it and you'll look into it later?
[15:02] <gnomefreak> http://www.mavic.fr/home.aspx this page?
[15:04] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: looking at it now and 3.6 so far opens it i am taking screenshots and testing on 3.5 in a minute
[15:05] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: yes and I can confirm 3.5, set the bug to confirmed
[15:06] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: 3.6 works i will test 3.5
[15:06] <nigel_nb> okay :)
[15:07] <nigel_nb> 3.6 is already available with ubuntu?
[15:08] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: no just from our daily PPA atm
[15:08] <gnomefreak> !firefox-3.6 lucid
[15:08] <nigel_nb> so whatever is the problem, its probably going to be fixed in lucid, right?
[15:08] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: not sure if it is a problem yet.
[15:09] <nigel_nb> oh
[15:11] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: open a link using the following only: mavic.fr
[15:11] <gnomefreak> not sure why the link posted on the bug doesnt work the same
[15:11] <nigel_nb> checking
[15:11] <nigel_nb> that works
[15:12] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: but thats not the same page that comes up when you try the link he gave
[15:14] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: what is not the same http://www.mavic.fr/home.aspx and he provided http://www.mavic.fr/home.aspx
[15:14] <gnomefreak> it is the same to me :)
[15:14] <nigel_nb> hold on, I'll give you a screenshot
[15:14] <nigel_nb> juggling a couple of things at the moment :)
[15:14] <gnomefreak> first is just mavic.fr and the other is the link he gave
[15:18] <nigel_nb> uploading what I see in epiphany
[15:19] <gnomefreak> the link locations are the same nad rightclicnking ont he link i posted to bug opens fine not sure why his link isnt opening. I will be back in a few minutes
[15:32] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: just check out when you get back, this is what I see on empathy (something with flash, I think the problem is flash+firefox) http://www.flickr.com/photos/nigelbabu/4169463986/
[15:39] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: correction to above, thats what I see in epiphany ;)
[15:43] <nigel_nb> thunderstruck: did u get time to check the sreenshot?
[15:45] <thunderstruck> nigel_nb: hold on a minute
[15:46] <nigel_nb> okay:)
[15:46] <thunderstruck> is it on the bug report?
[15:46] <nigel_nb> no
[15:46] <nigel_nb> its the screenshot I took
[15:46] <nigel_nb> thats what I see on epiphany
[15:46] <thunderstruck> my net dropped before you posted link
[15:46] <nigel_nb> want the link again?
[15:47] <thunderstruck> yes
[15:47] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: just check out when you get back, this is what I see on empathy (something with flash, I think the problem is flash+firefox) http://www.flickr.com/photos/nigelbabu/4169463986/
[15:47] <nigel_nb> correct the empathy to epiphany
[15:47] <nigel_nb> (always get confused)
[15:47] <thunderstruck> thats what i see in firefox
[15:47] <thunderstruck> as long as i dont use his link unless i paste it
[15:48] <nigel_nb> I dont see that
[15:48] <nigel_nb> I get a blank page
[15:48] <thunderstruck> if i paste his link into browser it works fine
[15:48] <nigel_nb> and when I type only magic.fr, i go to a different page
[15:49] <thunderstruck> if trying to open it it fails with. i get same page for somhttp://www.mavic.fr/home.aspxreason
[15:50] <nigel_nb> so is it a bug in 3.5?
[15:50] <nigel_nb> or something to do with the link?
[15:54] <nigel_nb> thunderstruck: since I dont get it on 3.5, it should be some problem...right?
[15:54] <thunderstruck> nigel_nb: use a new profile and see what happens. clears your info (cookies/cache/ect..) in epipany and try again. but i am unable to reproduce unless i left click on link
[15:55] <nigel_nb> lemme try, didnt think of that.. michag always says that..
[15:56] <gnomefreak> profiles get corrupted for any number of reasons. ectensions are a big problem. they dont corrupt profiles but cause a number of issues (new profile handles most bugs (atleast gives us a clear idea)
[15:57] <gnomefreak> /home/j/.mozilla/firefox/yji4nkof.default/extensions/{d40f5e7b-d2cf-4856-b441-cc613eeffbe3} (Not Parsed)
[15:57] <nigel_nb> i know, micah gave me a class some time back.. didnt think of t
[15:57] <gnomefreak> not sure what extension that is
[15:58] <AnAnt> asac: ping
[15:59] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: works beautifully now
[15:59] <asac> AnAnt: yes quick :)
[15:59] <nigel_nb> I think I'll ask the user to try to create a new profile
[15:59] <AnAnt> asac: I was asking about building libmozjs1 from xulrunner-1.9.1 last week
[15:59] <AnAnt> asac: you seen that ?
[16:00] <asac> nope
[16:00] <asac> but the problem is still that upstream doesnt want to support that in any way
[16:00] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: profile/extension thanks for testing :)_
[16:01] <AnAnt> erm, nevermind, seemed that we did talk together, I really got some bad memory here
[16:01] <nigel_nb> gnomefreak: thanks for helping me narrow down the issue
[16:01] <gnomefreak> np
[16:02] <AnAnt> asac: sorry !
[16:03] <gnomefreak> nigel_nb: i updated bug. thanks for helping
[16:37] <gnomefreak> hey is pulseaudio-udev needed? in Lucid?
[16:40] <asac> probably
[16:40] <asac> why wouldnt it?
[16:49] <gnomefreak> asac: its been wanting to remove it in lucid since beginning
[16:49] <asac> hmm. if nothing else goes away, try to let it go
[16:51] <gnomefreak> ok yeah that is only thing it wants to remove
[16:51] <gnomefreak> thanks'
[17:06] <micahg> fta: what happened to tb31?
[17:25] <gnomefreak> Installed: 3.0.1~hg20091206r4489+ <<< installed here
[17:25]  * gnomefreak gone 
[18:19] <BUGabundo> boas
[18:23] <asac> saob
[18:24] <BUGabundo> ahha
[18:33] <eagles0513875> hey guys
[18:33] <eagles0513875> google chrome beta for linux has been unleashed into the open
[18:33] <BUGabundo> so?
[18:33] <BUGabundo> we have chromium alreyday
[18:34] <BUGabundo> 4.0.267.0 (Ubuntu build 34029)
[18:38] <eagles0513875> asac: whats the advantage of chromium over google chrome?
[18:38] <asac> its free ... ;)
[18:39] <asac> eagles0513875: the advantage is that they know what pieces make a release ;) .. while we sit there watching from outside
[18:40] <eagles0513875> technically isnt chrome as well or not really
[18:41] <asac> eagles0513875: not really. the difference is that they also add some non-free stuff
[18:41]  * BUGabundo is back
[18:42] <eagles0513875> gotcha
[19:05] <fta> hi
[19:07] <fta> eagles0513875: i was aware that google was ready to release a beta, but as asac & BUGabundo said, there's no difference for us, at least none i'm looking forward to have (multicolor logo, various trackers, and a known brand name)
[19:09] <fta> i can still build the same revision, if people are really willing to stick with it
[19:11] <fta> asac, btw, we fixed the codecs that ftbfs on arm yesterday, and i'm trying to move to the sumo codec like upstream did
[19:11] <asac> cool
[19:11] <asac> let me know hen i should copy something
[19:11] <asac> builders seems to be back for the time being
[19:13] <fta> well, you can take the current codecs, they should build fine on arm now
[19:13] <fta> the sumo will come later, it needs some work
[19:16] <fta> asac, yasm exists on arm but is useless (and unused), it's not able to generate code for arm
[19:17] <fta> so it means the codecs using it are less optimized on arm
[19:20] <debfx> asac: I put together the necessary changes for the firefox kde integration in bug #494067
[19:26] <fta> asac, in case you missed that, http://identi.ca/notice/16085460 http://identi.ca/notice/16096444
[19:27] <asac> stemp is a whiner
[19:28] <fta> eheh
[19:28] <fta> no reply so he is ;)
[19:29] <asac> he whines since when? 2 month?
[19:29] <fta> donno
[19:33] <fta> micahg, what did you mean about tb31?
[19:33] <fta> micahg1, ^^
[19:36] <asac> fta: less optimized? or not working at all?
[19:36] <asac> fta: otherwise i would suggest to drop the -ffmpeg depends for [!armel]
[19:36] <asac> err restrict i mean
[19:46] <fta> asac, just less optimized. for a long time, i used to build those codecs without yasm (like google), until the ffmpeg author told me to use it
[19:46] <micahg1> fta: upload size
[19:47] <fta> thunderbird-3.1 (3.1~a1~hg20091207r4499+nobinonly -> 3.1~a1~hg20091208r4502+nobinonly) [12.56MB (-48163kB, -383.23%)]
[19:47] <fta> d'oh!
[19:47] <asac> fta: k i think its fine for now for arm
[19:47] <asac> then
[19:47] <asac> yes
[19:47] <asac> tb 3.0 is out today afaik
[19:47] <fta> -383.23% lol
[19:48] <fta> bad math
[19:49] <micahg> http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/google-chrome-for-holidays-mac-linux.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+blogspot/MKuf+%28Official+Google+Blog%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
[20:18] <asac> fta: so new ffmpeg avail in ppa already?
[20:19] <asac> 17h ago ... seems not to be it i guess
[20:19] <fta> it is
[20:26] <bdrung> asac: i am working on restructuring xpi.mk and make it simpler and more scalable. can you rewrite the xpath commands in python?
[20:27] <asac> probably. do we really have scalability issues?
[20:27] <asac> ;)
[20:27] <asac> also do we really want to build depend on python ;)?
[20:28] <asac> j.k. i think if it helps it shouldnt be a blocker ;)
[20:29] <fta> chromium-browser                 24172   1.77%      4822   12186    7159       5
[20:29] <fta> google-chrome-unstable           20017   1.47%      5084    9117    5798      18
[20:29] <bdrung> asac: yes, we love python. 1. my makefile code is not very easy to debug (even for me) 2. supporting multiple xpi files is currently not possible, but should be possible with the new design
[20:29] <fta> for the records, before the buzz kills it
[20:29] <bdrung> asac: j.k. means what?
[20:31] <fta> joking
[20:32] <asac> just kidding
[20:32] <bdrung> aha
[20:33] <micahg> asac: what are your plans for TB3 in lucid?
[20:33] <micahg> now that it's been released
[20:33] <asac> get up asap ;)
[20:33] <asac> i am not sure we want to use the versioned package name though
[20:34] <asac> given that we probably want to drop tbitd support right away
[20:34] <asac> tbird
[20:34] <asac> 2
[20:34] <asac> i mean
[20:34] <micahg> so just morph thunderbird source into TB3?
[20:34] <asac> tb3 into tbird source ;)
[20:36] <fta> ?
[20:36] <micahg> asac: that's what I meantr
[20:37] <micahg> asac: I guess I never built the final version
[20:39] <micahg> asac: do you need me to do anything for TB3?
[21:13] <asac> micahg: yes. i just noticed that we ignored the -dev package completely, right?
[21:13] <asac> e.g. no -dev package at all
[21:13] <asac> thats actually an upstream issue i should have raised before ;)
[21:17] <bdrung> asac: i need XPI_TARGET_EMIDs and TARGET_VERSION as python code
[21:17] <bdrung> (either object or function)
[21:17] <fta> asac, http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/releases/LATEST.txt?view=markup  \o/
[21:18] <micahg> asac: for TB3?
[21:19] <micahg> asac: it's pretty much empty
[21:37] <asac> !test
[22:07] <fta> asac, you're alive but freenode is dying
[22:11] <micahg> fta: I figured why my builds took so long, I'm using xfs :)
[22:13] <fta> eh? what's the difference in % ?
[22:13] <asac> hehe
[22:13] <micahg> idk, xulrunner took me 3 hours to build
[22:13] <asac> xfs
[22:13] <asac> ;)
[22:14] <asac> i think ext4 is best atm
[22:14] <micahg> it's great for large files, but bad for small ones
[22:14] <micahg> hg clone is a nightmare
[22:14] <micahg> next time I rebuild, I'm making an ext4 partition for builds :)
[22:15] <micahg> asac: I'm running a test build of TB3 final now
[22:15] <micahg> or as soon as I have an .org.tar.gz
[22:16] <fta> micahg, you're using the DEBIAN_TAG feature, right?
[22:16] <micahg> fta, yes, and appending ~micahg :)
[22:16] <fta> good
[22:17] <micahg> I'm building this tag:  THUNDERBIRD_3_0rc3_RELEASE
[22:17] <[reed]> micahg: why?
[22:17] <[reed]> thunderbird 3.0 released today
[22:17] <[reed]> no need to build the rc
[22:17] <micahg> yep, that's the last tag
[22:17] <asac> [reed]: no new tag ;)
[22:17] <[reed]> really?
[22:17] <asac> yet
[22:17] <[reed]> hmm
[22:17] <micahg> [reed]: I'm not building the production version
[22:17] <asac> hehe
[22:17] <asac> yes
[22:17] <asac> i didnt find it at leased
[22:17] <[reed]> you should complain
[22:18] <micahg> http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.1/tags
[22:18] <asac> so i am too doing a build with rc atm
[22:18] <asac> [reed]: i was about to complain. but then got distracted ;)
[22:18] <asac> and since i alrady fired a 3.0rc3 build up i thought i can complain later ;) (maybe they will do it still)
[22:20] <mconnor> asac: they're new at this, they probably didn't think about it much
[22:23] <asac> _Tsk_: remember to tag your final tb 3.0 ;)
[22:24] <[reed]> yeah, I already brought it up with tb-drivers
[22:25] <asac> cool
[22:25] <asac> hopefully they dont stop the deserved party because of this now ;)
[22:26] <micahg> asac: do you need any help cleaning up the changelog for TB3/TB2
[22:31] <fta> micahg, it's a new package, iirc, i made it from scratch, it should be almost empty
[22:31] <micahg> right, so it has to be merged
[22:32] <fta> why? they don't any common ancestor?
[22:32] <micahg> fta: same sounrce
[22:32] <micahg> in lucid
[22:32] <fta> well, do as you want, i don't mind in fact
[22:32] <fta> :)
[22:32] <fta> (+share)
[22:33] <micahg> it's up to asac
[22:33] <fta> i wanted to write: why? they don't share any common ancestor!
[22:35] <micahg> ah
[22:39] <fta> lol http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36602796/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-lpia.chromium-browser_4.0.267.0~svn20091208r34059-0ubuntu1~ucd1~intrepid_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[22:39] <fta> dh_md5sums -pchromium-browser-dbg
[22:39] <fta> md5sum: write error: No space left on device
[22:50] <micahg> [reed]: do I need to register a nick on irc.mozilla.org?
[22:51] <[reed]> you don't have to, but you can
[22:51] <micahg> [reed]: is it the same process as freenode?
[22:51] <[reed]> no, but similar
[22:51] <[reed]> /msg nickserv help register
[22:52] <[reed]> gives you directions
[22:53] <[reed]> I'm "reed" (without the quotes or brackets) on irc.mozilla.org
[22:58] <micahg> [reed]: I did it, thanks
[22:58]  * micahg wanted to add a nick on LP for irc.mozilla.org
[23:45] <micahg> asac: what's the story with enigmail?
[23:47] <asac> the story with enigmail is that we need thunderbird-dev headers
[23:47] <asac> and what is in dist/sdk isnt enough (not that it matters)
[23:47] <asac> we need the full include/ dir i guess
[23:48] <asac> and upstream system isnt really prepared to install that in make install from what i see :/
[23:49] <[reed]> glandium was working on getting stuff moved to frozen linkages
[23:49] <[reed]> or frozen glue
[23:51] <micahg> asac: anything I can do to prepare for it?
[23:55] <asac> [reed]: working on moving enigmail to frozen glue ;)?
[23:56] <asac> they use mime*.h headers
[23:56] <asac> i guess he works on mail/mailnews
[23:56] <BUGabundo> fta so what's in the new PPA for chromium beta?
[23:56] <[reed]> no
[23:56] <[reed]> on tbird
[23:56] <fta> BUGabundo, it's still empty
[23:57] <asac> micahg: check with mailnews folks and ask them how they want to make the build system export all headers
[23:57] <asac> then do it ;) or do it differently
[23:57] <micahg> ok
[23:57] <asac> basically on make install the stuff currently in dist/include needs to be in debian/tmp/... somewhere
[23:57] <asac> after make install ;)
[23:57] <fta> BUGabundo, i just need to bend my get-orig-source code a bit further without breaking it
[23:57] <asac> [reed]: yes. thats mail/mailnews and some other stuff afair
[23:58] <micahg> asac: we don't have an enigmail bzr repo do we?
[23:58] <BUGabundo> fta so it's the same as in daily?
[23:58] <BUGabundo> don't want to loose any juicy bits
[23:58] <fta> BUGabundo, will be there: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/beta
[23:59] <BUGabundo> fta but what will bring that dailies don't ?