/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/12/09/#ubuntu-x.txt

faganhey im trying to test out the nouveu driver and xorg is saying its not configured properly, I ran Xorg -configure but it looks like its not doing anything00:20
faganIm on lucid by the way00:20
faganI think it may have something to do with residual config from the nvidia driver 00:21
faganAnyone have any ideas?00:21
RAOFfagan: How are you trying nouveau?00:23
RAOFBecause the version in the archives currently isn't expected to work, pending some kernel-team decision about how to get nouveau.ko in our kernel build.00:24
faganRAOF: Im using it from the nouveau ppa00:24
faganThe one from the archive works though00:25
faganon my machine 00:25
RAOFReally?  It doesn't build against 2.6.32 kernels, though.00:25
faganhmmmm I just installed it rebooted and it worked 00:25
fagandont ask me how 00:25
faganits definitly not the nv driver00:26
faganThat sucked on my hardware00:26
RAOFIts possible that you've got nouveau-kernel-source from the nouveau ppa and the DDX from lucid, I guess.00:26
faganI did install the -source package so thats it :)00:27
faganRAOF: so any ideas why im running safe graphics mode?00:27
faganIt hung when I did a -configire00:27
RAOFNo idea, no.00:27
fagan-configure 00:27
faganhmmm00:28
faganany other things I can try?00:28
RAOFWhat's in your xorg.conf?00:28
faganthe nvidia config 00:29
faganwhich caused the problem I think00:29
RAOFWell, yes.  Can you pastebin your xorg.conf?00:29
fagandamn I just rm'd it 00:29
fagansorry 00:30
RAOFThat's OK.00:30
RAOFAll it wants is "Section "driver" Identifier "nouveau" Driver "nouveau" EndSection" in it.00:30
faganoh ok then ill give it a go00:30
faganbe back in 500:31
notlisteningA bit later and there is no difference in the cpu usage on that machine with all the extras that i installed so there must be something different between the hardware more than just CPU and GPU00:35
faganthat didnt work anyway01:00
faganso im going to go back to the nvidia driver 01:01
faganthe conflict is http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/337674/01:02
faganThe xorg update conflicts with nvidia's driver 01:02
RAOFYes it does.01:02
faganso what do I do?01:03
RAOFNot use the nvidia driver in Lucid.01:03
faganThat isnt a solution because my computer looks very crap without it01:04
RAOFBeacuse it won't work.  IIUC, we need a newer nvidia driver, one that will actually work against xserver 1.701:04
RAOFfagan: Not use Lucid?  The proprietary drivers are frequently, and often long-term broken in development.01:05
faganI tried the 190 driver with no luck01:05
faganhmmmmm01:05
* fagan thinks maybe rolling back to an older version of xorg will help him01:05
RAOFYes, it might.  If you can :)01:06
faganOr maybe a newer one01:08
RAOFWell, that won't work, because the nvidia driver won't work against it.01:08
faganAh ill see what I can do 01:09
faganDont ask me how but the ppa for the xorg team worked01:10
faganno conflict no nothing https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa01:11
Sarvatt185.18.36 worked for you with that?01:11
fagan19001:11
Sarvattoh ok01:11
faganAwesomeness 01:12
Sarvatti couldnt find a 190 in a ppa that wasnt really borked when i looked at the stuff in debian/ and one screwed up being able to downgrade back, ended up just manually installing it from nvidia for now01:15
faganNope spoke too soon got killed at the end of installation01:16
fagandamn it01:17
Sarvatti had a ton of dangling alternatives from the bad packages01:17
faganim just going to get the one from nvidia themselves01:17
Sarvatt195.22 manually installed is working great with edgers here01:18
fagangot to exit the session to install it brb01:19
faganthat worked well01:27
faganx and nvidia now play nice01:28
faganwhy are the packages so bad then?01:28
faganIf the nvidia driver works why dont we just package that up that?01:29
Sarvatttseliot is working on it01:32
faganthank god01:32
notlisteningCan i come back to my original question, aobut the amount of CPU i am using for a video, can the frame buffer in the bios make a big difference or the amount of RAM a system has to use?01:54
Sarvattnvidia gpu acceleration requires either 128 or 256mb last i checked01:55
Sarvattcant remember which, i think its 25601:56
faganmine has 51201:56
Sarvattif you are using xbmc, i know i saw a good guide on using gpu acceleration on an ion board in ubuntu on their forums01:58
Sarvatthttp://blog.xbmc.org/forum/tags.php?tag=ion01:59
notlisteningthe bios limits me to 256 at the moment as i only have a 1 gb a the moment01:59
notlisteningThanks Sarvatt 02:01
Sarvattgotta be a vdpau thread out there somewhere that'll explain how to make it work, you would know if its working because you'd be getting closer to 10% cpu usage than the 80%02:04
Sarvattewwww http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-December/004029.html02:49
LLStarkswhois keybuk06:40
LLStarksdamn06:40
RAOFHm.  X seems unusually slow, and seems to be spending a lot of time in i915_gem_throttle_ioctl.  Is this something others are seeing?07:38
LLStarkshow would i know?07:45
LLStarksjeez, that sounded rude.07:45
RAOFYou'd know if X was being extremely laggy for you, you had an intel card, and ran gnome-system-monitor and saw X waiting for i915_gem_throttle_ioctl :)07:50
tjaaltonfeels quite normal here07:56
RAOFOh, wow.  ubuntu-desktop's new libgtk kills emacs!07:59
tjaaltonheh, funny.. we ship a cirrus driver with patches to support qemu, and then in xserver a patch that uses vesa for the hw id08:59
tjaaltonnevermind, it depends on what type kvm is using09:22
tjaalton"std" want's mesa09:22
tjaaltonurgh, vesa09:22
tjaaltons/'//09:22
tjaaltonthat should be upstreamed09:24
tjaaltonmvo: does update-manager always run dist-upgrade, ie. remove packages when there are conflicts during the devel release?09:34
mvotjaalton: sort of, by default it does not do this, but it will prompt for "partial upgrade" mode if it has to remove stuff and tries to be clever09:36
tjaaltonmvo: ok, thanks09:37
mvowhy? anything that it should do to make transitions better or something?09:38
tjaaltonnah, there was just one user who claims that lucid->lucid upgrade broke everything without prompting09:39
tjaaltonand I don't believe him :)09:39
tjaaltonthe result was that it removed all the drivers09:39
tjaaltonso the system didn't get X09:39
mvonot without prompting :)09:40
mvoif he used update-manager we should have logs too09:41
tseliottjaalton: what's the status of input drivers in lucid? An AMD engineer reported that xserver-xorg-core is not installable. Was it just because of synaptics?09:41
tjaaltonyes, but I won't bother.. told him to install video-all09:41
tjaaltontseliot: no, check the mirror09:41
tjaaltonat least the images build09:41
tjaaltontseliot: also, the current synaptics doesn't have your patch in it, had to upload it to make it installable09:42
tjaaltonbut I'll add it now09:42
tseliotok, thanks09:42
* tseliot forgot about having a lucid chroot already09:45
tseliotxserver-xorg-core was installed correctly here09:45
tjaaltonif he's using fglrx, it'll get removed09:46
tjaaltononly the OSS drivers work09:46
tseliotok10:01
hyperairdoes anyone here using the nvidia-96 driver have issues with screen flickering?10:03
=== seb128_ is now known as seb128
=== paran_ is now known as paran
=== mac_v_ is now known as mac_v
tseliotfederico1: hey, do you have a few minutes to discuss new features (one of which is more of a fix) for g-s-d and g-d?17:00
tseliototherwise I can file 2 bug reports and we'll discuss there17:02
federico1tseliot: sure, what's up?17:21
tseliotfederico1: the 1st feature is support for transformations17:22
federico1tseliot: BTW, I'm going to start integrating some of the Moblin patches for RANDR stuff17:22
tseliotmainly scaling17:22
federico1ah!17:22
federico1there *is* a patch for that :)17:22
tseliotfederico1: really?17:22
tseliotI'm working on Moblin too17:22
federico1I just haven't looked at it closely17:23
tseliotfederico1: can you give me the link, please?17:23
tseliotfederico1: I can't find it in the Moblin 2.1 sources17:28
tseliotfederico1: anyway the 2nd feature is, put simply, that we check GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE in addition to the max framebuffer size17:29
tselioti.e. that we check the 3D limitations in addition to the 2D limitations17:30
tseliotfor example on i945 chips you can have 2D up to 4096x4096 and 3D up to 2048x204817:31
tseliotand if you go beyond the 3D limit when using a compositing manager you get a black screen17:32
tseliottherefore we should not validate modes that go beyond that when using, say, mutter (in Moblin)17:34
federico1tseliot: makes sense17:46
federico1tseliot: so, I don't know much about GL.  Is the texture size limit just for textures, or does it involve the whole screen?  I.e. could a smarter compositing manager simply create two textures for too-wide windows (or something like that?)17:47
tseliotfederico1: it's the area in which you get 3d acceleration17:48
tseliotI have a bug report about it17:49
tseliothttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2371817:49
ubottuFreedesktop bug 23718 in Driver/intel "[945GME] attaching external monitor causes black screen, with Compiz Fusion in Karmic" [Critical,New]17:49
tseliotI've written a patch to access max texture size but I haven't tested it yet. I'll file a bug report and attach it there soon17:51
* tseliot -> dinner17:51
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
Amaranthso, my mouse keeps jumping to the center of the screen now... :/23:00
Amaranthfederico1: btw, while a compositing manager could split the screen into smaller chunks to work around the texture size limit the only way to do so is to not use GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap at all23:04
Amaranththe other way of doing OpenGL compositing is...slow23:05

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!